Complexity and action for warped AdS black holes
Journal of High Energy Physics
September 2018, 2018:13 | Cite as
Complexity and action for warped AdS black holes
AuthorsAuthors and affiliations
Roberto AuzziStefano BaigueraMatteo GrassiGiuseppe NardelliNicolò Zenoni
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
First Online: 04 September 2018
Received: 26 June 2018
Accepted: 29 August 2018
26 Downloads
Abstract
The Complexity=Action conjecture is studied for black holes in Warped AdS3 space, realized as solutions of Einstein gravity plus matter. The time dependence of the action of the Wheeler-DeWitt patch is investigated, both for the non-rotating and the rotating case. The asymptotic growth rate is found to be equal to the Hawking temperature times the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy; this is in agreement with a previous calculation done using the Complexity=Volume conjecture.
Keywords AdS-CFT Correspondence Black Holes
ArXiv ePrint: 1806.06216
Download to read the full article text
Notes
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
References
[1]
S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
[2]
H. Casini, M. Huerta and R.C. Myers, Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 05 (2011) 036 [arXiv:1102.0440] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
[3]
A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy, JHEP 08 (2013) 090 [arXiv:1304.4926] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
[4]
J.D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333 [INSPIRE].
[5]
J.M. Bardeen, B. Carter and S.W. Hawking, The four laws of black hole mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys. 31 (1973) 161 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
[6]
J.M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in Anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04 (2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]
T. Hartman and J. Maldacena, Time evolution of entanglement entropy from black hole interiors, JHEP 05 (2013) 014 [arXiv:1303.1080] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
[8]
L. Susskind, Computational complexity and black hole horizons, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 24 [Addendum ibid. 64 (2016) 44] [arXiv:1403.5695] [INSPIRE].
[9]
L. Susskind, Entanglement is not enough, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 49 [arXiv:1411.0690] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
[10]
R. Jefferson and R.C. Myers, Circuit complexity in quantum field theory, JHEP 10 (2017) 107 [arXiv:1707.08570] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
[11]
S. Chapman, M.P. Heller, H. Marrochio and F. Pastawski, Toward a definition of complexity for quantum field theory states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 121602 [arXiv:1707.08582] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]
K. Hashimoto, N. Iizuka and S. Sugishita, Time evolution of complexity in Abelian gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 126001 [arXiv:1707.03840] [INSPIRE].
[13]
R.-Q. Yang, C. Niu, C.-Y. Zhang and K.-Y. Kim, Comparison of holographic and field theoretic complexities for time dependent thermofield double states, JHEP 02 (2018) 082 [arXiv:1710.00600] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
[14]
R. Khan, C. Krishnan and S. Sharma, Circuit complexity in fermionic field theory, arXiv:1801.07620 [INSPIRE].
[15]
L. Hackl and R.C. Myers, Circuit complexity for free fermions, JHEP 07 (2018) 139 [arXiv:1803.10638] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]
P. Caputa et al., Liouville action as path-integral complexity: from continuous tensor networks to AdS/CFT, JHEP 11 (2017) 097 [arXiv:1706.07056] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
[17]
A. Bhattacharyya et al., Path-integral complexity for perturbed CFTs, JHEP 07 (2018) 086 [arXiv:1804.01999] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]
B. Swingle, Entanglement renormalization and holography, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 065007 [arXiv:0905.1317] [INSPIRE].
[19]
R.-Q. Yang et al., Axiomatic complexity in quantum field theory and its applications, arXiv:1803.01797 [INSPIRE].
[20]
K. Hashimoto, N. Iizuka and S. Sugishita, Thoughts on holographic complexity and its basis-dependence, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 046002 [arXiv:1805.04226] [INSPIRE].
[21]
D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Complexity and shock wave geometries, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 126007 [arXiv:1406.2678] [INSPIRE].
[22]
A.R. Brown et al., Holographic complexity equals bulk action?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 191301 [arXiv:1509.07876] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]
A.R. Brown et al., Complexity, action and black holes, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 086006 [arXiv:1512.04993] [INSPIRE].
[24]
G. Hayward, Gravitational action for spac (...truncated)