A Blueprint to Address Research Gaps in the Development of Biomarkers for Pediatric Tuberculosis

Clinical Infectious Diseases, Sep 2015

Childhood tuberculosis contributes significantly to the global tuberculosis disease burden but remains challenging to diagnose due to inadequate methods of pathogen detection in paucibacillary pediatric samples and lack of a child-specific host biomarker to identify disease. Accurately diagnosing tuberculosis in children is required to improve case detection, surveillance, healthcare delivery, and effective advocacy. In May 2014, the National Institutes of Health convened a workshop including researchers in the field to delineate priorities to address this research gap. This blueprint describes the consensus from the workshop, identifies critical research steps to advance this field, and aims to catalyze efforts toward harmonization and collaboration in this area.

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/61/suppl_3/S164.full.pdf

A Blueprint to Address Research Gaps in the Development of Biomarkers for Pediatric Tuberculosis

CID A Blueprint to Address Research Gaps in the Development of Biomarkers for Pediatric Tuberculosis Mark Patrick Nicol () 0 Devasena Gnanashanmugam 0 Renee Browning 0 Eleanor S. Click 0 Luis E. Cuevas 0 Anne Detjen 0 Steve M. Graham 0 Michael Levin 0 Mamodikoe Makhene 0 Payam Nahid 0 Carlos M. Perez-Velez 0 Klaus Reither 0 Rinn Song 0 Hans M. L. Spiegel 0 Carol Worrell 0 Heather J. Zar 0 Gerhard Walzl 0 0 Anzio Road, Observatory , Cape Town, 7925 South Africa Childhood tuberculosis contributes significantly to the global tuberculosis disease burden but remains challenging to diagnose due to inadequate methods of pathogen detection in paucibacillary pediatric samples and lack of a child-specific host biomarker to identify disease. Accurately diagnosing tuberculosis in children is required to improve case detection, surveillance, healthcare delivery, and effective advocacy. In May 2014, the National Institutes of Health convened a workshop including researchers in the field to delineate priorities to address this research gap. This blueprint describes the consensus from the workshop, identifies critical research steps to advance this field, and aims to catalyze efforts toward harmonization and collaboration in this area. - tuberculosis; children; diagnosis; biomarker; blueprint. Childhood tuberculosis is estimated to account for 6% of the tuberculosis caseload globally, and for 4%–21% of the caseload in the 22 high-incidence countries that account for 80% of global tuberculosis cases [1]. Mathematical modeling suggests that only 35% of tuberculosis cases in children are detected [2]. Improving the accuracy of tuberculosis diagnosis in children is required to improve case detection and outcomes, surveillance, efficiency of healthcare delivery, future research, and effective advocacy. However, attaining an accurate diagnosis in children in tuberculosis-endemic settings remains challenging. There is overlap of the clinical presentation of tuberculosis with other common childhood diseases such as pneumonia, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)– associated lung disease, and severe malnutrition [3]. Clinical and chest radiographic features are often nonspecific and subject to variable interpretation [4]. Structured diagnostic scoring systems based on clinical and radiological findings and tuberculin skin testing show high variability in case yield, with poor agreement between scoring systems [5]. Microbiological confirmation is possible in children of all ages, but is rarely attempted due to perceived difficulties in obtaining respiratory specimens and because both culture [6] and automated real-time nucleic acid amplification tests are only positive in a proportion of children who have been clinically diagnosed with tuberculosis [7– 9]. Current diagnostics that measure immunological responses following infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis have uncertain sensitivity and are unable to distinguish active tuberculosis from latent tuberculosis [10]. The clinical distinction between latent and active tuberculosis is unlikely to be dichotomous, especially following recent infection—a common scenario in children. In 2014, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of the United States convened a group of panelists to develop a blueprint for the process of discovery and implementation of new diagnostic biomarkers for pediatric tuberculosis. In the 19th century, a “blueprint” was a reproduction of a technical drawing through a contact print process on light-sensitive sheets that allowed the rapid and accurate reproduction of documents but was unable to reproduce color or shades of gray. This article shares several similarities with the original blueprint method, inasmuch as it builds on existing efforts for pediatric diagnostic biomarker discovery, qualification, validation, and implementation, but does not dictate the exact approach in view of the rapidly changing technological, regulatory, and health implementation realities. The blueprint presented here outlines the issues facing the field of pediatric tuberculosis biomarker development and is aligned with the Stop TB Partnership and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Roadmap for Tuberculosis Research [11]. The blueprint covers the following critical steps: The target audience for this article includes researchers, healthcare providers, funding agencies, and regulatory bodies, in an effort to coordinate and streamline the challenging process of pediatric tuberculosis diagnostic biomarker discovery, validation, qualification, and implementation. CONSENSUS STATEMENT PREPARATION Wide consultation was sought in the development of this blueprint with input from international experts from relevant clinical, basic science, public health and regulatory fields, and other stakeholders. Among the panelists specifically included were pediatric tuberculosis clinicians, tuberculosis researchers, HIV research network representatives, ethicists, representatives from research funding agencies, and individuals from nongovernmental, advocacy, and community research organizations. Panelists were invited to a workshop entitled “Pediatric Tuberculosis: Addressing Research Gaps in Diagnostic TB Biomarkers” organized by the NIH in Bethesda, Maryland, in May 2014. Prior to the workshop, conference calls were held to identify key questions for discussion at the workshop. A table summarizing existing pediatric (and major adult) specimen repositories was developed (Table 1). During the workshop, there were timed discussions, including break-out groups, with statement modification in real time. The statements were reviewed in the subsequent plenary sessions. Agreement was reached by consensus or by vote. The consensus questions covered 3 key areas relating to pediatric tuberculosis biomarker research: 1. What are the criteria for the optimal pediatric tuberculosis biomarkers? 2. What are the challenges and sustainability issues for a pediatric tuberculosis specimen repository? 3. What are the custodianship, ownership, legal, regulatory, and policy issues relating to such repositories? This document, which captures the consensus from the workshop, aims to generate further discussion about pediatric tuberculosis biomarker research, and to catalyze efforts toward harmonization and collaboration. An NIH-sponsored Pediatric TB Biomarker Working Group has been established to assist in moving this process forward. THE CHARACTERISTICS OF AN “IDEAL” BIOMARKER FOR TUBERCULOSIS IN CHILDREN A biomarker (or set of biomarkers) that could be used to develop an accurate test for tuberculosis in a child would ideally fulfill the following requirements: Measurable in a readily obtainable matrix such as blood (eg, by fingerstick), urine, stool, saliva, buccal mucosal transudates, or exhaled air given the challenges in obtaining respiratory specimens from infants and young children (<5 years). Identify M. tuberculosis with high sensitivity and specificity, independent of age, nutritional status, or HIV status as the cause of, or contributing factor to, the current illness in children presenting clinically with pulmonary or extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Distinguish between children with latent tuberculosis (including children with latent tuberculosis who have respiratory symptoms due to another pathogen) and those with active tuberculosis disease. Suitable for incorporation into a diagnostic platform that would provide a rapid, accurate result at, or close to, the point of care. G G 4 iaon frch ltah P tho enw and nep aeh ityn B r u ls e d re re ()2 um sae H il e e m rto h v v d m n e e C e e n o o n R ) s s a c c P y5 uS 300 tac ite , n m (n n< )(1 = r ine laeb l,ye top rne re th (n the fd bo ilk ym ild lihd iw TB fru sa rp un as ch ry r s e ito tn ) ,s eo ve ire rfcneee laepm irsoepo llreonm (tsyep IttasuV iitvsoP itaegn liilacn tacgoe B ) s Td (2 s a ), r I aw t d e r B o B ,a la e d c e s o T , T tce an tan r irz sae re ,ve lbe lbe B sse yhL ifrc ,M sp se co the ego id ltu iit ab is -T ae lt A ya u s s n a h n o so o is e t e )S ca TB fru tac TB (cu po rp p n d h u K o w g o (2 lt s id lm ,s du sae con sce )C g so as a r e ly pu se :a e y l H in s e a s is h od -H d re is w lt c C d lt a n lu g d , r ) m fo is TB be le tu tu d o T u o h F B p s – m lo rs T s e itru rcu rke lodo nee lbo ,)w inQ li(,n ,ne ),n irn so eb am be gX leo TA od seb itgo ieg tu on Tu io t o C B lho (PA hw (ED lbo tu m a s n p n B ta ion r f sc –T ro U fo seo ,try its m od ne ,th n n s e o itu lo e ,) a s aep itco ase voP iang rso be gX se sm ab rou A iD D no lho (PA tub lap sw C W tae ,) ); P um irp (t2 l(2 on i.nn .sn illeE .ccd ian )v :N , tu as tse too reu (gR ilred ;)ud c9@ ivnC .cdgo rue TB tde re )tn )(2 sp irc lt Mcep ,trp iap te de tsa itrng ,)(s2 ltcu )(1 onS ch@ .rde (oe eK c@ cu rt hoo irtca irasp cdu ),g ,)s ien ITG ldoo inn gno rava likc );v z1 ITG peX (ssu c p a in (2 (2 ru Mb R S h C go (vb I in -6 TB ta s e s C r d lp l ge G fo , , re a llahen ltaehH rrakse l,saapm ,RCAN .tsoMltsseo i,tse saedm trcTen itryo C l p s tc C s G G 4 l r iltyogoE lirohdC TB lage ryange ,asb tuuom ii(rtfae ;csase llifaud l),ung asse , lung sy iaon frch ltah l,odo ryanh rahop )sPOw scped irscap tuum lrupe lyson (tcse irenu treom ipoeb re um sae eH lbe spo o / u ts sp l),y se irap l,)y tsm led ltuu ho an and (PN ind ag no on (ca as on po ne c l itrcTB ),tube ,rum ,ttaan lage ryange ,asb i,rtae l ia e rn n a w p o d od ne ,s e ry h s s o e p a p ) a t aP lob eg am su ph roo /PO irtc ,se e lhoe (PXA lasp FTQ asno and (PN asg iru y n n K T D en , tu in ed ra ic (E le g m u r t n itra od ho XA reu sp ,bu lcee lom sen d lo w (P s d a s u eP -be ,)e do ,)e ceu sw l,o rap icm T l :tLew re rrke@ .)rog trahe /rs ;fro I as a .as a@ .)zca ca rk a as e fe ras TV om irb om irb .ta n B (LB rae &H eS eA SA Th cS (t s u t a i h c c o d . . r a a c n a @ a a@ irtn irn .ta an rhe lz irb ib a ta c m G la ,) c r K K u S .sc ), ( @ fau :ts w a a g g F In i G G 4 PRIORITIES FOR PEDIATRIC TUBERCULOSIS BIOMARKER DEVELOPMENT/VALIDATION search were identified: ed) should be considered top priority. should be given to young children aged 0–5 years who are firmation of disease is most challenging. nostic challenges highlighted above. plification (NAAT) technologies include the development of molecular detection of small fragments of tuberculosis-specific transrenal DNA [17, 18] and fluorogenic enzymatic tests for the specific detection of BlaC [19]. The latter is a highly conserved the potential for diagnostics based on miRNA profiles in reported that specific miRNAs show the potential to discriminate infected from healthy individuals, and active from latent infection, and to be useful for monitoring response to treatment [20]. Similarly, pediatric studies have demonstrated that genomewide host transcriptional RNA signatures in blood can distinguish tuberculosis from other diseases and from latent tuberculosis infection, and that risk scores based on gene expression may be useful for ruling out tuberculosis [21]. It has also been recently shown that a T-cell activation marker present on circulating M. tuberculosis–specific T cells can discriminate active from latent infection in children [22]. Given the rapid emergence of new technologies, there is a need to better define the strategy for biomarker selection and validation. KEY DESIGN FEATURES FOR BIOMARKER STUDIES Diagnostic studies in children should be standardized with regard to the key elements of study design such as eligibility criteria, radiological and microbiological assessments, specimen collection and storage, data collection and analysis, clinical care, and clinical case definitions. The Pediatric TB Biomarker Working Group is currently developing consensus guidelines in this regard. Case definitions of disease should preferably follow the NIH consensus definitions for diagnostic study categories for intrathoracic tuberculosis [23], which have recently been revised to define 3 categories of tuberculosis disease: (1) confirmed tuberculosis (microbiologically confirmed); (2) unconfirmed tuberculosis (formerly possible or probable tuberculosis); (3) unlikely tuberculosis [24]. Ideally, prospective cohort studies with adequate follow-up to monitor response to therapy should be undertaken to enable accurate, standardized collection of data and specimens. However, leveraging existing cohorts and biorepositories from wellcharacterized cohorts (eg, Table 1) will also be of considerable value. Children with a wide range of symptoms and clinical manifestations should be included in studies to cover the full spectrum of tuberculosis disease. Studies should be done in different epidemiological settings that include a broad range of frequent nontuberculosis conditions (eg, malnutrition, HIVassociated infections, bacterial pneumonia, malaria) as differential diagnoses. Detailed historical, clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics should be collected to enable standardized case definitions. A standardized data dictionary and specimen collection template would be useful to enable metaanalysis of data from different studies, cohorts, and repositories, and should be developed by pediatric tuberculosis researchers. Study design should include follow-up of all children, with and without tuberculosis infection or disease, not only to allow collection of sequential specimens, but also to strengthen the case definitions for tuberculosis, by evaluating response to therapy in children treated or not treated for tuberculosis. The suggested follow-up times for children treated for tuberculosis disease include visits at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 6 months or treatment completion and a visit at 2 months for children not treated for tuberculosis disease. COLLECTION AND STORAGE OF SUITABLE SPECIMENS A key component of study design is the choice of specimen type and collection method. Specimens should be collected bearing in mind that both pathogen and host biomarker detection strategies may be used, including, for example, proteomic, metabolomic, and gene expression profiling. In children with pulmonary tuberculosis, M. tuberculosis has been isolated from a variety of respiratory and alimentary tract specimens, and potential diagnostic biomarkers can also be detected in blood products and urine [7, 8, 21, 25–28]. Selection of the most suitable specimen types for a pediatric tuberculosis diagnostic biomarker study should take into account the issues of feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness, and cost of the collection procedure under programmatic conditions. In general, this would include blood (eg, serum, whole blood for RNA), respiratory specimens (eg, induced or spontaneously expectorated sputum, nasopharyngeal aspirate or swab, gastric aspirate/ lavage, string test), urine, and other extrapulmonary specimens (when clinically indicated). To facilitate comparison of results between biomarker studies and thereby increase their usefulness, it is important to standardize specimen collection, handling, processing, and storage across studies. There are many considerations to take into account to assure standardization. Collection of specimen types should be well documented, including anatomical location (eg, nasopharyngeal/ oropharyngeal/laryngopharyngeal); specimen content (eg, “pure” aspirate vs diluted lavage/wash); collection vehicle (eg, swab tip vs suction catheter); swab type (eg, cotton vs synthetic tip); additives used (eg, antimicrobial agent, nucleic acid stabilizer, buffer); and volume accepted and processed, as volume can significantly impact assay sensitivity. Handling, processing, and storage of specimens vary by type, and considerations for standardization include pH (eg, neutralization based on initial pH); transport time, especially for nonsterile specimens; centrifugation parameters; and refrigeration and storage temperature. Ideally, standard operating procedures for the collection of each specimen type should be collaboratively developed, piloted and refined, and consistently implemented. Stored specimens may be used not only for tuberculosis biomarker discovery and detection, but, as improved diagnostics for other respiratory pathogens become available, may also be tested for such pathogens to improve the specificity of clinical case definitions. Research protocols, reviewed by institutional review boards, need to incorporate specific consent for storage and future testing of samples. DEVELOPING A SUSTAINABLE BIOREPOSITORY The biomarker discovery and validation process would be facilitated by the availability of biorepositories containing wellcharacterized and appropriate pediatric specimens. Given the substantial upfront effort and cost involved in carefully characterizing a symptomatic cohort by clinical criteria and in confirming a case of tuberculosis in a child, it is particularly important to maximize the benefit associated with this initial investment by establishing repositories for pediatric specimens. At present, tuberculosis-specimen biorepositories are focused on samples from adults, or are in the hands of individual investigators (Table 1), with little coordination and standardization. A key outcome of the workshop was an initiative to develop a shared pediatric repository. Key questions in designing a repository are: What is the scientific objective of the work and what are the potential biomarker targets of interest? Scientific objectives, for example, could include discovery of new diagnostics for tuberculosis disease or of markers of treatment response and will guide decisions about whether to focus more on specimen collection at baseline vs longitudinal specimen collection [29]. Biomarker targets of interest will guide decisions about which specimens to collect, how to store specimens, and whether initial processing is required prior to biobanking. Practical questions to be addressed in repository planning are: (1) How many aliquots of each specimen to biobank and in what volume, based on considerations of known vs unknown potential applications, cost, and clinical limitations (eg, blood volume)? (2) Which specimens should be prioritized in case it is not possible to collect all specimens from every participant? and (3) What are the time points for specimen collection during longitudinal sampling? The technical differences between methods used to collect, transport, process, and store specimens in studies may be contributing factors to variation in the published accuracy of diagnostic markers [30]. Data collection and process harmonization are therefore critical for interpretability and comparability of results. Detailed data on the specifics of specimen collection are necessary to determine what potential targets are likely preserved in a sample. Similarly, linkage to clinical metadata is needed to identify the potential suitability of specific samples for studies and the interpretation of study findings. A large challenge to the integrity of repositories is the requirement for meticulous record-keeping. Potential solutions to record-keeping challenges include the use of barcode labeling, electronic databases to indicate the location of each sample and to link sample data to clinical metadata, and segregation of samples by specimen type and aliquot number to facilitate easy access at a later time. As a part of first steps, it was determined at the workshop that a Data Sharing Framework needed to be created with agreedupon standard procedures and pediatric tuberculosis nomenclature, and a Pediatric TB Biomarkers Working Group is being organized by NIH, including the authors of this manuscript, other tuberculosis experts, and microbiologists. This group is currently developing standard nomenclature and operating procedures for pediatric specimen collection. The establishment, maintenance, and custodianship of a biorepository will require dedicated funding. Funding of a biorepository requires careful planning as costs for specimen collection, handling, and processing for long-term storage, and for data management and storage, are often not included in the initial budget of research studies, and specific funding sources are currently limited. Appropriate funders or partners will need to be identified and key partnerships should be sought with existing networks, such as the International Maternal, Pediatric, Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trial Network (IMPAACT) and foundations with experience in running biorepositories, such as the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), as well as potential funders such as the NIH and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Considering that prior experience has shown that the creation and maintenance of such repositories is a large and expensive undertaking, entities such as those listed above could pool resources and each fund parts of the repository creation and maintenance. Funders may be more amenable to provide resources when existing specimens are pooled together in a single repository, as opposed to generating de novo repositories or funding individual repositories. A repository team would be needed to plan the establishment of the repository in detail. This blueprint can be seen as part of the lobbying exercise to facilitate such funding and may stimulate the participation of other collaborators. Funding would have to be for a period of at least 5 years, with clear milestones and deliverables, culminating in a sample release phase during which researchers could apply for sample release to facilitate their test development work. A long-term plan for sustainability should be developed, which may include contributions from researchers wishing to access samples. To encourage investigators to submit specimens to biorepositories, funders could consider making submission of samples a component of funding opportunities or incentivizing submission through the provision of supplementary funding. REGULATORY CHALLENGES FOR PEDIATRIC BIOREPOSITORIES Custodianship of a biorepository involves the provision of careful oversight and management of samples from the point of specimen collection all the way to the research use of biospecimens and the linked data. A plan for selection of an appropriate custodian, with explicit details on the responsibilities, should be developed prior to the launch of a biobanking initiative. Policies need to be in place to safeguard the quality of samples being entered into the repository and their long-term storage. Additionally, policies are needed for the appropriate use of biospecimens and data, while assuring the privacy and confidentiality of participants and their data. Research data standards, such as those provided by the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium [31], along with a data-sharing framework and agreed-upon pediatric tuberculosis nomenclature, should be established as part of the custodianship plan. Local and national regulatory bodies may have restrictions on types of specimens that may be collected as well as the international exchange of samples. Such regulations vary by country, by specimen type (eg, host DNA), and by target patient population (eg, pediatric patients and pregnant women). A well-delineated custodianship plan can help address some of these issues by providing to the local and national regulatory bodies the agreed-upon principles and protocols that govern the biorepository. The National Cancer Institute Best Practices for Biospecimen Resources [32] notes that the “custodian is the trusted intermediary and caretaker of biospecimens and associated data, and the custodian’s caretaking responsibilities should align with applicable ethical and policy standards,” adding that the ideal custodian should be someone other than research investigators or sponsor(s) of the biospecimen resource (eg, a biospecimen resource manager) to eliminate potential conflicts of interest. As part of a governance plan for the biorepository, an organizational structure should be delineated that includes a biorepository team responsible for planning and managing the repository as well as a sample access committee that governs access to samples. These could be modeled on the framework established by CTB2, a project of the TB Alliance, the CDC’s TB Trials Consortium, and the AIDS Clinical Trials Group of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), NIH. This project is collecting high-quality patient specimens in late-stage tuberculosis drug clinical trials where they are linked to detailed, yet anonymized clinical documentation to enable discovery and qualification of biomarkers for clinical development of improved tuberculosis treatments for both drug-sensitive and multidrugresistant tuberculosis (see http://www.tbbiorepository.org/). The sample access committee should include scientists knowledgeable about the research that may arise from the specimens, experienced curators of biorepositories, and experts in epidemiology, biostatistics, and informatics, among other technical consultants. Patient advocates and research participants, where feasible, should be included as members. The governance plan should describe (1) the methods for safeguarding the integrity of the samples and associated data, providing protocols used for biospecimen collection and storage; (2) clear procedures for requesting access to samples and data by investigators; (3) the review process for sample and data requests, assuring that the composition of a review committee that evaluates access requests is aligned with the stated mission/goals of the biobank; (4) policies for the dissemination of results from research that uses the samples; and (5) responsible fiscal planning for the long-term storage of specimens and data, as well as plans for securing future funds to maintain the repository until samples are depleted. Early planning for the custodianship, governance, and sample access mechanisms will help mitigate potential legal, ethical, and regulatory complications that can arise in the future operations of the biorepository. Continued advocacy, collaboration, and communication are needed to ensure the key elements of the blueprint are adopted and implemented. Future pediatric tuberculosis biomarker efforts will require focus on standardization in terms of case definitions, specimen collection methods, and clinical data collection, as well as the adaptability to evaluate new potential biomarkers and technologies. Early inclusion of donors into the discussion should emphasize the need of funding not only for diagnostic development and pediatric cohorts, but also for building and maintaining specimen repositories as part of a larger research network. Developers of new tuberculosis diagnostics should be involved at early stages to consider ways to integrate new biomarkers into already existing, adapted, or new platforms. Given the limited number of pediatric specimens in existing centralized repositories, there is a clear need to continue to enroll children in prospective cohort studies that collect standardized high-quality data and samples and to optimize available resources. Harmonization of specimen collection methods and clinical data collection has begun with the formation of a Pediatric TB Biomarker Working Group and a coordinating committee from the attendees of this workshop, with the goal of having unified standards for evaluating biomarkers from existing and future repositories. Building on newly discovered promising biomarkers and on new technologies with a focus on the clinical challenges in children and the priority areas as identified in this blueprint can serve as the initial stages of tuberculosis diagnostics development. Successful identification of a child-friendly tuberculosis diagnostic biomarker will require input, collaboration, and coordination from many stakeholders, from concept development of the study design to, ultimately, the development of a point-of-care test appropriate for use in those regions with the highest burden of pediatric tuberculosis. Acknowledgments. We thank the following organizations: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); Treatment Action Group, TB/HIV, New York, New York. We thank the following individuals: Sheryl Zwerski, MSN, CRNP, Peter Kim, MD: NIAID, Bethesda, Maryland; Patrick Jean-Philippe, MD, Marco Schito, PhD, Arthur Stone: Henry M. Jackson Foundation– Division of AIDS, Bethesda, Maryland; Lori Dodd, PhD: NIAID, Bethesda, Maryland; Patrick Bossuyt, PhD: Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Martina Casenghi, PhD: Médecins Sans Frontières, Geneva, Switzerland; Maryline Bonnet, MD: Epicentre, Geneva, Switzerland; David Murdoch, MD: University of Otago, Department of Pathology, Christchurch, New Zealand; Lindsay McKenna, MPH; Treatment Action Group, TB/HIV, New York, New York; Elizabeth Talbot, MD: Dartmouth College, Infectious Diseases and International Health, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire. Disclaimer. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC and NIAID. Financial support. This work was supported by NIAID/NIH and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD. This project has also been supported in part with federal funds from the NIAID/NIH, US Department of Health and Human Services (contract no. HHSN272200800014C). Supplement sponsorship. This article appears as part of the supplement “Advances inTuberculosis Research: A Blueprint for Opportunities.” This article was sponsored by the Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health. Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No potential conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed. 1. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2014 . Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2014 : 1 - 289 . 2. Dodd PJ , Gardiner E , Coghlan R , Seddon JA . Burden of childhood tuberculosis in 22 high-burden countries: a mathematical modelling study . Lancet Glob Health 2014 ; 2 : e453 - 9 . 3. Graham SM , Sismanidis C , Menzies HJ , Marais BJ , Detjen AK , Black RE . Importance of tuberculosis control to address child survival . Lancet 2014 ; 383 : 1605 - 7 . 4. Swingler GH , du Toit G , Andronikou S , van der Merwe L , Zar HJ . Diagnostic accuracy of chest radiography in detecting mediastinal lymphadenopathy in suspected pulmonary tuberculosis . Arch Dis Child 2005 ; 90 : 1153 - 6 . 5. Hatherill M , Hanslo M , Hawkridge T , et al. Structured approaches for the screening and diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis in a high prevalence region of South Africa . Bull World Health Organ 2010 ; 88 : 312 - 20 . 6. Marais BJ , Hesseling AC , Gie RP , Schaaf HS , Enarson DA , Beyers N. The bacteriologic yield in children with intrathoracic tuberculosis . Clin Infect Dis 2006 ; 42 : e69 - 71 . 7. Nicol MP , Workman L , Isaacs W , et al. Accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children admitted to hospital in Cape Town, South Africa: a descriptive study . Lancet Infect Dis 2011 ; 11 : 819 - 24 . 8. Bates M , O'Grady J , Maeurer M , et al. Assessment of the Xpert MTB/ RIF assay for diagnosis of tuberculosis with gastric lavage aspirates in children in sub-Saharan Africa: a prospective descriptive study . Lancet Infect Dis 2013 ; 13 : 36 - 42 . 9. Rachow A , Clowes P , Saathoff E , et al. Increased and expedited case detection by Xpert MTB/RIF assay in childhood tuberculosis: a prospective cohort study . Clin Infect Dis 2012 ; 54 : 1388 - 96 . 10. Pollock L , Basu Roy R , Kampmann B. How to use: interferon gamma release assays for tuberculosis . Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2013 ; 98 : 99 - 105 . 11. World Health Organization. An international roadmap for tuberculosis research: towards a world free of tuberculosis . Geneva, Switzerland: WHO , 2011 . 12. Murray CJ , Ortblad KF , Guinovart C , et al. Global , regional, and national incidence and mortality for HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 . Lancet 2014 ; 384 : 1005 - 70 . 13. Pai M , Schito M. Tuberculosis diagnostics in 2015: landscape , priorities, needs, and prospects. J Infect Dis 2015 ; 211 (suppl 2): S21 - 8 . 14. Cepheid . Cepheid, FIND & Rutgers announce collaboration for nextgeneration innovations to game-changing Xpert MTB /RIF test, 2014 . Available at: http://ir.cepheid. com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=878540. Accessed 14 February 2015 . 15. Epistem . Genedrive products, 2015 . Available at: http://www.genedrive. com/store/sales.php?product=3. Accessed 14 February 2015 . 16. TrueLab . Truelab , 2015 . Available at: http://www.molbiodiagnostics. com/molbio_realtime%20micro%20pcr%20system.html. Accessed 14 February 2015 . 17. Petrucci R , Lombardi G , Corsini I , et al. Use of transrenal DNA for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in children: a case of tubercular otitis media . J Clin Microbiol 2015 ; 53 : 336 - 8 . 18. Botezatu I , Serdyuk O , Potapova G , et al. Genetic analysis of DNA excreted in urine: a new approach for detecting specific genomic DNA sequences from cells dying in an organism . Clin Chem 2000 ; 46 ( 8 pt 1 ): 1078 - 84 . 19. Xie H , Mire J , Kong Y , et al. Rapid point-of-care detection of the tuberculosis pathogen using a BlaC-specific fluorogenic probe . Nat Chem 2012 ; 4 : 802 - 9 . 20. Harapan H , Fitra F , Ichsan I , et al. The roles of microRNAs on tuberculosis infection: meaning or myth? Tuberculosis 2013 ; 93 : 596 - 605 . 21. Anderson ST , Kaforou M , Brent AJ , et al. Diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis and host RNA expression in Africa . N Engl J Med 2014 ; 370 : 1712 - 23 . 22. Portevin D , Moukambi F , Clowes P , et al. Assessment of the novel T-cell activation marker-tuberculosis assay for diagnosis of active tuberculosis in children: a prospective proof-of-concept study . Lancet Infect Dis 2014 ; 14 : 931 - 8 . 23. Graham SM , Ahmed T , Amanullah F , et al. Evaluation of tuberculosis diagnostics in children: 1. Proposed clinical case definitions for classification of intrathoracic tuberculosis disease . Consensus from an expert panel . J Infect Dis 2012 ; 205 (suppl 2): S199 - 208 . 24. Graham SM , Cuevas LE , Jean-Philippe P , et al. Clinical case definitions for classification of intrathoracic tuberculosis in children: an update . Clin Infect Dis 2015 ; 61 (suppl 3): S179 - 87 . 25. Nicol MP , Allen V , Workman L , et al. Urine lipoarabinomannan testing for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children: a prospective study . Lancet Glob Health 2014 ; 2 : e278 - 84 . 26. Zar HJ , Workman L , Isaacs W , et al. Rapid molecular diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children using nasopharyngeal specimens . Clin Infect Dis 2012 ; 55 : 1088 - 95 . 27. Nicol MP , Spiers K , Workman L , et al. Xpert MTB/ RIF testing of stool samples for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children . Clin Infect Dis 2013 ; 57 : e18 - 21 . 28. Walters E , Gie RP , Hesseling AC , Friedrich SO , Diacon AH , Gie RP . Rapid diagnosis of pediatric intrathoracic tuberculosis from stool samples using the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay: a pilot study . Pediatr Infect Dis J 2012 ; 31 : 1316 . 29. Nahid P , Saukkonen J , Mac Kenzie WR , et al. CDC/NIH workshop . Tuberculosis biomarker and surrogate endpoint research roadmap . Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011 ; 184 : 972 - 9 . 30. Green C , Huggett JF , Talbot E , Mwaba P , Reither K , Zumla AI . Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis through the detection of mycobacterial DNA in urine by nucleic acid amplification methods . Lancet Infect Dis 2009 ; 9 : 505 - 11 . 31. Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium . CDISC: strength through collaboration . Available at: www.cdisc.org. Accessed 6 March 2015 . 32. Vaught J , Rogers J , Myers K , et al. An NCI perspective on creating sustainable biospecimen resources . J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2011 ; 2011 : 1 - 7 .


This is a preview of a remote PDF: http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/61/suppl_3/S164.full.pdf

Mark Patrick Nicol, Devasena Gnanashanmugam, Renee Browning, Eleanor S. Click, Luis E. Cuevas, Anne Detjen, Steve M. Graham, Michael Levin, Mamodikoe Makhene, Payam Nahid, Carlos M. Perez-Velez, Klaus Reither, Rinn Song, Hans M. L. Spiegel, Carol Worrell, Heather J. Zar, Gerhard Walzl. A Blueprint to Address Research Gaps in the Development of Biomarkers for Pediatric Tuberculosis, Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2015, S164-S172, DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ613