Using learning design as a framework for supporting the design and reuse of OER

Journal of European Psychology Students, May 2008

The paper will argue that adopting a learning design methodology may provide a vehicle for enabling better design and reuse of Open Educational Resources (OERs). It will describe a learning design methodology, which is being developed and implemented at the Open University in the UK. The aim is to develop a 'pick and mix' learning design toolbox of different resources and tools to help designers/teachers make informed decisions about creating new or adapting existing learning activities. The methodology is applicable for designers/teachers designing in a traditional context – such as creation of materials as part of a formal curriculum, but also has value for those wanting to create OERs or adapt and repurpose existing OERs. With the increasing range of OERs now available through initiatives as part of the Open Courseware movement, we believe that methodologies, such as the one we describe in this paper, which can help guide reuse and adaptation will become increasingly important and arguably are an important aspect of ensuring longer term sustainability and uptake of OERs. Our approach adopts an empirically based approach to understanding and representing the design process. This includes a range of evaluation studies (capturing of case studies, interviews with designers/teachers, in-depth course evaluation and focus groups/workshops), which are helping to develop our understanding of how designers/teachers go about creating new learning activities. Alongside this we are collating an extensive set of tools and resources to support the design process, as well as developing a new Learning Design tool that helps teachers articulate and represent their design ideas. The paper will describe how we have adapted a mind mapping and argumentation tool, Compendium, for this purpose and how it is being used to help designers and teachers create and share learning activities. It will consider how initial evaluation of the use of the tool for learning design has been positive; users report that the tool is easy to use and helps them organise and articulate their learning designs. Importantly the tool also enables them to share and discuss their thinking about the design process. However it is also clear that visualising the design process is only one aspect of design, which is complex and multi-faceted. Editors: Alexandra Okada (Open University, UK). Reviewers: Teresa Conolly (Open University, UK), Rose Luckin (Institute of Education, UK), and Alexandra Okada (Open University, UK)

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

http://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2008-5/galley/336/download/

Using learning design as a framework for supporting the design and reuse of OER

Articles Using learning design as a framework for supporting the design and reuse of OER Authors: Gráinne Conole , Institute of Educational Technology, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA X close Martin Weller Institute of Educational Technology, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA X close Abstract The paper will argue that adopting a learning design methodology may provide a vehicle for enabling better design and reuse of Open Educational Resources (OERs). It will describe a learning design methodology, which is being developed and implemented at the Open University in the UK. The aim is to develop a 'pick and mix' learning design toolbox of different resources and tools to help designers/teachers make informed decisions about creating new or adapting existing learning activities. The methodology is applicable for designers/teachers designing in a traditional context – such as creation of materials as part of a formal curriculum, but also has value for those wanting to create OERs or adapt and repurpose existing OERs. With the increasing range of OERs now available through initiatives as part of the Open Courseware movement, we believe that methodologies, such as the one we describe in this paper, which can help guide reuse and adaptation will become increasingly important and arguably are an important aspect of ensuring longer term sustainability and uptake of OERs. Our approach adopts an empirically based approach to understanding and representing the design process. This includes a range of evaluation studies (capturing of case studies, interviews with designers/teachers, in-depth course evaluation and focus groups/workshops), which are helping to develop our understanding of how designers/teachers go about creating new learning activities. Alongside this we are collating an extensive set of tools and resources to support the design process, as well as developing a new Learning Design tool that helps teachers articulate and represent their design ideas. The paper will describe how we have adapted a mind mapping and argumentation tool, Compendium, for this purpose and how it is being used to help designers and teachers create and share learning activities. It will consider how initial evaluation of the use of the tool for learning design has been positive; users report that the tool is easy to use and helps them organise and articulate their learning designs. Importantly the tool also enables them to share and discuss their thinking about the design process. However it is also clear that visualising the design process is only one aspect of design, which is complex and multi-faceted. Editors: Alexandra Okada (Open University, UK). Reviewers: Teresa Conolly (Open University, UK), Rose Luckin (Institute of Education, UK), and Alexandra Okada (Open University, UK) Keywords: e-learning ,   IMS learning design ,   Learning Design ,   mind mapping ,     How to Cite: Conole, G. & Weller, M., (2008). Using learning design as a framework for supporting the design and reuse of OER. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 2008(1), p.Art. 5. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/2008-5 286 Views 104 Downloads 6 Citations   Published on 09 May 2008 Peer Reviewed  CC BY 4.0 Using learning design as a framework for supporting the design and reuse of OER Gr‡inne Conole and Martin Weller The Institute of Educational Technology, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA UK http://iet.open.ac.uk Abstract: The paper will argue that adopting a learning design methodology may provide a vehicle for enabling better design and reuse of Open Educational Resources (OERs). It will describe a learning design methodology, which is being developed and implemented at the Open University in the UK. The aim is to develop a ‘pick and mix’ learning design toolbox of different resources and tools to help designers/teachers make informed decisions about creating new or adapting existing learning activities. The methodology is applicable for designers/teachers designing in a traditional context - such as creation of materials as part of a formal curriculum, but also has value for those wanting to create OERs or adapt and repurpose existing OERs. With the increasing range of OERs now available through initiatives as part of the Open Courseware movement, we believe that methodologies, such as the one we describe in this paper, which can help guide reuse and adaptation will become increasingly important and arguably are an important aspect of ensuring longer term sustainability and uptake of OERs. Our approach adopts an empirically based approach to understanding and representing the design process. This includes a range of evaluation studies (capturing of case studies, interviews with designers/teachers, in-depth course evaluation and focus groups/worksh (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: http://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2008-5/galley/336/download/

Gráinne Conole, Martin Weller. Using learning design as a framework for supporting the design and reuse of OER, Journal of European Psychology Students, 2008, pp. Art. 5, Volume 2008, Issue 1, DOI: 10.5334/2008-5