“EGEDA and Others”

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Nov 2016

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:


“EGEDA and Others”

Directive 0 Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition , Munich 2016 1. Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be interpreted as precluding a scheme for fair compensation for private copying which, like the one at issue in the main proceedings, is financed from the General State Budget in such a way that it is not possible to ensure that the cost of that compensation is borne by the users of private copies. Reproduction right; Private copying; Fair compensation; Financing from the General State Budget

This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs40319-016-0514-5.pdf

“EGEDA and Others”, IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2016, DOI: 10.1007/s40319-016-0514-5