A Downstream Voyage with Mercury

Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, Aug 2016

Gary H. Heinz

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:


A Downstream Voyage with Mercury

Bulletin of Envi- ronmental Contamination and Toxicology paper. However, in spite of their superiority, the A Downstream Voyage with Mercury Gary H. Heinz 0 1 0 Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey , c/o BARC-East, Building 308, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705 , USA 1 & Gary H. Heinz As I look back on my paper, ''Effects of Low Dietary Levels of Methyl Mercury on Mallard Reproduction,'' published in 1974 in the Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, a thought sticks in my mind. I realize just how much my mercury research was not unlike a leaf in a stream, carried this way and that, sometimes stalled in an eddy, restarted, and carried downstream at a pace and path that was not completely under my control. I was hired in 1969 by the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center to study the effects of environmental pollutants on the behavior of wildlife. A colleague was conducting a study on the reproductive effects of methylmercury on mallards (Anas platyrhynchos), and he offered to give me some of the ducklings. I conducted a pilot stdprudy, testing how readily ducklings approached a tape-recorded maternal call. Sample sizes were small, but the results suggested that ducklings from mercury-treated parents behaved differently than controls. That's how I got into mercury research-pretty much by chance. The next year, I purchased my own adult mallards and fed them a control diet, a diet containing 0.5 lg/g mercury (as methylmercury dicyandiamide), or a diet containing 3 lg/g mercury (Heinz 1974). My goal was to put the ducklings from these breeding adults through my behavioral tests, but I noticed that some of the ducklings from parents fed 3 lg/g mercury staggered about and later died. Dr. Louis Locke, a pathologist at our center, discovered that methylmercury, transferred from the mother to her - eggs, had caused lesions in the brains of the ducklings (Heinz and Locke 1976) . The following year, I fed the same female mallards the diets they had received the year before. As was the case in the first year, 3 lg/g mercury in the adult diet resulted in a decrease in duckling survival (Heinz 1976) . As I was thinking about what to do next, I happened upon a few papers related to multi-generation effects of contaminants on wildlife. I got the idea that it would be interesting to feed the offspring of the mercury-dosed adults the same concentration of mercury as their parents had been fed, and see if any harmful effects, not seen in the first generation, might surface in the second generation. Having shown pretty conclusively that 3 lg/g mercury fed to adults was harmful to their ducklings, in this second generation study I focused on the controls and birds in the 0.5 lg/g mercury group. The results demonstrated that second-generation females fed 0.5 lg/g mercury did not produce as many 1-week-old ducklings as did controls. Based on these exciting second generation results, I talked to my supervisor, Dr. Lucille Stickel, asking if it was okay to begin a third generation study. She was not happy with this idea. She said something to the effect: Gary, we have a lot of chemicals that need studying and we can’t just keep working on the same one. But I must have had a sorrowful look on my face, because she finally said, ‘‘Okay but this is your last mercury study.’’ And it was—for a while. That ‘‘last’’ study (Heinz 1979) turned out to be a fairly influential one because the results were used to set regulatory guidelines for methylmercury in water. In this 1979 paper, I reported that 0.5 lg/g mercury in the diet of breeding mallards resulted in about 0.8 lg/g mercury, wetweight, in eggs, and that this very low concentration in eggs harmed reproduction. I remember how the editor of the Journal of Wildlife Management questioned how many Contamination and Toxicology paper has been cited 119 times, which is respectable in itself. As I look back on the 1974 paper, I think about it in different ways. I think about it as the beginning of my decades’ long research ‘battle’ with mercury. And I also think about it just in terms of being so many years ago, a whole research lifetime ago. When I began planning for the 1974 Bulletin study, I was 27 years old and, frankly, I didn’t know too much about the harm of mercury contamination to birds. Writing this little essay now, all I have to do is reverse those two numbers (2 and 7) to come up with my current age: 72. I realize I still only understand a fraction of what there is to know about mercury contamination and birds. Ironically, the initial behavioral findings I got in that pilot study that prompted me to conduct the 1974 study proved to be a statistical anomaly, contradicted by findings when I tested thousands of ducklings in bigger studies. So, everything got started by some false, chance results. In science, we like to think we are in charge, directing the course of our long-term studies and interests, but I believe we are often at the mercy of our everyday work life: changing budgets, changing assignments from our boss, and just luck. Hey—science is dignified, logical, and objective, but life can be unpredictable, mysterious, and ridiculous. And life generally trumps science. More than we like to think, our career is like a leaf in a stream, carried this way and that by forces other than ourselves—but that’s okay. At least it was for me. Heinz G ( 1974 ) Effects of low dietary levels of methyl mercury on mallard reproduction . Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 11 : 386 - 392 Heinz GH ( 1976 ) Second-year feeding effects on mallard reproduction and duckling behavior . J Wildl Manage 40 : 82 - 90 Heinz GH ( 1979 ) Methylmercury: reproductive and behavioral effects on three generations of mallard ducks . J Wildl Manage 43 : 394 - 401 Heinz GH , Locke LN ( 1976 ) Brain lesions in mallard ducklings from parents fed methylmercury . Avian Dis 20 : 9 - 17

This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00128-016-1909-1.pdf

Gary H. Heinz. A Downstream Voyage with Mercury, Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2016, 591-592, DOI: 10.1007/s00128-016-1909-1