The game-changing potential of digitalization for sustainability: possibilities, perils, and pathways

Sustainability Science, Feb 2017

Peter Seele, Irina Lock

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11625-017-0426-4.pdf

The game-changing potential of digitalization for sustainability: possibilities, perils, and pathways

Sustain Sci The game-changing potential of digitalization for sustainability: possibilities, perils, and pathways Peter Seele 0 1 Irina Lock 0 1 0 University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , Netherlands 1 Sustainability and Digitalization: A Game-Changer? Possibilities , Perils, Pathways Vol.:(011233456789) - When in 2015, 193 countries agreed on 17 sustainable development goals, the nations’ delegates signed a challenging agenda aimed to render this planet livable for future generations within the next 15 years. This process has just begun and implementation and dialogue with different stakeholders is required to bring the SDG to live. This is true, particularly given the past steps to strive for sustainability, which have not yet led to groundbreaking levels of achieving more sustainability (or less unsustainability). Despite many efforts in developing and developed countries, none of the member states of the United Nations has achieved all goals yet (GeSI 2016) , so the call for intensifying engagement and transforming societies remains open. This is where Big Data and Digitalization comes in: Digital technologies in the form of e-health services, robotics, or emission reduction solutions could help individuals, organizations, and nations achieve a more sustainable planet in light of the sustainable development goals. Given the stagnation of sustainable development, the overall “sustainability gap” (Lubin and Esty 2014) continues to be a major issue, as the overconsumption of natural resources and its harmful consequences threaten the basis of our existence and that of future generations (WCED 1987) . Parallel to this development stands the increasing speed and spread of digital technology in all areas of life. Information and communication (ICT) technology constitute our new “digital age” (Schmidt and Cohen 2013) , encompassing a richness of soft- and hardware and linked processes. Analyses of genetic sequences, personal health data, phone Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland records, social media profiles, and many more (Boyd and Crawford 2012) have altered the way humans interact with each other and with their natural environment. Digital technology, as in the example of Big Data, offers new possibilities and pathways of how to shape the future and research (Shah et  al. 2015) , for instance, through the “information civilization” brought about by monopolistic structures in the corporate sphere (Zuboff 2015) . Algorithmic capacities allow for data processing and analysis that open up unseen predictive capabilities, and thus a “time-ontological shift” (Seele 2016a) . Digitalization has (positively as well as negatively) incalculable potential to help achieve sustainability of the planetary and human system, or at least help reduce the negative impact of people. ICT and Big Data can help promote sustainability (Gijzen 2013; Hampton et al. 2013) , because the societal complexity of the planetary nervous system is strongly connected and these systems may lead to cascading effects that increase vulnerability (Helbing 2012). Via a big data-driven “transnational sustainability agency” (Seele 2016b) or a digital “global participatory platform”, for instance, digitalization can help increase (strong) sustainability in the environmental, social and economic spheres (Helbing 2012) . Hence, digitalization bears consequences for transparency and accountability that open up entirely new ways to shape, monitor, communicate, and govern sustainability (e.g., Heemsbergen 2016) . In conclusion, both megatrends, sustainability and digitalization, impose major transitions on our world and how we picture it. In this regard, sustainability science is the scientific way of gathering data to analyze pathways towards a (more) sustainable world, by taking into account future generations. Given its transformative nature, sustainability is expected to adapt to the new possibilities and perils of the digital age, or vice versa, digitalization is the driver that changes sustainability. Whether and in how far this transformation through digitalization facilitates or impedes the development of a more sustainable world, however, is still unknown. The purpose of this special issue is therefore to shed light on the different possibilities, perils, and pathways the digital revolution can bring for sustainability and sustainability science and intends to address the overall question: In what ways is digitalization a game changer for sustainability? The papers in this special issue deal with the impact of digitalization on sustainability in manifold ways, applying an array of disciplinary, methodological, cultural, and topical perspectives. Analyzing e-participation of citizens in environmentally sensitive projects through ICTs, He et  al. (2016) investigated the potentials of digital communication technology in a Chinese setting. The article “E-participation for environmental sustainability in (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11625-017-0426-4.pdf

Peter Seele, Irina Lock. The game-changing potential of digitalization for sustainability: possibilities, perils, and pathways, Sustainability Science, 2017, pp. 183-185, Volume 12, Issue 2, DOI: 10.1007/s11625-017-0426-4