Capsule Commentary on Lee et al., Patient Perceptions of Electronic Medical Record Use by Faculty and Resident Physicians: A Mixed Methods Study

Journal of General Internal Medicine, Jul 2016

Elizabeth G. Hunter

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11606-016-3809-9.pdf

Capsule Commentary on Lee et al., Patient Perceptions of Electronic Medical Record Use by Faculty and Resident Physicians: A Mixed Methods Study

J Gen Intern Med Capsule Commentary on Lee et al., Patient Perceptions of Electronic Medical Record Use by Faculty and Resident Physicians: A Mixed Methods Study Elizabeth G. Hunter 0 1 OTR/L 0 1 0 Compliance with Ethical Standards: 1 Graduate Center for Gerontology, University of Kentucky , Lexington, KY , USA - ee et al.1 describe positive and negative patient perspecL tives of outpatient EMR use. From 108 telephone interviews, two major themes and six subthemes were identified. Overall, 85 % of patient perceptions of EMR use were positive. Of the negative perceptions, 66 % were related to lack of eye contact and attention from the provider and not sharing the screen with the patient. Only 7 % reported that EMR made it harder to talk with their doctors. While EMR use in healthcare is important, there has been limited research exploring its impact on patient–provider communication.2 A systematic review revealed that EMR use often had a positive impact on information exchange, but diminished patient-centeredness and patient rapport.2 Both computer skills and behavioral style had the ability to overcome some of the negative influence that emerged.2 Physicians might employ three different methods of sharing information using the EMR. They can use active information sharing, in which they show the computer screen to the patient; passive information sharing, where the screen is not shown to the patient but they can lean in and look at the screen; or finally, technology withdrawal, where the screen is never shared with the patient.3 While there is no going back to paper records, it must be acknowledged that the EMR has dramatically changed the patient–provider encounter. One potential key for lessening the negative impact of a computer screen in the middle of a communication encounter is to actually introduce the EMR and explain what is being done at the beginning of the encounter.4 The sharing of information related to the EMR has the potential to enhance patient engagement and improve communication.4 However, the EMR also has the potential to compete with the patient for the provider’s attention.5 Screen-driven communication can limit patient narratives and hide clues about psychosocial and emotional concerns.5 Unfortunately, there seems to be little time spent training providers on how best to incorporate EMR into the clinical encounter.1 25 Increasing this communication training can result in enhanced rather than diminished communication and relationships. Conflict of Interest: The author has no conflict of interest with the material in this article. 1. Lee WW , Alkureishi MA , Ukabiala O , Venable LR , Ngooi SS , Staisiunas DD , Wrobleswski KE , Arora VM . Patient perceptions of electronic medical record use by faculty and resident physicians: a mixed methods study . J Gen Intern Med . 2016 . doi: 10 .1007/s11606-016-3774-3. 2. Shachak A , Reis S. The impact of electronic medical records on patientdoctor communication during consultation: a narrative literature review . J Eval Clin Pract . 2009 ; 15 ( 4 ): 641 - 9 . 3. Asan O , Montague E . Technology-mediated information sharing between patients and clinicians in primary care encounters . Behav Inform Technol . 2014 ; 33 ( 3 ): 259 - 70 . 4. White A , Danis M. Enhancing patient-centered communication and collaboration by using the electronic health record in the examination room . JAMA . 2013 ; 309 ( 22 ): 2327 - 8 . 5. Lown BA , Rodriguez D. Commentary : lost in translation? How electronic health records structure communication, relationships, and meaning . Acad Med . 2012 ; 87 ( 4 ): 392 - 4 . (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11606-016-3809-9.pdf

Elizabeth G. Hunter. Capsule Commentary on Lee et al., Patient Perceptions of Electronic Medical Record Use by Faculty and Resident Physicians: A Mixed Methods Study, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2016, pp. 1355-1355, Volume 31, Issue 11, DOI: 10.1007/s11606-016-3809-9