Super-BMS3 invariant boundary theory from three-dimensional flat supergravity

Journal of High Energy Physics, Jan 2017

The two-dimensional super-BMS3 invariant theory dual to three-dimensional asymptotically flat \( \mathcal{N}=1 \) supergravity is constructed. It is described by a constrained or gauged chiral Wess-Zumino-Witten action based on the super-Poincaré algebra in the Hamiltonian, respectively the Lagrangian formulation, whose reduced phase space description corresponds to a supersymmetric extension of flat Liouville theory.

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

Super-BMS3 invariant boundary theory from three-dimensional flat supergravity

Received: November Super-BMS3 invariant boundary theory from Glenn Barnich 0 Laura Donnay 0 Javier Matulich 0 1 Ricardo Troncoso 0 1 Open Access 0 c The Authors. 0 0 Casilla 1469 , Valdivia , Chile 1 Centro de Estudios Cient ́ıficos (CECs) The two-dimensional super-BMS3 invariant theory dual to three-dimensional asymptotically flat N = 1 supergravity is constructed. It is described by a constrained or gauged chiral Wess-Zumino-Witten action based on the super-Poincar´e algebra in the Hamiltonian, respectively the Lagrangian formulation, whose reduced phase space description corresponds to a supersymmetric extension of flat Liouville theory. Conformal and W Symmetry; Space-Time Symmetries; Gauge-gravity corre- 1 Introduction 2 3 4 Chiral constrained super-Poincar´e WZW theory Solving the constraints in the action Symmetries of the chiral WZW model Super-BMS3 algebra from a modified Sugawara construction Reduced super-Liouville-like theory Gauged chiral super-WZW model A Conventions Gauged chiral bosonic WZW theory Introduction A prime example of duality between a three-dimensional and a two-dimensional theory is the relation between a Chern-Simons theory in the presence of a boundary and the associated chiral Wess-Zumino-Witten (WZW) model: on the classical level for instance, the variational principles are equivalent as the latter is obtained from the former by solving the constraints in the action [1–3]. In the case of the Chern-Simons formulation of three-dimensional gravity [4, 5], the role of the boundary is played by non trivial fall-off conditions for the gauge fields. For anti-de Sitter or flat asymptotics, a suitable boundary term is required in order to make solutions with the prescribed asymptotics true extrema of the variational principle. Furthermore, the fall-off conditions lead to additional constraints that correspond to fixing a subset of the conserved currents of the WZW model [6, 7]. The associated reduced phase space description is given by a Liouville theory for negative cosmological constant and a suitable limit thereof in the flat case [8, 9]. This procedure was also implemented in the context of three dimensional higher spin gravity without cosmological constant, where a flat limit of Toda theory is recovered [10]. supergravity, whose algebra of surface charges has been shown to realize the centrally extended super-BMS3 algebra [11]. The non-vanishing Poisson brackets read i{Jm, Jn} = (m − n)Jm+n + i{Jm, Pn} = (m − n)Pm+n + i{Jm, Qn} = {Qm, Qn} = Pm+n + 2 − n c1 = µ c2 = where the fermionic generators Qm are labeled by (half-)integers in the case of (anti)periodic boundary conditions for the gravitino, and the central charges are given Here, G and µ stand for the Newton constant and the coupling of the Lorentz-Chern-Simons form, respectively. The resulting two-dimensional field theory admits a global super-BMS3 invariance. By construction, the associated algebra of Noether charges realizes (1.1) with the same values of the central charges. We provide three equivalent descriptions of this theory: (i) a Hamiltonian description in terms of a constrained chiral WZW theory based on the threedimensional super-Poincar´e algebra, (ii) a Lagrangian formulation in terms of a gauged chiral WZW theory and (iii) a reduced phase space description that corresponds to a supersymmetric extension of flat Liouville theory. Besides the extension to the supersymmetric case, previous results in the purely bosonic sector are also generalized. This is due to the inclusion of parity-odd terms in the action, which suitably modifies the Poincar´e current subalgebra, and consequently, turns on the additional central charge c1 in (1.1). Brief review of (minimal) N = 1 flat supergravity in 3D with vanishing cosmological constant admits a Chern-Simons formulation [15]. Different extensions of this theory have been developed in e.g., [16–29]. Hereafter we consider the most general supergravity theory with N flat boundary conditions, and leads to first order field equations for the dreibein, the supergravity theory is recovered for a particular choice of the couplings (see below). The spans the super-Poincar´e algebra, [Ja, Jb] = ǫabcJ c , [Ja, Pb] = ǫabcP c , [Pa, Pb] = 0 , (Γa)βα Qβ , [Pa, Qα] = 0 , {Qα, Qβ} = − 2 (CΓa)αβ Pa , where C is the charge conjugation matrix (see appendix A for conventions). In these terms, the action reads I[A] = where the bracket h·, ·i stands for an invariant nondegenerate bilinear form, whose only nonvanishing components are given by boundary term, the action reduces to k Z 2Rˆaea + µL (ωˆ) − ψ¯αDˆ ψα , supersymmetry transformations curvature two-form and the covariant derivative of the gravitino are defined as By construction the action is invariant, up to a surface term, under the following local decompose as Ra = 1 γ2ǫabcebec + 1 γψ¯Γaψ , T a = −γǫabcebec − 4 2 4 Dψ = − 21 γeaΓaψ , (2.8) the general (local) solution is The asymptotic conditions proposed in [11] imply that the gauge field is of the form A = h−1ah + h−1dh , a = can be generalized, along the lines of [31], so as to include a generic choice of chemical potentials [30]. Chiral constrained super-Poincar´e WZW theory Solving the constraints in the action Up to boundary terms and an overall sign which we change for later convenience, the Hamiltonian form of the Chern-Simons action (2.3) is given by hA˜, duA˜˙i + 2hduAu, d˜A˜ + A˜2i , where A = duAu + A˜. One of the advantages of the gauge choice in (2.10), for which the dependence in the radial coordinate is completely absorbed by the group element h, is that the boundary can boundary generically describes a two-dimensional timelike surface with the topology of a cylinder (R ×S1). We will also discard all holonomy terms. As a consequence, the resulting action principle at the boundary only captures the asymptotic symmetries of the original The boundary term in the variation of the Hamiltonian action is given by the gauge field at the boundary fulfill so that the boundary term becomes integrable. Consequently, the improved action principle that has a true extremum when the equations of motion are satisfied is given by I = In this action principle Au are Lagrange multipliers, whose associated constraints are locally I = dudφ hG−1∂φG, G−1∂uGi − ωφaωaφ hG−1dG, (G−1dG)2i . Equivalently, in terms of the gauge field components, the action can be conveniently dudφ ωφeau + eaφωau − ωφaωaφ + µω φaωau − ψ¯uψφ a (3ǫabceaωbωc + µǫ abcωaωbωc − 2 eq. (2.9) allows one to rewrite this expression in terms of a 2 by 2 matrix trace, so that − 4 −(Λ′Λ−1)2 +µ Λ′Λ−1Λ˙ Λ−1 + finds that the action reduces to that of a chiral super-Poincar´e Wess-Zumino-Witten theory, dudφ Tr 2 λ˙λ−1α′ − (λ′λ−1)2 + µλ ′λ−1 λ˙λ−1 + α + (µ∂ u − ∂φ)(λ′λ−1) − 4 respectively. The general solution of these equations is given by α = τ a(φ) + δ(u) + uκ′κ−1 − µ [ln τ, ln κ] + 4 ζ1ζ¯2 + Symmetries of the chiral WZW model By using the Polyakov-Wiegmann identities, the action (3.10) can be shown to be invariant under the gauge transformations Moreover, it is also invariant under the following global symmetries whose associated infinitesimal transformations read δγα = 1 νγ¯λ−1 + 1 γ¯λ−1ν1 . The Noether currents associated to a global symmetry, whose parameters are collectively denoted by X1, generically read JX1 = −kX1 + ∂∂μLφi δX1φi, with δX1L = ∂μkXμ1. Hence, in μ μ the case of global symmetries spanned by (3.15), the corresponding currents are given by P = Q = λ−1α′λ − u(λ−1λ′)′ + µλ −1λ′ − 4 general results guarantee that, in the Hamiltonian formalism, this computation corresponds {Ja(φ), Jb(φ′)}∗ = ǫabcJ cδ(φ − φ ) − µ ′ {Ja(φ), Qα(φ′)}∗ = 1 (QΓa)αδ(φ − φ′) , {Qα(φ), Qβ(φ′)}∗ = − 2 (CΓa)αβPaδ(φ − φ ) − 2π Cαβ∂φδ(φ − φ′) , ′ which is the affine extension of the super-Poincar´e algebra (2.2). Super-BMS3 algebra from a modified Sugawara construction In order to recover the super-BMS3 algebra (1.1) from the affine extension of the superPoincar´e algebra in (3.19), it can be seen that the standard Sugawara construction has to be slightly improved. Indeed, let us consider bilinears made out of the currents components H = P = − k P2 Q+ + √ 2 P0 Q− , for which the current algebra (3.19) implies {H(φ), Ja(φ′)}∗ = −Pa(φ)δ′(φ − φ′) , {P(φ), Pa(φ′)}∗ = Pa(φ)δ′(φ − φ′) , {P(φ), Ja(φ′)}∗ = Ja(φ)δ′(φ − φ′) , {P(φ), Qα(φ′)}∗ = Qα(φ)δ′(φ − φ′) , When expressed in terms of modes, the algebra of the generators H, P corresponds to the pure BMS3 algebra without central extensions, i.e., the bosonic part of (1.1) with whose algebra disagrees with the non-centrally extended super BMS3 algebra given in (1.1). It reflects the fact that the non-constrained super-WZW model (3.10) is invariant under class constraints global BMS3 transformations, but not under the full super-BMS3 symmetries, in the sense that there are no (obvious) superpartners to H, P that would close with them according to the (non centrally extended) super-BMS algebra (see [7] for an analogous discussion in the case of the superconformal algebra). According to the fall-off of the gauge field in (2.11), the remaining boundary conditions P0 = Q+ = 0 . The super-BMS3 invariance of our model with the correct values of the central charges is recovered only once the constraints (3.23) are imposed. The generators of super-BMS3 symmetry in the constrained theory are given by which are representatives that commute with the first class constraints (3.23), on the surface defined by these constraints. Furthermore, on this surface, the Dirac brackets of the generators are given by {H˜(φ), P˜(φ′)}∗ = (H˜(φ) + H˜(φ′))∂φδ(φ − φ ) − 2kπ ∂φ3δ(φ − φ′) , ′ {P˜(φ), P˜(φ′)}∗ = (P˜(φ) + P˜(φ′))∂φδ(φ − φ ) − 2π ∂φ3δ(φ − φ′) , ′ 1 G˜(φ′))∂φδ(φ − φ′) , so that, once expanded in modes according to Pm = Jm = Qm = the super-BMS3 algebra (1.1) with central charges given in (1.2) is recovered. Reduced super-Liouville-like theory In order to obtain the reduced phase space description of the action (3.10) on the constraint surface defined by (3.23), it is useful to decompose the fields according to and hence, by virtue of (4.1) and (4.2), the reduced chiral super-WZW action (3.10) is IR = dudφ ξ′ϕ˙ − ϕ′2 + µϕ ′ϕ˙ + √ χχ˙ , super-BMS3 generators (3.24) then reduce to H˜ = ϕ′2 −2ϕ′′ , P˜ = G˜= 21/4 k which generate the following transformations δξ = 2f ϕ′ + ξ′Y + 2f ′ − 21/4ǫχ , Liouville-like theory turns out to be invariant under (4.5), and the mode expansion of the algebra of Noether charges is again given by (1.1) and (1.2). Gauged chiral super-WZW model The super-Liouville-like action (4.3), that has been shown to be equivalent to the chiral super-WZW model (3.10) on the constraint surface given by (3.23), can also be described through a gauged chiral super-WZW model. Here we follow the procedure given in [36], where it was shown that Toda theories can be written as gauged WZW models based on a Lie group G. The action is endowed with additional terms involving the currents linearly coupled to some gauge fields that belong to the adjoint representation of the subgroups of G generated by the step operators associated to the positive and negative roots. Hence, we consider the following action principle dudφ Tr Au λ−1α′λ − u λ−1λ′ ′ − 4 One can then show that the action (5.1) is invariant (up to boundary terms) under the transformations given in (3.15), where a subset of the symmetries has been gauged δσA˜u = − (σ˙ + [Au, σ]) , δγΨ¯ = −∂uγ¯ . δϑAu = −(ϑ˙ + [Au, ϑ]) , δϑA˜u = −[A˜u, ϑ]. Therefore, the reduced theory described by the action in (4.3) is equivalent to the one in (5.1), which corresponds to a WZW model in which the subgroup generated by the first multipliers for these currents, so that the variation of the action with respect to these nonpropagating fields sets them to zero. In other words, solving the algebraic field equations for the gauge fields into the action amounts to imposing the first class constraints (3.23), which shows the equivalence of both descriptions. Acknowledgments We thank M. Ban˜ados, O. Fuentealba, G. Giribet, M. Henneaux, P.-H. Lambert, B. Oblak, A. P´erez, and very especially H. Gonz´alez for enlightening discussions. J.M. and R.T. wish to thank the Physique th´eorique et math´ematique group of the Universit´e Libre de Bruxelles, and the International Solvay Institutes for the warm hospitality. This work is partially funded by the Fondecyt grants N ◦ 1130658, 1161311, 3150448. The Centro de Estudios Cient´ıficos (CECs) is funded by the Chilean Government through the Centers of Excellence Base Financing Program of Conicyt. L.D. is a research fellow of the “Fonds pour la Formation `a la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’Agriculture”-FRIA Belgium. She thanks the group of the Centro de Estudios Cient´ıficos (CECs) for the hospitality. The work of G.B. and L.D. is partially supported by research grants of the F.R.S.-FNRS and IISN-Belgium as well as the “Communaut´e francaise de Belgique - Actions de Recherche 0 −1 The matrices fulfill the following useful properties: (Γa)αβ(Γa)γδ = 2δδαδβγ − δβαδδγ , and it has the following Noether symmetries According to (3.23), we are interested in gauging the subset of these symmetries involving −1 0 Gauged chiral bosonic WZW theory Let us describe here a way to construct a gauged chiral iso(2, 1) WZW model associated k Z dudφ Tr h−Au λ−1α′λ − u λ−1λ′ ′ One can check that the action is invariant under the suitable final action is δϑλ = −λϑ(u, φ) , δϑα = −uλϑ′λ−1 , δϑAu = −(ϑ˙ +[Au, ϑ]) , δϑA˜u = −[A˜u, ϑ] , (B.4) δσα = λσ(u, φ)λ−1 , δσAu = 0 , Since the constraints we want to implement set some current components to a constant, k Z dudφ Tr h−Au λ−1α′λ − u λ−1λ′ ′ is indeed still gauge invariant since, as noticed in [36], the variation of Tr[µ M A˜u] under a gauge transformation is a boundary term. Finally, in order to see how the constraints are explicitly implemented, it is useful to parametrize the fields according to that, taking µ = 1, the reduced action is I = found in [9]. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. [1] E. Witten, Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial, Commun. Math. Phys. 121 (1989) 351 [INSPIRE]. Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1988) 46 [INSPIRE]. Einstein gravity with a negative cosmological constant, Class. Quant. Grav. 12 (1995) 2961 [gr-qc/9506019] [INSPIRE]. [7] M. Henneaux, L. Maoz and A. Schwimmer, Asymptotic dynamics and asymptotic symmetries of three-dimensional extended AdS supergravity, Annals Phys. 282 (2000) 31 [hep-th/9910013] [INSPIRE]. invariant two-dimensional field theories as the flat limit of Liouville theory, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 124032 [arXiv:1210.0731] [INSPIRE]. [9] G. Barnich and H.A. Gonzalez, Dual dynamics of three dimensional asymptotically flat Einstein gravity at null infinity, JHEP 05 (2013) 016 [arXiv:1303.1075] [INSPIRE]. higher spin fields, JHEP 05 (2014) 127 [arXiv:1403.4898] [INSPIRE]. of three-dimensional flat supergravity, JHEP 08 (2014) 071 [arXiv:1407.4275] [INSPIRE]. pg. 374 [INSPIRE]. Nucl. Phys. B 228 (1983) 145 [INSPIRE]. theories, Phys. Lett. B 229 (1989) 383 [INSPIRE]. [hep-th/9505032] [INSPIRE]. Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 2605 [gr-qc/9601003] [INSPIRE]. JHEP 03 (2008) 015 [arXiv:0710.4177] [INSPIRE]. Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 205005 [arXiv:1305.6737] [INSPIRE]. invariant under the AdS-Lorentz superalgebra, arXiv:1401.3697 [INSPIRE]. in three dimensions, JHEP 02 (2015) 125 [arXiv:1412.3118] [INSPIRE]. half-integer spin generators: hypergravity and beyond, JHEP 09 (2015) 003 [arXiv:1505.06173] [INSPIRE]. and Maxwell superalgebra, Phys. Lett. B 750 (2015) 117 [arXiv:1507.02335] [INSPIRE]. [2] G.W. Moore and N. Seiberg , Taming the conformal zoo , Phys. Lett. B 220 (1989) 422 [3] S. Elitzur , G.W. Moore , A. Schwimmer and N. Seiberg , Remarks on the canonical quantization of the Chern-Simons-Witten theory, Nucl . Phys . B 326 ( 1989 ) 108 [INSPIRE]. [4] A. Achucarro and P.K. Townsend , A Chern-Simons action for three-dimensional anti-de Sitter supergravity theories , Phys. Lett . B 180 ( 1986 ) 89 [INSPIRE]. [5] E. Witten , ( 2 + 1 ) -dimensional gravity as an exactly soluble system , [10] H.A. Gonzalez and M. Pino , Boundary dynamics of asymptotically flat 3D gravity coupled to [11] G. Barnich , L. Donnay , J. Matulich and R. Troncoso , Asymptotic symmetries and dynamics [12] S. Deser and J.H. Kay , Topologically massive supergravity , Phys. Lett . B 120 ( 1983 ) 97 [13] S. Deser , Cosmological topological supergravity, chapter in Quantum theory of gravity: essays in honor of the 60th birthday of Bryce S . DeWitt, Adam Hilger Ltd., Bristol U.K. ( 1984 ), [14] N. Marcus and J.H. Schwarz , Three-dimensional supergravity theories, [15] A. Achucarro and P.K. Townsend , Extended supergravities in d = ( 2 + 1) as Chern-Simons [16] H. Nishino and S.J. Gates , Jr., Chern-Simons theories with supersymmetries in three-dimensions , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 8 ( 1993 ) 3371 [INSPIRE]. [17] P.S. Howe , J.M. Izquierdo , G. Papadopoulos and P.K. Townsend , New supergravities with central charges and Killing spinors in (2 + 1)-dimensions, Nucl . Phys . B 467 ( 1996 ) 183 [18] M. Ban˜ados , R. Troncoso and J. Zanelli , Higher dimensional Chern-Simons supergravity , [19] A. Giacomini , R. Troncoso and S. Willison , Three-dimensional supergravity reloaded , Class. Quant. Grav . 24 ( 2007 ) 2845 [hep-th /0610077] [INSPIRE]. [20] R.K. Gupta and A. Sen , Consistent truncation to three dimensional (super-)gravity , [21] R. Andringa , E.A. Bergshoeff , M. de Roo , O. Hohm , E. Sezgin and P.K. Townsend , Massive 3D supergravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 27 ( 2010 ) 025010 [arXiv:0907.4658] [INSPIRE]. [22] E.A. Bergshoeff , O. Hohm , J. Rosseel and P.K. Townsend , On maximal massive 3D supergravity, Class . Quant. Grav. 27 ( 2010 ) 235012 [arXiv:1007.4075] [INSPIRE]. [23] E.A. Bergshoeff , M. Kovaˇcevi´c , L. Parra, J. Rosseel , Y. Yin and T. Zojer , New massive supergravity and auxiliary fields, Class . Quant. Grav. 30 ( 2013 ) 195004 [arXiv:1304.5445] [24] R. Andringa , E.A. Bergshoeff , J. Rosseel and E. Sezgin , 3D Newton-Cartan supergravity, [25] O. Fierro , F. Izaurieta , P. Salgado and O. Valdivia , ( 2 + 1 )-dimensional supergravity [26] G. Alkac¸ , L. Basanisi , E.A. Bergshoeff , M. Ozkan and E. Sezgin , Massive N = 2 supergravity [27] O. Fuentealba , J. Matulich and R. Troncoso , Extension of the Poincar ´e group with [28] P.K. Concha , O. Fierro , E.K. Rodr´ıguez and P. Salgado , Chern-Simons supergravity in D = 3 [29] E. Bergshoeff , J. Rosseel and T. Zojer , Newton-Cartan supergravity with torsion and Schr¨odinger supergravity , JHEP 11 ( 2015 ) 180 [arXiv:1509.04527] [INSPIRE]. [30] O. Fuentealba , J. Matulich and R. Troncoso , Asymptotically flat structure of hypergravity in three spacetime dimensions , JHEP 10 ( 2015 ) 009 [arXiv:1508.04663] [INSPIRE]. [31] M. Henneaux , A. P´erez, D. Tempo and R. Troncoso , Chemical potentials in three-dimensional higher spin anti-de Sitter gravity , JHEP 12 ( 2013 ) 048 [arXiv:1309.4362] [INSPIRE]. [32] M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim , Quantization of gauge systems, Princeton University Press, Princeton U.S.A. ( 1992 ) [INSPIRE]. [33] G. Barnich and M. Henneaux , Isomorphisms between the Batalin-Vilkovisky anti-bracket and the Poisson bracket , J. Math. Phys. 37 ( 1996 ) 5273 [hep-th /9601124] [INSPIRE]. [34] G. Barnich and G. Comp `ere, Surface charge algebra in gauge theories and thermodynamic integrability , J. Math. Phys. 49 ( 2008 ) 042901 [arXiv:0708.2378] [INSPIRE]. [35] G. Barnich and C. Troessaert , Comments on holographic current algebras and asymptotically flat four dimensional spacetimes at null infinity , JHEP 11 ( 2013 ) 003 [arXiv:1309.0794] [36] J. Balog , L. Feher , L. O'Raifeartaigh , P. Forgacs and A. Wipf , Toda theory and W algebra from a gauged WZNW point of view , Annals Phys . 203 ( 1990 ) 76 [INSPIRE].

This is a preview of a remote PDF:

Glenn Barnich, Laura Donnay, Javier Matulich. Super-BMS3 invariant boundary theory from three-dimensional flat supergravity, Journal of High Energy Physics, 2017, 29, DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2017)029