Naturwissenschaften: recent advances, changes and challenges

The Science of Nature, Jan 2012

Sven Thatje

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00114-011-0876-y.pdf

Naturwissenschaften: recent advances, changes and challenges

Sven Thatje 0 ) National Oceanography Centre , Southampton, European Way, University of Southampton, Ocean and Earth Science , Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK - In this editorial, I want to take the opportunity to summarise some of the key developments in Naturwissenschaften (NAWI) over the past 3 years and since the beginning of my tenure as editor in chief of the journal. Furthermore, I wish to raise awareness of some new changes to manuscript formats and promote the recently launched Concepts & Synthesis article section in NAWI. NAWI has undergone a series of structural changes since early 2009, which, in particular, addressed article types and formats (Thatje 2009). The loyal reader of the journal will have noticed that overall manuscripts have become more concise and that the editors have continuously encouraged authors to make use of Electronic Supplementary Material (ESM). ESM comprises information on, e.g. detailed methodological descriptions essential to the very specialist academic but not necessary for the more general reader to understand the main scientific message(s) proposed in an article. Overall, articles have therefore become shorter in length and more accessible; however, it has to be recognised that the various scientific disciplines represented by a multidisciplinary journal such as NAWI often demand flexibility in the text allowance of scholarly works. This means that although strict length limits as outlined in the instructions for authors are generally enforced, flexibility is given where appropriate. Recently, the instructions for authors have been revised again, and new length restrictions are requested for Review articles as well as Short Communications. Review manuscript length should not exceed 50 manuscript pages including everything from the title page to the last figure, and may include up to seven figures and/or tables. Short Communications are now limited to a maximum of 2,500 words including everything from the title to the last reference, and may include a maximum of three figures and 30 references. This is in order to truly distinguish this article type from longer formats published. What makes a Short Communication is often difficult to assess. In the current academic environment in which scientists are under pressure of publishing rapidly and frequently (Thatje 2010), journal editors are challenged by a flood of rather short incoming manuscripts for consideration as Short Communications. Often, such manuscripts reflect on limited data that do not make a full story for an Original Article and are therefore submitted as a shorter publication. In the current academic system in which not only the quality but also an aspect of quantity decides an academics future, the scientist alone is probably not to blame. However, the value of such contributions can be of controversy and a problem in quality assessment, and therefore often requires discussion among editors in order to distinguish between what is valuable for a particular research area, and what is simply not yet there. The Comments & Replies section introduced during 2009 can now be regarded as an established discussion forum in NAWI. Although the journal is not inundated with such discussions to date, those manuscripts that have been published provide a valuable contribution to assessing divergent views on a topic. I am keen on seeing this area develop further as I personally believe that overall, there is not enough open discussion of science in the literature these days. I now welcome the introduction of a new paper format in NAWI, the Concepts & Synthesis article. This article type in NAWI aims to promote the conceptual advance of ideas from manuscript submission to first decision are extremely swift, thanks to joint effort taken by board members and NAWI main office. The journal has achieved a very competitive position in the pace of publishing scholarly work online. This is despite increasing the number of reviews per submitted manuscript to a minimum of three. It took me some time to understand why this strategy had worked out so well in comparison to other publishers and I have come to the conclusion that it is the frequent and direct communication with both authors and reviewers that speeds up handling time and assessment processes of manuscripts. In 2013, NAWI will celebrate 100 years of existence. The journal has been a continuous promoter of the whole breadth of the natural sciences throughout its long history. Today, scientific publishing has probably reached unprecedented levels of competition and much of this is driven by the rapid development of electronic communication tools, such as online and open access publishing, and the rapid dissemination of knowledge through the worldwide web. The success of some more recently launched journals that have exclusively embarked on electronic publishing has to be recognised, and it is well possible that within a few years, the print format of journals may be a stor (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00114-011-0876-y.pdf

Sven Thatje. Naturwissenschaften: recent advances, changes and challenges, The Science of Nature, 2012, pp. 1-2, Volume 99, Issue 1, DOI: 10.1007/s00114-011-0876-y