“Repaglinid”

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Jul 2015

European Patent Convention, Art. 56 Patent Act, Sec. 4

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs40319-015-0362-8.pdf

“Repaglinid”

Advantages of the invention to which a person skilled in the art would not have addressed his efforts for the further development of the state of the art because it was only thanks to the invention that it became apparent that they could be achieved cannot determine the technical problem underlying the invention (the object of the invention). Depending on the characteristics of the field of technology and the circumstances of the individual case, the pursuit of each of several different approaches to solving the problem can be obvious. Object of the invention; Advantages of the invention; Several different approaches to solving the problem (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs40319-015-0362-8.pdf

European Patent Convention, Art. 56 Patent Act, Sec. 4. “Repaglinid”, IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2015, pp. 595, Volume 46, Issue 5, DOI: 10.1007/s40319-015-0362-8