Laterality of Facial Expressions of Emotion: Universal and Culture-Specific Influences

Behavioural Neurology, Jul 2018

Recent research indicates that (a) the perception and expression of facial emotion are lateralized to a great extent in the right hemisphere, and, (b) whereas facial expressions of emotion embody universal signals, culture-specific learning moderates the expression and interpretation of these emotions. In the present article, we review the literature on laterality and universality, and propose that, although some components of facial expressions of emotion are governed biologically, others are culturally influenced. We suggest that the left side of the face is more expressive of emotions, is more uninhibited, and displays culture-specific emotional norms. The right side of face, on the other hand, is less susceptible to cultural display norms and exhibits more universal emotional signals.

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

Laterality of Facial Expressions of Emotion: Universal and Culture-Specific Influences

Behavioural Neurology 0953-4180 Laterality of facial expressions of emotion: Universal and culture-specific influences Manas K. Mandal 1 Nalini Ambady 0 0 Tufts University , Medford, MA , USA 1 Indian Institute of Technology - Kharagpur , India Recent research indicates that (a) the perception and expression of facial emotion are lateralized to a great extent in the right hemisphere, and, (b) whereas facial expressions of emotion embody universal signals, culture-specific learning moderates the expression and interpretation of these emotions. In the present article, we review the literature on laterality and universality, and propose that, although some components of facial expressions of emotion are governed biologically, others are culturally influenced. We suggest that the left side of the face is more expressive of emotions, is more uninhibited, and displays culturespecific emotional norms. The right side of face, on the other hand, is less susceptible to cultural display norms and exhibits more universal emotional signals. 1. Introduction “we respond to gestures. . . in accordance with an elaborate and secret code that is written nowhere, known by none and understood by all” [120, p. 892]. Human beings rely extensively on nonverbal channels of communication in their day-to-day emotional as well as interpersonal exchanges. The verbal channel, language, is a relatively poor medium for expressing the quality, intensity and nuancing of emotion and affect in different social situations. Nonverbal channels of communication that transmit emotional messages include facial expressions, paralanguage, gestures, gaze, posture, and proximal behavior. Amongst these channels, the face is thought to have primacy in signaling affective information [ 102 ]. First, the face is exposed to the full view of others in order to facilitate social interaction. Second, the amount (especially in short period of time) and type of information (e.g., emotional, attitudinal) conveyed by the face are relatively easy to comprehend [ 59 ]. It is not surprising, then, that the face has been a central focus of research on the communication of emotion, beginning with the classic work of Darwin [38], and followed up by pioneers in the field such as Tomkins [ 136 ], Izard [ 67 ], and Ekman [43]. During the past two decades, a great deal of attention has been paid to the issues of the lateralization and universality of facial expressions of emotion. The focus of the lateralization issue has been on the relative role of the two cerebral hemispheres in the understanding, expression and subjective experience of emotion. Primary questions of interest include: (a) Is there a hemispatial advantage in the identification of facial expressions of emotion?, (b) To what extent do the two hemifaces differ in the expression of positive or negative emotions?, and, (c) Which hemisphere is more activated during the subjective experience of different emotions? The focus of the universality issue has been on the panculturality of recognition and expression of facial emotion. Primary questions of interest that have been examined in the literature include: (a) Are facial emotions recognized similarly across all cultures?, (b) To what extent does culture influence the expression of emotion?, and, (c) Are there any culture-specific emotions? The purpose of the present article is to review evidence for the laterality and universality of facial expressions of emotion and to ascertain their possible relationship. To review the evidence, computerized databases (involving search engines like PsychInfo, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Google) were utilized, in addition to examining relevant journals. The selection criteria for studies involved including any that dealt with the functional laterality of facial expressions of emotion, with the major focus being on the recognition and expression of emotion. Studies dealing with the neural pathways in the recognition or the anatomical pathways in the expressions of facial emotions were not included. Experimental as well as clinical evidence was reviewed in order to garner further evidence for the functional laterality of facial expression of emotion. Studies examining the universality and culture-specificity of facial expression of emotion were also included. No attempt was made to determine the efficacy of any particular theoretical position that supported either a universal or a culture-specific perspective. Instead, evidence for both perspectives was examined by focusing on laterality studies. The impetus behind the examination of the lateralization of emotion was drawn mainly from recent observations that emotion regulation is not restricted to subcortical and limbic structures. A substantial body of research has confirmed the role of the neocortex in the understanding, expression and subjective experience of emotion [ 18,69 ]. Interestingly, this work has largely overlooked evidence that facial expression, and judgment of emotions differ widely amongst cultures as a function of emotion type and hedonic valence (but see [ 83,140 ]), and the degree of subjective experience of emotion [ 137 ]. 2. Laterality & facial emotions The study of laterality provides a window into the understanding of behavioral and neural processes [ 60 ], especially those pertaining to emotion [ 26 ]. The term “laterality” indicates anatomic and functional differences between the two halves of the brain [ 143 ]. Anatomical differences are referred to as biological asymmetry (like the relative size, shape of the two hemispheres, brain-ventricle ratio, skull size, etc.) and functional differences are referred to as behavioral asymmetry. Behavioral asymmetry is determined either via central (e.g., split-visual-field, dichotic listening, dichhaptic techniques, etc.) or peripheral (e.g., facedness, handedness, footedness, etc.) measures. The central measures directly assess perceptual processes in the two hemispheres. Peripheral measures indirectly ascertain the role of two hemispheres in motor expressions. Two approaches are generally taken in examining hemispheric involvement in affective processing: experimental approaches, in which normal functions of the brain are studied usually with participants whose brains are intact (although, at times brain-damaged patients are also tested in experimental studies); and clinical approaches, the goal of which is to examine the degree and magnitude of functional impairment following localized brain damage [ 128 ]. Both approaches deal with the hemispheric involvement in affective functioning, although observations derived from these two approaches are not directly comparable. 3. Lateralization in the identification of facial emotion: Experimental and clinical evidence Table 1 presents the experimental evidence for perceptual asymmetry of facial expressions of emotion. This evidence, in general, suggests that the left visualfield (a contralateral function of the right hemisphere) is superior in the identification of facial expressions of emotion, especially negative emotions. Most of these studies utilize a split visual-field technique in which facial expressions are presented to two visual-fields (with the observer’s eyes fixed on a central point) for 180 ms or less. This method ensures that left and right visual images initially reach the contralateral hemispheres. The left visual-field superiority for facial emotion identification has been found to be robust across studies that used photographs, cartoons, or schematic drawings. Left visual-field superiority has also been found when stimulus photographs are presented under neutral or free-viewing conditions. These experimental findings have been substantiated by clinical evidence. For example, studies on clinical samples reveal that there is strong evidence that righthemisphere damage relative to left-hemisphere damage impairs the perception of emotional expressions displayed via the face [ 20,35,77,80,83,88 ], the comprehension of emotional prosody [111], the judgment of emotion-laden lexicons [ 127 ], the understanding of an emotional tone of voice [ 61 ], and the appreciation of humorous stimuli [ 10 ]. Moreover, right hemispheredamaged patients, in comparison to left hemispheredamaged patients, also have difficulty in naming the emotions conveyed by different facial expressions [ 23, 36,53 ]. Butchel et al., 1978 Mc Keever and Dixon, 1981 Natale et al., 1983 Left visual-field (right hemisphere) advantage was found for the processing of all emotions Authors 4. Lateralization in the expression of facial emotion: Experimental and clinical evidence In expression studies, actors are required to produce facial expressions in posed or spontaneous conditions. In these studies, facial composites are prepared by cutting the original and mirror-reversed prints of each photograph along the vertical midline and then joining the appropriate sides (e.g. [ 118 ]). The left-left (LL) composite is thus produced by joining the left hemiface of normal orientation and its mirror image. Similarly, the right-right (RR) facial composite is prepared by assembling the right hemiface of normal orientation and its mirror image. Observers are asked to rate these composite photographs in terms of intensity of expression (see also [ 84 ]). Findings from these experiments suggest a left hemifacial bias for both posed and spontaneous expressions of emotion (See Table 2). A left hemifacial bias in emotion expression presupposes the right hemispheric involvement because of the crossed cortical dominance by the way of contralateral fibre connections. Metaanalyses also show compelling evidence for a left hemiface bias, especially during negative emotion expressions; the effect size is less pronounced for a right hemiface bias for positive emotion expressions (see [ 16,84, 131 ]). These findings have been substantiated with clinical evidence examining the ability of patients with focal brain damage to communicate emotions via the face. In a review of these studies, Borod [ 12 ] found that right hemisphere-damaged patients were significantly more impaired than left hemisphere-damaged patients for posed [ 20,25,68 ] and spontaneous [ 29,90,110 ] facial expressions of emotion. Based on this evidence, Borod [ 11,13 ] conceptualized two hypotheses with regard to hemispheric involvement in emotional behavior: (a) a right-hemisphere hypothesis, and, (b) a valence hypothesis. The first hypothesis proposes that the right hemisphere is dominant for all kinds of emotions (see also [ 28,60 ]). The second hypothesis assumes that the right hemisphere is specialized for negative emotions and the left hemisphere is specialized for positive emotions (see also [ 129 ]). A variant of this hypothesis assumes that the two hemispheres are differentially specialized for the expression and experience of emotion as a function of valence but not for the perception of emotion. According to this view, the right hemisphere is specialized for the perception of emotion irrespective of valence (see also [ 26,39 ]). In sum, the evidence in favor of right-hemisphere involvement in emotion perception and expression is overwhelming [ 14,72 ]. Bowers, Bauer, and Heilman [24] reviewed evidence from neuropsychological studies and concluded that the right hemisphere contains a “vocabulary” of nonverbal affective signals (facial expressions, prosody, and gestures), supporting the notion of a general processor (rather than specific processor for particular facial expressions, prosody, etc.) for emotion processing in normal subjects [ 21 ]. But a role for the left hemisphere in the earliest level of processing of facial emotions has not been ruled out. Rinn [ 108 ] speculated that “(the) right hemisphere lateralization for emotion may actually be due to a left superiority for the inhibition of emotion” (p. 73). Further, social perception depends on the ability to dissociate signals from social and nonsocial situations. This function may be mediated primarily by the left hemisphere. Social situations embody both perceptual as well as conceptual cues. Conceptual information has been found to be mediated by the left hemisphere, and perceptual information has been found to be mediated by the right hemisphere [ 147 ]. The involvement of the right hemisphere in positive affect states is also somewhat controversial. Some investigators have demonstrated a bilateral advantage for the processing of positive emotion whereas others have documented a left-hemispheric advantage for the processing of such emotions [ 11 ]. Researchers have also speculated about a distinction in terms of motoric direction as well as approach-withdrawal [41] in addition to a positive-negative distinction within the emotion categories. The roles of hedonic valence and motoric direction were tested in a recent study on brain-damaged patients [ 80 ]. Right hemisphere-damaged patients had specific deficits relative to left hemisphere-damaged patients in processing negative and withdrawal emotions; there was a non-significant group difference for positive/approach emotions. The issue of posed vs. spontaneous expressions has generated some controversy. Posed expressions are produced voluntarily whereas spontaneous expressions are produced automatically in response to an affective situation. Anatomical evidence suggests different anatomical involvement during these two situations; for example, neocortical structures have been implicated for posed expression and subcortical structures for spontaneous expressions [?,95]. Though many experimental findings suggest a left hemifacial bias for both posed and spontaneous expressions of emotion, some studies do not report a hemifacial bias for spontaneous expressions (for example [ 31,47,117,130 ]. Finally, facial musculature is not solely controlled by the contralateral mechanism of the brain (the right hemisphere – the left side of the face). It has been observed that the muscles in the lower region of the face are contralaterally innervated by the fibre projection of the two cerebral hemispheres [ 20,108 ]; however, the facial nerves originating in the right hemisphere are distributed uncrossed to the upper region of the face. Supporting these obersvations, a recent study found that the right upper face is more expressive than the left upper face [7]. 5. Universality and culture-specificity Having examined the issues related to laterality and emotion, we now turn to the question about the innateness versus the cultural specificity of facial expressions of emotion. Neurophysiologists, cultural anthropologists, and psychologists have been addressing this issue for several decades. Beginning with the influential early work by Darwin [37,38] that favored universality, researchers in psychology have spent decades examining the issues of the universality and cultural specificity of the expression, experience, and judgment of emotion. Extreme positions taken by early theorists have gradually given way to recent theoretical models with an interactionist perspective that suggest a role for both universality and cultural specificity (e.g. [ 43,55,89,93, 94,110,122 ]). Proponents of this view consider emotion as a composite of several subsystems that include: (a) antecedent events, (b) emotional experience, (c) appraisal, (d) physiological change, (e) change in action readiness, (f) behavior, (g) change in cognitive functioning and beliefs, and, (h) regulatory processes [ 56, 74,104,121 ]. Each subsystem of a modal emotion may vary as a result of variation in culture and, therefore, it is essential that universality has to be examined for each of these subsystems of an emotion before generalizations can be made. Ekman [43,44] suggested that facial emotions are expressed in a universally similar manner. He maintained that primary emotions are expressed by a combination of facial muscular movements that are neurally connected. Six primary emotions were identified with distinct facial muscle combinations during expressions happiness, sadness, fear, anger, surprise, and disgust. Two lines of evidence are available to support Ekman’s view, dealing with (a) the decoding (understanding) of facial emotion, and, (b) the encoding (expression) of facial emotion. Decoding studies require observers of different cultures to judge the facial expression of primary emotions, namely, happiness, sadness, fear, anger, disgust, and surprise. Facial expressions of emotion do seem to be recognized panculturally in Western and non-Western cultures [ 15,43,46,49,67,91,101 ] as well as in literate and preliterate populations [ 22,45,49, 132 ]. In comparison to decoding studies, attempts made to test universality in the expressions of primary emotions have been relatively less frequent. Encoding studies require that the subjects of different cultures express basic facial emotions. These emotions are produced either by imagining affective situations, or by following instructions to move facial muscles in a definite pattern. Some data suggest that facial emotional expressions are displayed by all cultures as long as socially learned display rules do not interfere [48]. Russell [ 114 ], on the other hand, has argued that the recognition of facial expressions of emotion depends to a large extent on the sender’s and receiver’s language and culture (see also [50]). Reviewing the cross-cultural evidence for the recognition of facial expression of emotions, Russell concluded that “facial expressions and emotion labels are probably associated, but the association may vary with cultures and is loose enough to be consistent with various alternative accounts” [113, p. 102]. In examining the classic data on emotion recognition along with newer cross-cultural evidence, a recent meta-analysis has provided evidence for an “ingroup advantage” in emotion recognition [50,51]. That is, emotion recognition is more accurate when members of the same cultural group that express the emotions also make the judgments. This ingroup advantage has been seen across a range of experimental methods and nonverbal channels of communication, as well as across each of the basic emotions, both positive and negative. Further, the ingroup advantage has been found when examining only balanced studies, in which members of every cultural group in the study judged emotions expressed by members of every other group. Such balanced studies control for possible differences in the main effects of emotional expression and recognition ability across cultures, while examining the impact of cultural match or mismatch on communication accuracy in the form of an interaction effect. Thus, there is strong evidence for an ingroup advantage in emotional decoding even after controlling for absolute differences across cultures. The universality thesis argues that facial expressions of emotion are uniformly understood, expressed or experienced across cultures (for example [44]). Opponents of this view (cultural relativism) suggest that, despite universality, culture plays a major role in the understanding and expression of facial emotion and that emotion expressions are a natural outgrowth of cultural learning [ 8,104 ]. Their argument is grounded in ecological demand, ethnic variation, social construction of the self, and cultural practices. These two extreme views rarely acknowledge the fact that biological and social signals may be accommodated in an opposite but complementary manner in facial emotion research. To understand this interface, contributions from lateralization research can be utilized that suggest an asymmetry of both the expression and the perception of facial expression. We suggest that linking the judgment of facial expression with findings on laterality might provide one way to disentangle innate and culture-specific effects. The laterality literature suggests that facial expressions of emotion, though distinct and universal, are not uniformly displayed or consensually judged. Asymmetry in facial expressions of emotion may be produced as a result of a variety of factors such as neurobiological constraints as well as by cultural factors [140]. The bulk of the literature on laterality and facial emotion reviewed earlier in this paper suggests that (a) facial expressions of emotion are better perceived in the left than in the right visual-field (a right-hemisphere dominance) of the perceiver, and, (b) the left side of the face, in comparison to the right, displays emotion in a more pronounced manner (a right-hemisphere dominance). With regard to the first proposition, that emotion judgments are governed by right-hemisphere dominance, some authors argue that the left visualfield dominance is found generally for face recognition rather than specifically for recognition of facial emotion. Neuropsychological research has established that the two processes (face recognition and recognition of facial emotion) are separate. Prosopagnosic patients (who do not recognize familiar faces following damage to the visual system) retain the ability to recognize facial expressions of emotion [54]. Studies with normal subjects have also documented a difference in performance on face-identity judgment tasks and faceemotion judgment tasks [ 133 ]. The second proposition, that emotional displays are right-hemisphere dominant, has also been criticized with the argument that the left hemifacial dominance in emotion production may be a function of non-emotional peripheral factors. For example, if the two hemifaces differ in the degree of muscular activity, the hemiface with greater mobility might be perceived as more emotionally expressive. But the role of the peripheral factors in the production and judgment of neutral expression in comparison to emotion expression is significantly reduced. Yet the resting left hemiface is judged either more happy [ 135 ] or miserable [ 32 ] than the right hemiface. In one study, Mandal, Asthana, Madan, and Pandey [ 81 ] examined the asymmetrical nature of the resting (neutral) face by preparing hemifacial composites, left-left, right-right, and a normal facial orientation. The left-side facial composites were found to be more emotional than the right-side or normal facial orientations of neutral expressions. These two propositions suggest that in face-to-face interactions the dominant side of the face does not fall into the dominant visual-field of the perceiver. Other researchers have also tested similar face-to-face situations (for example [ 118 ]) and have examined the impact of lateralization of facial expression on the attribution of personality [ 71 ], and facial attractiveness [ 146 ]. For instance, Asthana and Mandal [ 4 ] tested a speculation that the mirror-reversal of a facial expression would be perceived as more intense in comparison to its normal orientation because in such a case the hemiface (left), dominant for emotion expression, will be processed by the side of a hemisphere (right) that determines judgment about a whole face in a free-viewing condition. As predicted, expressions in the mirror-reversed orientation were perceived as more intense than those in the normal orientation. Based on these findings, Asthana & Mandal suggested two possibilities as to why the emotional tone in the left hemiface eludes day-to-day notice. First, “we learn in the course of human development to civilize intense emotional expressions . . . by the side of the face (right) which is more under the voluntary motor control of the [left] cerebral hemisphere.” Alternatively, “we evolve a strategy in the course of civilization to process the emotionally pronounced side of the face (left) by the hemisphere side (left) that largely mediates cognitive ability. . . (p. 117)”. These speculations were, however, made based on evidence drawn under laboratory conditions. Further studies are needed to substantiate these views with more recent methodologies involving visual scan paths. Taken together, these studies suggest that although some components of facial emotion are more biologically governed, others are moderated to great extent by cultural experience. Undeniably, therefore, these two components develop an interface to facilitate social communication. Relatively less theoretical energy has been expended to examine the reciprocal nature of the biological and cultural components of facial expressions of emotion. But the literature does provide evidence upon which such a theory can be built. For example, neuropsychological research has shown that the two sides of the human face are not equally expressive, and that ‘asymmetrical facial expressions have some relationship to the functional asymmetry of the brain’ [ 140 ]. The right side of a face (controlled by the left hemisphere that primarily mediates cognitive behavior) offers socially appropriate clues whereas its left side (controlled by the right hemisphere that primarily mediates emotional processes) divulges hidden personalized feelings (see for example [ 4 ]). This proposition was originally made by Wolff [ 144 ] who suggested that the left side of the face expresses more personalized, hidden and unconscious content while the right side of face reveals more social, explicit and conscious content of personality (see also [ 118 ]). Support for the differential hemispheric involvement in facial expression is drawn from both clinical as well as experimental studies. Neuroanatomically, the left side of the face is motorically governed by the right side of the brain (via contralateral fibre connections), which is relatively specialized for processing of emotions; the left side of the brain, which is relatively specialized for cognitive processing, governs the right side of face. Buck [ 28 ] and Tucker [ 138 ] also suggest that the right hemisphere is associated with emotional processes and the left hemisphere with the control (i.e., facilitation, inhibition) of these processes as per the socially approved rules. Given such evidence, one may argue that the left in comparison to the right side of the face should be more emotional, uninhibited and culture-specific. Expressions of the right side of face, on the other hand, should be pancultural, and should exhibit emotional expressions in accordance with universal norms. Universal expressions are expected to be displayed by the right side of face due to greater voluntary motor control which is contralaterally connected with the relatively less emotional side of the cerebral hemisphere (left) for the facility of social interaction [ 4 ]. Two recent studies were conducted that examined this claim. In one study, hemifacial composite photos (left-left, right-right, and normal orientation) of three cultures - Japanese, Oriental Indian, and North American - displaying six emotions happy, sad, fear, anger, surprise, disgust, and a neutral state - were judged by Indian observers for distinctiveness of expression. The findings suggest that facial emotions were displayed in a universal manner; however, there was a subtle difference in the hemifacial involvement of expression. Although North Americans showed left hemifacial bias for all emotions, Japanese showed a right hemifacial bias for positive and left hemifacial bias for negative emotions. Negative emotional expressions were least distinctly identifiable in Japanese faces, followed by Indian and North American faces [ 85 ]. In another study, the in-group advantage in emotion judgment was examined as a function of the hemifacial differences in expressions. Participants from the USA, India, and Japan judged facial expressions from all three cultures in a balanced design. The right-right facial composites, in comparison to the left-left composites, yielded more cross-cultural agreement. More specifically, the in-group advantage was greater for the left-left than the right-right composites. These findings suggest that the left side of the face has an expressive style that is more culture-specific and less universal [52]. These studies do not conclusively prove that the two hemifaces differ as a function of the differential influence of biology and culture. A host of factors may influence facial asymmetry including anatomical, neurological, psychological, pathological, and socio-cultural factors [ 140 ]. More studies are needed to examine the theory proposed above that control for variables such as hemiface size, developmental changes, age, sex, etc. Such studies will pave the way towards the development of cross-cultural neuropsychology [ 2 ] in the communication and experience of emotion. Cross-cultural neuropsychology is an emerging discipline that examines behavioral neuroscience within a cultural context. Behavioral neuroscience explores the biological bases of behavior by drawing from the fields of neurospsychology, neurophysiology, psychopharmacology, neuroanatomy and neuroendocrinology. Cultural psychology, on the other hand, understands behavior from the interdisciplinary perspectives of anthropology, behavioral ecology and social and developmental psychology. The interest in examining cultural issues in cognitive neuropsychological performance has generated a great deal of research, for example, the influence of language [ 1,139 ], literacy [3], socio-educational factors [ 103 ], and cultural norms [ 27 ]; for details see Ardila [ 4 ]. Very few attempts have been made, nevertheless, to examine the relationship between culture and the neuropsychology of emotion. We suggest that examining laterality effects in cross-cultural studies of facial expressions of emotion will advance our understanding of both the communication and the construction of emotion. Acknowledgement Preparation of this article was supported by a Fulbright Visiting Lecturer Grant to MKM at Harvard University, USA to the first author and a NSF Presidential Early Career Award to the second author. Correspondence concerning this article may be addressed to Manas K. Mandal, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology – Kharagpur – 721302, India. The authors thankfully acknowledge the help of Hari O. Sharma in preparation of this article. [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] MEDIATORS INFLAMMATION World Journal Hindawi Publishing Corporation ht p:/ Practice Hindawi Publishing Corporation ht p:/ Hindawi Publishing Corporation ht p:/ Hindawi Publishing Corporation ht p:/ Journal of Disease Markers Hindawi Publishing Corporation ht p:/ Immunology Research PPAR Research Hindawi Publishing Corporation ht p:/ Submit your manuscr ipts Obesity Endocrin ology BioMed Journal of Ophthalmology Hindawi Publishing Corporation ht p:/ Stem Cells International Hindawi Publishing Corporation ht p:/ Evidence-Based Complementary Alternative Medicine and Hindawi Publishing Corporation ht p:/ Hindawi Publishing Corporation ht p:/ Journal of Oncology Disease Computatio nal and Mathematical Methods Behavioural Neurology AIDS Oxidative [1] M. Albert and L. Obler , The bilingual brain , Academic Press: New York, 1978 . [2] A. Ardila , Towards a cross-cultural neuropsychology , Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 19 ( 1995 ), 237 - 249 . [3] A. Ardila , O. Ardila , M.P. Bryden , F. Ostrosky , M. Rosselli and R. Steenhuis , Effects of cultural background and education on handedness , Neuropsychologia 27 ( 1989 ), 893 - 897 . [4] H.S. Asthana and M.K. Mandal , Mirror-reversal of a face is perceived as expressing emotions more intensely , Behaviour Neurology 9 ( 1996 ), 115 - 117 . [5] H.S. Asthana and M.K. Mandal , Hemiregional variations in facial expression of emotions , British Journal of Psychology 88 ( 1997 ), 519 - 525 . [6] H.S. Asthana and M.K. Mandal , Hemifacial asymmetry in emotion expression, Behavior Modification (Special Issue: Facial expression of emotions) 22 ( 1998 ), 177 - 183 . [7] H.S. Asthana and M.K. Mandal , Visual-field bias in the judgment of facial expression of emotion , The Journal of General Psychology 128 ( 2001 ), 21 - 29 . [8] J.R. Averill , The structural bases of emotional behaviour: A metatheoretical analysis , in: Emotion , Sage, M.S. Clark, ed., Newbury Park, CA, 1992 . [9] J. Baribeau , R. Guerette and C. Braun , Hemifacial production of posed emotional expression in normal men and women, Paper presented at the meeting of The International Neuropsychological SocietyWashington , D.C., 1987 . [10] A.M. Bihrle , H.H. Brownell , J.A. Powelson and H. Gardner , Comprehension of humorous and nonhumorous materials by left and right brain-damaged patients , Brain and Cognition 5 ( 1986 ), 399 - 411 . [11] J.C. Borod , Interhemispheric and intrahemispheric control of emotion : A focus on unilateral brain damage , Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 60 ( 1992 ), 339 - 348 . [12] J.C. Borod , Cerebral mechanisms underlying facial, prosodic and lexical emotional expression: A review of neuropsychological studies and methodological issues , Neuropsychology 7 ( 1993 ), 445 - 463 . [13] J.C. Borod , The neuropsychology of emotion , Oxford University Press, New York, 2001 . [14] J.C. Borod , R.L. Bloom , A.M. Brickman , L. Nakhutina and E.A. Curko , Emotional processing deficits in individuals with unilateral brain damage , Applied Neuropsychology 9 ( 2002 ), 23 - 36 . [15] J.C. Borod and H.S. Caron , Facedness and emotion related to lateral dominance, sex, and expression type , Neuropsychologia 18 ( 1980 ), 237 - 242 . [16] J.C Borod , C.S. Haywood and E. Koff , Neuropsychological aspect of facial asymmetry during emotional expression: A review of the normal adult literature , Neuropsychology Review 7 ( 1997 ), 41 - 60 . [17] J.C Borod , J. Kent , E. Koff , C. Martin and M. Alpert , Facial asymmetry while posing positive and negative emotions. Support for the right hemisphere hypothesis , Neuropsychologia 26 ( 1988 ), 759 - 764 . [18] J.C. Borod and E. Koff, The neuropsychoogy of emotion. Evidence from normal, neurological and psychiatric populations, in: Integrating theory and practice in clinical neuropsychology , E. Perecman, ed., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1989 . [19] J.C. Borod and E. Koff , Lateralization for facial emotional behavior : A methodological perspective , International Journal of Psychology 25 ( 1990 ), 157 - 177 . [20] J.C. Borod , E Koff , M.P. Lorchand and M. Nicholas , The expression and perception of facial emotion in brain-damaged patients , Neuropsychologia 24 ( 1986 ), 169 - 180 . [21] J.C. Borod , L.H. Pick , S. Hall , M. Slivinski , N. Madigan , L.K. Obler , J. Wekowitz , E. Canino, H.M. Erhan , M. Goral , C. Morrison and M. Takert , Relationships among facial prosodic and lexical channels of emotional perceptual processing , Cognition and Emotion 14 ( 2000 ), 193 - 212 . [22] J.D. Boucher and G.E. Carlson , Recognition of facial expression in three cultures , Journal of Cross- cultural Psychology 11 ( 1980 ), 263 - 280 . [23] D. Bowers , R.M. Bauer , H.B. Coslett and K.M. Heilman , Processing of face by patients with unilateral hemisphere lesion , Brain and Cognition 4 ( 1985 ), 258 - 272 . [24] D. Bowers , R.M. Bauer and K.M. Heilman , The nonverbal affect lexicon: Theoretical perspectives from neuropsychological studies of affect perception , Neuropsychology 7 ( 1993 ), 433 - 444 . [25] R. Bruyer , Asymmetry of facial expression in brain-damaged subjects , Neuropsychologia 19 ( 1981 ), 615 - 624 . [26] M.P. Bryden , Laterality: Hemispheric specialization in intact brain , Academic Press, New York, 1982 . [27] M.P. Bryden , Handedness and cerebral organization: data from clinical and normal populations, in: Duality and unity of the brain , D. Ottoson, ed., Macmillan Press, Houndmills, 1987 , pp. 55 - 70 . [28] R. Buck , The communication of emotion , Guilford Press, New York, 1984 . [29] R. Buck and R.J. Duffy , Non-verbal communication of affect in brain-damaged subjects , Cortex 16 ( 1980 ), 351 - 362 . [30] H.A. Butchel , F. Campari , C. DeRisio and R. Rotal , Hemispheric differences in discriminative reaction time to facial expressions , Italian Journal of Psychology 5 ( 1978 ), 159 - 169 . [31] J.T. Cacioppo and R.E. Petty , Lateral asymmetry in the expression of cognition and emotion , Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 7 ( 1981 ), 333 - 341 . [32] R. Campbell , Asymmetries in interpreting and expressing posed facial expression , Cortex 14 ( 1978 ), 327 - 342 . [33] R. Campbell , Left handers' smiles: Asymmetries in the projection of a posed expression , Cortex 14 ( 1979 ), 571 - 579 . [34] R. Campbell , Asymmetries in moving faces, British Journal of Psychology 73 ( 1982 ), 95 - 103 . [35] S. Charbonneau , B.P. Scherzer , D. Aspirot and H. Cohen , Perception and production of facial and prosodic emotions by chronic CVA patients , Neuropsychologia 41 ( 2003 ), 605 - 613 . [36] M. Cicone , W. Wapner and H. Gardner , Sensitivity to emotional expressions and situations in organic patients , Cortex 16 ( 1980 ), 158 . C.R. Darwin , The expression of the emotion in man and animals , Chicago: University of Chicago (original work published 1872 ). C. Darwin , The expression of the emotion in man and animals , Murray, London, 1872 . R.J. Davidson , Affect, cognition, and hemispheric specialization, in: Emotions, cognition, and behaviour, C.E. Izard, J. Kagan and R. Zajonc, eds, Cambridge Press, Cambridge, 1984 . Molfese and S.J . Segalowitz eds, Guilford, New York, 1988 . R.J. Davidson and A.J. Tomarken , Laterality and emotion: an electrophysiological approach , in: Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 3 ), F. Boller and J. Grafman, eds, Elsevier, North Holland, 1989 . W. Dopson , B. Beckwith , D.M. Tucker and P. Bullard-Bates , Asymmetry of facial expression in spontaneous emotion , Cortex 20 ( 1984 ), 243 - 252 . P. Ekman , Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotions , in: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, J.R. Cole , ed., University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska, 1972 . P. Ekman , Emotion in the human face , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982 . P. Ekman and W.V. Friesen , Constant across cultures in the face and emotion , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17 ( 1971 ), 124 - 129 . Tzavaras , Universals and cultural differences in the judgements of facial expressions of emotion , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 ( 1987 ), 712 - 717 . P. Ekman , J.C. Hager and W.V. Friesen , The symmetry of emotional and deliberate facial actions , Psychophysiology 18 ( 1981 ), 101 - 105 . P. Ekman and H. Oster , Facial expressions of emotion, Annual Review of Psychology 30 ( 1979 ), 527 - 554 . P. Ekman , E.R. Sorenson and W.V. Friesen , Pan-cultural elements in facial display of emotion , Science 164 ( 1969 ), 86 - 88 . H.A. Elfenbein and N. Ambady , On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis , Psychological Bulletin 128 ( 2002a ), 203 - 235 . H.A. Elfenbein and N. Ambady , Is there an in-group advantage in emotion recognition? Psychological Bulletin 128 ( 2002b ), 243 - 249 . H.A. Elfenbein , M.K. Mandal , N. Ambady , S. Harizuka and S. Kumar , Hemifacial differences in the in-group advantage in emotion recognition, Cognition and Emotion ( 2003 ), in press. N.L. Etcoff , Selective attention to facial identity and facial emotion , Neuropsychologia 22 ( 1984 ), 281 - 295 . N.L. Etcoff , Asymmetries in recognition of emotion, in: Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 3 ), F. Boller and J. Grafman, eds, Elsevier, North Holland, 1989 . A.P. Fiske , S. Kitayama , H.R. Markus and R.E. Nisbett , The Cultural Matrix of Social Psychology, in: The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th Ed., (Vol. 2 ), D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske and G. Lindzey, eds, McGraw-Hill , Boston, 1998 , pp. 915 - 981 . [56] N.H. Frijda , The emotions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986 . [57] G. Gianotti , Emotional behavior and hemispheric side of the lesion , Cortex 8 ( 1972 ), 41 - 55 . [58] J.C. Hager and P. Ekman , The asymmetry of facial actions is inconsistent with models of hemispheric specialization , Psychophysiology 22 ( 1985 ), 307 - 318 . [59] R.G. Harper , A.N. Wiens and J.D. Matarazzo , Nonverbal communication: The state of the art , John Wiley, New York, 1978 . [60] K.M. Heilman and D. Bowers , Neuropsychological studies of emotional changes induced by right and left hemispheric studies, in: Psychological and biological approaches to emotion , N.L. Stein , B. Leventhal and T. Trabasso, eds, Guilford Press, New York, 1990 . [61] K.M. Heilman , D. Bowers , L. Speedie and H.B. Coslett , Comprehension of affective and nonaffective prosody , Neurology 34 ( 1984 ), 917 - 921 . [62] W. Heller , The Neuropsychology of emotion: Developmental patterns and expression of emotion in right handers and left handers , Neuropsychologia 19 ( 1990 ), 263 - 273 . [63] W. Heller and J. Levy , Perception and expression of emotion in right - handers and left-handers , Neuropsychologia 19 ( 1981 ), 263 - 272 . [64] J.B. Hellige , Hemispheric asymmetry, Annual Review of Psychology 41 ( 1990 ), 55 - 80 . [65] M.J. Hoptman and J. Levy , Perceptual asymmetries in left and right handers for cartoon and real faces , Brain and Cognition 8 ( 1988 ), 178 - 188 . [66] T. Indersmitten and R.C. Gur , Emotion processing in chimeric faces: hemispheric asymmetries in expression and recognition of emotions , Journal of Neuroscience 23 ( 2003 ), 3820 - 3825 . [67] C.E. Izard, The face of emotion, Appleton-Century- Crofts , New York, 1971 . [68] J. Kent , J. Borod , E. Woff , J. Welkowitz and M. Alpert , Posed facial emotional expression in brain-damaged patients , International Journal of Neuroscience 43 ( 1988 ), 81 - 87 . [69] B. Kolb and L. Taylor , Neocortical substrates of emotional behaviour, in: Psychological and biological approaches to emotion , N.L. Stein , B. Leventhal and T. Trabasso, eds, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1990 . [70] W.J. Kop , H. Merckelbach and P. Muris , Unilateral contraction of facial muscles and emotion: A failed replication , Cortex 27 ( 1991 ), 101 - 104 . [71] R. Kowner , Laterality in facial expression and its effect on attributions of emotion and personality: A reconsideration , Neuropsychologia 33 ( 1995 ), 539 - 559 . [72] K. Kucharska-Pietura , M.L. Phillips , W. Gernand and A.S. David , Perception of emotions from faces and voices following unilateral brain damage , Neuropsychologia 41 ( 2003 ), 1082 - 1090 . [73] E. Ladavas , The development of facedness, Cortex 18 ( 1982 ), 535 - 545 . [74] R. Lazarus , Emotion and adaptation, Oxford University Press, New York, 1991 . [75] R.G. Ley and H.P. Bryden , Hemispheric differences in processing emotions and faces , Brain and Language 7 ( 1979 ), 127 - 138 . [76] S. Magnussen , B. Sunde and S. Dyrnes , Patterns of perceptual asymmetry in processing facial expression , Cortex 30 ( 1994 ), 215 - 229 . [77] M.K. Mandal , H.S. Asthana and S. Maitra , Right hemisphere damage impairs the ability to process emotion expression of unusual face , Behavior Modification 22 ( 1998 ), 167 - 176 . [78] M.K. Mandal , H.S. Asthana and R. Pandey , Asymmetry in emotional face: Its role in intensity of emotion , Journal of Psychology 129 ( 1995 ), 235 - 241 . [79] M.K. Mandal , H.S. Asthana and S.C. Tandon , Judgement of facial expression of emotion in unilateral brain-damaged patients , Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 8 ( 1993 ), 171 - 183 . [80] M.K. Mandal , H.S. Asthana , C.B. Dwivedi and M.P. Bryden , Hand preference in the deaf , Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 11 ( 1999 ), 265 - 273 . [81] M.K. Mandal , H.S. Asthana , S. Madan and R. Pandey , Hemifacial display of emotion in the resting face , Behavioural Neurology 5 ( 1992 ), 169 - 171 . [82] M.K. Mandal , J.C. Borod , H.S. Asthana , A. Mohanty , S. Mohanty and E. Koff , Hemiregional variations in the processing of dimensions of emotion , Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 187 ( 1999 ), 603 - 609 . [83] M.K. Mandal , M.P. Bryden and M.B. Bulman-Fleming , Similarities and variations in facial expression of emotions: Cross-cultural evidence , International Journal of Psychology 31 ( 1996 ), 49 - 58 . [84] M.K. Mandal , M.B. Bulman-Fleming and G. Tiwari , Side bias: A neuropsychological perspective , The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000 . [85] M.K. Mandal , S. Harizuka , B. Bhushan and R.C. Mishra , Cultural variation in hemifacial asymmetry of emotion expressions , British Journal of Social Psychology 40 ( 2001 ), 385 - 398 . [86] M.K. Mandal , A. Mohanty , R. Pandey and S. Mohanty , Emotion- specific processing deficit in focal brain-damaged patients , International Journal of Neuroscience 84 ( 1996 ), 87 - 95 . [87] M.K. Mandal and S.K. Singh , Lateral asymmetry in identification and expression of facial emotions , Cognition and Emotion 4 ( 1990 ), 61 - 70 . [88] M.K. Mandal , S.C. Tandon and H.S. Asthana , Right brain damage impairs recognition of negative emotions , Cortex 27 ( 1991 ), 247 - 254 . [89] H.R. Markus and S. Kitayama , Culture and self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation , Psychological Review 98 ( 1991 ), 224 - 253 . [90] C.C. Martin , J.C. Borod , M. Alpert , A. Brozgold and J. Welkowitz , Spontaneous expression of facial emotion in schizophrenic and right brain-damaged patients , Journal of Communication Disorders 23 ( 1990 ), 287 - 301 . [91] F.T. McAndrew , A cross-cultural study of recognition thresholds for facial expression of emotion , Journal of Crosscultural Psychology 17 ( 1986 ), 221 - 224 . [92] W.F. McKeever and M.S. Dixon , Right- hemisphere superiority for discriminatory memorized from non- memorized faces: Affective imagery, sex and perceived emotionality effects , Brain and Language 12 ( 1981 ), 246 - 260 . [93] B. Mesquita and N.H. Frijda , Cultural Variations in Emotions: A Review, Psychological Bulletin 112 ( 1992 ), 197 - 204 . [94] B. Mesquita , N.H. Frijda and K.R. Scherer , Culture and Emotion, in: Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, (Vol. 2 ), J.W. Berry , P.R. Dasen and T.S. Sarawasthi, eds, Allyn and Bacon , Boston, 1997 . [95] A. Miehlke , Surgery of the facial nerve , W.B. Saunders , Philadelphia, PA, 1973 . [96] L. Monserrat , Facial asymmetry in the spontaneous expression of emotion: An index of functional brain asymmetry in the regulation of emotional expression , Unpublished Doctoral Disseration , New York University, New York, 1984 . [97] C.R. Moreno , J.C. Borod , J. Welkowitz and M. Alpert , Lateralization for the expression and perception of facial emotion as a function of age , Neuropsychologia 27 ( 1990 ), 199 - 209 . [98] M. Moscovitch and J. Olds , Asymmetries in spontaneous facial expressions and their possible relation to hemispheric specialization , Neuropsychologia 20 ( 1982 ), 71 - 81 . [99] M. Natale , R.E. Gur and R.C. Gur , Hemispheric asymmetries in processing emotional expressions , Neuropsychologia 21 ( 1983 ), 555 - 565 . [100] M.E. Nicholls , B.J. Wolfgang , D. Clode and A.K. Lindell , The effect of left and right poses on the expression of facial emotion , Neuropsychologia 40 ( 2002 ), 1662 - 1665 . [101] T. Niit and J. Valsiner , Recognition of facial expressions: An experimental investigation of Ekman's model , Acta et Commentationes Universitatis arvensis 429 ( 1977 ), 85 - 107 . [102] P. Noller , Video primacy: A further look , Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 9 ( 1985 ), 28 - 47 . [103] F. Ostrosky , E. Canseco , L. Quintanar , E. Navarro and A. Ardila , Sociocultural effects in neuropsychological assessment , International Journal of Neuroscience 27 ( 1985 ), 53 - 66 . [104] A. Ortony and T. Turner , What's basic about basic emotions? Psychological Review 97 ( 1990 ), 315 - 331 . [105] K. Patterson and J. Bradshaw, Differential hemispheric mediation of nonverbal visual stimuli , Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1 ( 1975 ), 246 - 252 . [106] P. Reuter-Lorenz and R.J. Davidson, Differential contribution of the two cerebral hemispheres to the perception of happy and sad faces , Neuropsychologia 19 ( 1981 ), 609 - 613 . [107] P. Reuter-Lorenz , R.P. Givis and M. Moscovitch , Hemispheric specialization and the perception of emotion: Evidence from right -handers and from inverted and noninverted left handers , Neuropsychologia 21 ( 1983 ), 687 - 692 . [108] W.E. Rinn, The neuropsychology of facial expression: A review of the neurological and psychological mechanisms for producing facial expressions , Psychological Bulletin 95 ( 1984 ), 52 - 77 . [109] W.E. Rinn , C. Friedman and P. Meller , An investigation of personality correlates of lateral gaze preference and facial asymmetry, A paper presented at the meeting of the The International Neuropsychological Society , Pittsburg, USA, 1982 . [110] R. Rosenthal , J.A. Hall , M.R. DiMatteo , P.L. Rogers and D. Archer , Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS test , Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1979 . [111] E. Ross, The aprosodias , Archives of Neurology 38 ( 1981 ), 561 - 569 . [112] E. Ross and M.M. Mesulam , Dominant language functions of the right hemisphere prosody and emotional gesturing , Archives of Neurology 36 ( 1979 ), 144 - 148 . [113] J.A. Russell , Is there Universal recognition of emotion from facial expressons: A review of the cross-cultural studies , Psychological Bulletin 115 ( 1994 ), 102 - 141 . [114] J.A. Russell , J-A. Bachorowski and J-M. Fernandez-Dols , Facial and vocal expressions of emotion , Annual Review of Psychology 54 ( 2003 ), 329 - 349 . [115] H.A. Sackeim , M. Greenberg , A. Weiman , R.C. Gur , J. Hunger-buhler and N. Geschwind, Functional brain asymmetry in the expression of positive and negativeemotions. Lateralization of insults in cases of uncontrollable emotional outbursts , Archives of Neurology 19 ( 1982 ), 210 - 218 . [116] H.A. Sackeim and D.M. Grega , Perceiver bias in the processing of deliberately asymmetric emotional expressions , Brain and Cognition 6 ( 1987 ), 464 - 473 . [117] H.A. Sackeim and R.C. Gur , Lateral asymmetry in intensity of emotional expression , Neuropsychologia 16 ( 1978 ), 473 - 481 . [118] H.A. Sackeim , R.C. Gur and M.C. Saucy , Emotions are expressed more strongly on the left side of the face , Science 202 ( 1978 ), 434 - 435 . [119] H.A. Sackeim , A.L. Weiman and B.D. Forman , Asymmetry of the face at rest: Size, area, and emotional expression , Cortex 20 ( 1984 ), 165 - 178 . [120] E. Sapir , Speech as a personality trait , American Journal of Sociology 32 ( 1927 ), 892 - 905 . [121] K.R. Scherer , On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach , in: Approches to emotion, K.R. Scherer and P. Ekman, eds, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1984 . [122] K.R. Scherer , The role of culture in emotion-antecedent appraisal , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73 ( 1997 ), 902 - 922 . [123] B.B. Schiff and M. Lamon , Inducing emotion by unilateral contraction of facial muscles: A new look at hemispheric specialization and the experience of emotion , Neuropsychologia 27 ( 1989 ), 923 - 935 . [124] K.L. Schmidt and J.F. Cohn , Human facial expressions as adaptations: Evolutionary questions in facial expression , Yearbook of physical anthropology 44 ( 2001 ), 3 - 24 . [125] G.E. Schwartz , G.L. Ahern and S. Brown , Lateralized facial muscles response to positive and negative emotional stimuli , Psychophysiology 16 ( 1979 ), 561 - 571 . [126] S.R. Schweinberger , L.M. Baird , M. Bluemler , J.M. Kaufman and B. Mohr , Interhemispheric cooperation for face recognition but not for affective facial expressions , Neuropsychologia 41 ( 2003 ), 407 - 414 . [127] C. Semenza , M. Pasini , M. Zettin , P. Tonin and P. Portolan , Right hemisphere patients' judgments on emotions , Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 74 ( 1986 ), 43 - 50 . [128] J. Sergent , Some theoretical and methodological issues in neuropsychological research , in: Handbook of Neuropsychology, (Vol. 1 ), F. Boller and J. Grafman, eds, Elsevier, North-Holland, 1988 . [129] E.K. Silberman and H. Weingartner , Hemispheric lateralization of functions related to emotion , Brain and Cognition 5 ( 1986 ), 322 - 353 . [130] A. Sirota and G.E. Schwartz , Facial muscle patterning and lateralization during elation and depression imagery , Journal of Abnormal Psychology 91 ( 1982 ), 25 - 34 . [131] M. Skinner and B. Mullen , Facial asymmetry in emotional expression: A meta-analysis of research , British Journal of Social Psychology 30 ( 1991 ), 113 - 124 . [132] E.R. Sorenson , Culture and the expression of emotion , in: Psychological anthropology, T.R. Williams, ed., Aldine , Chicago, 1975 . [133] E. Strauss and E. Kaplan , Lateralized asymmetries in selfperception, Cortex 16 ( 1980 ), 289 - 293 . [134] E. Strauss and M. Moscovitch , Perception of facial expression , Brain and Language 13 ( 1981 ), 308 - 332 . [135] P. Stringer and P. May , Attributional asymmetries in the perception of moving, static, chimeric, and hemisected faces , Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 5 ( 1980 ), 238 - 252 . [136] S.S. Tomkins , Affect, imagery, consciousness, (Vol. 1 ), The positive affects Springer, New York, 1962 . [137] J.L. Tsai , Y. Chentsova-Dutton , L.H. Friere-Bebau and D. Przymus , Emotional expression and physiology in European Americans and among Americans, Emotion 2 ( 2002 ), 380 - 397 . [138] D.M. Tucker , Lateral brain function, emotion and conceptualization , Psychological Bulletin 89 ( 1981 ), 19 - 46 . [139] J. Vaid , Language processing in bilinguals: Psycholinguistic and neuropsychological perspectives . Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1986 . [140] R.S. Van Gelder and J.C. Borod , Neurobiological and cultural aspects of facial asymmetry , Journal of Communication Disorders 23 ( 1990 ), 273 - 286 . [141] G. Vingerhoets , C. Berckmoes and N. Stroobant , Cerebral hemodynamics during discrimination of prosodic and semantic emotion in speech studied by transcranial doppler ultrasonography , Neuropsychology 17 ( 2003 ), 93 - 99 . [142] C.Y. Wemple , M.A. Safer and C.T. Notarious , Display rules and facial expression: intensity, asymmetry and type, Paper presented at the Convention of the American Psychological Association , Washington, D.C., 1986 . [143] B.E. Wexler , Cerebral laterality and psychiatry: A review of literature , American Journal of Psychiatry 137 ( 1980 ), 279 - 291 . [144] W. Wolff , The experimental study of forms of expression , Character and Personality 2 ( 1933 ), 168 - 173 . [145] S. Yecker , J.C. Borod , A. Brozgold , C. Martin , M. Alpert and J. Welkowitz , Lateralization of facial emotional expression in schizophrenic and depressed patients , Journal of Neuropsy chiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 11 ( 1999 ), 370 - 379 . [146] D.W. Zaidel , A.C. Chen and C. German , She is not a beauty even when she smiles: possible evolutionary basis for a relationship between facial attractiveness and hemispheric specialization , Neuropsychologia 33 ( 1995 ), 649 - 655 . [147] M.A. Za ´rate , J.D. Sanders and A.A. Garza , Neurological disassociations of social perception processes , Social Cognition 18 ( 2000 ), 223 - 251 . Volume 2014 Volume 2014

This is a preview of a remote PDF:

Manas K. Mandal, Nalini Ambady. Laterality of Facial Expressions of Emotion: Universal and Culture-Specific Influences, Behavioural Neurology, DOI: 10.1155/2004/786529