Image Analysis of Soil Micromorphology: Feature Extraction, Segmentation, and Quality Inference

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, Jun 2004

We present an automated system that we have developed for estimation of the bioecological quality of soils using various image analysis methodologies. Its goal is to analyze soilsection images, extract features related to their micromorphology, and relate the visual features to various degrees of soil fertility inferred from biochemical characteristics of the soil. The image methodologies used range from low-level image processing tasks, such as nonlinear enhancement, multiscale analysis, geometric feature detection, and size distributions, to object-oriented analysis, such as segmentation, region texture, and shape analysis.

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1155%2FS1110865704402054.pdf

Image Analysis of Soil Micromorphology: Feature Extraction, Segmentation, and Quality Inference

EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing Image Analysis of Soil Micromorphology: Feature Extraction, Segmentation, and Quality Inference Petros Maragos 0 1 Giorgos B. Stamou 0 1 Vassilis Tzouvaras 0 1 Efimia Papatheodorou 0 School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens , Athens 15773 , Greece 1 Department of Biology, Ecology Division, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki , Thessaloniki 54006 , Greece We present an automated system that we have developed for estimation of the bioecological quality of soils using various image analysis methodologies. Its goal is to analyze soilsection images, extract features related to their micromorphology, and relate the visual features to various degrees of soil fertility inferred from biochemical characteristics of the soil. The image methodologies used range from low-level image processing tasks, such as nonlinear enhancement, multiscale analysis, geometric feature detection, and size distributions, to object-oriented analysis, such as segmentation, region texture, and shape analysis. and phrases; soilsection image analysis; geometric feature extraction; morphological segmentation; multiscale texture analysis; neurofuzzy quality inference 1. INTRODUCTION The goal of this research work is the automated estimation of the bioecological quality of soils using image processing and computer vision techniques. Estimating the soil quality with the traditional biochemical methods, and more specifically estimating those elements that are essential components for the soil fertility, is a difficult, time-consuming, and expensive process, which is, however, necessary for selecting and applying any management practice to land ecosystems. Our approach has been the development of an automated system that will recognize the characteristics relevant to the soil quality by computer processing of soilsection images and extraction of suitable visual features. Its final goals are double-fold: ( 1 ) quantification of the micromorphology of the soil via analysis of soilsection images and ( 2 ) correspondence of the extracted visual information with the classification of soil into various fertility degrees inferred from measurements performed biochemically on the soil samples. The overall system is shown in Figure 1. Soil (map image) Soil sampling Digital image acquisition system (digital camera, scanner) Filtering for image enhancement Watershed segmentation Multiscale image analysis Geometrical feature extraction Marker detection/ extraction Texture analysis with AM-FM models Size distribution histograms and moments measures Shape analysis Homogeneous regions texture analysis with fractals Chemical analysis Neural network Initial knowledge of soil quality from soilsection features Feature extraction using computer vision Correspondence Soil quality evaluation In the image analysis part of this work, the above goals require solving a broad spectrum of problems in image processing and computer vision. Next, we list the most important of such problems (following a hierarchy from low-level vision to high-level vision) which we have investigated for detecting characteristics and extracting information from soilsection images: ( 1 ) enhancement of images; ( 2 ) feature detection; ( 3 ) multiscale image analysis; ( 4 ) statistical size distributions; ( 5 ) segmentation into homogeneous regions; ( 6 ) texture analysis; ( 7 ) shape analysis; and ( 8 ) correspondence of the features extracted from analyzing the soilsection images with the fertility grade of the soil inferred from its biochemical characteristics. The tools and methodologies that we have used for solving the above image analysis problems ( 1 )–( 7 ) include the following: (i) nonlinear geometric multiscale lattice-based image operators (of the morphological and fuzzy type) for multiscale image simplification and enhancement, extracting presegmentation features, size distributions, and region-based segmentation; (ii) nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs) for isotropic modeling and implementing various multiscale evolution and visual detection tasks; (iii) fractals for quantifying texture and shape analysis from the viewpoint of geometrical complexity; (iv) modulation models for texture modeling from the viewpoint of instantaneous spatial frequency and amplitude components; and (v) topological and curvature-based methods for region shape analysis. Finally, methods of fuzzy logic and neural networks were investigated for the symbolic description and automated adaptation of the correspondence between the soilsection images and the bioecological quality of soil. 2. SOIL DATA AND MICROMORPHOLOGY Soil data: the first phase of this work dealt with collecting soil samples both for performing biochemical measurements and for computer-based automated analysis of their images. During the phase of data collection, soil was sampled in mid September 2000 und (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1155%2FS1110865704402054.pdf

Petros Maragos, Anastasia Sofou. Image Analysis of Soil Micromorphology: Feature Extraction, Segmentation, and Quality Inference, EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2004, pp. 356937, Volume 2004, Issue 6, DOI: 10.1155/S1110865704402054