“Austro-Mechana”

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Dec 2016

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs40319-016-0533-2.pdf

“Austro-Mechana”

Regulation (EC) No. 0 Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition , Munich 2016 1. Article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that a claim seeking to obtain payment of remuneration due by virtue of a national law, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, implementing the 'fair compensation' system provided for in Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/ EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, falls within 'matters relating to tort, delict or quasidelict', within the meaning of Article 5(3) of that regulation. Jurisdiction copy; Fair compensation; Reproduction right; Exceptions and limitations; Private; Non-payment


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs40319-016-0533-2.pdf

“Austro-Mechana”, IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2016, DOI: 10.1007/s40319-016-0533-2