One-loop quantization of rigid spinning strings in AdS3 × S3 × T 4 with mixed flux

Journal of High Energy Physics, Jul 2018

Abstract We compute the one-loop correction to the classical dispersion relation of rigid closed spinning strings with two equal angular momenta in the AdS3 × S3 × T 4 background supported with a mixture of R-R and NS-NS three-form fluxes. This analysis is extended to the case of two arbitrary angular momenta in the pure NS-NS limit. We perform this computation by means of two different methods. The first method relies on the Euler-Lagrange equations for the quadratic fluctuations around the classical solution, while the second one exploits the underlying integrability of the problem through the finite-gap equations. We find that the one-loop correction vanishes in the pure NS-NS limit.

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FJHEP07%282018%29141.pdf

One-loop quantization of rigid spinning strings in AdS3 × S3 × T 4 with mixed flux

HJE One-loop quantization of rigid spinning strings in Juan Miguel Nieto 0 1 Roberto Ruiz 0 1 0 28040 Madrid , Spain 1 Departamento de F ́ısica Teo ́rica, Universidad Complutense de Madrid We compute the one-loop correction to the classical dispersion relation of rigid closed spinning strings with two equal angular momenta in the AdS3 × S3 × T 4 background supported with a mixture of R-R and NS-NS three-form fluxes. This analysis is extended to the case of two arbitrary angular momenta in the pure NS-NS limit. We perform this computation by means of two different methods. The first method relies on the EulerLagrange equations for the quadratic fluctuations around the classical solution, while the second one exploits the underlying integrability of the problem through the finite-gap equations. We find that the one-loop correction vanishes in the pure NS-NS limit. AdS-CFT Correspondence; Integrable Field Theories; Sigma Models - S3 × T 4 1 Introduction 2 The R × S3 string with mixed flux 3 Quadratic fluctuations around the classical solution 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Bosonic fluctuations on AdS3 4 Frequencies from the algebraic curve 5 Computation of the one-loop correction 6 A comment about non-rigid strings 7 Conclusions A Conventions B Computation of the corrections to the quasi-momenta of the one-cut solution B.1 Contribution from AdS3 excitations B.2 Contribution from S3 excitations B.3 Contribution from fermionic excitations C Finite gap frequencies for general values of q × M4 backgrounds. The interest has been brought forth by the progress made in the application of integrability techniques developed for the AdS5/CFT4 correspondence [3]. Its two best understood realizations involve string theories formulated on AdS3 × S3 × T 4 [ 4–19 ] and AdS3 × S3 × S3 × S1 [ 7, 8, 12, 14, 20–28 ] spaces, which have proven to be classically integrable and conformally invariant [29, 30]. On the one hand, the dual CFT2 to the former is believed to reduce to the SymN (T 4) orbifold at certain point of its moduli space [31], albeit deeper insight remains to be gained. On the other hand, the dual CFT2 to the latter is still not clear and there exist different proposals [32–35]. – 1 – M4 = S3 × S1 case, where it has been shown to emerge also in its CFT2 side [36]. Besides, integrability has been shown to be more fruitful in the M4 = T 4 than in the In spite of its similarities with the AdS5 × S5 scenario, these two backgrounds exhibit some features that obstruct a straightforward integrability approach. The presence of massless excitations play a prominent role among them, as it seems to be responsible for the mismatch between the computation of the dressing factor for massive excitations performed via perturbative world-sheet calculations [37, 38] and crossing equations [10, 16]. This link was proposed for the AdS3 × S3 × T 4 space in [39], where it is argued that the lack of suppression of wrapping corrections involving massless modes associated to the T 4 factor could explain the discrepancy. Unlike AdS5 × S5, just supported by a Ramond-Ramond (R-R) five-form flux, both × S1 can be deformed through the addition of a Neveu-Schwarz-Neveu-Schwarz (NS-NS) three-form flux, which mixes with the R-R one. Integrability, conformal invariance and kappa symmetry are not spoiled by the introduction of the NS-NS flux [40]. The mixed flux set-up has been also extensively studied in the literature [12, 41–47]. The aim of this paper is to compute the one-loop correction to the dispersion relation of rigid spinning string on AdS3 × S3 × T 4 in the presence of mixed flux. To this end, we use two different methods. The first one extracts the characteristic frequencies from the Lagrangian of quadratic fluctuations, whose signed sum leads to the one-loop correction. This procedure has been already applied successfully to different string configurations in AdS5 × S5 [48–58]. It was also applied to rigid spinning strings on AdS3 × S3 × T 4 with pure R-R flux [37]. The second method starts from the construction of the algebraic curve associated to the Lax connection of the PSU(1, 1|2)2/(SU(1, 1) × SU(2)) supercoset sigma model. The quantization of the algebraic curve is well understood for the AdS5 × S5 case (see [59] for an in-depth explanation). The extension of this procedure to the AdS3×S3×T 4 space is straightforward for the massive excitations with pure R-R flux. However, the construction of the finite-gap equations requires some extensions when dealing with the full spectrum supported by a general mixed flux. First of all, the introduction of an NS-NS flux shifts the poles of the Lax connection away from ±1. This issue has been solved in [60], where the finite-gap equations proposed for AdS3 × S3 × T 4 in the pure R-R regime [29] are generalized. A second problem arises from massless excitations, which require to loosen the usual implementation of the Virasoro constraints [61]. The one-loop correction to the BMN string for AdS3 × S3 × T 4 and AdS3 × S3 × S3 × S1 with pure R-R flux has been obtained within this framework in [61], while the respective correction to the short folded string in such backgrounds has been derived in [38]. The one-loop correction to the BMN string for AdS3 × S3 × T 4 with mixed flux has been computed in [60]. The outline is as follows. In section 2 we summarize some features of the rigid classical spinning string solution on R × S3 ⊂ AdS3 × S3 × T 4. The pure NS-NS limit and the restriction to the su(2) sector are then discussed. In section 3 we compute the Lagrangian of the quadratic fluctuations around the rigid spinning solution and solve its equations of motion, hence obtaining their characteristic frequencies. In section 4 we check the results of the previous section by rederiving the characteristic frequencies from the flux-deformed – 2 – finite-gap equations. In doing so, we neglect contributions from the massless excitations as we will have proven in section 3 that their net contribution ultimately vanishes. In section 5 we make use of the characteristic frequencies previously obtained to compute the one-loop correction to the dispersion relation. In section 6 we present an argument regarding the extension to non-rigid strings in the NS-NS limit. We close the article with summary and conclusions. In the appendices we have collected conventions and detailed computations that supplement the main text. 2 The R × S 3 string with mixed flux In this section we review the dynamics of rigid closed spinning strings on a R × S3 ⊂ × T 4 background in the presence of both R-R and NS-NS three-form fluxes. This kind of solution as been studied, for example, in references [ 62–65 ].1 After doing so, we restrict ourselves to two regimes of interest, the su(2) sector and the pure NS-NS limit, which are the focus of the reminder of the article. The AdS3 × S3 × T 4 background metric can be parameterized by (2.1) (2.2) (2.3) ds2 = −dz02 − z02 dt2 + dz12 + z12 dφ2 + dr12 + r12dϕ12 + dr22 + r22dϕ22 + X dγi2 , where the parameter q ∈ [0, 1] measures the mixing of the two fluxes. In the case of pure R-R flux, q = 0, the theory can be formulated in terms of a Metsaev-Tseylin action akin to that of the AdS5 × S5 background [72]. The Lagrangian associated to the bosonic spinning string ansatz in AdS3 × S3 reduces in this case to the Neumann-Rosochatius integrable system [73, 74]. Turning on the NS-NS flux introduces an additional term in the latter which does not spoil integrability [63, 64]. In fact, the complete Lagrangian remains integrable under this deformation [40]. The pure NS-NS flux limit, q = 1, is of particular interest because the action can be re-expressed as a supersymmetric WZW model [75] (see also the recent paper [76] and references therein), which leads to several simplifications. Instead of considering the most general setup, the remainder of this paper is devoted to bosonic classical spinning strings rotating in S3 at the center of AdS3 with no dynamics 1The general spinning string solution encompasses other well known solutions as particular limits which are interesting enough to be studied separately. Examples are the giant magnon [ 66–69 ], spiky strings [66–68] and multi-spike strings [70]. Spinning D1-strings have also been studied [71]. – 3 – along T 4. Thus we fix z0 = 1 and γi = 0, and impose the ansatz describing a closed string rotating with two angular momenta in S3 t(τ, σ) = w0τ , ri(τ, σ) = ri(σ) , ϕi(τ, σ) = ωiτ + αi(σ) , i = 1, 2 . (2.4) Dealing with closed string solutions requires periodic boundary conditions of (2.4) on σ, entailing ri(σ + 2π) = ri(σ) , αi(σ + 2π) = αi(σ) + 2πmi , where mi are integer winding numbers. After substituting the ansatz (2.4) into the Polyakov action with the B-field in the conformal gauge, we obtain , 2 i=1 ! where the prime stands for derivatives with respect to σ and h = h(√λ) is the coupling constant.2 In addition, we can construct three non-vanishing conserved charges from the isometries of the metric: the energy and the two angular momenta E = 4πhw0 , J1 = 2h J2 = 2h Z 2π Z 2π 0 0 dσ r12ω1 − qr22α2′ , dσ r22ω2 + qr22α1′ . The Euler-Lagrange equations for the radial coordinates are r1′′ = −r1ω12 + r1α1′2 − Λr1 , r2′′ = −r2ω22 + r2α2′2 − Λr2 + 2qr2(ω1α2 − ω2α1′) . ′ On the other hand, the equations of motion for the angular equations can be easily integrated as the Lagrangian only depends on their derivatives α1′ = v1 + qr22ω2 r 2 1 , α2′ = v2 − qr22ω1 r 2 2 , where vi are integration constants which can be understood as the momenta associated to αi. Replacing α‘i by these momenta in the Lagrangian (2.6) leads to aforementioned 2The relationship between the coupling constant and the string tension is the same as the one for AdS5 × S5 at first order, i.e. h = √4πλ + . . . , although it might receive corrections (both perturbative and non-perturbative) in the ‘t Hooft coupling. However, it is known that the first correction O(1) should vanish for the pure RR case [ 25–27, 30, 37 ] and it might vanish also for the mixed flux case. (2.5) (2.6) (2.7) (2.8) (2.9) (2.10) (2.11) (2.12) deformation of the Neumann-Rosochatius system. The equations of motion must be supplemented with the Virasoro constraints, which read 2 X i=1 2 i=1 ri′2 + ri2(αi′2 + ωi2) = w02 , X ri2ωiαi′ = X viωi = 0 . 2 i=1 ri(σ) = ai . (2.13) (2.14) (2.15) (2.16) (2.17) (2.18) (2.19) (2.20) (2.21) (2.22) On these solutions α‘i = mi and (2.10) and (2.11) simplify to Λ = m12 − ω12 = m22 − ω22 + 2q(ω1m2 − ω2m1) . Furthermore, the restriction (2.2) and the Virasoro constraint (2.14) determine or, using the definitions of the angular momenta, , , pure NS-NS limit we commented above, while the second one corresponds to a restriction to a su(2) subsector of the theory, which amounts to set the J1 = J2. Note that these two regimes are not mutually exclusive. Let us examine in more depth both cases. In the first limit the equations of motion can be solved by dispersion relation where we have defined ω1 = J 4πh , J ω2 = 4πh − (m1 − m2) , E = J + 4πhm1 . where J = J1 + J2. Using the first Virasoro constraint (2.13) and (2.17) we can obtain the On the other hand, if we restrict ourselves to the su(2) subsector, the second Virasoro constraint (2.14) implies m1 = −m2 ≡ m, while the equations of motion and the definition of the angular momenta imposes J 4πh ω1 = = Υ + qm , J ω2 = 4πh − 2qm = Υ − qm , stant radii The most straightforward solutions to the equations of motion are those of conHJEP07(218)4 Υ = J 4πh − qm = J1 + J2 4πh − qm , – 5 – for later convenience. The expression for the dispersion relation reads E = pJ 2 − 8πhqmJ + 16π2h2m2 = 4πhpΥ2 + κ2m2 , (2.23) with κ2 = 1 − q2. 3 Quadratic fluctuations around the classical solution In this section we derive the Lagragian for the quadratic fluctuations around the rigid spinning string-type solutions on R × S3. We obtain the equation for the characteristic frequencies for them, which greatly simplifies in both the case of two equal angular momenta and the case of pure NS-NS flux. The signed sum of the characteristic frequencies provide the one-loop correction to the classical energy. We derive this effective Lagrangian by splitting the target-space fields into the classical background and fluctuation fields and truncating the latter up to second order in the action. We treat the bosonic fluctuations on the sphere, on the anti-de Sitter space, on the torus and the fermionic fluctuations separately in order to make the section more readable.3 3.1 Bosonic fluctuations on S3 Regarding the fluctuations on the sphere, we take advantage of the spherical symmetry and perform the following substitution ri cos ϕi → ai cos(αi + ωiτ ) + r˜i cos(αi + ωiτ ) − ρi sin(αi + ωiτ ) , ri sin ϕi → ai sin(αi + ωiτ ) + r˜i sin(αi + ωiτ ) + ρi cos(αi + ωiτ ) . where r˜i, ρi denote the perturbation fields.4 Introducing (3.1) into the Polyakov action with the B-field in the conformal gauge, the Lagrangian for the quadratic fluctuations of the fields turns out to be ( 2 X h i=1 L˜S3 = h − r˜i − ρ˙i2 + r˜i′2 + ρ′i2 + (r˜i2 + ρi2)(−ωi2 + αi′2) + 2r˜i(−ωiρ˙i + αi′ρ‘i) ˙2 − 2ρi(−ωir˜˙i + α‘ir˜i) − Λ(r˜i2 + ρi2)i + 2q (r˜22 + ρ22)(ω1α‘2 − α1ω2) ′ ′ + r˜2(ω1ρ′2 − α2ρ˙2) − ρ2(ω1r˜2 − α1′r˜˙2) + a2 ′ ′ − aa222 ρ1(r˜˙1α2′ − r˜1′ω2) + a2 (ρ˙1ρ′2 − ρ′1ρ˙2) 1 a1 a1 ) , 2r˜2 − a1 a2 r˜1 (ρ˙1α2′ − ρ′1ω2) (3.1) (3.2) where the dot stands for derivatives with respect to τ . 3In this section we do not label the origin of the frequencies (S, AdS, T or F ) as no ambiguity arises. 4It is also possible to incorporate the fluctuations as ri → ai + r˜i and ϕi → αi + ωiτ + ϕ˜i instead. Both choices are equivalent since ρi ≈ aiϕ˜i at first order. – 6 – Besides, an orthogonality requirement has to be satisfied between the classical solution and the fluctuation fields. Such condition can be seen as a consequence of the perturbation of the Lagrange multiplier in (2.6), promoted as Λ → Λ + Λ˜ . In particular, this constraint reads 2 i=1 X air˜i = 0 . Imposing it, the Euler-Lagrange equations for r˜2, ρ1 and ρ2 become a1 −ρ¨1 + ρ“1 + 2 a2 (ω1 + qm2)r˜˙2 − (m1 + qω2)r˜2′ = 0 , −ρ¨2 + ρ“2 − 2 (ω2 + qm1)r˜˙2 − (m2 + qω1)r˜2′ = 0 , We are allowed to decompose r˜2, ρ1 and ρ2 in a base of exponential functions due to the periodic boundary conditions in σ. Supplementing the decomposition with an expansion in Fourier modes in τ , we write ρj = ∞ X 6 n=−∞ k=1 X A(jk,n)eiωk,nτ+inσ , r˜2 = X Bn(k)eiωk,nτ+inσ . (3.5) ∞ X 6 n=−∞ k=1 The sum over k follows from the existence of six different frequencies associated to the same mode number n [77]. Employing this ansatz, the Euler-Lagrange equations (3.4) become the matrix equation ωk2,n − n 2   0 M31 0 ωk2,n − n 2 M32 M13 M23 ωk2,n − n2  Bk,n  A1,k,n  A2,k,n ≡ M A2,k,n = 0 . A1,k,n  Bk,n where the unspecified matrix elements are explicitly M13 = 2i [(ω1 + qm2)ωk,n − (m1 + qω2)n] a2 , M23 = −2i [(ω2 + qm1)ωk,n − (m2 + qω1)n] , M31 = −2i [(ω1 + qm2)ωk,n − (m1 + qω2)n] a1a2 , M32 = 2i [(ω2 + qm1)ωk,n − (m2 + qω1)n] a12 . a1 The existence of non-trivial solutions to (3.6) requires det M = 0, which provides the following characteristic equation for the frequencies (ωk2,n − n2) (ωk2,n − n2)2 − 4a12 [(ω1 + qm2)ωj,n − (m1 + qω2)n]2 −4a22 [(ω2 + qm1)ωk,n − (m2 + qω1)n]2 = 0 . This equation has six solution as we commented above, and reduces to the one obtained in [50] in the limit of a pure R-R flux. – 7 – (3.3) (3.4) (3.6) (3.7) (3.8) We should note that two frequencies corresponding to decoupled massless modes arise as solutions to the characteristic equation. They emerge as a consequence of the conformal gauge-fixing condition [51]. Solving the linearized Virasoro constraints for the AdS3 decoupled massless field and substituting the solution back in the full Lagrangian remove these spurious frequencies from (3.8), since their associated field gets cancelled. Therefore, we can safely ignore them. In principle, we can find the remaining solutions to the equation (3.8) as a series in inverse powers of the total angular momentum J . Since expressions thus obtained are not very enlightening, we focus exclusively on the two regimes we presented at the end of the previous section. In the su(2) sector (m1 = −m2 = m) the frequencies, written as a series in Υ, are HJEP07(218)4 whereas in the pure NS-NS limit they read In the overlap of both regimes the frequencies can be written as follows n2κ2 2Υ + We proceed analogously for AdS3 fluctuations using the parameterization z0 cos t → (1 + z˜0) cos(κτ ) − χ0 sin(κτ ) , z0 sin t → (1 + z˜0) sin(κτ ) + χ0 cos(κτ ) , z1 sin φ → z˜1 , z1 cos φ → χ1 . This choice leads to the following Lagrangian density for the fluctuation fields 2 ′ ′ +w02(z˜12 + χ1) − 2qw0(z˜1χ1 − χ1z˜1) . L˜AdS3 = h z˜0′2 + χ′2 0 − z˜0 − χ˙ 0 − z˜1′2 − χ′12 + z˜˙12 + χ˙ 21 + 2w0 z˜0χ˙ 0 − χ0z˜˙0 ˙2 2 – 8 – (3.9) (3.10) (3.11) (3.12) (3.13) This Lagrangian has to be supplemented with an orthogonality constraint between the background and the fluctuation fields similar to (3.3), which in this case reads z˜0 = 0. As a consequence, the field χ0 decouples, leading to two massless excitations that can be ignored in view of the discussion above. The relevant Euler-Lagrange equations are −z˜¨1 + z˜“1 − w0z˜1 + 2qw0χ′1 = 0 , 2 −χ¨1 + χ“1 − w02χ1 − 2qw0z˜1′ = 0 . (3.14) An analogous expansion to (3.5) allows us to derive the characteristic equations for the frequencies. In this case, whose solutions are (ωk2,n − n2 − w02)2 − 4q2n2w02 = 0 , (3.15) All of them reduce to already known result in the non-deformed case [37, 50]. Furthermore, the pure NS-NS limit allow us to complete squares, obtaining with uncorrelated signs. 3.3 Bosonic fluctuations on T 4 Since we consider no classical dynamics on the torus, we are led to a free Lagrangian for the fluctuations. Therefore, the characteristic frequencies are5 ωk,n = ±n ± w0 , ωk,n = ±n , with one pair of solutions for each of the four coordinates. 3.4 Fermionic fluctuations As our background solution is purely bosonic, the Lagrangian for the fermionic fluctuations reduces to the usual fermionic Lagrangian computed up to quadratic order in the fermionic fields. For a type IIB theory, the latter is given by LF = i(ηαβδI˙J˙ − ǫαβ(σ3)I˙J˙)θ¯I˙ρα(Dβ) ˙K˙ θK , ˜ J ˙ where the covariant derivative is [13, 15] (Dα)I˙J˙ = δI˙J˙ ∂α − 4 ωαabΓaΓb 1 1 8 1 48 + (σ1)I˙J˙eaαHabcΓbΓc + (σ3)I˙J˙FabcΓaΓbΓc . (3.20) We refer to appendix A for definitions and conventions. 5In the T 4 space one could also consider fluctuations with non-trivial windings. However, after averaging over these windings, one is left only with the contribution from the zero winding sectors. We want to thank Tristan McLoughlin for pointing us this issue. – 9 – We get the characteristic equation for the frequencies by substituting the classical solution, fixing the kappa symmetry and expanding the fermions in Fourier modes. In particular, the kappa gauge condition we choose is θ1 = θ 2 ≡ θ as [29, 37]. The Fourier expansion reads ∞ X 8 n=−∞k=1 θ = Xθn(k)eiωk,nτ+inσ , su(2) for i = 3, 7, ωi = −(m1 + m2) + ωisu(2) for i m8 256 m2κ2(4κ2 − 5) + 4n2 + (3 − 4q2)Υ2 + 4ωk,n(w0 − ωk,n) × m2κ2(4κ2 − 5) + 4n2 + (3 − 4q2)Υ2 − 4ωk,n(w0 + ωk,n) × m2κ2(4κ2 − 3) − 4n2 + (1 − 4q2)Υ2 + 8qnw0 + 4ωk,n(ωk,n − w0) × m2κ2(4κ2 − 3) − 4n2 + (1 − 4q2)Υ2 − 8qnw0 + 4ωk,n(ωk,n + w0) = 0 , where κ2 = 1 − q2. Note that it is a polynomial of eighth degree, which agrees with the discussion above. Solving this equation, we find the following frequencies for the su(2) sector: where we have summed up to eight frequencies for each mode instead of up to the sixteen frequencies that would be expected from the number of degrees of freedom [78]. We are allowed to do so because only six of the ten target-space coordinates are non-trivially involved in the equations of motion and hence we can restrict ourselves to six-dimensional gamma matrices. To recover the full set of frequencies we have to double the multiplicity of each frequency ωk,n. We should remark that we have imposed periodic boundary conditions to the fermionic fields as [50, 79, 80], relying on the discussion of the appendix E of [81]. Imposing the vanishing of the determinant of the differential operator in (3.19), the resulting expression for the characteristic equation is (3.21) (3.22) (3.23) (3.24) ω1,n = n + ω3,n = −n + 1 q − 2 q + 1 2 w0 , w0 , ω5,n = qn2 − q2w02 + Υ2 + ω7,n = − qn2 − q2w02 + Υ2 + 1 We stress that the massless frequencies remain as such independently from the mixing parameter, cancelling the contributions from the T 4 modes for all values of q. Performing the q → 1 limit manifestly simplifies the expressions in (3.23)6 ω1,n = n + ω5,n = n + 1 1 where we have used that limq→1 w0 = Υ. i = 4, 8 and ωi = ω su(2) for the remainder. i the following shifts of the frequencies: ωi = (m1 + m2) + ω Frequencies from the algebraic curve In order to check the computations performed in the previous section, we derive again the frequencies associated to the fluctuations using a different method that relies on the integrability of our problem: the semi-classical quantization of the classical algebraic curve. We start by constructing the eigenvalues of the monodromy matrix for the classical solution, whose associated quasi-momenta define a Riemann surface. This classical setting is quantized by adding infinitesimal cuts to this surface, thus modifying the analytical properties of the quasi-momenta, which contain the one-loop correction to the energy. The Riemann surface we are interested in presents only one cut, analogously to the gR = g ⊕ 1 ∈ psu(1, 1|2)2 where7 one studied for the AdS5 × S5 scenario in [81]. Although the presence of the NS-NS flux deforms the construction of the algebraic curve, hence rendering the results from AdS5 ×S5 inapplicable, the procedure remains mostly the same and can be used as guideline. For the full detailed derivation of the finite-gap equations for general values of q we refer to [60], where the authors apply them to the particular case of the BMN string. Although this procedure neglects the contribution from the massless excitations, we already know from the previous section that their contributions cancel each other. We start the computation of the classical algebraic curve by choosing the gauge gL ⊕ g =  eiw0τ Using the normalization from [60]8 the Lax connection associated reads L(x) = Lˆ(x) = Lˆ(x) 0 0 ! Lˇ(x) = Lˆ(x) 0 0 ˆ 1 L x ! , ix (x − s) x + 1s  w0/κ    0 0 0 −w0/κ 0 0 0 fluxes, appearing now at ±s and ± 1s , where s = s(q) is defined as Notice that the usual ±1 poles of the Lax connection shift due to the presence of both 7Notice that the choice of representative in [60] was not correct. Even though ai2 = wJii holds for the undeformed case, this relation gets modified due to the flux becoming the one shown in equation (2.18). In any case, this problem does not affect the computation of the correction to the BMN spectrum therein. Our quasi-momenta for the rigid spinning string are the same as those obtained there after replacing their Ω by our Υ. 8We have chosen this normalization over the one proposed in [40] because it facilitates our later construction of the corrections to the classical curve by simplifying the relation between the Lax connection and the Noether currents. −m e2im(σ+qτ) κ − x √Υ2−m2q2 κ 0 0 q . s = r 1 + q 1 − q 0 0 m q κ − x e−2im(σ+qτ) √Υ2−m2q2  . κ (4.1) (4.2)     (4.3) The quasi-momenta associated to this Lax connection, obtained from the logarithm of the eigenvalues of the monodomy matrix, are pˆ1A(x) = −pˆ2A(x) = pˇ1A = −pˇ2A 1 x 1 x = 2πxw0 κ(x − s) x + 1s , pˆ1S(x) = −pˆ2S(x) = pˇ1S(x) = −pˇ2S(x) = − κ(x + s) x − s energy we add extra cuts to the Riemann surface. These cuts are infinitesimally small and appear as poles on the quasi-momenta. Depending on the sheets of the Riemann surface the infinitesimal cuts connect, they correspond to different kinds of excitations. The precise relations between them are AdS3 : (pˆ1A, pˆ2A), (pˇ2A, pˇ1A) , S3 : (pˆ1S, pˆ2S), (pˇ2S, pˇ1S) , Fermions : (pˆ1A, pˆ2S), (pˆ1S, pˆ2A), (pˇ2A, pˇ1S), (pˇ2S, pˇ1A) . The explicit residues of these poles are res x=xˆnAX res x=xˇnAX δpˆiA = −(δ1i − δ2i)αˆ(xˆnAX )NnAX , δpˇiA = +(δ1i − δ2i)αˇ(xˇnAX )NnAX , res x=xˆSnX res x=xˇSnX δpˆiS = +(δ1i − δ2i)αˆ(xˆnSX )NnSX , δpˇiS = −(δ1i − δ2i)αˇ(xˇnSX )NnSX , (4.7) where X is either A or S depending on which sheet the cut ends. The functions αˆ(x) and αˇ(x) are defined as αˆ(x) = x 2 κh(x − s) x + 1s , αˇ(x) = x 2 κh(x + s) x − s To fix the positions where we have to add these poles we have to use the relation between the quasi-momenta above and below the branch cuts of the Riemann surface Cij, where i and j (comprising both A or S and 1 or 2) label the sheets the cut connects, pi+(x) − pj−(x) = 2πn , x ∈ Cij . This equation not only constraints the positions of the poles xinj, but also the behaviour of the corrections to the quasi-momenta on them pi(xinj) − pj(xinj) = 2πn , (δpi)+(xinj) − (δpj)−(xinj) = 0 . (4.8) (4.9) (4.10) On top of that, the quasi-momenta also present poles on the same points as the Lax connection. From the residue of the Lax connection we infer that 1 1 s x=s s x=s res δpˆ1A = res δpˆ2A = 1 1 s x=s res δpˆ1S = −s x=re1s/s δpˇ1A = −s x=re1s/s s x=s res δpˆ2S = −s x=re1s/s δpˇ2A = −s x=re1s/s δpˇ1S , δpˆ1A = −s x=r−es1/s −s x=r−es1/s δpˆ2A = −s x=r−es1/s δpˆ1S = δpˆ2S = 1 1 s x=−s res δpˇ1A = s x=−s res δpˇ1S , s x=−s res δpˇ2A = s x=−s res δpˇ2S . 1 1 These restrictions provides us with enough information to completely fix the corrections to the quasi-momenta. The details of the construction are lengthy, so we have relegated them to appendix B. We eventually obtain the following expression for the correction to the dispersion relation w0δΔ = X nκxˆnAA − qn − w0 NˆnAA + n nκ xˇAA − qn NˇnAA + n (n + 2m)κ xˇSS n − qn NˇnSS + nκxˆnSS − qn + 2K(0) NˆnSS + − qn (NˇnAS + NˇnSA) + nκxˆnF − qn − K(0) − w0κ (NˆnAS + NˆnSA) where we still have to implement the expressions for each pole. We can check that in the q → 0 limit we recover the undeformed AdS3 × S3 ⊂ AdS5 × S5 expressions [29]. Note that all −2qn terms in the expressions from appendix B have been replaced by −qn terms to facilitate a later comparison with the frequencies obtained through the quadratic fluctuations. This substitution is legitimated by the level matching condition, expressed as X n n X all exc. Nn = 0 . It is also convenient to define the frequencies Ωin as w0δΔ = X h(Ωˆ nAA − w0)NˆnAA + Ωˇ nNˇnAA + Ωˆ nSS + 2K(0) NˆnSS + Ωˇ nSSNˇnSS n + (Ωˆ nF − K(0) − κw0)(NˆnAS + NˆnSA) + ΩˇnF (NˇnAS + NˇnSA)i . The value of the poles is determined by equation (4.10), which can be solved as a series in Υ−1 for general values of q. Nevertheless, when taking the q → 1 limit, those equations heavily simplify and we can find exact solutions after an appropriate regularization the poles with κ factors. The solutions for general q are collected in the appendix C. Here we (4.11) HJEP07(218)4 (4.12) (4.13) (4.14) just write down the solutions for q = 1, which read κxˆqA→A1 = 2 κxˆqS→S1 = 2 κxˆqA→S1 = 2 n + Υ n n n n + Υ n + Υ , , , xˇqA→A1 = xˇqS→S1 = xˇqA→S1 = κ κ κ n 2(n − Υ) , , ωnB = 2n + (n + w0) + (n − w0) + 4n = 8n , ωnF = 2 h2 n + w0 2 + 2 n − 2 w0 i = 8n . The κ factors cancel after substituting into the one-loop correction (4.12), revealing that HJEP07(218)4 the limit is well behaved despite the apparent singularities that appear. Plugging back into the aforementioned equation and using the definitions (4.14) we get Ωˆ qA→A1 = n + 2Υ , Ωˆ qS→S1 = n + 2Υ , Ωˆ qF→1 = n + 2Υ , Ωˇ qA→A1 = n − 2Υ , Ωˇ qS→S1 = n + 4m − 2Υ , Ωˇ qF→1 = n + 2m − 2Υ . We end this section comparing the expressions of the characteristic frequencies obtained through both methods and discuss their differences. Here we focus on the su(2) sector in the pure NS-NS limit. The comparison for general values of q is relegated to the appendix C, but the arguments presented in the discussion below are still valid. When we collate equations (3.11), (3.17) and (3.24) with (4.16) we observe that they are equal up to some shifts. Such shifts fall into two categories, shifts of the mode number and shifts of the frequencies, and can be understood as a change of reference frame [81]. As our frequencies present the same shift structure and the shifts at q = 1 cancel each other when summed, we confirm that both computations are in agreement. Therefore, we can extract the one-loop correction to the dispersion relation using the frequencies from either of the methods. 5 Computation of the one-loop correction In this section we put together the characteristic frequencies from previous sections to compute the one-loop shift to the dispersion relation in the su(2) sector. This correction is given by the sum of the fluctuation frequencies E1-loop = E0 + δE , δE = 1 2w0 n∈Z X (ωnB − ωnF ) , where ωnB and ωnF are the bosonic and fermionic contributions respectively. Firstly, we consider the pure NS-NS the limit in the su(2) sector. Using the frequencies obtained from the quadratic fluctuations, these contributions are (4.15) (4.16) (5.1) (5.2) The net contribution from the frequencies thus vanishes, resulting in the vanishing of the one-loop correction in the pure NS-NS limit This vanishing remains valid out of the su(2) sector, i.e. if m1 6= −m2. Let us focus now on the case of general mixed flux. Here ωnAdS = qn2 + 2qnw0 + w02 + qn2 − 2qnw0 + w02 = q(n + qw0)2 + κ2w02 + q(n − qw0)2 + κ2w02 , ωnT = 4n , ωnF = 4n + 4qn2 − q2w02 + Υ2 , whereas the S3 contribution is more conveniently written after summing part of the series in a square root, by analogy with the results we have obtained from the algebraic curve, ωnS = Υ + pn2 − 2nqΥ + Υ2 + O Υ−2 + −Υ + pn2 + 2nqΥ + Υ2 + O Υ−1 = p(n + qΥ)2 + κ2Υ2 + p(n − qΥ)2 + κ2Υ2 + O Υ−1 . In order to perform the infinite sum on the mode number we use the method presented in [54], which consists in replacing such sum by an integral weighed with a cotangent function 2πi X ωn = n∈Z C I dz π cot(πz)ωz , where the contour C encircles the real axis. The frequencies related to the AdS space (5.4) and fermions (5.6) contain square roots with complex branch points. The same applies to the leading order of the frequencies related to S3 (5.7). Choosing our branch cuts from each branch point to infinity allow us to deform the contour of the integral so it encircles them. As the branch points are of order iΥ, we can consistently approximate the cotangent by one in the semiclassical limit, reducing the contour integral to the usual integral of a square root. In our case, (5.8) involves integrals of the form I(a, b) = − dzp(z − a)2 + b2 = p(z + ia)2 − b2 = 1 Z iΛ a+ib Z Λ b−ia (5.9) where Λ is a sharp cut-off which regularizes (5.9). The sum of these contributions gives X n∈Z ωnS + ωnAdS + ωnT − ωn F = I(qΥ, κΥ) + I(−qΥ, κΥ) + I(qw0, κw0) + I(−qw0, κw0) −4I 0, qΥ2 − q2w02 A direct inspection shows that the quadratic and linear contributions of the regulator cancel but the logarithmic contribution does not. This fact reflects that higher orders in the expansion in the mode number of the S3 frequencies contribute to the cancellation. In order to check this statement we should expand the characteristic frequencies of the S3 modes in the regime of large mode number n S ω1,n = n + (1 − q)w0 + S ω2,n = n − (1 − q)w0 + κ2[Υ2 − m2(1 + q2)] where we have written down just the solutions with +n as leading contribution. Since matching with the frequencies expanded in Υ is not direct, the labelling here is arbitrary. Taking into account the relation − m2(1 + q2)] = 4(Υ2 − q2w02) − 2κ2w02 , (5.12) we can check that after replacing the first two contributions in (5.10) by the sum over n of the frequencies (5.11), the logarithmic divergence now cancels. This proves that the one-loop correction to the dispersion relation is finite for all values of the mixing parameter. 6 A comment about non-rigid strings In this section we provide a plausibility argument for the vanishing of the one-loop correction for the non-rigid case in the pure NS-NS limit. First we must summarize some results about the non-rigid spinning string. The existence of an Uhlenbeck constant of motion allows us to reduce the equations of motion (2.10), (2.11) and (2.12) into a first-order differential equation. This equation is solved in terms of Jacobi elliptic functions, giving r12(σ) = c1 + c2 sn2 c3σ, ν , where ci and ν are constants that depend on ωi, vi and q whose explicit expressions can be found in [64]. For our purposes it is enough to know that the elliptic parameter ν vanishes the same as the one for non-rigid spinning strings in AdS5 × S5 [73, 74]. when q → 1. Another important feature of the solution (6.1) is that its functional form is The one-loop corrections for spinning folded and pulsating strings in AdS5 × S5 were computed in [56–58], where it was shown that the Euler-Lagrange equations of all the fluctuations can be rewritten as the eigenvalue problem of a single-gap Lam´e operators [∂x2 + 2ν¯2sn2(x|ν¯) + Ω2]fΛ(x) = ΛfΛ(x) . Here ν¯ is related to the elliptic modulus of the Jacobi function involved on the classical solution, x is a linear function of σ for spinning strings and Ω2 is a linear function of the square of the characteristic frequency. The specific relations depend on which of the (6.1) (6.2) fluctuations are we considering, but in all the cases ν¯ vanishes if the elliptic modulus of the classical solution vanishes. Since ν vanishes in the limit q = 1, all the Lam´e equations reduce to a wave equation in such limit as long as the functional form of this eigenvalue problem remains unaltered when we include the NS-NS flux. Accordingly, the characteristic frequencies should become a linear function of the mode number n and the one-loop correction would vanish in the non-rigid case. 7 Conclusions In this article we have derived the one-loop correction to the dispersion relation of rigid closed spinning strings on the R ×S3 subsector of a type IIB string theory on AdS3 ×S3 ×T 4 background supported by a mixture of R-R and NS-NS fluxes. This correction has been obtained through the computation of the characteristic frequencies via both background field expansion and the finite-gap equations without massless excitations. We have proved that the correction remains finite for all values of the parameter that controls the mixing of the two fluxes. In addition, all the frequencies can be computed analytically in the pure NS-NS limit, where they become linear and the one-loop correction vanishes. We have also argued that this vanishing probably extends to non-rigid strings. It is important to remark that our finite-gap computation does not take into account the massless fields because the background field expansion showed that their net contribution vanishes. Including the massless contributions into the finite-gap equations would need a further extension of the procedure followed here. It would be desirable to generalize the method presented in [61] to deal with these massless excitations in the case of mixed flux. A natural generalization of our analysis would be the precise computation of the oneloop correction for non-rigid strings. Even though the vanishing of this correction on the in [56–58] for AdS5 × S5 string theory could be generalized to this end. q → 1 limit seems plausible, an explicit check is needed. In principle, the procedure used Semiclassical giant magnon solutions support this statement, as they can be obtained as a particular regime of general spinning strings. These solutions were studied in [ 43, 69 ], where it was shown that they display a linear dispersion relation.9 Furthermore, in [43] it is argued that such dispersion relation holds at each perturbative order for giant magnons understood as magnonic bound states, which in particular implies the vanishing of its one-loop correction up to corrections in the coupling constant h. The construction of the S-matrix for elementary magnonic excitations starting from symmetry considerations strongly supports this fact [15]. Equation (5.3) and the discussion of section 6 suggests that the vanishing of the one-loop correction in the pure NS-NS limit is not a characteristic of rigid spinning string solutions but it might be a feature of general spinning strings. Proving this statement would shed light on the role of spinning semiclassical solutions in the mixed flux scenario, and its q → 1 limit. 9Note that in [ 69 ] a more general magnonic dispersion relation has been derived. Nonetheless, semiclassical solutions can be typically mapped via AdS/CFT duality in the Ji → ∞ limit, according to which the dispersion relation therein indeed becomes linear. Besides, it would be desirable to compare our results with the prediction from the string Bethe ansatz for the dressing phase. The comparison is based on the realization of rigid spinning string solutions in the su(2) sector from the point of view of the Bethe equations, along the lines of Hern´andez-L´opez construction [79]. In particular, such realization involves a large quantity of su(2) Bethe roots lying in a single connected curve of the complex plane. The construction shows that there are two possible sources of corrections: quantum corrections to the classical integrable structure and wrapping corrections coming from finite size effects. In the AdS5 × S5 background, the comparison allowed to extract strong-coupling corrections to the dressing phase that later were proven to be in agreement with the predictions derived from crossing relations. In contrast to the AdS5 × S5 comparison, in AdS3 × S3 × T 4 with pure R-R flux both computations of the dressing phase did not match. The presence of massless modes, with no analogy in AdS5 × S5, is believed to underlie this disagreement as wrapping contributions are exponentially supressed by the mass of the excitations involved.10 On the other hand, it has been recently shown [46, 76] that in the pure NS-NS limit wrapping corrections are absent and both the S-matrix and the string Bethe equations present a remarkably simple structure [46, 76].11 Taking all of this into account, we expect that some control over massless wrapping corrections in the Hern´andez-L´opez construction can be gained by means of the parameter q, helping to elucidate the disagreement. Finally, we want to point out that the spectrum of closed strings with zero winding and zero momentum on the torus on a F1/NS5-brane supported with R-R moduli has been studied in [47]. It is also shown there that the mixed flux background studied here can be retrieved from the near-horizon geometry of such scenario. Thus, our computation may also be relevant to the pure NS-NS theory at a generic point in its moduli space. Acknowledgments The authors want to thank Rafael Hern´andez, Alessandro Torrielli and Santiago Varona for valuable comments on the manuscript. We also want to thank Ben Hoare for feedback on this work and for pointing us the articles [56, 57]. J. M. N. also want to thanks the Trinity College Dublin for its hospitality during the “Workshop on higher-point correlation functions and integrable AdS/CFT”. A Conventions In this appendix we collect the conventions we used during the article, in particular those concerning the fermionic Lagrangian (3.19). 10Perturbative analyses around the BMN vacuum of the dressing phase in the R-R [39] and mixed flux [45] regimes has also led to discrepancies with the all-loop S-matrix predictions and the dispersion relation, obtained both from the underlying symmetries of the system, when dealing with massless excitations. 11It is not obvious how to apply the pure NS-NS limit to the flux-deformed Bethe equations proposed in [9], based on the centrally extended light-cone symmetry algebra. This is so because such algebra cannot be centrally extended when q = 1. HJEP07(218)4 Firstly, we fix our index notation. We use greek indices for the worldsheet coordinates, lower-case latin indices for the ten-dimensional Minkowski flat spacetime, upper-case undotted indices for target spacetime and upper-case dotted indices separate the 32 components Majorana-Weyl spinors in 10 dimensions into two 16 components spinors. The worldsheet coordinates, denoted as τ and σ, are raised and lowered with the flat metric ηαβ =diag(−1, 1) and its associated Levi-Civita symbol is defined so ǫτσ = 1. Flat Minkowskian coordinates takes values in {0, . . . , 9}, being raised and lowered with the flat metric ηab =diag(−1, 1, . . . , 1). ΩcabEc, obtained from the former using In order to relate target space coordinates and flat Minkowskian coordinates we construct the vielbeins Ea = EAadXA and the spin connection differential 1-forms Ωab = For the AdS3 × S3 space the vielbeins are given by E0 = z0 dt , E3 = −r1 dr2 + r2 dr1 , E1 = −z0 dz1 + z1 dz0 , E4 = r1 dϕ1 , E2 = z1 dφ , E5 = r2 dϕ2 , The spin connection differential one-forms are written down as Ω01 = −z1 dt , Ω21 = z0 dφ , Ω43 = r2 dϕ1 , Ω53 = −r1 dϕ2 ; the remaining components either could be obtained through Ωab = −Ωba, or are zero. Both vielbeins and spin connection can be pulled back to the worldsheet using a solution of the equations of motion as eaα = EAa∂αXA , ωαab = ecαΩcab . When the constant radii classical solution presented in section 2 is plugged, the non-trivial pulled back vielbiens are e0 = κ dτ , e4 = a1(ω1dτ + α1′dσ) , e5 = a2(ω2dτ + α2′dσ) , and the non-trivial pulled-back spin connection differential one-forms are ω43 = a2(ω1dτ + α1′dσ) , ω53 = −a1(ω2dτ + α2′dσ) . Habc and Fabc refer the Minkowskian components of the Neveu-Schwarz-Neveu-Schwarz and Ramond-Ramond three-form fluxes respectively, given by [15] H/ a = 2q E/ a(Γ012 + Γ345) + (Γ012 + Γ345)E/ a , Fabc = 12κ(Γ012 + Γ345) , where the slash denotes contraction with the gamma matrices. Integrability and conformal symmetry fix q2 + κ2 = 1 [40]. (A.1) (A.2) (A.3) (A.4) (A.5) Computation of the corrections to the quasi-momenta of the one-cut We treat the AdS3, the S3 and the fermionic contributions separately to simplify the computation. This separation allow us to alleviate notation by dropping the sheet labels both on the poles x and on the number of excitations/cuts Nn. B.1 Contribution from AdS3 excitations The classical algebraic curve presents a cut only on the sheets related to the sphere, making the process of computing the AdS3 modes equivalent to the computation of fluctuations around the BMN string solution. This computation has been already performed in [60], so we just quote their result here (without imposing the level matching condition) δΔ = 2 X n ˆ Nn hκαˆ(xˆn) − 1 − w0 2qn + Nˇn hκαˇ(xˇn) xˇ2 n 2qn − w0 . (B.1) Substituting the quasimomenta (4.4) on the cut condition (4.10) relates the functions αˆ and αˇ with the mode number and the position of the poles (B.2) (B.3) (B.4) (B.5) (B.6) pˆ1A(xˆn) − pˆ2A(xˆn) = 2 pˇ2A(xˇn) − pˇ1A(xˇn) = 2 2πxˆnw0 κ(xˆn − s) xˆn + 1s 2πxˇnw0 1 κ(xˇn + s) xˇn − s = = xˆn xˇn 4πhαˆ(xˆn)w0 = 2πn , 4πhαˇ(xˇn)w0 = 2πn . Plugging them into the previous expression we obtain δΔ = 1 w0 n X Nˆn (nκxˆn − 2nq − w0) + Nˇn nκ xˇn − 2nq . B.2 Contribution from S3 excitations Adding infinitesimal cuts in the sheets related to S3 has to take into account the existence of a branch cut on the classical algebraic curve. The presence of both cuts generates two kinds of corrections to the quasi-momenta, one coming from the poles associated to the infinitesimal cuts and another coming from shifts of the branch points of the cut due to the addition of these poles. Thus we have to split the ansatz for the corrections to the quasi-momenta in two contributions where the factor K(x) dividing the second term comes from the fact that ∂x0 x − x0 ∝ 1/√x − x0. Using both the analytic properties of the corrections to the quasi-momenta on the cut (4.10) and the inversion symmetry of the algebraic curve √ δpˇ2S = f (x) + δpˆiS(x) = δpˇiS g(x) K(x) 1 x . , δpˇ1S(x) = f (x) − K(x) , g(x) δpˆ1S(x) = f 1 − Kg x1x1 , δpˇ2S(x) = f (x) + δpˆ2S(x) = f 1 x g(x) K(x) , + g x1 K x1 . The explicit form of these functions is obtained from the known pole structure of the corrections and their asymptotic properties. Equation (4.7) entails that the combinations δpˇ1S + δpˇ2S and δpˆ1S + δpˆ2S have no poles, hence we are free to choose f (x) = 0. On the other hand, δpˇ2S − δpˇ1S has a simple pole with residue 2αˇ(xˇ)Nˇn at xˇ and δpˆ2S − δpˆ1S has a simple pole with residue 2αˆ(xˆ)Nˆn at xˆ. Furthermore, δpˇiS (respectively δpˆiS) have poles at −s and 1s (respectively s and − s ) whose residues are correlated with those of the δpˇiA (respectively 1 δpˆiA) quasi-momenta at the same points, see (4.11). As a consequence, we can write down the following ansatz for the function g(x) g(x) = a + sδa1 + x + s δa2 sx − 1 + X n Nn ˇ αˇ(xˇn)K(xˇn) − Nˆn αˆxˆ(xˆnn(1)K−(x1x/ˆxnˆ)n) = a + −2κδa− + 2x(δa+ + qδa−) 1 κ(x + s) x − s + X n Nn ˇ αˇ(xˇn)K(xˇn) − Nˆn αˆxˆ(xnˆn(1)K−(x1x/ˆxnˆ)n) where a and δai are unknown constants. As we mentioned in section 4, our conventions for the definition of the Lax connection allow us to relate it with the Noether currents of the system for large values of the spectral parameter in a simple way. Therefore, the asymptotic behaviour of the quasi-momenta can be related with conserved global charges. In particular, for the excitations we are interested in we have xl→im∞ κhx δpˇ1S(x) = −Nˇ , xl→im∞ κhx δpˆ1S(x) = Nˆ , xl→im∞ κhx δpˇ2S(x) = Nˇ , xl→im∞ κhx δpˆ2S(x) = −Nˆ , with N = Pn Nn. These asymptotic properties are mapped to asymptotic properties of g(x) at x → ∞ and x → 0. The behaviour at infinity fixes the constant a to xl→im∞ g(x) = a = xl→im∞ (δpˇ2(x) − δpˇ1(x)) = K(x) 2 mNˇ h . Besides, the behaviour around zero provides us two conditions that fix the remaining two unknown constants we can fix the rest of the quasi-momenta related to the sphere g(x) K(x) = δpˆ2(1/x) − δpˆ1(1/x) , g(0) K(0) + g′(0) g(0) K′(0) K(0) − K(0) K(0) ˆ N x + O(x2) = − κh x + O(x2) . (B.7) (B.8) , (B.9) (B.10) (B.11) (B.12) To simplify our results we write the residues αˆ and αˇ in terms of the poles using the equation (4.10) and the classical values of the quasi-momenta (4.5) and (4.6) pˆ1S(xˆn) − pˆ2S(xˆn) = 2πn ⇒ 2 pˇ2S(xˇn) − pˇ1S(xˇn) = 2πn ⇒ 2 xˆn xˇn αˆ(xˆn)hK(1/xˆn) = n , αˇ(xˇn)hK(xˇn) = n + 2m . The O(1) of (B.12) reads g(0) = a + 2δa− − X while the O(x) gives us δa+ − qδa− = − X n 4h xˇn n + 2m Nˇn + nxˆn − 2K(0) κ ˆ Nn . Now that we know the residues at −s and 1/s of the quasimomenta associated to the sphere, we can compute the correction to, for example, the pˇ2A quasi-momenta, as δΔ is computed from its asymptotic behaviour. Using that K(−s) = K(1/s) = w0 we can write δpˇ2A(x) = −2κδa− + 2x(δa+ + qδa−) , 1 w0κ(x + s) x − s and thus δΔ = xl→im∞ x δpˇ2A(x) = 2(δa+ + qδa−) , w0κ n Nˆnn 2h + Nˇn(n + 2m) ! 2h = 0 ⇒ δa− = X (Nˆn + Nˇn)n 4h n , (B.15) δΔ = X κ n w0 xˇn − 2qn Nˇn + nxˆn − 2qn − ˆ Nn . (B.18) 2K(0) κ B.3 Contribution from fermionic excitations As opposed to the previous cases, we have to distinguish between the fermionic contributions N AS and N SA, both hatted and checked. Nevertheless, equations (4.4), (4.5) and (4.6) imply that the differences of classical quasi-momenta are equal two by two pˆ1A(x) − pˆ2S(x) = −pˆ2A(x) + pˆ1S(x) , pˇ2A(x) − pˇ1S(x) = −pˇ1A(x) + pˇ2S(x) , (B.19) hence both kind of poles are equal in pairs xˆAS = xˆSA and xˇAS = xˇSA. As we have to deal with the cut of the classical solution too, we can use an analogue ansatz to the one we used for the S3 modes (B.5), but with different functions f (x) and g(x) that reflect the pole structure of fermionic fluctuations (4.7). The ansa¨tze for such functions are g(x) = b + 1 κ(x + s) x − s 2(δa+ + qδa−)x − 2κδa− + X 1 κ(x + s) x − s 2(δb+ + qδb−)x − 2κδb− + X n n αˇ(xˇn) nˇn − xˆn(1 − xxˆn) nˆn , αˆ(xˆn) x − xˇn K(xˇn)αˇ(xˇn) Nˇn − xˆn(1 − xxˆn) x − xˇn K(1/xˆn)αˆ(xˆn) Nˆn (B.13) (B.14) (B.16) (B.17) (B.20) (B.21) where we have defined 2nˇ ≡ Nˇ AS − Nˇ SA and 2Nˇ ≡ Nˇ AS + Nˇ SA, with similar expression for the hatted ones. Again, the known asymptotic behaviour of the quasi-momenta fixes the unknown constants. Let us start with the function f (x) n xˆ2 n + O 1 x2 f (x) = a + 2δa− − X αˇ(xˇn)nˇn − X αˆ(xˆn)nˆn + − + 2δa− s − s + O 1 − X αˇ(xˇn)nˇn xˇ2 n n These are four equations for three unknowns. We can check that the equations are compatible and, in fact, solved by − X αˆ(xˆn)nˆn x + O(x2) = − κh + O(x2) . xˆn 2(δa+ + qδa−) nˇx αˇ(xˇn)nˇn + αˆ(xˆn)nˆn , −2δa+ = X αˇ(xˇn)nˇn xˇn − q + X αˆ(xˆn)nˆn κ xˆn n κ xˆn − q . Substituting back these expressions, f (x) can be rewritten in a more compact form 1 hκ(x + s) x − s xnˇn + nˆn In addition, the function g(x) has the expansions g(x) = b + O = K(∞) κhx + O g(x) = b + 2δb− − X αˇ(xˇn)K(xˇn)Nˇn − X αˆ(xˆn)K(1/xˆn)Nˆn + − 1 x = mNˇ + O h 1 x , +2δb− s − s = − K(0)Nˇ x κh + O(x2) . n − X αˇ(xˇn)K(xˇn)Nˇn xˇ2 n The computation of the explicit value of the unknown constants is simplified when the residues are rewritten in terms of the poles via eq. (4.10) pˇ2S(xˇn) − pˇ1A(xˇn) = 2πhαˇ(xˇn)K(xˇn) + xˇn 2πwˇn h − m = 2πn ⇒ n xˆn − X αˆ(xˆn)K(1/xˆn)Nˆn x + O(x2) a = 0 , 2δa− = X n f (x) = 1 x n 1 xˇ n xˇn xˇn x ˇ N xˇn xˆn X n n pˆ1A(xˆn) − pˆ2S(xˆn) = 2πn ⇒ (B.22) 1 (B.23) (B.24) (B.25) (B.26) 2(δb+ + qδb−) κ # xˇn xˆ αˇ(xˇn)K(xˇn) = n + m − wˇn αˆ(xˆn)K(1/xˆn) = n − wˆn h h (B.27) write the unknown coefficients as xˇnw0 xˆnw0 where we have defined wˇn ≡ κ(xˇn+s)(xˇn− 1s ) and wˆn ≡ κ(xˆn−s)(xˆn+ 1s ) . Therefore we can b = , n 2h κ xˇn −2δb− = X wˇn − n Nˇn + wˆn − n ˆ Nn , δb+ = κ " 2qhδb− + X wˇn − n − m Nˇn + X n K(0) + (wˆn − n)xˆn Nn , ˆ # Now that we have reconstructed the δpˇiS quasi-momenta, we can focus on the anti-de Sitter sheets. For example, we can construct δpˇ2A and extract δΔ from the comparison of the residues of the former at −s and 1/s with the residues of δpˇ2A. As the steps involved in the construction of δpˇ2A are similar to those in fixing f (x), we can write down directly δpˇ2A = 1 hκ(x + s) x − s −δΔ 2 + X Nn − nˆn + X x(nˇn − Nˇn) ! ˆ . 1 − xxˆn n res δpˇ2A + res δpˇ2A = res δpˇ2S + res and using that K(−s) = K(1/s) = w0, we get δΔ − hκ + X n 1 hκ s + 1s X n + s 1+ sxˆn s − xˆn 1 + 1 s − xˆn hnˆκn −s+Nˆ1ns + nˆn + s 2 s + xˇn + s(1 + sxˇn) hκ s + 1s 1 nˇn − Nˇn # s 2 s + xˇn + 1 s(1+ sxˇn) nˇn + 2(δb+ + qδb−) , κw0 (B.28) (B.29) which reduces to xˇn/κ − 2qn Nˇn + (nκxˆn − K(0) − 2qn − κw0) Nˆn . (B.30) C Finite gap frequencies for general values of q In this appendix we write down the frequencies computed using the finite-gap equations for general values of the mixing parameter q. The equations (4.10) for the placement of the poles can be solved exactly for general q for the AdS3 and the fermionic fluctuations, but not for the S3 fluctuations, which have to be expressed as a series on Υ−1. The values for the poles involving first two kinds of excitations are xˆnAA = nq + w0 ± pn2 + 2nqw0 + w02 , xˇnAA = −nq + w0 ∓ pn2 + 2nqw0 + w02 = nκ nκ xˆnAS = xˆnSA = xˇnAS = xˇnSA = nq + w0 ± pn2 + Υ2 + 2nqw0 , nκ q(n + m) − w0 ± pΥ2 + (m + n)(m + n − 2qw0) nκ nq − w0 ± pn2 − 2nqw0 + w02 , , (C.1) while for the sphere are κxˆnSS = κxˆnSS = κ xˇSS = n xˇSS = n − = ± nq + Υ + pn2 + 2nqΥ + Υ2 n nq + Υ − pn2 + 2nqΥ + Υ2 = ± κ2√n2 − 4m2 2Υ + (n − 2m)qκ2 2Υ2 + + m2qκ2 Υ2 q(2m + n) − Υ − p(2m + n)2 − 2q(2m + n)Υ + Υ2 (2m + n) (2m + n) q(2m + n) − Υ + p(2m + n)2 − 2q(2m + n)Υ + Υ2 2Υ 2Υ + (n + 2m)κ2 ± κ2pn(n + 4m) κ2pn(n + 4m) (n2 + 4mn + 2m2)qκ2 − m2qκ2 Υ2 2Υ2 Substituting into equation (4.12) and using the definition (4.14) we get ΩˆnAA = nq + w0 ± ΩˇnAA = nq − w0 ± qn2 + 2nqw0 + w02 , qn2 − 2nqw0 + w02 , Ωˆ nF = nq − Υ ± pn2 + Υ2 + 2nqw0 , Ωˇ nF = (m + n)q − w0 ± pΥ2 + (m + n)(m + n − 2qw0) , and Ωˆ nSS = nq − Υ + pn2 + 2nqΥ + Υ2 + κ2n√n2 − 4m2 2Υ m2nqκ2 Υ2 + − + m2qκ2 Υ2 qκ2m2 Υ2 Ωˇ nSS = q(2m + n) − Υ + p(2m + n)2 − 2q(2m + n)Υ + Υ2 + = −2Υ + 2(n + 2m)q − − (n + 2m)2κ2 qκ2(n + 2m)[(n + 2m)2 − 2m2] Υ2 Ωˇ nSS = ± = ± 2Υ 2Υ κ2(n + 2m)pn(n + 4m) qκ2(n + 2m)(n2 + 4mn + 2m2) κ2(n + 2m)p(n + 2m)2 − 4m2 qκ2(n + 2m)[(n + 2m)2 − 2m2] + 2Υ2 We immediately observe that Ωˆ nAA match frequencies ω1,n and ω3,n from equation (3.16) up to a shift by a constant, while Ωˇ nAA match frequencies ω2,n and ω4,n from equation (3.16) up to the opposite shift. The comparison between fermionic frequencies is not so immediate, since it requires a shift of the mode number n. In fact the combination Ωˆ nF−qw0 + w20 is identical to ω5,n and ω7,n from the equation (3.23). A similar relation relates ΩˇnF with ω6,n and ω8,n with an extra contribution from the winding. The comparison of sphere frequencies is more involved since we do not have a closed expression for general values of q. Instead we can compare them at the level of the characteristic equation. From the equation (3.8) and equations (B.13) and (B.14) we infer ωnS = −ω−Sn, these relations can be rewritten as Ωˆ S−n = ωnS and ΩˇS−n−2m = ωnS . that ΩˆnS = −ωnS and Ωˇ nS−2m = −ωnS. Using the reality condition for the fluctuation fields, Open Access. Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. [1] J.M. Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE]. [2] J.R. David, G. Mandal and S.R. Wadia, Microscopic formulation of black holes in string theory, Phys. Rept. 369 (2002) 549 [hep-th/0203048] [INSPIRE]. [3] N. Beisert et al., Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview, Lett. Math. Phys. 99 (2012) 3 [arXiv:1012.3982] [INSPIRE]. [4] J.R. David and B. Sahoo, Giant magnons in the D1-D5 system, JHEP 07 (2008) 033 [arXiv:0804.3267] [INSPIRE]. [arXiv:1005.0501] [INSPIRE]. [5] J.R. David and B. Sahoo, S-matrix for magnons in the D1-D5 system, JHEP 10 (2010) 112 [6] O. Ohlsson Sax, B. Stefan´ski Jr. and A. Torrielli, On the massless modes of the AdS3/CF T2 integrable systems, JHEP 03 (2013) 109 [arXiv:1211.1952] [INSPIRE]. [7] C. Ahn and D. Bombardelli, Exact S-matrices for AdS3/CF T2, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28 (2013) 1350168 [arXiv:1211.4512] [INSPIRE]. [arXiv:1302.5349] [INSPIRE]. integrable spin-chain for strings on AdS3 × S3 × T 4: the massive sector, JHEP 08 (2013) 043 [INSPIRE]. HJEP07(218)4 JHEP 08 (2014) 097 [arXiv:1405.7947] [INSPIRE]. [12] L. Bianchi and B. Hoare, AdS3 × S 3 × M 4 string S-matrices from unitarity cuts, worldsheet S matrix, JHEP 10 (2014) 66 [arXiv:1406.0453] [INSPIRE]. [13] R. Borsato, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini and B. Stefanski, The complete AdS3 × S × T 3 4 [14] A. Pittelli, A. Torrielli and M. Wolf, Secret symmetries of type IIB superstring theory on AdS3 × S3 × M 4, J. Phys. A 47 (2014) 455402 [arXiv:1406.2840] [INSPIRE]. [15] T. Lloyd, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini and B. Stefan´ski, Jr., The complete worldsheet S matrix of superstrings on AdS3 × S × T Nucl. Phys. B 891 (2015) 570 [arXiv:1410.0866] [INSPIRE]. 3 4 with mixed three-form flux, AdS3 × S 3 × T [arXiv:1605.00518] [INSPIRE]. [16] R. Borsato, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini and B. Stefan´ski, On the spectrum of 4 strings with Ramond-Ramond flux, J. Phys. A 49 (2016) 41LT03 JHEP 06 (2016) 062 [arXiv:1605.01632] [INSPIRE]. [17] P. Sundin and L. Wulff, The complete one-loop BMN S-matrix in AdS3 × S × T , 3 4 [18] R. Borsato, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini, B. Stefan´ski, A. Torrielli and O. Ohlsson Sax, On J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 024004 [arXiv:1607.00914] [INSPIRE]. the dressing factors, Bethe equations and Yangian symmetry of strings on AdS3 × S × T , 3 4 [19] M. Baggio, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini, B. Stefan´ski and A. Torrielli, Protected string spectrum in AdS3/CF T2 from worldsheet integrability, JHEP 04 (2017) 091 [arXiv:1701.03501] [INSPIRE]. [20] O. Ohlsson Sax and B. Stefanski, Jr., Integrability, spin-chains and the AdS3/CF T2 correspondence, JHEP 08 (2011) 029 [arXiv:1106.2558] [INSPIRE]. superstring, JHEP 07 (2012) 159 [arXiv:1204.4742] [INSPIRE]. [21] N. Rughoonauth, P. Sundin and L. Wulff, Near BMN dynamics of the AdS3 × S × S3 × S1 3 AdS3/CF T2, JHEP 04 (2013) 113 [arXiv:1211.5119] [INSPIRE]. [22] R. Borsato, O. Ohlsson Sax and A. Sfondrini, A dynamic SU(1|1)2 S-matrix for [23] R. Borsato, O. Ohlsson Sax and A. Sfondrini, All-loop Bethe ansatz equations for AdS3/CFT2, JHEP 04 (2013) 116 [arXiv:1212.0505] [INSPIRE]. JHEP 02 (2013) 102 [arXiv:1211.5587] [INSPIRE]. [24] R. Borsato, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini and B. Stefan´ski, The AdS3 × S × S × S worldsheet S matrix, J. Phys. A 48 (2015) 415401 [arXiv:1506.00218] [INSPIRE]. 3 3 1 [25] M.C. Abbott, Comment on Strings in AdS3 × S3 × S3 × S1 at One Loop, 1 Hern´andez–L´opez phases: a semiclassical derivation, AdS3 × S3 × S3 × S1, JHEP 03 (2017) 124 [arXiv:1701.03552] [INSPIRE]. correspondence, JHEP 03 (2010) 058 [arXiv:0912.1723] [INSPIRE]. [30] P. Sundin and L. Wulff, Classical integrability and quantum aspects of the 3 AdS3 × S × S3 × S1 superstring, JHEP 10 (2012) 109 [arXiv:1207.5531] [INSPIRE]. [31] F. Larsen and E.J. Martinec, U(1) charges and moduli in the D1-D5 system, JHEP 06 (1999) 019 [hep-th/9905064] [INSPIRE]. [32] S. Gukov, E. Martinec, G.W. Moore and A. Strominger, The Search for a holographic dual to AdS3 × S3 × S3 × S1, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 9 (2005) 435 [hep-th/0403090] [INSPIRE]. AdS3 × S3 × S3 × S1, JHEP 08 (2017) 111 [arXiv:1707.02705] [INSPIRE]. [35] M.R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, Tensionless string spectra on AdS3, JHEP 05 (2018) 085 [arXiv:1803.04423] [INSPIRE]. [36] O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini and B. Stefanski, Integrability and the Conformal Field Theory of the Higgs branch, JHEP 06 (2015) 103 [arXiv:1411.3676] [INSPIRE]. [37] M. Beccaria, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk, G. Macorini and A.A. Tseytlin, Quantum corrections to spinning superstrings in AdS3 × S JHEP 04 (2013) 006 [arXiv:1211.6090] [INSPIRE]. 3 × M 4: determining the dressing phase, in string theory in AdS3 × S × T [arXiv:1311.1794] [INSPIRE]. [38] M. Beccaria and G. Macorini, Quantum corrections to short folded superstring in AdS3 × S3 × M 4, JHEP 03 (2013) 040 [arXiv:1212.5672] [INSPIRE]. [39] M.C. Abbott and I. Aniceto, Massless Lu¨scher terms and the limitations of the AdS3 asymptotic Bethe ansatz, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 106006 [arXiv:1512.08761] [INSPIRE]. [40] A. Cagnazzo and K. Zarembo, B-field in AdS3/CF T2 Correspondence and Integrability, JHEP 11 (2012) 133 [Erratum ibid. 1304 (2013) 003] [arXiv:1209.4049] [INSPIRE]. [41] B. Hoare and A.A. Tseytlin, On string theory on AdS3 × S × T 3 4 with mixed 3-form flux: tree-level S-matrix, Nucl. Phys. B 873 (2013) 682 [arXiv:1303.1037] [INSPIRE]. [42] B. Hoare and A.A. Tseytlin, Massive S-matrix of AdS3 × S3 × T 4 superstring theory with mixed 3-form flux, Nucl. Phys. B 873 (2013) 395 [arXiv:1304.4099] [INSPIRE]. [43] B. Hoare, A. Stepanchuk and A.A. Tseytlin, Giant magnon solution and dispersion relation 3 4 with mixed flux, Nucl. Phys. B 879 (2014) 318 [44] T. Lloyd, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini and B. Stefan´ski, Jr., The complete worldsheet S matrix of superstrings on AdS3 × S × T 3 4 with mixed three-form flux, HJEP07(218)4 JHEP 07 (2003) 016 [hep-th/0306130] [INSPIRE]. Nucl. Phys. B 668 (2003) 77 [hep-th/0304255] [INSPIRE]. [49] S. Frolov and A.A. Tseytlin, Multispin string solutions in AdS5 × S , [50] S. Frolov and A.A. Tseytlin, Quantizing three spin string solution in AdS5 × S , 5 in AdS5 × S [hep-th/0507189] [INSPIRE]. to energy in SL(2) sector, JHEP 03 (2005) 013 [hep-th/0501203] [INSPIRE]. [51] I.Y. Park, A. Tirziu and A.A. Tseytlin, Spinning strings in AdS5 × S5: One-loop correction [52] N. Beisert and A.A. Tseytlin, On quantum corrections to spinning strings and Bethe equations, Phys. Lett. B 629 (2005) 102 [hep-th/0509084] [INSPIRE]. [53] S. Sch¨afer-Nameki, M. Zamaklar and K. Zarembo, Quantum corrections to spinning strings 5 and Bethe ansatz: A Comparative study, JHEP 09 (2005) 051 [54] S. Sch¨afer-Nameki, Exact expressions for quantum corrections to spinning strings, Phys. Lett. B 639 (2006) 571 [hep-th/0602214] [INSPIRE]. [55] S. Sch¨afer-Nameki, M. Zamaklar and K. Zarembo, How Accurate is the Quantum String Bethe Ansatz?, JHEP 12 (2006) 020 [hep-th/0610250] [INSPIRE]. [56] M. Beccaria, G.V. Dunne, V. Forini, M. Pawellek and A.A. Tseytlin, Exact computation of J. Phys. A 43 (2010) 165402 [arXiv:1001.4018] [INSPIRE]. one-loop correction to energy of spinning folded string in AdS5 × S , 5 5 [45] P. Sundin and L. Wulff, One- and two-loop checks for the AdS3 × S × T 4 superstring with arXiv:1804.01998 [INSPIRE]. [47] O. Ohlsson Sax and B. Stefan´ski, Closed strings and moduli in AdS3/CFT2, JHEP 05 (2018) 101 [arXiv:1804.02023] [INSPIRE]. JHEP 06 (2002) 007 [hep-th/0204226] [INSPIRE]. [48] S. Frolov and A.A. Tseytlin, Semiclassical quantization of rotating superstring in AdS5 × S , 5 [57] M. Beccaria, G.V. Dunne, G. Macorini, A. Tirziu and A.A. Tseytlin, Exact computation of one-loop correction to energy of pulsating strings in AdS5 × S5, J. Phys. A 44 (2011) 015404 [arXiv:1009.2318] [INSPIRE]. [arXiv:1409.8674] [INSPIRE]. J. Phys. A 25 (2009) 254004. [58] V. Forini, V.G.M. Puletti, M. Pawellek and E. Vescovi, One-loop spectroscopy of semiclassically quantized strings: bosonic sector, J. Phys. A 48 (2015) 085401 [59] N. Gromov, Integrability in AdS/CFT correspondence: Quasi-classical analysis, [60] A. Babichenko, A. Dekel and O. Ohlsson Sax, Finite-gap equations for strings on AdS3 × S × T 3 4 with mixed 3-form flux, JHEP 11 (2014) 122 [arXiv:1405.6087] [INSPIRE]. [61] T. Lloyd and B. Stefan´ski, Jr., AdS3/CF T2, finite-gap equations and massless modes, JHEP 04 (2014) 179 [arXiv:1312.3268] [INSPIRE]. [62] J.R. David and A. Sadhukhan, Spinning strings and minimal surfaces in AdS3 with mixed 3-form fluxes, JHEP 10 (2014) 49 [arXiv:1405.2687] [INSPIRE]. mixed three-form fluxes, JHEP 11 (2015) 133 [arXiv:1508.03430] [INSPIRE]. solutions for strings on AdS3 × S3, JHEP 06 (2008) 065 [arXiv:0804.2923] [INSPIRE]. fluxes, JHEP 04 (2016) 172 [arXiv:1601.06360] [INSPIRE]. Nucl. Phys. B 533 (1998) 109 [hep-th/9805028] [INSPIRE]. [8] P. Sundin and L. Wulff , Worldsheet scattering in AdS3/CF T2 , JHEP 07 ( 2013 ) 007 [9] R. Borsato , O. Ohlsson Sax , A. Sfondrini , B. Stefan´ski and A. Torrielli , The all-loop [10] R. Borsato , O. Ohlsson Sax , A. Sfondrini , B. Stefanski , Jr. and A. Torrielli , Dressing phases of AdS3/CFT2, Phys. Rev. D 88 ( 2013 ) 066004 [arXiv: 1306 .2512] [INSPIRE]. [11] R. Borsato , O. Ohlsson Sax , A. Sfondrini and B. Stefanski , Towards the All-Loop Worldsheet S Matrix for AdS3 × S3 × T 4 , Phys . Rev. Lett . 113 ( 2014 ) 131601 [arXiv: 1403 .4543] J. Phys . A 46 ( 2013 ) 445401 [arXiv: 1306 .5106] [INSPIRE]. [26] M.C. Abbott , The AdS3 × S × S × S [27] M.C. Abbott and I. Aniceto, Macroscopic (and Microscopic) Massless Modes, Nucl . Phys. B 894 ( 2015 ) 75 [arXiv: 1412 .6380] [INSPIRE]. [28] L. Eberhardt , M.R. Gaberdiel , R. Gopakumar and W. Li , BPS spectrum on [29] A. Babichenko , B. Stefanski , Jr. and K. Zarembo , Integrability and the AdS3/CF T2 mixed flux , J. Phys. A 48 ( 2015 ) 105402 [arXiv: 1411 .4662] [INSPIRE]. [46] M. Baggio and A. Sfondrini , Strings on NS-NS Backgrounds as Integrable Deformations , [63] R. Hern ´andez and J.M. Nieto , Spinning strings in AdS3 × S [64] R. Hernandez and J.M. Nieto , Elliptic solutions in the Neumann-Rosochatius system with mixed flux , Phys. Rev. D 91 ( 2015 ) 126006 [arXiv: 1502 .05203] [INSPIRE]. [65] A. Banerjee , K.L. Panigrahi and M. Samal , A note on oscillating strings in AdS3 × S3 with [66] B . -H. Lee , R.R. Nayak , K.L. Panigrahi and C. Park , On the giant magnon and spike [67] C.-M. Chen , J.-H. Tsai and W.-Y. Wen, Giant Magnons and Spiky Strings on S3 with B-field , Prog. Theor. Phys . 121 ( 2009 ) 1189 [arXiv: 0809 .3269] [INSPIRE]. Phys. Rev. D 90 ( 2014 ) 106006 [arXiv: 1405 .5497] [INSPIRE]. [68] A. Banerjee , K.L. Panigrahi and P.M. Pradhan , Spiky strings on AdS3 × S3 with NS-NS flux , Phys. Rev. D 90 ( 2014 ) 066010 [arXiv: 1404 .7644] [INSPIRE]. [69] C. Ahn and P. Bozhilov , String solutions in AdS3 × S3 × T 4 with NS-NS B-field , [70] A. Banerjee and A. Sadhukhan , Multi-spike strings in AdS3 with mixed three-form fluxes,


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FJHEP07%282018%29141.pdf

Juan Miguel Nieto, Roberto Ruiz. One-loop quantization of rigid spinning strings in AdS3 × S3 × T 4 with mixed flux, Journal of High Energy Physics, 2018, 141, DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2018)141