Poor quality roughage based complete feed blocks for ruminants

Animal Research, Jan 1995

OP Lohan

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

http://animres.edpsciences.org/articles/animres/pdf/1995/05/Ann.Zootech._0003-424X_1995_44_Suppl1_ART0053.pdf

Poor quality roughage based complete feed blocks for ruminants

Poor quality roughage based complete OP Lohan 0 0 Department of Animal Feed Technology, CCS, Haryana Agricultural University , Hisar 125004 , India Cereal crop residues are the staple feed for and 2.52 ± 0.03 kg in T, and T2 groups, - livestock in India and other countries of the third world. Every year an average of about 62.4 million tonnes of these residues are transported from surplus to deficit regions in India alone, which costs about 15000/-million rupees annually. high transportation is mainly due to the low bulk density (65-75 kg/m3) of these residues. Several workers produced pelleted complete feeds, but pelleting of complete feeds increases the cost due to grinding. Recently in our laboratory, densified complete feed blocks were developed using chaffed/threshed cereal residues and were evaluated in growing buffalo calves and lactating cross bred cattles. cost Production of complete feed blocks : For the production of wheat straw based complete feed blocks, the wheat straw was treated with 15 % molasses. Molasses was used as binder. Molasses-treated straw was mixed with concentrate in a ratio of 60:40. The concentrate mixture consisted of barley 45 parts, ground nut cake 33 parts, deoiled rice polish 9 parts, mineral mixture 2 parts and common salt 1 part. The complete feed mixture was pressed into blocks using a hydraulic press. The size of the press jacket was 9 x 18 and the weight of each block was 3.5 kg. Experiment I : 12 buffalo calves of same age were randomly divided into two groups, having 6 animals in each. In group one (T,) complete feed blocks were offered, while an another group (2)T was fed mesh form of the feed. The experiment continued for 90 days. The DM intake/100 kg body wt/day was 2.76 ± 0.04 respectively. The digestibility coefficients for CP, crude fibre, organic matter, DM and NFE were almost similar in both the groups. However, the daily body weight gain was significantly (P 0.01) higher in T, group (431.52 +17.11 g) than in T2 group (384.15 ± 20.26 g). Experiment II : fifteen lactating cattle were randomly divided into 3 groups (5 cattle in each) in such a way that milk yield in each group was the same. Group one (T,) was fed complete feed blocks, group two (2)T was fed complete pelleted feed, and group three (3)T3) was fed mesh form of feed ad lib. In addition to these treatments, 10 kg of green fodder and 1 kg wheat bran was offered to each animal in each group. The wheat bran was fed at the time of milking in milking parlour to enable milk ejection. The milk yield (1/animal/day) was 7.96, 7.28 and 7.12 and FCM yield was 8.09, 7.09 and 7.36 % in Tl, 2T and T3 ration-fed groups respectively. However, the differences were non-significant. In T, group the fat percentage (4.13 %) was highest, followed by T3 group (4.09 %), and was lowest in T2 group (3.83 %). The crude fibre digestibility coefficients were 54.06, 50.6 and 55.23 % in lT, 2T and 3T groups, being significantly (P 0.01) lower in T2 group. coefficients DM, CP were and NFE digestibility not affected the was also similar in T, (3.32), T2 (3.54) and 3T (3.21) groups. The increase in bulk density of the complete feed, as compared to mesh form, was nearly three times (2.79 times) and has no adverse effect on the feed intake and nutrients (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: http://animres.edpsciences.org/articles/animres/pdf/1995/05/Ann.Zootech._0003-424X_1995_44_Suppl1_ART0053.pdf

OP Lohan. Poor quality roughage based complete feed blocks for ruminants, Animal Research, 1995, pp. 83-83, Volume 44, Issue Suppl. 1, DOI: doi:10.1051/animres:19950553