“Thomas Philipps”

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, May 2017

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs40319-017-0574-1.pdf

“Thomas Philipps”

Thomas Philipps GmbH 0 Co. KG v. Gr u¨ne Welle Vetriebs GmbH 0 0 Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition , Munich 2017 1. The first sentence of Article 33(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs must be interpreted as meaning that the licensee may bring proceedings alleging infringement of a registered Community design which is the subject of the licence although that licence has not been entered in the register of Community designs. 2. Article 32(3) of Regulation No 6/2002 must be interpreted as meaning that the licensee can claim damages for its own loss in proceedings for infringement of a Community design brought by it in accordance with that provision. Licence; Register of community designs; Right to bring proceedings; Infringement


This is a preview of a remote PDF: http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs40319-017-0574-1.pdf

“Thomas Philipps”, IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2017, DOI: 10.1007/s40319-017-0574-1