Determinants of research engagement in academic obstetrics and gynaecology

BMC Medical Education, Apr 2016

Background To identify the determinants of research engagement among faculty in an academic department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Methods All members of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the University of British Columbia were mailed an online version of the Edmonton Research Orientation Survey (EROS) in 2011 and in 2014. High scores on overall research engagement and on each of the 4 subscales, namely, value of research, value of innovation, research involvement and research utilization/evidence-based practice were quantified. Analyses were carried out on both surveys combined and on the 2014 survey separately. Logistic regression was used to identify determinants of high levels of research engagement. Results The overall response rate was 37 % (130 responses; 54 respondents in 2011 and 76 respondents in 2014). The average EROS score was 140 (range 54 to 184) and 35 % of respondents had a score ≥150. Significant determinants of positive research engagement based on the overall EROS scale included being paid for research work (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 22.1, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.47–197.7) and carrying out research during unpaid hours (AOR 6.41, 95 % CI 1.97–20.9). Age <50 years (AOR 11.0, 95 % CI 1.35–89.9) and clinical experience <20 years (AOR 19.7, 95 % CI 2.18–178.8) were positively associated, while journal reading during unpaid hours (AOR 0.21, 95 % CI 0.07–0.62) was negatively associated with specific EROS subscales. Conclusions In a setting with a positive research orientation, research engagement among the faculty was associated with paid research time, research work and journal reading during unpaid hours and more recent entry into clinical practice.

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/s12909-016-0640-2.pdf

Determinants of research engagement in academic obstetrics and gynaecology

Fernandez et al. BMC Medical Education Determinants of research engagement in academic obstetrics and gynaecology Ariadna Fernandez 0 Leslie Sadownik 2 Sarka Lisonkova 1 Geoffrey Cundiff 4 K. S. Joseph 1 3 0 Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia , Room C427- 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1 , Canada 1 Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia , Vancouver , Canada 2 Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Development & Educational Support, University of British Columbia , Vancouver , Canada 3 School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia , Vancouver , Canada 4 Division of Gynaecologic Specialties, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia , Vancouver , Canada Background: To identify the determinants of research engagement among faculty in an academic department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Methods: All members of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the University of British Columbia were mailed an online version of the Edmonton Research Orientation Survey (EROS) in 2011 and in 2014. High scores on overall research engagement and on each of the 4 subscales, namely, value of research, value of innovation, research involvement and research utilization/evidence-based practice were quantified. Analyses were carried out on both surveys combined and on the 2014 survey separately. Logistic regression was used to identify determinants of high levels of research engagement. Results: The overall response rate was 37 % (130 responses; 54 respondents in 2011 and 76 respondents in 2014). The average EROS score was 140 (range 54 to 184) and 35 % of respondents had a score ≥150. Significant determinants of positive research engagement based on the overall EROS scale included being paid for research work (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 22.1, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.47-197.7) and carrying out research during unpaid hours (AOR 6.41, 95 % CI 1.97-20.9). Age <50 years (AOR 11.0, 95 % CI 1.35-89.9) and clinical experience <20 years (AOR 19.7, 95 % CI 2.18-178.8) were positively associated, while journal reading during unpaid hours (AOR 0.21, 95 % CI 0.07-0.62) was negatively associated with specific EROS subscales. Conclusions: In a setting with a positive research orientation, research engagement among the faculty was associated with paid research time, research work and journal reading during unpaid hours and more recent entry into clinical practice. Obstetrics; Gynaecology; Attitude; Research involvement; Evidence-based practice Background Engagement of clinicians in research is essential for ensuring that relevant clinical questions are posed and addressed. Also, clinical experts sometimes have valuable insights that can lead to unexpected advances in medical science. The causal link between thalidomide and phocomelia was made simultaneously by an obstetrician, William Mcbride, and a pediatrician, Widukind Lenz, based on routine clinical observation [ 1–3 ]. Similarly, clinical insight obtained in routine practice led to the discovery that diethylstilbestrol use in pregnancy caused clear cell vaginal adenocarcinoma in daughters decades later [ 4, 5 ]. It is even claimed that obstetrician John Snow’s attribution of cholera epidemics to contaminated drinking water was based on a clinical conviction that was merely confirmed by subsequent epidemiologic research [ 6, 7 ]. Recognition of the clinician’s key role in advancing medical science notwithstanding, academic faculties and departments struggle with the challenge of effectively engaging clinical faculty in research [ 8–14 ]. There are many obstacles to clinician engagement and prominent among these challenges is the recruitment, training and retention of clinician researchers. Although a significant proportion of medical students express a strong interest in securing a full-time academic appointment with research involvement, resource issues hamper recruitment of clinician scientists. Specific issues include remuneration for research, anxiety regarding the competitive nature of research funding, inadequate research infrastructure and lack of protected time for research [ 8 ]. In 2010, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the University of British Columbia created a Faculty Forum for Research dedicated to increasing clinician involvement in research. This effort is supported by a generous philanthropic donation, the Fred Bryans endowment. Given the goal of fostering an improved research culture within the department, we carried out a study exploring the determinants of positive research engagement among the faculty. Methods In 2011 and 2014, the Edmonton Research Orientation Survey (EROS) was circulated to all faculty members within the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the University of British Columbia (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/s12909-016-0640-2.pdf

Ariadna Fernandez, Leslie Sadownik, Sarka Lisonkova, Geoffrey Cundiff, K. Joseph. Determinants of research engagement in academic obstetrics and gynaecology, BMC Medical Education, 2016, pp. 111, 16, DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0640-2