Psychometric properties of the Chalder Fatigue Scale revisited: an exploratory structural equation modeling approach

Quality of Life Research, Feb 2015

Objective Previous validation studies of the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS) suffer methodological shortcomings. The present study aimed to re-evaluate its psychometric properties using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). Methods A Chinese sample of 1259 community-dwelling residents completed the 11-item Chinese CFS and a variety of health measures (anxiety, depression, exhaustion, sleep disturbance, and quality of life). In addition to traditional confirmatory factor analysis, ESEM was performed to assess the fit of two- and three-factor models using robust maximum likelihood estimation and oblique geomin rotation. Convergent validity of the CFS was examined via associations with five covariates (gender, age, exercise, perceived health, and life event) and the health measures in the ESEM model. Results The ESEM models displayed a superior fit to confirmatory factor models. The three-factor ESEM model showed a satisfactory model fit to the data but not for the two-factor model. The three factors were physical fatigue (three items, α = .800), low energy (four items, α = .821), and mental fatigue (four items, α = .861). The factors exhibited convergent validity with the model covariates and health measures. Conclusion The results demonstrate the satisfactory reliability and convergent validity for the three-factor structure of the CFS as a valid measure of fatigue symptoms in the general population. Future psychometric studies could adopt the ESEM approach as a practical alternative to traditional confirmatory factor analysis.

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11136-015-0944-4.pdf

Psychometric properties of the Chalder Fatigue Scale revisited: an exploratory structural equation modeling approach

Psychometric properties of the Chalder Fatigue Scale revisited: an exploratory structural equation modeling approach Ted C. T. Fong 0 1 2 Jessie S. M. Chan 0 1 2 Cecilia L. W. Chan 0 1 2 Rainbow T. H. Ho 0 1 2 Eric T. C. Ziea 0 1 2 Vivian C. W. Wong 0 1 2 Bacon F. L. Ng 0 1 2 S. M. Ng 0 1 2 0 E. T. C. Ziea V. C. W. Wong B. F. L. Ng Chinese Medicine Department, Hong Kong Hospital Authority , Hong Kong , China 1 J. S. M. Chan C. L. W. Chan R. T. H. Ho S. M. Ng (&) Department of Social Work and Social Administration , Jockey Club Tower, The Centennial Campus , The University of Hong Kong , Pokfulam, Hong Kong , China 2 T. C. T. Fong R. T. H. Ho Centre on Behavioral Health, The University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong , China Objective Previous validation studies of the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS) suffer methodological shortcomings. The present study aimed to re-evaluate its psychometric properties using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). Methods A Chinese sample of 1259 community-dwelling residents completed the 11-item Chinese CFS and a variety of health measures (anxiety, depression, exhaustion, sleep disturbance, and quality of life). In addition to traditional confirmatory factor analysis, ESEM was performed to assess the fit of two- and three-factor models using robust maximum likelihood estimation and oblique geomin rotation. Convergent validity of the CFS was examined via associations with five covariates (gender, age, exercise, perceived health, and life event) and the health measures in the ESEM model. Results The ESEM models displayed a superior fit to confirmatory factor models. The three-factor ESEM model showed a satisfactory model fit to the data but not for the two-factor model. The three factors were physical fatigue (three items, a = .800), low energy (four items, a = .821), and mental fatigue (four items, a = .861). The factors exhibited convergent validity with the model covariates and health measures. Conclusion The results demonstrate the satisfactory reliability and convergent validity for the three-factor structure of the CFS as a valid measure of fatigue symptoms in the general population. Future psychometric studies could adopt the ESEM approach as a practical alternative to traditional confirmatory factor analysis. Chinese; Chronic fatigue; Convergent validity; Cross-loadings; Factor structure - Chronic fatigue is a symptom commonly reported by patients in primary care practice and by the general population, with prevalence of 11.3 % among British primary care patients [1] and of 10.7 % among the general population of Hong Kong [2]. Patients with relapsing and unexplained fatigue that persists for at least 6 months are said to suffer from chronic fatigue syndrome. This debilitating syndrome is associated with significant disability in the functioning capacity of the cognitive and psychosocial domains [3]. The 11-item Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS) [4, 5] was developed as an assessment tool for fatigue in both general and clinical populations [6, 7]. The scale has shown adequate degrees of reliability and convergent validity [5, 8, 9]. Regarding the factor structure of the CFS, a two-factor structure was originally proposed [4]. Despite some empirical support for the two-factor structure [8, 10], previous validation studies of the CFS suffer methodological shortcomings. First, most of these studies adopted the outdated principal component analysis and varimax rotation approaches. Principal component analysis does not distinguish shared variance from unique variance [11] and is a biased estimator in factor analysis [12]. The unrealistic orthogonal factors resulting from varimax rotation likely lead to distorted factor structures [12]. The Kaisers criterion of retaining factors with eigenvalues that exceed one is known to be unreliable and biased. The frequent use of these outdated approaches diminishes the credibility of these results on the factor structure of the CFS. Second, Wong and Fielding [13] applied confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to evaluate the factor structure of the CFS in a Chinese sample. They compared the fit of a twofactor correlated model with a two-factor model with a second-order factor (see their Fig. 1, p. 91). Although they claimed to successfully replicate the original two-factor structure by showing a superior model fit for the latter model, the second-order factor model with only two firstorder factors was actually statistically unidentified and addition of a second-order factor should not result in a decrease in model Chi-square. It remains open to question whether their findings replicated the original two-factor model or provided evidence in support of a three-factor model. Given the methodological limitations of the existing validation studies, there is a clear need for systematic psychometric analysis on this widely used scale. Traditional CFA has been criticized for being overly restrictive in fixing all cross-loadings to zero [14]. The (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11136-015-0944-4.pdf

Ted C. T. Fong, Jessie S. M. Chan, Cecilia L. W. Chan, Rainbow T. H. Ho, Eric T. C. Ziea, Vivian C. W. Wong, Bacon F. L. Ng, S. M. Ng. Psychometric properties of the Chalder Fatigue Scale revisited: an exploratory structural equation modeling approach, Quality of Life Research, 2015, pp. 2273-2278, Volume 24, Issue 9, DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-0944-4