Impacts and management of common buzzards Buteo buteo at pheasant Phasianus colchicus release pens in the UK: a review

European Journal of Wildlife Research, Jan 2015

In the UK, alongside an expanding common buzzard population, there is increasing concern of raptor predation at pheasant release pens. Historically, losses of poults to raptor predation has been low, commonly (90 % of shoots) ≤1 % of birds released into pens, representing a small percentage of losses relative to all causes of mortality. A small number of shoots did suffer higher losses, estimated at >5 % at one in 30 estates and >10 % at some estates. Predation was lower (i) with increased poult age at release, (ii) in later releases, (iii) in pens with good vegetative cover, (iv) in pens within woods <50 acres and (v) in releases of <500 birds; there were also indications that predation was greater in high-density releases. Studies found no evidence for indirect losses (i.e. non-predation impacts of raptor activity, e.g. panic-induced smothering events). Mitigation measures include the following: (i) sufficient vegetative cover (supplemented if necessary, e.g. brash piles), (ii) minimise perching opportunities for raptors, (iii) stock older poults, (iv) stock at recommended densities, (v) reflective tape and scaring devices and (vi) diversionary feeding. Significant gaps in knowledge were identified, including (i) predation being incompletely evaluated in the context of contemporary buzzard populations, (ii) indirect effects not adequately studied, (iii) occurrence of ‘problem’ individual buzzards is unclear, (iv) adequate field trials of mitigation measures are lacking and (v) level of gamekeepers’ adherence to industry recommendations not known. Contemporary studies of these issues are necessary to understand the impacts and to inform management of buzzards at pheasant release pens.

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10344-014-0893-1.pdf

Impacts and management of common buzzards Buteo buteo at pheasant Phasianus colchicus release pens in the UK: a review

0 ) National Wildlife Management Centre, Animal & Plant Health Agency , Sand Hutton, York YO41 1LZ , UK In the UK, alongside an expanding common buzzard population, there is increasing concern of raptor predation at pheasant release pens. Historically, losses of poults to raptor predation has been low, commonly (90 % of shoots) 1 % of birds released into pens, representing a small percentage of losses relative to all causes of mortality. A small number of shoots did suffer higher losses, estimated at >5 % at one in 30 estates and >10 % at some estates. Predation was lower (i) with increased poult age at release, (ii) in later releases, (iii) in pens with good vegetative cover, (iv) in pens within woods <50 acres and (v) in releases of <500 birds; there were also indications that predation was greater in high-density releases. Studies found no evidence for indirect losses (i.e. nonpredation impacts of raptor activity, e.g. panic-induced smothering events). Mitigation measures include the following: (i) sufficient vegetative cover (supplemented if necessary, e.g. brash piles), (ii) minimise perching opportunities for raptors, (iii) stock older poults, (iv) stock at recommended densities, (v) reflective tape and scaring devices and (vi) diversionary feeding. Significant gaps in knowledge were identified, including (i) predation being incompletely evaluated in the context of contemporary buzzard populations, (ii) indirect effects not adequately studied, (iii) occurrence of 'problem' individual buzzards is unclear, (iv) adequate field trials of mitigation measures are lacking and (v) level of gamekeepers' adherence to industry recommendations not known. Contemporary studies of these issues are necessary to understand the impacts and to inform management of buzzards at pheasant release pens. - The potential role of predators, real or perceived, as limiting factors of prey populations (Sih et al. 1985; Newton 1993, 1998) has created a number of human-wildlife conflicts (Graham et al. 2005; Thirgood et al. 2005). Conflict occurs where different groups of stakeholders disagree over the management of a species and is frequently manifest in respect to predator species whose populations are, or were formerly, threatened, or are species considered to be charismatic or iconic (Manosa 2002; Woodroffe et al. 2005). For birds of prey, there are long-standing conflicts with gamebird, poultry and other livestock interests, and more recently in respect to avian species of conservation concern (JNCC 2000; Thompson et al. 2003; Valkama et al. 2005; Gibbons et al. 2007). In most European regions, gamebird hunting is an important socioeconomic activity in rural areas (Manosa 2002; Vinuela and Arroyo 2002). Hunting may also be potentially beneficial to biodiversity, by promoting conservation and management of habitats within a strategy of conservation through wise use of natural resources. However, in some cases, there may be conflicts between hunting and the conservation of biodiversity, which appears when hunting is nonsustainable and intensive and, particularly, when predators are subjected to illegal killing with the purpose of maximising game numbers. Predators (including raptors) are perceived within a large part of the hunting sector as an important limiting factor for small game populations, and thus as an enemy of hunters, in some cases leading to illegal control of protected species. As a result of such illegal activities, the protectionist movement sometimes perceives hunting as a detrimental activity for conservation. Conflict between the desire to maintain the economic and conservation benefits of gamebird shooting and the legal requirements and aesthetic appeal of conserving raptors is manifest across Europe (Manosa 2002; Stroud 2003). In the UK, during the nineteenth and twenteenth centuries, as a consequence of persecution, egg-collection and organochlorine pesticide poisoning, most raptor populations suffered dramatic declines, with a number driven to extinction (JNCC 2000). Subsequent recoveries of some species populations, through reduced persecution, a ban on organochlorine pesticides and protective wildlife legislation, are regarded as a major conservation success (JNCC 2000; Greenwood et al. 2003). The existence, however, of contemporary healthy and in some cases abundant raptor populations, such as the buzzard, has intensified conflict between conservationists and other stakeholders that utilise prey species. For wild avian prey, the existence of high levels of predation may not be sufficient to demonstrate that predation is imposing a detrimental impact at the population level (Newton 1998; Park et al. 2005; Gibbons et al. 2007). Predators may be taking similar numbers of birds that may have died from other causes anyway (Errington 1956; Newton 1993; Newton et al. 1997). In addition, many species have evolved to cope with high levels of predation (Stoate and Thomson 1999; Gibbons et al. 2007). For popu (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10344-014-0893-1.pdf

Dave Parrott. Impacts and management of common buzzards Buteo buteo at pheasant Phasianus colchicus release pens in the UK: a review, European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2015, pp. 181-197, Volume 61, Issue 2, DOI: 10.1007/s10344-014-0893-1