Measurement of electrons from beauty-hadron decays in p-Pb collisions at \( \sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02 \) TeV and Pb-Pb collisions at \( \sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76 \) TeV

Journal of High Energy Physics, Jul 2017

The production of beauty hadrons was measured via semi-leptonic decays at mid-rapidity with the ALICE detector at the LHC in the transverse momentum interval 1<p T < 8 GeV/c in minimum-bias p-Pb collisions at \( \sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02 \) TeV and in 1.3 < p T < 8 GeV/c in the 20% most central Pb-Pb collisions at \( \sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76 \) TeV. The pp reference spectra at \( \sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02 \) TeV and \( \sqrt{s}=2.76 \) TeV, needed for the calculation of the nuclear modification factors R pPb and R PbPb, were obtained by a pQCD-driven scaling of the cross section of electrons from beauty-hadron decays measured at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV. In the p T interval 3 < p T < 8 GeV/c, a suppression of the yield of electrons from beauty-hadron decays is observed in Pb-Pb compared to pp collisions. Towards lower p T, the R PbPb values increase with large systematic uncertainties. The R pPb is consistent with unity within systematic uncertainties and is well described by theoretical calculations that include cold nuclear matter effects in p-Pb collisions. The measured R pPb and these calculations indicate that cold nuclear matter effects are small at high transverse momentum also in Pb-Pb collisions. Therefore, the observed reduction of R PbPb below unity at high p T may be ascribed to an effect of the hot and dense medium formed in Pb-Pb collisions.

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FJHEP07%282017%29052.pdf

Measurement of electrons from beauty-hadron decays in p-Pb collisions at \( \sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02 \) TeV and Pb-Pb collisions at \( \sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76 \) TeV

Revised: May Measurement of electrons from beauty-hadron decays in p-Pb collisions at collisions at The production of beauty hadrons was measured via semi-leptonic decays at mid-rapidity with the ALICE detector at the LHC in the transverse momentum interval 1 < pT < 8 GeV/c in minimum-bias p-Pb collisions at psNN = 5:02 TeV and in 1:3 < pT < 8 GeV/c in the 20% most central Pb-Pb collisions at psNN = 2:76 TeV. The pp reference s = 2:76 TeV, needed for the calculation of the nuclear section of electrons from beauty-hadron decays measured at p modi cation factors RpPb and RPbPb, were obtained by a pQCD-driven scaling of the cross Heavy Ion Experiments - 2:76 TeV = 5:02 TeV and Pb-Pb The ALICE collaboration spectra at p s = 5:02 TeV and p s = 7 TeV. In the pT interval 3 < pT < 8 GeV/c, a suppression of the yield of electrons from beauty-hadron decays is observed in Pb-Pb compared to pp collisions. Towards lower pT, the RPbPb values increase with large systematic uncertainties. The RpPb is consistent with unity within systematic uncertainties and is well described by theoretical calculations that include cold nuclear matter e ects in p-Pb collisions. The measured RpPb and these calculations indicate that cold nuclear matter e ects are small at high transverse momentum also in Pb-Pb collisions. Therefore, the observed reduction of RPbPb below unity at high pT may be ascribed to an e ect of the hot and dense medium formed in Pb-Pb collisions. 1 Introduction 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2 Results Summary Experimental apparatus and data samples Analysis overview and electrons from background sources Data analysis in p-Pb collisions Extraction of electrons from beauty-hadron decays Systematic uncertainties estimation Data analysis in Pb-Pb collisions Extraction of electrons from beauty-hadron decays Systematic uncertainties estimation Reference pp cross sections at p s = 2.76 TeV and p expected to be about 0.3 fm/c [4] and its decoupling time is about 10 fm/c for collisions at LHC energies [5]. Due to their stronger colour coupling to the medium gluons are argued to lose more energy than quarks [6{8]. Furthermore, the radiative energy loss of heavy quarks is predicted to be reduced with respect to light quarks due to the massdependent restriction of the phase space into which medium-induced gluon radiation can take place (dead-cone e ect) [9{12]. The e ect of the charm-quark mass on energy loss becomes negligible at high transverse momentum, pT & 10 GeV=c, where the ratio mc=pT approaches zero [13]. Therefore, due to the larger mass, beauty quarks can be sensitive { 1 { parton energy loss, can be studied experimentally through the spectra of hadrons containing heavy quarks in comparison with light- avour hadrons in heavy-ion (AA) collisions. The understanding of nal-state e ects requires measurements of initial-state e ects in Cold Nuclear Matter (CNM), which are inherent to nuclei in the collision system and thus present in AA collisions. Measurements in proton-nucleus (p-A) collisions are used to investigate cold nuclear matter e ects such as the modi cation of the Parton Distribution Functions (PDF) inside the nucleus with respect to those in the proton, kT broadening via parton collisions inside the nucleus prior to the hard scattering and energy loss in the nuclear modi cation factor, RAA (RpA), de ned as the ratio of the pT distributions measured in AA (p-A) collisions with respect to the one in pp collisions: RAA = 1 dNAA=dpT hTAAi d pp=dpT ; (1.1) where dNAA=dpT and d pp=dpT are the pT-di erential yield and production cross section of a given particle species in AA and pp collisions, respectively, and hTAAi is the average of the nuclear overlap function for the centrality range under study [19]. Previous beauty-hadron production measurements in pp collisions at various energies at RHIC [20, 21], the Tevatron [22] and the LHC [3, 23{28] are described by Fixed Order plus Next-to-Leading-Log perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics (FONLL pQCD) calculations [29{31] within uncertainties. At both RHIC and the LHC, a suppression of the yield of D mesons and high-pT electrons and muons from heavy- avour hadron decays was observed in AA collisions. The suppression is nearly as large as that of light- avour hadrons at high pT [32{36]. The D meson and pion RPbPb were found to be consistent within uncertainties and described by model calculations that include a colour-charge dependent energy loss [34, 37, 38]. However, in addition to energy loss, the nuclear modi cation factor is also in uenced by e.g. the parton pT spectrum and the fragmentation into hadrons [13, 39]. Furthermore, the nuclear modi cation factors RPbPb of prompt D mesons and of J/ from B meson decays were compared in the pT interval 8 < pT < 16 GeV=c for D mesons and 6:5 < pT < 30 GeV=c for J/ mesons in order to have a similar average pT ( 10 GeV=c) for the heavy hadrons [34, 40, 41]. This comparison with models indicates that charm quarks lose more energy than beauty quarks in this pT interval in central Pb-Pb collisions. The b-jet yield as measured in Pb-Pb collisions also shows a suppression compared with the yield expected from pp collisions in the jet-pT interval 70 < pT < 250 GeV=c [42]. Recently, the relative contributions of electrons from charm- and beauty-hadron decays were measured as a function of transverse momentum in Au-Au collisions at RHIC [43]. There is a hint that in the momentum interval 3 < pT < 4 GeV=c the RAuAu of electrons from beauty-hadron decays is larger than that of electrons from charm-hadron decays. In p-Pb collisions at the LHC, the nuclear modi cation factors of B mesons [44], bjets [45], J/ from beauty-hadron decays [46, 47], leptons from heavy- avour hadron decays { 2 { and D mesons [ 48, 49 ] were investigated extensively. The results are consistent with unity within uncertainties and compatible with theoretical calculations including cold nuclear matter e ects [45{48]. Therefore, the observed suppression of charm and beauty yields at high pT in Pb-Pb collisions is not explained in terms of initial-state e ects but is due to strong nal-state e ects induced by hot partonic matter. In central d-Au collisions at psNN = 200 GeV at RHIC, an enhancement was measured at backward rapidity by means of RdAu of muons from heavy- avour hadron decays [ 50 ]. Theoretical calculations including modi ed PDFs cannot describe the data, implying that models incorporating only initial-state e ects are not su cient and suggesting the possible importance of nal-state e ects in the d-Au collision system. Recently, a potential signature of collective behaviour in small systems was observed via the anisotropic ow parameter v2 of charged hadrons in p-Pb collisions [51{54] and in d-Au collisions [55, 56], suggesting radial ow as a possible explanation of the enhancement of the RdAu [57]. In this paper, the invariant cross section in p-Pb and yield in Pb-Pb collisions are (jylabj presented together with the nuclear modi cation factors, RpPb and RPbPb, of electrons from beauty-hadron decays in p-Pb and Pb-Pb collisions at psNN = 5.02 TeV and psNN = 2.76 TeV, respectively. The identi cation of electrons from beauty-hadron decays is based on their separation from the interaction vertex, induced by the sizable lifetime of beauty hadrons. The p-Pb (Pb-Pb) measurement covers the rapidity range jylabj 0:6 0:8) and the pT interval 1:0 < pT < 8:0 GeV=c (1:3 < pT < 8:0 GeV=c). In the p-Pb collisions, due to the di erent energy per nucleon of the proton and lead beam, the centre-of-mass system (cms) is shifted by y = 0:465 in the proton beam direction, resulting in the rapidity coverage 1:06 < ycms < 0:14 for electrons. Given the cms energies and the rapidity coverages in the p-Pb and Pb-Pb collisions, both measurements probe, at the lowest pT, similar values of Bjorken-x of about 10 3 for electrons from beauty-hadron decays [58]. The Pb-Pb measurement is restricted to the 20% most central Pb-Pb collisions, where the largest e ect of energy loss on heavy- avour production is expected. The paper is organised as follows: section 2 describes the experimental apparatus and the data samples used in both analyses, which are outlined in section 3. Details of the analysis in p-Pb and Pb-Pb collisions are given in sections 4 and 5, respectively. The determination of the pp reference spectra for the calculations of the RpPb and RPbPb is reported in section 6. The results are presented and discussed in section 7. Section 8 summarises the results. 2 Experimental apparatus and data samples A comprehensive description of the ALICE apparatus and its performance can be found in [59] and [60], respectively. Electron tracks were reconstructed and identi ed using detectors located inside the solenoid magnet that generates a eld of 0.5 T parallel to the beam direction. Forward and backward detectors inside and outside the magnet were employed for triggering, background rejection and event characterisation. Charged particles are tracked with the Inner Tracking System (ITS) [59, 61] and the Time Projection Chamber (TPC) [62] in the pseudorapidity range j j < 0.9. The ITS { 3 { consists of six cylindrical layers of silicon detectors. The two innermost layers are made of Silicon Pixel Detectors (SPD), the two middle layers of Silicon Drift Detectors (SDD) and the two outermost layers of Silicon Strip Detectors (SSD). In the direction perpendicular to the detector surface, the total material budget of the ITS corresponds on average to 7.7% of a radiation length [61]. In this analysis, the ITS was also used to reconstruct the primary (interaction) vertex and the track impact parameter d0, de ned as the distance of closest approach of the track to the interaction vertex in the plane transverse to the beam direction. The resolution on d0 is better than 65 m and 70 m for charged particles with momenta larger than 1 GeV=c in Pb-Pb and p-Pb collisions [60], respectively, including the resolution of the primary vertex determination. The particle identi cation capability of the four outer layers of the ITS via the measurement of the ionisation energy loss dE=dx was used at low transverse momentum in the p-Pb analysis. The TPC, which provides up to 159 space points per track, is used for particle identi cation via the measurement of the speci c energy loss dE=dx in the detector gas. The tracks reconstructed in the ITS and the TPC are matched to hits in the other detectors inside the magnet located at larger radii. The Transition Radiation Detector (TRD) [63] surrounding the TPC provides hadron and electron identi cation via the measurement of the speci c energy loss dE=dx and transition radiation. During the Pb-Pb (p-Pb) data taking period it covered 7/18 (13/18) of the full azimuth. Therefore, only in the Pb-Pb analysis it was used to verify the amount of hadron contamination within the electron identi cation strategy at low transverse momentum (see section 5). The Time-Of-Flight array (TOF) [64], based on Multi-gap Resistive Plate Chambers (MRPCs), provides hadron rejection at low transverse momentum via the timeof- ight measurement, within the electron identi cation strategy applied in both analyses. The T0 detectors, arrays of Cherenkov counters, located at +350 cm and 70 cm from the interaction point along the beam direction [65] provided, together with the TOF detector, the precise start time for the time-of- ight measurement in the p-Pb analysis. For central Pb-Pb events the start time was estimated only using the particle arrival times at the TOF detector. The SPD, the T0 detectors as well as the V0 scintillator arrays, placed on both sides of the interaction point at 2.8 < < 5.1 (V0-A) and 3.7 < < 1.7 (V0-C), respectively, can be employed to de ne a minimum-bias trigger. The two Zero Degree Calorimeters (ZDC), that are symmetrically located 112.5 m from the interaction point on either side, were used in the o ine event selection to reject beam-gas interactions by correlating the time information with the one from the V0 detectors. The Pb-Pb and p-Pb data presented here were recorded in 2010 and 2013, respectively. Minimum-bias p-Pb collisions were selected by requiring coincident signals in V0-A and V0-C (V0AND condition). Beam-gas interactions were rejected o ine by the aforementioned correlation of the ZDC and V0 time information. The Pb-Pb collisions were collected with two di erent minimum-bias interaction triggers. The rst trigger condition required signals in two of the following three detectors: SPD (two hits in the outer SPD layer), V0-A and V0-C. The second trigger condition required a coincidence between V0-A and V0-C. Both minimum-bias trigger conditions had e ciencies larger than 95% for hadronic interactions, whereas the second rejected electromagnetic processes to a large { 4 { LiPnbtPb = 2:2 0:2 b 1, respectively. extent [66]. Only events with a primary vertex within 10 cm from the centre of the detector along the beam direction were considered in the p-Pb and Pb-Pb analyses. The Pb-Pb events were categorised into centrality classes by tting the sum of the two V0 signal amplitudes with a geometrical Glauber-model simulation [19], as described in [66]. The Glauber-model simulation yields a value of 18.93 0.74 mb 1 for the average nuclear overlap function hTAAi for the 20% most central Pb-Pb collisions considered in the analysis. About 100 and 3 million p-Pb and 20% most central Pb-Pb events passed the o ine selection criteria corresponding to an integrated luminosity of LipnPtb = 47:8 1:6 b 1 and 3 Analysis overview and electrons from background sources The identi cation of electrons from beauty-hadron decays is divided into the following steps: selection of tracks with good quality, electron identi cation (eID), determination of the electron yield from beauty-hadron decays. The signal contains both electrons from direct decays (b ! e, branching ratio: 11%) as well as cascade decays (b ! c ! e, branching ratio: 10%) of hadrons that contain a beauty (or anti-beauty) quark [ 67 ]. Throughout the paper the term `electron' denotes both electron and positron. The track selection procedure is identical to previous analyses on the production of electrons from beauty-hadron decays [23, 24]. The selection criteria are the same in the p-Pb and Pb-Pb analyses, except for the restriction of the geometrical acceptance in rapidity, which was adjusted in each collision system to the region where the TPC could provide optimal electron identi cation, taking into account the detector and running conditions during each data-taking period. In Pb-Pb collisions this corresponds to the rapidity range jylabj 0:8 and in p-Pb to jylabj 0:6. The tracks were required to have associated hits in both SPD layers, in order to minimise the contribution of electrons from photon conversions in the ITS detector material and the fraction of tracks with misassociated hits (see below). The electrons were identi ed with the TPC and the TOF detectors via the measurement of their respective signal, speci c energy loss in the gas (dE/dx) and the time-ofight. The selection variable (hereafter nTPC or nTOF) is de ned as the deviation of the measured signal of a track with respect to the expected signal for an electron in units of the corresponding detector resolution ( TPC or TOF). The expected signal and the resolution originate from parametrisations of the TPC and TOF detector signals, described in detail in [60]. For both analyses, particles were accepted with the TPC as electron candidates if they satis ed the condition 0:5 < nTPC < 3. This asymmetric selection was chosen to remove hadrons, that are mainly found at negative nTPC values. However, at low and high transverse momentum, the eID strategy based on TPC is subject to contamination from pions, kaons, protons and deuterons. To resolve these ambiguities, a selection cut of jnTOF j 3 was applied for the whole pT range in the Pb-Pb analysis and for pT { 5 { HJEP07(21)5 2.5 GeV=c in the p-Pb analysis. The remaining hadron contamination was determined via data-driven methods in the p-Pb analysis and subtracted statistically (see section 4). The technique used for the Pb-Pb analysis is described in section 5. The electrons passing the track and eID selection criteria originate, besides from beauty-hadron decays, from the following background sources. In what follows, prompt and non-prompt contributions are marked in parentheses as `P' and `NP', respectively: (P) Dalitz and di-electron decays of prompt light neutral mesons ( 0; ; ; !; 0; ), (P) di-electron decays of prompt heavy quarkonia (J/ , etc.). (NP) decay chains of hadrons carrying a strange (or anti-strange) quark, (NP) photon conversions in the detector material, (NP) semi-leptonic decays of prompt hadrons carrying a charm (or anti-charm) quark. The measurement of the production of electrons from beauty-hadron decays exploits their larger mean proper decay length (c 500 m [ 67 ]) compared to that of charm hadrons and most other background sources, resulting in a larger average impact parameter. The sign of the impact parameter value is attributed based on the relative position of the track and the primary vertex, i.e. if the primary vertex lies on the left- or right-hand side of the track with respect to the particle momentum direction in the transverse plane. For the presented analyses, the impact parameter was multiplied with the sign of the particle charge and of the magnetic eld component along the beam axis (plus or minus for the two eld orientations). With this de nition, the sign of the impact parameter depends on whether the primary vertex lies inside or outside of the circle de ned by the track projection in the transverse plane. Electrons from the conversion of photons in the detector material have an initial momentum with a very small angle to the direction of the photon. The magnetic eld bends the track away from the primary vertex. Thus, they typically have an impact parameter d0 < 0. The asymmetric shape helps to di erentiate this background source. It is important to include the eld con guration, because the magnetic eld direction was reversed during the Pb-Pb data taking period, which motivated this rede nition. Figure 1 shows for two pT intervals the resulting distribution of the measured impact parameter value multiplied by the sign of the charge of each track and the sign of the magnetic eld in the 20% most central Pb-Pb collisions. The impact parameter distributions for electrons from beauty- and charm-hadron decays, from Dalitz decays of light mesons, and from photon conversions are also drawn for comparison. The distributions were obtained from Monte Carlo simulations and normalised to the data using the t values described in section 5. The distribution for electrons from photon conversions is, as explained before, visible as an asymmetric and shifted distribution. The impact parameter distribution of electrons from prompt sources, such as Dalitz and quarkonium decays, is determined by the impact parameter resolution. The electrons from these sources are thus categorised as Dalitz decays within both analyses. { 6 { e i r 1tn04 E 103 102 1.5 < p < 2.0 GeV/c ALICE, 0−20% Pb−Pb, sNN = 2.76 TeV DataT Conversion electrons Dalitz electrons c → e d0 × sign(charge × field) (cm) d0 × sign(charge × field) (cm) 5 < pT < 6 GeV=c in the 20% most central Pb-Pb collisions. The impact parameter value of each track was multiplied by the sign of the charge of each track and the sign of the magnetic eld. The individual distributions for electrons from beauty-hadron and charm-hadron decays, from Dalitz-decays of light mesons, and from photon conversions were obtained by HIJING and PYTHIA simulations. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the data and `Sum'. The Monte Carlo simulations were produced as follows. A sample of minimum-bias Pb-Pb collisions at psNN = 2.76 TeV was generated with HIJING v1.36 [68] for e ciency and acceptance corrections as well as to obtain the impact parameter distributions for photon conversions and Dalitz decays. To increase the statistics of electrons from charm- and beauty-hadron decays, a signal enhanced sample was generated using pp events produced by the generator PYTHIA v6.4.21 [69] with Perugia-0 tune [70]. Each added pp event contains one cc or bb pair. For the p-Pb analysis, the same procedure was used. The generated particles were propagated through the ALICE apparatus using GEANT3 [71] and a realistic detector response was applied to reproduce the performance of the detector system during data taking. The inclusive yield of electrons originating from strange-hadron decays is small compared to the other background sources. However, as these electrons originate from secondary 0 from strange-hadron decays (K0S, K0L, K , ) and three prong decays of strange hadrons (K0L,K ), the impact parameter distribution is broader than that of electrons from Dalitz and di-electron decays of other light neutral mesons. Sections 4 and 5 describe how the analyses handle this background contribution. Although requiring hits in both SPD layers, electrons from photon conversions in detector material with production radii outside the SPD layers were observed to have passed the track selection. These electron tracks are wrongly associated with signals of other particles in the inner detector layers. Within this paper these electrons are called { 7 { `mismatched conversions'. The amount of mismatched conversions depends on the track multiplicity within the event and thus has a larger impact for the Pb-Pb analysis. Sections 4 and 5 outline how the analyses deal with the mismatched conversions. The impact parameter distributions of electrons from most background sources are narrow compared to the one of electrons from beauty-hadron decays. By applying a minimum cut on the absolute value of the impact parameter jd0j, the fraction of electrons from beauty-hadron decays can thus be enhanced. The remaining background can be described using a cocktail method and subtracted statistically to obtain electrons from beauty-hadron decays [23, 24]. This method was applied in the p-Pb analysis and is described in detail in section 4. Another technique, used in the Pb-Pb analysis (see section 5), is to make use of the whole impact parameter distribution, i.e. to compare the impact parameter distributions of the various electron sources from simulation (templates) with the impact parameter distribution of all measured electron candidates to estimate the individual contributions. 4 Data analysis in p-Pb collisions The identi cation of electrons from beauty-hadron decays in the p-Pb analysis is based on the selection of electrons with large impact parameters. This method was already applied in pp collisions at p s = 2.76 TeV and p s = 7 TeV [23, 24]. Since the impact parameter distribution of electrons from beauty-hadron decays is broader compared to the one of electrons from most background sources (see section 3), the requirement of a minimum absolute impact parameter enhances the signal-to-background (S/B) ratio of electrons from beauty-hadron decays. The remaining background due to hadron contamination and electrons from background sources was obtained via a data-driven method and from Monte Carlo simulations re-weighted to match the pT distributions of the background sources in data, respectively, and then subtracted. 4.1 Extraction of electrons from beauty-hadron decays Electron candidates with an impact parameter jd0j > 0:0054 + 0:078 exp( 0:56 pT) (with d0 in cm and pT in GeV=c) were selected. This selection criterion was determined from Monte Carlo simulations to maximise the signi cance for electrons from beautyhadron decays. The selection of the minimum impact parameter is pT dependent, because the width of the impact parameter distribution, the S/B ratio as well as the true impact parameter distribution of the various electron sources [23] are pT dependent. The number of hadrons passing the track selection, eID, and the minimum impact parameter requirement was estimated at high transverse momentum (pT 4 GeV=c) by parametrising the TPC nTPC distribution in momentum slices, and it was subtracted [72]. Above a pT of 4 GeV=c, the hadron contamination increases with transverse momentum and reaches 10% at 8 GeV=c, see gure 2 (left). At low transverse momentum (pT 4 GeV=c), the hadron contamination is negligible except in the transverse momentum interval 1 < pT < 1:2 GeV=c, see gure 2 (left), where electrons cannot be distinguished from protons via the measurement of speci c energy loss in the TPC gas. In addition, the requirement of a minimum impact parameter increases the relative contribution of secondary { 8 { protons originating from e.g. and + decays, which have larger impact parameter values compared to electrons from beauty-hadron decays. The relative abundance of protons in the electron candidate sample was determined by using the ITS particle identi cation capabilities, because electrons and protons can be separated with ITS in this momentum interval. The ITS energy loss signal was tted with data-derived templates for electrons and protons. The templates were obtained in pT-bins by selecting electrons and protons with tight selection criteria in TOF and TPC. The estimated proton contribution, which is 10% (4%) in the pT interval 1 < pT < 1:1 GeV=c (1:1 < pT < 1:2 GeV=c), was subtracted statistically from the measured electron candidate pT distribution. track, eID, and impact parameter selection, before e ciency corrections. The contributions due to the proton and hadron contamination at low and high pT, respectively, determined via the aforementioned methods are shown. Also shown are the distributions of electrons originating from the various background sources, which were obtained using the Monte Carlo simulations described in section 3. To match the measured shapes, the pT di erential yields of the background sources were re-weighted in the Monte Carlo simulations prior to the propagation through the ALICE apparatus with GEANT3. As there is no measurement of the 0 production cross section in p-Pb collisions available, the 0 input was based on the measured charged-pion spectra [73, 74] assuming N 0 = (N + + N )=2. Due to the requirement of a minimum impact parameter, the contribution of electrons from decays of secondary 0 from strange-hadron decays is comparable with the one from primary decays. Therefore the measured pT spectra of K , K0S and [73] were used to compute the corresponding weights. To obtain the weights, the pion and strange-hadron spectra were parameterised with a Tsallis function as described in [72]. The contribution of electrons originating from secondary pions from strange-hadron decays or three-body decays of strange hadrons is shown in gure 2 (left). The other light mesons ( , , !, 0 and ), which contribute little, via Dalitz decays and photon conversions compared to primary re-weighted via mT-scaling of the 0 spectrum [72]. The electron background from charmhadron decays was estimated based on the D0, D+ and Ds+ meson production cross section measurements with ALICE [ 48 ] in the transverse momentum intervals 1 < pT < 16 GeV=c, 2 < pT < 24 GeV=c and 2 < pT < 12 GeV=c, respectively. In a rst step the measurements were extrapolated to the pT interval 1 < pT < 24 GeV=c by assuming constant ratios D0/D+ and Ds+/D0 from the measured D meson production cross sections. Next the pT di erential production cross sections were extrapolated to pT = 50 GeV=c via FONLL pQCD calculations. About 10% of the electrons with pT 8 GeV=c originate from the extrapolated D meson high-pT region (pT 24 GeV=c). The electron contribution from 0 decays, were c+ decays was estimated using the ratio ( c+)/ laboration [75]. Analogous to the light mesons, the measured D meson pT spectra were also used to re-weight the pT distributions in the Monte Carlo simulations. The signal of electrons from beauty-hadron decays was obtained after subtraction of the aforementioned background contributions from the measured electron candidate sample after track selection, eID and impact parameter requirement. The resulting pT spectrum is shown in gure 2 (left). At pT = 1 GeV=c, the number of electrons from beauty-hadron { 9 { V e 1 0.8 parameter requirement in comparison with the proton and hadron contamination as well as electrons from the di erent background sources in p-Pb collisions. The error bars represent the statistical uncertainties. (Right) E ciencies for the p-Pb analysis as a function of transverse momentum (see text and equation 4.1 for details). The vertical dashed line indicates the switch of the eID between the TPC and TOF and TOF-only method. decays is approximately equal to the one from charm-hadron decays, from Dalitz decays of light mesons, from strange-hadron decays and from photon conversions, resulting in a S/B ratio of approximately 1=3. With increasing pT the background electron yield from Dalitz decays of light mesons, from strange-hadron decays and from photon conversions quickly decreases compared to the contribution of electrons from charm-hadron decays. In the pT interval 4:5 < pT < 5 GeV=c, the S/B ratio reaches its maximum of 3. Here the electron background mostly originates from charm-hadron decays. At higher pT, the S/B ratio decreases again due to the increasing hadron contamination. Other background sources, such as di-lepton decays of J/ mesons are negligible due to the minimum impact parameter selection. The yield of electrons from Drell-Yan processes is negligible over the whole pT range [72]. The raw yield of electrons from beauty-hadron decays Ne;raw was then corrected for the geometrical acceptance and for the e ciency ( rec) of the track reconstruction, matching and selection criteria, TOF electron identi cation and minimum impact parameter requirement using the Monte Carlo simulations. The e ciency of the TPC electron identi cation selection ( TPCeID) was determined to be 69% via a data-driven approach based on the nTPC distributions [72]. The transverse-momentum dependence of the e ciencies is shown in gure 2 (right). The total e ciency shows a signi cant pT dependence, mainly due to the d0 cut. The e ects of the nite momentum resolution and the energy loss due to Bremsstrahlung were taken into account in a bin-by-bin pT resolution correction step based on a Monte Carlo simulation [23, 76]. The pT-di erential invariant cross section of electrons from beauty-hadron decays, (e+ + e )=2, is thus given as: 1 d 2 2 pT dpTdy = 1 1 T 2 2 pcentre y pT rec TPCeID Nmb 1 Ne;raw V0 mb ; (4.1) where pcentre is the centre of the pT bin with width T pT and y denotes the geometrical acceptance in jylabj to which the analysis was restricted. Nmb is the total number of analysed minimum-bias events. The p-Pb cross section for the minimum-bias V0 trigger condition, which has an e ciency of more than 99% for non-single-di ractive (NSD) p-Pb collisions [77], is mV0b = 2:09 An overview of the relative systematic uncertainties is shown in table 1. The systematic uncertainties were estimated as a function of pT by repeating the analysis with modi ed track selection and eID criteria and by varying the background yields within their estimated The uncertainty of the tracking results from di erences in data and Monte Carlo simulations for the track reconstruction with the ITS and the TPC, which includes the uncertainty of nding a hit in the ITS for a track reconstructed in the TPC. The latter uncertainty (3%) was taken from [79], where the e ect was studied for charged particles. The TOF-TPC matching uncertainty (5%) was obtained by comparing the matching e ciency of electrons from photon conversions identi ed via topological selections in data and Monte Carlo simulations. The TOF eID uncertainty was derived by repeating the analysis with di erent eID selection criteria. At high pT the TOF was not used in the analysis and thus the corresponding uncertainty does not apply in this region. The uncertainty of the TPC eID was estimated in the same way as for the TOF eID. The systematic uncertainty of the determination of the hadron contamination ranges from 1% to 6%, i.e. increasing as the contamination itself with increasing pT. The systematic uncertainty of the minimum impact parameter requirement was evaluated by varying this selection criterion by 1 , where corresponds to the measured impact parameter resolution [23]. At 1 GeV=c (8 GeV=c) this corresponds to a 10% ( 25%) variation of the cut value. The number of electrons from photon conversions increases quickly with decreasing transverse momentum (see gure 2, left). The di erence in yield of mismatched conversions in data and Monte Carlo simulations was estimated and assigned as a systematic uncertainty. For this purpose pions from K0S decays identi ed via topological and invariant mass cuts [80] can be used, because their decay vertex can be reconstructed, in contrast to electrons from photon conversions, for which it is more di cult due to their small opening angle. The yield of pions from K0S decays was studied as a function of the production vertex with and without requiring a signal in both SPD layers and compared with the corresponding results from Monte Carlo simulations. The di erence in yield was propagated into the simulation by renormalising the number of electrons from photon conversions. Repeating the full analysis with the varied conversion yield results in the uncertainties listed in table 1. The systematic uncertainty arising from the subtraction of electrons from the various background sources was evaluated by propagating the statistical and systematic uncertainties of the light-meson, strange- and charm-hadron measurements used as input to re-weight the pT distributions in Monte Carlo simulations. Uncertainties due to the mTscaling of the background yields, estimated as 30% [72], and the extrapolation of the D meson pT distributions to the unmeasured transverse momentum regions were included. The latter was obtained by using the uncertainties of the various D meson ratios and by using a power-law t instead of FONLL pQCD calculations for the extrapolation of the pT reach to 50 GeV=c. The uncertainty of the contribution of electrons from was estimated by varying the ratio ( c)/ The resulting uncertainty is negligible compared to the overall systematics, because the c contribution is small, less than 10%. Over the whole pT range, the systematic uncertainty due to the subtraction of electrons from charm-hadron decays dominates. The uncertainty due to the subtraction of electrons from light-hadron decays is large at very low pT, but decreases quickly with increasing pT as does the overall yield of this background source, as shown in gure 2 (left). At high pT, the uncertainty of the hadron contamination increases. The in uence due to the form factor of electrons from charm and beauty hadron decays as well as light neutral mesons was studied using di erent decayers and estimated to be negligible. As the individual sources of systematic uncertainties are uncorrelated, they were added in quadrature to obtain the total systematic uncertainty. The total uncertainty amounts to 38% for the lowest pT interval and decreases to 12% at pT = 8 GeV=c. The systematic uncertainty due to the determination of the nucleon-nucleon cross section for the minimum-bias trigger condition is 3.7% [78]. 5 Data analysis in Pb-Pb collisions In the Pb-Pb analysis, the yield of electrons from beauty-hadron decays was extracted using the full information contained within the impact parameter distribution of all electron candidates. From the shape of the impact parameter distribution within one pT interval, it is possible to infer the contributions from the di erent electron sources (see section 3). Templates for these distributions were obtained from Monte Carlo simulations including e ects such as particle lifetime and the detector response. The templates were then added with appropriate weights to reproduce the measured impact parameter distribution for all electron candidates. Examples are shown in gure 1. The template ts were performed using the method proposed in [81]. The approach relies on the accurate description of the impact parameter distributions in Monte Carlo simulations. Thus, detailed studies of di erences between the impact parameter distributions in data and Monte Carlo simulations were performed. Di erences were corrected for, while the related uncertainties were propagated as detailed below. For the template t method, four classes of electron sources Tracking and matching mentum intervals correspond to the TPC and TOF and TPC-only eID strategies. Individual sources of systematic uncertainties are pT dependent, which is reported using ranges. The lower and upper values of the interval, respectively, represent the uncertainty at pT = 1 GeV=c (pT = 2.5 GeV=c) and pT = 2.5 GeV=c (pT = 8 GeV=c) for the TPC and TOF (TPC-only) eID strategy. The lower and upper values of the interval for the hadron contamination are pT = 4 GeV=c and 8 GeV=c. The second group of entries in the table is related to the method used to extract the electrons from beauty-hadron decays. were distinguished. Their impact parameter distributions, as provided by the Monte Carlo simulations for each pT interval, will be referred to as t templates in the following. The four categories correspond to electrons from beauty-hadron decays, from charm-hadron decays, from photon conversions and electrons from other processes, which will be referred to as `Dalitz electrons'. The latter is dominated by electrons from Dalitz decays of light neutral mesons. Given that these electrons essentially originate from the interaction point with respect to the detector resolution, the measured impact parameter distribution depends only on the transverse momentum of the electron. Similarly, the remaining hadron contamination consists of particles mostly produced close to the interaction point making its impact parameter distribution similar to that of the Dalitz electrons. 5.1 Extraction of electrons from beauty-hadron decays The t templates from the Monte Carlo simulations can be considered as random samples of the unknown true distributions. For each of the four electron sources considered in the previous section, there is a number of counts in the template for each impact parameter bin (see gure 1). The number of counts from a particular electron source j in a particular bin i is called aji. Its unknown expectation value is called Aji and is considered as a free parameter of the t. The t function is the sum of the expectation values, each weighted with the appropriate amplitude parameter pj : fi = Pj pj Aji. The bin counts of the impact parameter templates are connected to their expectation values via Poisson statistics. The same relation holds between the t function and the data (di) within each impact parameter bin leading to the likelihood distribution [81] log L = i X di log fi fi + X X aji log Aji Aji : j i (5.1) 0.8 0.6 This gives one free amplitude parameter for each electron source (pj ) and one free expectation value parameter for each electron source and impact parameter bin (Aji). The main parameters of interest are the pj , in particular pbeauty, while the nuisance parameters Aji arise due to the nite statistics of the templates. Evaluating the full likelihood distribution in several hundred dimensions is challenging. Therefore a simpler approach is to use the maximum likelihood as an estimator for the amplitudes of the electron sources. An iterative procedure to nd the maximum likelihood with respect to the Aji for xed pj is suggested in [81]. Numerical minimisation is then performed only for the pj . Equations for the iterative procedure can be found by setting the di erentials dL=dAji to zero. Solving these equations for Aji, yields an iterative rule for each bin. For a bin i with a nite number of entries from data, but zero counts in any of the templates, the likelihood distribution of the Aji is not well represented by its maximum. This happens mostly in the tails of the distributions (see gure 1), where the contribution of electrons from beauty-hadron decays dominates. Thus, for this case only the contribution from this source was considered. To obtain the raw yield of the signal, i.e. electrons from beauty-hadron decays, in a given pT interval, the number of electrons in the template was scaled by the amplitude parameter pbeauty. As in the p-Pb analysis, the raw yield was then corrected for the geometrical acceptance, the track reconstruction and selection criteria, the TOF acceptance, and the TOF eID using Monte Carlo simulations. The TPC eID e ciency ( TPCeID) was determined via a data-driven approach using electrons from photon conversions identi ed via topological cuts and the invariant mass [82]. The corresponding nTPC distributions were tted with the function Landau Exp Gauss [72], which describes the distributions including uctuations, and the e ciency determined as the ratio of electrons before and after the TPC eID selection criterion (see section 3). Next the pT spectrum was unfolded. section 4. The o -diagonal elements of the response matrix are small. For this reason no regularisation was used in the unfolding procedure to avoid additional systematic uncertainties. The unfolding was done using a matrix inversion of the response matrix [76]. Due to the restricted pT range of the measurement there is some dependence of the unfolded values on bins that have not been measured, mainly the adjacent bins. To solve this, the yield was measured in two further bins (1:1 < pT < 1:3 GeV=c and 8 < pT < 12 GeV=c) and used only in the unfolding calculations. The statistical uncertainties were propagated To validate this signal extraction method, the template t method was also applied to the p-Pb data, where results were found to be consistent with the cut method described in Systematic uncertainties estimation The systematic uncertainties are summarized in table 2. They were estimated using datadriven methods where possible. An overview of the e ciencies of the di erent track selection steps may be found in gure 3. The e ciency due to the ITS track selection criteria (hits in both SPD layers) does not depend strongly on the particle species. Thus, charged tracks could be used as a representative sample with respect to the geometric e ects, such as inactive areas of the detector. The normalisation for the e ciency was performed by making use of phase space (pseudorapidity and azimuthal angle) regions where the e ciency was close to unity. Averaging over the phase space yields a proxy for the total e ciency which was compared between data and Monte Carlo simulations and yielded a di erence of 2%. The uncertainty for non-geometric e ects was estimated to be smaller than 3%. The e ciencies of the requirements on charged tracks with good quality, the TOF matching and TOF eID depend more strongly on the particle type. Therefore, only an electron sample could be representative. It was obtained by selecting electrons from photon conversions. Due to the large particle multiplicity in central Pb-Pb collisions (resulting in a sizeable hadron contamination), the comparison was done using weak additional particle identi cation ( 1:5 < nTPC < 4), in more peripheral collisions (20 40%; 40 80%), and with di erent ITS track selection criteria (excluding signals in the innermost layer). To account for biases due to these additional criteria, they were varied and the results were checked for consistency. The estimated systematic uncertainties are about 3% for the requirement of charged tracks with good quality and about 10% for the TOF matching and eID. The systematic uncertainty of the TPC eID includes di erences in the eID e ciency for electrons from beauty-hadron decays and for electrons from photon conversion (due to the di erent pseudorapidity distributions) in the sample as well as the uncertainty of the extrapolation towards lower nTPC. The uncertainty due to the modelling of the nTPC distribution was checked by comparing di erent model descriptions with the standard one and by comparing with a sample of pions selected with the TRD and TOF. The total uncertainty of 5% for the TPC eID is the quadratic sum of the following contributions: 2% from the extrapolation, 2% from the pseudorapidity dependence, 3% from a possible pT dependence and 2% from the tail of the nTPC distribution. To estimate the statistical and systematic uncertainty on the extracted signal yield due to the maximum-likelihood t, a Monte Carlo closure test was used. For this purpose, the templates were slightly smoothed and the result sampled with the statistics present in the measurement. The pseudo-data was created by using the measured contributions as input. The application of the template t allowed for a comparison of the measured and true value. Repetitions of this process gave an estimation of the statistical and systematic contribution to the uncertainty. The charm yield of the test was varied to avoid underestimating the uncertainty in pT intervals with downward uctuations of the measured charm yield. The systematic uncertainty varies between 19% and 6% between the di erent pT intervals. There is an uncertainty in how well the impact parameter distributions of the di erent electron sources are described by the Monte Carlo simulations. Where possible, any di erences were corrected for. The remaining uncertainty was propagated to the measured spectrum of electrons from beauty-hadron decays by changing the t templates within their The di erent resolution of the impact parameter (d0) with the given track and event selection criteria in Monte Carlo simulations and data was corrected for. The size of the correction was estimated by comparing the impact parameter distributions of primary pions, yielding a 10{12% worse resolution in data compared to the Monte Carlo simulations in the pT range of the measurement. To correct for this e ect, a Gaussian distributed random number was added to each impact parameter value such that the resolution in the Monte Carlo simulations matched that of the data. The central values of the yield of electrons from beauty-hadron decays were estimated using a resolution correction of 10%. The yield using a correction of 12% instead, di ers by about 10% at pT = 1.3 GeV=c with the di erence decreasing quickly towards higher pT. The e ect of the correction was found to be negligible for the p-Pb analysis. Despite the strong eID requirements, there is a signi cant contamination of the electron sample by hadrons (mostly charged pions). The contribution was estimated using a clean TPC energy loss signal of pions identi ed with the TRD, which was tted to the nTPC distribution, suggesting a contamination of the electron candidate sample of about 15% even for low transverse momentum. The contamination was not explicitly subtracted. The impact parameter distribution of charged hadrons is similar to that of the Dalitz template. This means that the contribution of the hadron contamination to the impact parameter distribution was absorbed into the Dalitz template by the t method. To account for slight di erences between the distributions, the result was compared with a t using the hadron impact parameter template instead. A hypothetical template with the same mixture of Dalitz electrons and hadrons as in data would yield a result between these two extreme cases. For pT 5 GeV=c, the t using the hadron template was used for the central points as the contribution from hadrons dominates compared to that of the Dalitz electrons. The di erence in the measured yield of electrons from beauty-hadron decays after exchanging the Dalitz template for the hadron template is 7% at pT = 1.3 GeV=c decreasing towards higher transverse momentum. The proton contamination is signi cant only below pT = 1.3 GeV=c. Like for the p-Pb analysis, the in uence of the di erence in yield of mismatched conversions in data and Monte Carlo simulations had to be considered, especially as it increases with the multiplicity of the event. By making use of the multiplicity dependence, it was possible to create templates that either over- or underestimate this e ect. This was crosschecked using charged pions from K0S decays as done in the p-Pb analysis (see section 4.2). The change of the resulting measured spectra of electrons from beauty-hadron decays was used as an estimate for the systematic uncertainty, which is 14% at pT = 1.3 GeV=c and decreases quickly towards higher transverse momentum. As for the p-Pb analysis, electrons from secondary pion and three-body decays of hadrons carrying a strange (or anti-strange) quark had to be considered, especially as these have broader impact parameter distributions than Dalitz electrons (see section 3). Due to the di erent nal states, both the template for electrons from photon conversions and the template for Dalitz electrons are a ected. These were split into a contribution from the decay of strange particles and the rest. For the t they were considered as separate templates, but the amplitude parameters were coupled to have a xed ratio. This was necessary because the contribution from strangeness is very small and could not be constrained by the information from the impact parameter distribution alone. The relative strength of the strangeness content was varied by a factor of two which includes the variation expected from the measured kaon/pion ratio [37]. The resulting di erence in the yield of electrons from beauty-hadron decays was used as the estimate for the systematic uncertainty. It is 1:3% for low pT, decreasing towards higher transverse momentum. Electrons at a xed transverse momentum have mother particles in a range of pT values. The impact parameter distributions of electrons depend on the momentum distributions of the mother particles. For the charm case this can be disentangled by making use of the measured charm pT distribution [83]. For the beauty case this means that the result of the measurement depends on the input beauty-hadron spectrum in the Monte Carlo simulation. The e ect was estimated by varying the beauty-hadron pT distribution of the templates and observing the resulting change in the measured electron pT distribution. The beauty-hadron pT distribution was obtained according to PYTHIA simulations with a Perugia-0 tune which describes the measured p-Pb data well. Therefore, an e ect of the variation of the pT distribution was studied by introducing a momentum-dependent nuclear modi cation factor RAA. An RAA based on a theoretical calculation was used for the central points [84]. It has values near unity for low transverse momenta and drops to about 0:5 from a hadron pT of 5 to 10 GeV=c. This was varied to half its e ect (RAA ! (1 + RAA)=2) in order to estimate the associated uncertainty. For the charm case, the variation was done according to the measurement uncertainties [83]. The di erence in the resulting measured yield of electrons from beauty-hadron decays is about 8%, with no visible pT dependence. For the template t, all species of charmed hadrons were combined into one template. The same holds for the beauty case. The baryon fraction of heavy hadrons is currently not known for Pb-Pb collisions and might be di erent than for pp collisions. Because of the di erent masses and decay channels, the various heavy- avour hadron decays produce electrons with di erent impact parameter distributions. The templates were split into their contributions from only mesons or only baryons, with xed ratios of the t amplitudes. To estimate the uncertainty, the baryon fraction was increased by a factor of three for both charm and beauty simultaneously, motivated by the results of thermal model calcuTracking and matching TOF matching and eID tainties are pT dependent, which is reported using intervals. The lower and upper value of the interval, respectively, lists the uncertainty at pT = 1.3 GeV=c and pT = 8.0 GeV=c. The second group of entries in the table is related to the method used to extract the electrons from beautyhadron decays. lations [85]. This led to a change in the measured yield of electrons from beauty-hadron decays of about 5% with no clear momentum dependence. Decreasing the baryon ratio even to 0 has a smaller e ect. 6 Reference pp cross sections at p For the calculations of the nuclear modi cation factors RpPb and RPbPb, corresponding pp s = 2.76 TeV are needed. To obtain these, the same method is used in both analyses. It is described in more detail in the following for the p-Pb analysis. At present no pp measurement at p s = 5.02 TeV exists. Therefore, the cross section pQCD calculations [29{31] at p s = 5.02 TeV and p of electrons from beauty-hadron decays measured in the momentum interval 1 < pT < 8 GeV=c at p s = 7 TeV [23] was scaled to p s = 5.02 TeV by applying a pQCD-driven psscaling [86]. The pT-dependent scaling function was obtained by calculating the ratio of the production cross sections of electrons from beauty-hadron decays from FONLL s = 7 TeV. Both the direct (b ! e) and the cascade decay (b ! c ! e) were considered. For the calculations at both energies the same parameters were used for the beauty-quark mass (mb = 4:75 GeV=c2), the PDFs (CTEQ6.6 [87]) as well as the factorisation F and renormalisation R scales with R = qm2b + p2T;b, where pT;b denotes the transverse momentum of the beauty quark. The uncertainties of the pT-dependent scaling function were estimated by varying the parameters. The beauty-quark mass was set to mb = 4.5 and 5 GeV=c2. The uncertainties for the PDFs were obtained by using the CTEQ6.6 PDF uncertainties [87]. The contribution from the scale uncertainties was estimated by using six di erent sets: ( R= 0; F= 0) = (0.5,0.5),(1,0.5),(0.5,1),(2,1),(1,2),(2,2). The uncertainties originating HJEP07(21)5 2 ) V )10-3 (eG10-4 2σ10-6 d ALICE pp, s = 2.76 TeV measured pp s = 7 TeV scaled to 2.76 TeV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 T 8 with the measured spectrum in pp collisions at p by a pQCD-driven scaling of the cross section measured in pp collisions at ps = 7 TeV in comparison spectrum at p spectrum measured at p of the pp reference spectrum at p from the mass and PDF variations are negligible. The uncertainty stemming from the variation of the scales was de ned as the largest deviation from the scaling factor obtained with R = F = 0. The resulting ps-scaling uncertainty is almost independent of pT. It ranges from +42% at 1 GeV=c to about +22% at 8 GeV=c. The total systematic uncertainty s = 5.02 TeV is then given as the bin-by-bin quadratic sum of the ps-scaling uncertainty and the relative systematic uncertainty of the measured s = 7 TeV. For the statistical uncertainties the relative uncertainties of the s = 7 TeV were taken. The measured spectrum at p trons from beauty-hadron decays in pp collisions at p For the RPbPb analysis, the measured spectrum at p s = 7 TeV was scaled to p s = 2.76 TeV using FONLL pQCD calculations at the respective energies. The systematic scaling uncertainty is about +117% at 1 GeV=c and about +75% at 8 GeV=c. The resulting pp reference spectrum was found to be consistent with the measurement of elecs = 2.76 TeV was not taken as a reference for the RPbPb, s = 2.76 TeV [88], shown in gure 4. the ps-scaling. because of larger statistical and systematic uncertainties than the reference obtained via The systematic uncertainty of the normalisation related to the determination of the cross section of the minimum-bias trigger used for the measurement at p and also holds for the obtained pp reference spectra at p s = 5.02 TeV and p s = 7 TeV is 3.5% s = 2.76 TeV. The systematic uncertainties of the input pT-di erential cross section of electrons from beauty-hadron decays measured at p s = 7 TeV, the normalisation uncertainty, as well as the scaling uncertainties for the reference spectra are summarised in table 3. ) 10-1 2 ) / eV10-2 G ( / )(110-3 y d T /(dp10-4 35% to 20% for 1:5 < pT < 2:5 GeV=c 20% for pT +42% +22% p +117% +75% scaling uncertainty for p-Pb ( s = 5.02 TeV) Pb-Pb ( s = 2.76 TeV) hadron decays measured at p uncertainties for the reference spectra at p s = 5.02 TeV and p s = 2.76 TeV. The scaling uncertainties for the reference spectra are slightly pT dependent; the uncertainties are given for the two s = 7 TeV [23], the normalisation uncertainty, as well as the scaling extreme pT intervals. Details are described in the text. 2 ) / V ( / T T as a function of transverse momentum in minimum-bias p-Pb collisions at psNN = 5.02 TeV and in the 20% most central Pb-Pb collisions at psNN = 2.76 TeV. The pp reference spectra scaled by the number of nucleons in the Pb nucleus (A = 208) and by hTAAi, respectively, are shown as well. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties, the boxes indicate the systematic uncertainties. The pp and p-Pb normalisation uncertainties of 3.5% and 3.7% as well as the one of the nuclear overlap function hTAAi of 3.9% are not shown. 7 most central Pb-Pb collisions at psNN = 2.76 TeV, respectively, are shown in The pT-di erential cross section and invariant yield of electrons from beauty-hadron decays at mid-rapidity in minimum-bias p-Pb collisions at psNN = 5.02 TeV and in the 20% gure 5. The markers are plotted at the centre of the pT bin. The vertical bars indicate the statistical uncertainties, the boxes represent the systematic uncertainties. The pp reference spectra, obtained via the pQCD-driven ps-scaling from the measurement in pp collisions 0−20% Pb−Pb, sNN = 2.76 TeV ALICE b (→ c) → e, | ycms | < 0.8 b, c → e, | ycms | < 0.6 ito 2 ALICE r r o o t t f f n n c i i f f m e e l l c ito 2 id1.5 o decays at mid-rapidity as a function of transverse momentum for minimum-bias p-Pb collisions at psNN = 5.02 TeV and 20% most central Pb-Pb collisions at psNN = 2.76 TeV. The data points of the p-Pb analysis were shifted by 0.05 GeV=c to the left along the pT axis for better visibility. (Right) RPbPb of electrons from beauty-hadron decays together with the corresponding result for beauty- and charm-hadron decays [89] for the 20% most central Pb-Pb collisions. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the systematic uncertainties. The normalisation uncertainties, common to all points, are shown as lled boxes at high pT for all nuclear modi cation factors. at p s = 7 TeV as described in section 6, are shown for comparison. The pp reference spectra were multiplied by the number of nucleons in the Pb nucleus (A = 208) for the p-Pb and with the nuclear overlap function (hTAAi) for the Pb-Pb comparison. The Pb-Pb result shows a suppression of electrons from beauty-hadron decays at high pT compared to the yield in pp collisions. Such a suppression is not seen in the comparison of the p-Pb spectrum with the corresponding pp reference. The nuclear modi cation factors RPbPb and RpPb are shown in gure 6 (left). The RPbPb was obtained using equation (1.1). The RpPb was calculated as the ratio of the cross section of electrons from beauty-hadron decays in p-Pb and pp collisions scaled by the number of nucleons in the Pb nucleus (A = 208). The statistical and systematic uncertainties of the Pb-Pb or p-Pb and the pp spectra were propagated as independent uncertainties. The systematic uncertainties of the nuclear modi cation factors are partially correlated between the pT bins. The normalisation uncertainty of the pp spectrum and the uncertainty of the nuclear overlap function hTAAi or the normalisation uncertainties of the p-Pb spectrum, respectively, were added in quadrature. The normalisation uncertainties are shown as lled boxes at high transverse momentum in gure 6. The RpPb is consistent with unity within uncertainties (of about 20% for pT > 2 GeV=c) for all shown transverse momenta. The production of electrons from beauty-hadron decays is thus consistent with binary-collision scaling of the corresponding measurement in pp collisions at the same centre-of-mass energy. The values of the RPbPb for the 20% most 1.5 0.5 b b P P b p−Pb, sNN = 5.02 TeV, −1.06 < ycms < 0.14 FONLL + EPS09NLO shad. Blast wave calculation Sharma et al.: Coherent scattering + CNM energy loss Kang et al.: Incoherent multiple scattering ALICE 2P.5 R 1 1.5 ALICE hadron decays in comparison with di erent theoretical predictions [17, 18, 29{31, 57, 84, 90{97], see text for details. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the systematic uncertainties. The normalisation uncertainty, common to all points, is shown as a lled box at high pT for both collision systems. central Pb-Pb collisions increase, for pT 3 GeV=c, with sizeable uncertainties of 30{45%. In the interval 3 < pT < 6 GeV=c, the RPbPb is about 0.7 with a systematic uncertainty of about 30%; in 6 < pT < 8 GeV=c the ratio is 0.48 with an uncertainty of about 25%. In the latter transverse momentum range the suppression with respect to RPbPb = 1 is a 3.3 e ect taking into account the statistical and systematic uncertainties. A comparison of the RPbPb of electrons from beauty-hadron decays with the one from charm- and beauty-hadron decays is shown in gure 6 (right) for the 20% most central Pb-Pb collisions. For the latter RPbPb, the pT-di erential invariant yields of electrons from charm- and beauty-hadron decays published in [89] for the centrality classes 0{10% and the corresponding invariant cross section measurement at p 10{20% were combined. For the pp reference in the momentum range up to pT s = 2.76 TeV [24], which has 12 GeV=c, uncertainties of about 20%, was used. For pT 12 GeV=c, the ATLAS measurement [72] at p s = 7 TeV was extrapolated to p s = 2.76 TeV applying a FONLL pQCD-driven psscaling analogous to the method described in section 6. The uncertainty of the pp reference in this momentum range is about 15%. As expected, the results agree within uncertainties at high pT, where the beauty contribution is larger than the charm contribution [24]. In the pT interval 3 < pT < 6 GeV=c, the suppression of the RPbPb for electrons from beauty-hadron decays is about 1.2 less. This di erence is consistent with the ordering of charm and beauty suppression seen in the prompt D meson and J/ from B meson comparison [34, 40, 41]. Within uncertainties, the RpPb is described by pQCD calculations including modi cations of the parton distribution functions (FONLL [29{31] + EPS09NLO [90] nuclear PDFs) as shown in gure 7 (left). The data and the calculation suggest that cold nuclear matter e ects are small at high transverse momentum. Recent measurements of long-range correlations for charged hadrons [ 51, 53, 54 ] and studies of the mean transverse momentum as a function of the charged-particle multiplicity in the event [73] suggest that there might be collective e ects in p-Pb collisions. The gure also reports the result of a calculation based on the idea proposed in ref. [57], in which the pT distribution of beauty hadrons from a hydrodynamically expanding medium is obtained from a blast-wave model. The blast-wave parameters were extracted from ts to the pT-spectra of light hadrons [73] in p-Pb collisions. The uncertainties of the measurement do not allow for a conclusion on possible ow e ects. The data are also described by calculations which include CNM energy loss, nuclear shadowing and coherent multiple scattering at the partonic level [17]. An enhancement at intermediate pT is predicted by the calculations based on incoherent multiple scattering [18]. Presently, the large systematic uncertainties of the measurement do not allow one to discriminate between the aforementioned theoretical approaches. Perturbative QCD calculations including initial-state e ects for Pb-Pb collisions at s = 2.76 TeV (FONLL [29{31] + EPS09NLO [90] nuclear PDFs) cannot describe the RPbPb at high transverse momentum (see gure 7, right), indicating that the suppression, particularly evident in the interval 6 < pT < 8 GeV=c, is induced by the presence of a hot and dense medium in the nal state. At lower transverse momentum, the large uncertainties do not allow one to conclude whether the measured RPbPb is larger than that obtained from this calculation. In order to gain further insight into the energy loss mechanisms, particularly the relative importance of radiative and collisional energy loss, the data are compared with several models of heavy-quark transport and energy loss in the QGP. Both radiative and collisional energy loss are included in the pQCD model MC@sHQ+EPOS2 [91], the partonic transport description BAMPS [96, 97], and in WHDG [93{95]. The non-perturbative transport model TAMU [84] includes only collisional processes, while the POWLANG [92] transport calculation simulates the production of heavy quarks using POWHEG and their propagation in the plasma via a relativistic Langevin equation. Heavy-quark energy loss can also be calculated using the AdS/CFT heavy-quark drag model [95]. The right-hand side of gure 7 shows the comparison of the various models with the measured RPbPb. The MC@sHQ+EPOS2 calculation with EPOS initial conditions [ 98, 99 ], including the Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal (LPM) e ect [100], is consistent with the data at high pT. The BAMPS [96, 97] model is based on pQCD cross sections including the running of the coupling and scaled by a constant factor . The two shown values of cannot be distinguished given the uncertainties in the data. In the WHDG calculation, the medium density is assumed to be proportional to the charged particle multiplicity and a 1-D Bjorken-expansion is included. The WHDG model describes the measurement well within the restricted pT range shown. The TAMU model includes collisional processes and incorporates resonance formation close to the critical temperature as well as di usion of heavy- avour mesons in the hadronic phase. The hydrodynamic expansion is constrained by pT spectra and elliptic ow measurements of light hadrons. The calculations are consistent with the data at high pT, indicating a limited sensitivity of the current data to radiative energy loss e ects. The POWLANG [92] transport calculation takes into account initial-state nuclear e ects via EPS09 modi cations of the PDFs and describes the medium using an underlying hydrodynamical model. The transport coe cients used for the evolution of the heavy quark in the medium are either extracted from lattice-QCD calculations or Hard-Thermal-Loop (HTL) resummation [101] of medium e ects. The hadronisation via in-vacuum fragmentation functions or via in-medium string-fragmentation routines occurs once the decoupling temperature is reached. The calculations are shown for di erent transport coe cients with a decoupling temperature Tdec = 155 MeV; the results with a temperature of Tdec = 170 MeV look similar. No scenario is clearly favoured by the current data set. The AdS/CFT model, which includes energy loss uctuations in a realistic strong-coupling energy loss mode, clearly shows a stronger suppression than the measured RPbPb. The MC@sHQ+EPOS2, the BAMPS as well as the TAMU calculation describe the suppression seen in data at high transverse momentum. They also show an increase towards lower momentum reaching RPbPb values around unity or slightly above. The data show a larger increase with decreasing transverse momentum, however exhibit large systematic and statistical uncertainties. 8 The pT-di erential cross section and invariant yield of electrons from beauty-hadron decays in minimum-bias p-Pb collisions and in the 20% most central Pb-Pb collisions, respectively, cross section of electrons from beauty-hadron decays measured at p were measured at mid-rapidity. The measurements are compared via the nuclear modication factors with pp reference spectra, obtained by a pQCD-driven ps-scaling of the s = 7 TeV. The RpPb is consistent with unity within uncertainties of about 20% at high transverse momentum pT, which increase towards low pT. The RpPb is described by pQCD calculations including initial-state e ects, energy loss approaches as well as by a blast wave model calculation that parametrises possible hydrodynamic e ects. The RPbPb is about 0.7 with an uncertainty of about 30% in the interval 3 < pT < 6 GeV=c and 0.48 with an uncertainty of about 25% for 6 < pT < 8 GeV=c. The suppression seen in the higher transverse momentum interval is not described by pQCD calculations including only initial-state e ects, indicating a nal-state e ect as the origin. The values of the RPbPb increase for pT 3 GeV=c with uncertainties of about 30{45%. The measured RPbPb is described within uncertainties by pQCD-inspired models of beauty-quark energy loss in the QGP. In the interval 3 < pT < 6 GeV=c, we observe that the suppression of the RPbPb for electrons from beauty-hadron decays is about 1.2 less than that from charm- and beauty-hadron decays. This di erence is consistent with the ordering of charm and beauty suppression seen in the prompt D meson and J/ from B meson comparison. Acknowledgments The ALICE Collaboration would like to thank all its engineers and technicians for their invaluable contributions to the construction of the experiment and the CERN accelerator teams for the outstanding performance of the LHC complex. The ALICE CollabHJEP07(21)5 oration gratefully acknowledges the resources and support provided by all Grid centres and the Worldwide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG) collaboration. The ALICE Collaboration acknowledges the following funding agencies for their support in building and running the ALICE detector: A. I. Alikhanyan National Science Laboratory (Yerevan Physics Institute) Foundation (ANSL), State Committee of Science and World Federation of Scientists (WFS), Armenia; Austrian Academy of Sciences and Nationalstiftung fur Forschung, Technologie und Entwicklung, Austria; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient co e Tecnologico (CNPq), Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (Finep) and Fundaca~o de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de S~ao Paulo (FAPESP), Brazil; Ministry of Education of China (MOE of China), Ministry of Science & Technology of China (MOST of China) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), China; Ministry of Science, Education and Sport and Croatian Science Foundation, Croatia; Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas (CIEMAT), Cuba; Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic; Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF), The Carlsberg Foundation and The Danish Council for Independent Research | Natural Sciences, Denmark; Helsinki Institute of Physics (HIP), Finland; Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique (CEA) and Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et de Physique des Particules (IN2P3) and Centre National de la Recherche Scienti que (CNRS), France; Bundesministerium fur Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie (BMBF) and GSI Helmholtzzentrum fur Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Germany; Ministry of Education, Research and Religious A airs, Greece; National Research, Development and Innovation O ce, Hungary; Department of Atomic Energy Government of India (DAE), India; Indonesian Institute of Science, Indonesia; Centro Fermi - Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche Enrico Fermi and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Italy; Institute for Innovative Science and Technology , Nagasaki Institute of Applied Science (IIST), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI and Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan; Consejo Nacional de Ciencia (CONACYT) y Tecnolog a, through Fondo de Cooperacion Internacional en Ciencia y Tecnolog a (FONCICYT) and Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academico (DGAPA), Mexico; Nationaal instituut voor subatomaire fysica (Nikhef), Netherlands; The Research Council of Norway, Norway; Commission on Science and Technology for Sustainable Development in the South (COMSATS), Pakistan; Ponti cia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Peru; Ministry of Science and Higher Education and National Science Centre, Poland; Ministry of Education and Scienti c Research, Institute of Atomic Physics and Romanian National Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation, Romania; Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR), Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation and National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, Russia; Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic, Slovakia; National Research Foundation of South Africa, South Africa; Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), South Korea; Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas (CIEMAT) and Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spain; Knut & Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW) and Swedish Research Council (VR), Sweden; European Organization for Nuclear Research, Switzerland; National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSDTA), O ce of the Higher Education Commission under NRU project of Thailand and Suranaree University of Technology (SUT), Thailand; Turkish Atomic Energy Agency (TAEK), Turkey; National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine; Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), United Kingdom; National Science Foundation of the United States of America (NSF) and United States Department of Energy, O ce of Nuclear Physics (DOE NP), United States. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. mystery in lattice QCD? Results with physical masses in the continuum limit III, JHEP 09 (2010) 073 [arXiv:1005.3508] [INSPIRE]. Rev. D 90 (2014) 094503 [arXiv:1407.6387] [INSPIRE]. [ 2 ] HotQCD collaboration, A. Bazavov et al., Equation of state in (2 + 1)- avor QCD, Phys. [3] A. Andronic et al., Heavy- avour and quarkonium production in the LHC era: from proton{proton to heavy-ion collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 107 [arXiv:1506.03981] [4] F.-M. Liu and S.-X. Liu, Quark-gluon plasma formation time and direct photons from heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 89 (2014) 034906 [arXiv:1212.6587] [INSPIRE]. psNN = 2:76 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 696 (2011) 328 [arXiv:1012.4035] [INSPIRE]. [5] ALICE collaboration, Two-pion Bose-Einstein correlations in central Pb-Pb collisions at [6] M. Gyulassy and X.N. Wang, Multiple collisions and induced gluon Bremsstrahlung in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 420 (1994) 583 [nucl-th/9306003] [INSPIRE]. [7] R. Baier, Y.L. Dokshitzer, A.H. Mueller, S. Peigne and D. Schi , Radiative energy loss and pT broadening of high-energy partons in nuclei, Nucl. Phys. B 484 (1997) 265 [hep-ph/9608322] [INSPIRE]. [8] U.A. Wiedemann, Gluon radiation o hard quarks in a nuclear environment: Opacity expansion, Nucl. Phys. B 588 (2000) 303 [hep-ph/0005129] [INSPIRE]. [9] Y.L. Dokshitzer and D.E. Kharzeev, Heavy quark colorimetry of QCD matter, Phys. Lett. B 519 (2001) 199 [hep-ph/0106202] [INSPIRE]. [10] N. Armesto, C.A. Salgado and U.A. Wiedemann, Medium induced gluon radiation o massive quarks lls the dead cone, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 114003 [hep-ph/0312106] [11] B.-W. Zhang, E. Wang and X.-N. Wang, Heavy quark energy loss in nuclear medium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 072301 [nucl-th/0309040] [INSPIRE]. Phys. A 733 (2004) 265 [nucl-th/0310076] [INSPIRE]. [12] M. Djordjevic and M. Gyulassy, Heavy quark radiative energy loss in QCD matter, Nucl. mass dependence of parton energy loss with heavy-to-light ratios at RHIC and CERN LHC, 400 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 3105 [INSPIRE]. HJEP07(21)5 [INSPIRE]. non-photonic electron production in p + p collisions at p (2010) 202301 [arXiv:1007.1200] [INSPIRE]. s = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 [21] STAR collaboration, H. Agakishiev et al., High pT non-photonic electron production in s = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 052006 [arXiv:1102.2611] p + p collisions at p production cross sections in pp collisions at p at p [arXiv:1208.1902] [INSPIRE]. decays in pp collisions at p [arXiv:1405.4117] [INSPIRE]. sections at mid-rapidity in pp collisions at p [arXiv:1205.5880] [INSPIRE]. p J= [arXiv:1106.4048] [INSPIRE]. [22] CDF collaboration, D. Acosta et al., Measurement of the J= meson and b-hadron s = 1:96 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 032001 [23] ALICE collaboration, Measurement of electrons from beauty hadron decays in pp collisions s = 7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 721 (2013) 13 [Erratum ibid. B 763 (2016) 507] [24] ALICE collaboration, Measurement of electrons from semileptonic heavy- avor hadron s = 2:76 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 012001 [25] ALICE collaboration, Measurement of prompt J= and beauty hadron production cross s = 7 TeV, JHEP 11 (2012) 065 [26] LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the B production cross-section in pp collisions at s = 7 TeV, JHEP 04 (2012) 093 [arXiv:1202.4812] [INSPIRE]. [27] CMS collaboration, Measurement of the strange B meson production cross section with decays in pp collisions at p s = 7 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 052008 and non-prompt J= 850 (2011) 387 [arXiv:1104.3038] [INSPIRE]. [28] ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the di erential cross-sections of inclusive, prompt production in proton-proton collisions at p s = 7 TeV, Nucl. Phys. B JHEP 05 (1998) 007 [hep-ph/9803400] [INSPIRE]. JHEP 03 (2001) 006 [hep-ph/0102134] [INSPIRE]. [29] M. Cacciari, M. Greco and P. Nason, The pT spectrum in heavy avor hadroproduction, predictions for charm and bottom production at the LHC, JHEP 10 (2012) 137 collisions at psNN = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 172301 [nucl-ex/0611018] [33] PHENIX collaboration, A. Adare et al., Heavy quark production in p + p and energy loss and ow of heavy quarks in Au+Au collisions at psNN = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C 84 (2011) 044905 [arXiv:1005.1627] [INSPIRE]. [34] ALICE collaboration, Centrality dependence of high-pT D meson suppression in Pb-Pb collisions at psNN = 2:76 TeV, JHEP 11 (2015) 205 [arXiv:1506.06604] [INSPIRE]. [35] ALICE collaboration, Transverse momentum dependence of D-meson production in Pb-Pb collisions at psNN = 2:76 TeV, JHEP 03 (2016) 081 [arXiv:1509.06888] [INSPIRE]. [36] ALICE collaboration, Production of muons from heavy avour decays at forward rapidity in pp and Pb-Pb collisions at psNN = 2:76 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 112301 [37] ALICE collaboration, Production of charged pions, kaons and protons at large transverse momenta in pp and Pb{Pb collisions at psNN = 2:76 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 736 (2014) 196 [38] M. Djordjevic, M. Djordjevic and B. Blagojevic, RHIC and LHC jet suppression in non-central collisions, Phys. Lett. B 737 (2014) 298 [arXiv:1405.4250] [INSPIRE]. [39] M. Djordjevic, Heavy avor puzzle at LHC: a serendipitous interplay of jet suppression and fragmentation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 042302 [arXiv:1307.4702] [INSPIRE]. [40] ALICE collaboration, Inclusive, prompt and non-prompt J= production at mid-rapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at psNN = 2:76 TeV, JHEP 07 (2015) 051 [arXiv:1504.07151] [INSPIRE]. [41] CMS collaboration, Suppression of non-prompt J= , prompt J= and Y (1S) in PbPb collisions at psNN = 2:76 TeV, JHEP 05 (2012) 063 [arXiv:1201.5069] [INSPIRE]. [42] CMS collaboration, Evidence of b-jet quenching in PbPb collisions at psNN = 2:76 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 132301 [arXiv:1312.4198] [INSPIRE]. [43] PHENIX collaboration, A. Adare et al., Single electron yields from semileptonic charm and bottom hadron decays in Au+Au collisions at psNN = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C 93 (2016) 034904 [arXiv:1509.04662] [INSPIRE]. [44] CMS collaboration, Study of B meson production in p+Pb collisions at psNN = 5:02 TeV using exclusive hadronic decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 032301 [arXiv:1508.06678] [45] CMS collaboration, Transverse momentum spectra of inclusive b jets in pPb collisions at psNN = 5:02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 754 (2016) 59 [arXiv:1510.03373] [INSPIRE]. [46] CMS collaboration, J= production in p Pb collisions, CMS-PAS-HIN-14-009 (2014). [47] LHCb collaboration, Study of J= production and cold nuclear matter e ects in pP b collisions at psNN = 5 TeV, JHEP 02 (2014) 072 [arXiv:1308.6729] [INSPIRE]. [ 48 ] ALICE collaboration, Measurement of prompt D-meson production in p-Pb collisions at psNN = 5:02 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 232301 [arXiv:1405.3452] [INSPIRE]. [ 49 ] ALICE collaboration, Measurement of electrons from heavy- avour hadron decays in p-Pb collisions at psNN = 5:02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 754 (2016) 81 [arXiv:1509.07491] production at forward and backward rapidity in d+Au collisions at psNN = 200 GeV, Phys. HJEP07(21)5 Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 252301 [arXiv:1310.1005] [INSPIRE]. [51] ALICE collaboration, Long-range angular correlations on the near and away side in p-Pb collisions at psNN = 5:02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 719 (2013) 29 [arXiv:1212.2001] [INSPIRE]. [ 52 ] ALICE collaboration, Long-range angular correlations of , K and p in p-Pb collisions at psNN = 5:02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013) 164 [arXiv:1307.3237] [INSPIRE]. [ 53 ] ATLAS collaboration, Measurement with the ATLAS detector of multi-particle azimuthal correlations in p+Pb collisions at psNN = 5:02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 725 (2013) 60 [arXiv:1303.2084] [INSPIRE]. [ 54 ] CMS collaboration, Observation of long-range near-side angular correlations in proton-lead collisions at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2013) 795 [arXiv:1210.5482] [INSPIRE]. [55] PHENIX collaboration, A. Adare et al., Quadrupole anisotropy in dihadron azimuthal correlations in central d+Au collisions at psNN = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 212301 [arXiv:1303.1794] [INSPIRE]. in d+Au collisions at psNN = 200 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 747 (2015) 265 [arXiv:1502.07652] [INSPIRE]. [56] STAR collaboration, L. Adamczyk et al., Long-range pseudorapidity dihadron correlations [57] A.M. Sickles, Possible evidence for radial ow of heavy Mesons in d+Au collisions, Phys. Lett. B 731 (2014) 51 [arXiv:1309.6924] [INSPIRE]. [58] A. Dainese, Charm production and in-medium QCD energy loss in nucleus nucleus collisions with ALICE: A Performance study, Ph.D. thesis, Padua University, Padua, Italy (2003), nucl-ex/0311004 [INSPIRE]. [59] ALICE collaboration, The ALICE experiment at the CERN LHC, 2008 JINST 3 S08002 [60] ALICE collaboration, Performance of the ALICE experiment at the CERN LHC, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29 (2014) 1430044 [arXiv:1402.4476] [INSPIRE]. tracks, 2010 JINST 5 P03003 [arXiv:1001.0502] [INSPIRE]. [61] ALICE collaboration, Alignment of the ALICE Inner Tracking System with cosmic-ray [62] J. Alme et al., The ALICE TPC, a large 3-dimensional tracking device with fast readout for ultra-high multiplicity events, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 622 (2010) 316 [arXiv:1001.1950] [63] ALICE collaboration, ALICE transition-radiation detector: technical design report, [64] ALICE collaboration, ALICE Time-Of Flight system (TOF): addendum to the technical design report, CERN-LHCC-2002-016 (2002). report, CERN-LHCC-2004-025 (2004). [65] ALICE collaboration, ALICE forward detectors: FMD, TO and VO: technical design [66] ALICE collaboration, Centrality determination of Pb-Pb collisions at psNN = 2:76 TeV with ALICE, Phys. Rev. C 88 (2013) 044909 [arXiv:1301.4361] [INSPIRE]. Phys. C 38 (2014) 090001 [INSPIRE]. [68] M. Gyulassy and X.-N. Wang, HIJING 1.0: a Monte Carlo program for parton and particle (1994) 307 [nucl-th/9502021] [INSPIRE]. [69] T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [INSPIRE]. 074018 [arXiv:1005.3457] [INSPIRE]. decays in pp collisions at p [72] ALICE collaboration, Measurement of electrons from semileptonic heavy- avour hadron s = 7 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 112007 [arXiv:1205.5423] [73] ALICE collaboration, Multiplicity dependence of pion, kaon, proton and production in p-Pb collisions at psNN = 5:02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 728 (2014) 25 [arXiv:1307.6796] [74] ALICE collaboration, Multiplicity dependence of charged pion, kaon and (anti)proton production at large transverse momentum in p-Pb collisions at psNN = 5:02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 760 (2016) 720 [arXiv:1601.03658] [INSPIRE]. [75] ZEUS collaboration, H. Abramowicz et al., Measurement of charm fragmentation fractions in photoproduction at HERA, JHEP 09 (2013) 058 [arXiv:1306.4862] [INSPIRE]. [76] G. Cowan, Statistical data analysis, Oxford science publications, Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K. (2004). [77] ALICE collaboration, Pseudorapidity density of charged particles in p+Pb collisions at psNN = 5:02 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 032301 [arXiv:1210.3615] [INSPIRE]. [78] ALICE collaboration, Measurement of visible cross sections in proton-lead collisions at psNN = 5:02 TeV in van der Meer scans with the ALICE detector, 2014 JINST 9 P11003 [arXiv:1405.1849] [INSPIRE]. [79] ALICE collaboration, Transverse momentum dependence of inclusive primary charged-particle production in p-Pb collisions at psNN = 5:02 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3054 [arXiv:1405.2737] [INSPIRE]. [80] ALICE collaboration, KS0 and production in Pb-Pb collisions at psNN = 2:76 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 222301 [arXiv:1307.5530] [INSPIRE]. [81] R. Barlow and C. Beeston, Fitting using nite Monte Carlo samples, Comp. Phys. Comm. 77 (1993) 219. [82] ALICE collaboration, Neutral pion production at midrapidity in pp and Pb-Pb collisions at [83] ALICE collaboration, Suppression of high transverse momentum D mesons in central Pb-Pb collisions at psNN = 2:76 TeV, JHEP 09 (2012) 112 [arXiv:1203.2160] [INSPIRE]. [84] M. He, R.J. Fries and R. Rapp, Heavy avor at the Large Hadron Collider in a strong ps-scaling of ALICE measurements at p heavy avour cross sections in pp collisions at p s = 2:76 TeV, using a pQCD-driven s = 7 TeV, arXiv:1107.3243 [INSPIRE]. HJEP07(21)5 [87] P.M. Nadolsky et al., Implications of CTEQ global analysis for collider observables, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 013004 [arXiv:0802.0007] [INSPIRE]. [88] ALICE collaboration, Beauty production in pp collisions at p s = 2:76 TeV measured via semi-electronic decays, Phys. Lett. B 738 (2014) 97 [arXiv:1405.4144] [INSPIRE]. [89] ALICE collaboration, Measurement of the production of high-pT electrons from heavy- avour hadron decays in Pb-Pb collisions at psNN = 2:76 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 771 (2017) 467 [arXiv:1609.07104] [INSPIRE]. [90] K.J. Eskola, H. Paukkunen and C.A. Salgado, EPS09: a new generation of NLO and LO nuclear parton distribution functions, JHEP 04 (2009) 065 [arXiv:0902.4154] [INSPIRE]. [91] M. Nahrgang, J. Aichelin, P.B. Gossiaux and K. Werner, In uence of hadronic bound states above Tc on heavy-quark observables in Pb + Pb collisions at at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C 89 (2014) 014905 [arXiv:1305.6544] [INSPIRE]. [92] A. Beraudo, A. De Pace, M. Monteno, M. Nardi and F. Prino, Heavy avors in heavy-ion collisions: quenching, ow and correlations, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 121 [arXiv:1410.6082] [INSPIRE]. [93] W.A. Horowitz and M. Gyulassy, The surprising transparency of the sQGP at LHC, Nucl. Phys. A 872 (2011) 265 [arXiv:1104.4958] [INSPIRE]. [94] S. Wicks, W. Horowitz, M. Djordjevic and M. Gyulassy, Elastic, inelastic and path length uctuations in jet tomography, Nucl. Phys. A 784 (2007) 426 [nucl-th/0512076] [INSPIRE]. [95] W.A. Horowitz, Fluctuating heavy quark energy loss in a strongly coupled quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 085019 [arXiv:1501.04693] [INSPIRE]. [96] J. Upho , O. Fochler, Z. Xu and C. Greiner, Elastic and radiative heavy quark interactions in ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions, J. Phys. G 42 (2015) 115106 [arXiv:1408.2964] [97] J. Upho , F. Senzel, O. Fochler, C. Wesp, Z. Xu and C. Greiner, Elliptic ow and nuclear modi cation factor in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions within a partonic transport model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 112301 [arXiv:1401.1364] [INSPIRE]. [ 98 ] K. Werner, I. Karpenko, T. Pierog, M. Bleicher and K. Mikhailov, Event-by-event simulation of the three-dimensional hydrodynamic evolution from ux tube initial conditions in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 82 (2010) 044904 [arXiv:1004.0805] 064907 [arXiv:1203.5704] [INSPIRE]. J. Adam39 ,88 , D. Adamova85 , M.M. Aggarwal89 , G. Aglieri Rinella35 , M. Agnello31 ,112 , HJEP07(21)5 A. Badala108 , Y.W. Baek68 , S. Bagnasco112 , R. Bailhache61 , R. Bala92 , S. Balasubramanian140 , A. Baldisseri15 , R.C. Baral58 , A.M. Barbano26 , R. Barbera28 , F. Barile33 , G.G. Barnafoldi139 , L.S. Barnby35 ,103 , V. Barret71 , P. Bartalini7 , K. Barth35 , J. Bartke119 ,i, E. Bartsch61 , M. Basile27 , N. Bastid71 , S. Basu136 , B. Bathen62 , G. Batigne115 , A. Batista Camejo71 , B. Batyunya67 , P.C. Batzing21 , I.G. Bearden82 , H. Beck95 , C. Bedda31 , N.K. Behera51 , I. Belikov65 , F. Bellini27 , H. Bello Martinez2 , R. Bellwied125 , E. Belmont-Moreno64 , L.G.E. Beltran121 , V. Belyaev76 , G. Bencedi139 , S. Beole26 , I. Berceanu79 , A. Bercuci79 , Y. Berdnikov87 , D. Berenyi139 , R.A. Bertens54 , D. Berzano35 , L. Betev35 , A. Bhasin92 , I.R. Bhat92 , A.K. Bhati89 , B. Bhattacharjee44 , J. Bhom119 , L. Bianchi125 , N. Bianchi73 , C. Bianchin138 , J. Bielc k39 , J. Bielc kova85 , A. Bilandzic82 ,36 ,96 , G. Biro139 , R. Biswas4 , S. Biswas80 ,4 , S. Bjelogrlic54 , J.T. Blair120 , D. Blau81 , C. Blume61 , F. Bock75 ,95 , A. Bogdanov76 , H. B ggild82 , L. Boldizsar139 , M. Bombara40 , M. Bonora35 , J. Book61 , H. Borel15 , A. Borissov98 , M. Borri127 ,84 , F. Bossu66 , E. Botta26 , C. Bourjau82 , P. Braun-Munzinger99 , M. Bregant122 , T.A. Broker61 , T.A. Browning97 , M. Broz39 , E.J. Brucken46 , E. Bruna112 , G.E. Bruno33 , D. Budnikov101 , H. Buesching61 , S. Bufalino31 ,26 , P. Buhler114 , S.A.I. Buitron63 , P. Buncic35 , O. Busch131 , Z. Buthelezi66 , J.B. Butt16 , J.T. Buxton19 , J. Cabala117 , D. Ca arri35 , X. Cai7 , H. Caines140 , A. Caliva54 , E. Calvo Villar104 , P. Camerini25 , F. Carena35 , W. Carena35 , F. Carnesecchi12 ,27 , J. Castillo Castellanos15 , A.J. Castro128 , E.A.R. Casula24 , C. Ceballos Sanchez9 , J. Cepila39 , P. Cerello112 , J. Cerkala117 , B. Chang126 , S. Chapeland35 , M. Chartier127 , J.L. Charvet15 , S. Chattopadhyay136 , S. Chattopadhyay102 , A. Chauvin96 ,36 , V. Chelnokov3 , M. Cherney88 , C. Cheshkov133 , B. Cheynis133 , V. Chibante Barroso35 , D.D. Chinellato123 , S. Cho51 , P. Chochula35 , K. Choi98 , M. Chojnacki82 , S. Choudhury136 , P. Christakoglou83 , C.H. Christensen82 , P. Christiansen34 , T. Chujo131 , S.U. Chung98 , C. Cicalo107 , L. Cifarelli12 ,27 , F. Cindolo106 , J. Cleymans91 , F. Colamaria33 , D. Colella56 ,35 , A. Collu75 , M. Colocci27 , G. Conesa Balbastre72 , Z. Conesa del Valle52 , M.E. Connors140 ,ii, J.G. Contreras39 , T.M. Cormier86 , Y. Corrales Morales112 , I. Cortes Maldonado2 , P. Cortese32 , M.R. Cosentino122 ,124 , F. Costa35 , J. Crkovska52 , P. Crochet71 , R. Cruz Albino11 , E. Cuautle63 , L. Cunqueiro35 ,62 , T. Dahms36 ,96 , A. Dainese109 , M.C. Danisch95 , A. Danu59 , D. Das102 , I. Das102 , S. Das4 , A. Dash80 , S. Dash48 , S. De122 , A. De Caro30 , G. de Cataldo105 , C. de Conti122 , J. de Cuveland42 , A. De Falco24 , D. De Gruttola30 ,12 , N. De Marco112 , S. De Pasquale30 , R.D. De Souza123 , A. Deisting95 ,99 , A. Delo 78 , C. Deplano83 , P. Dhankher48 , D. Di Bari33 , A. Di Mauro35 , P. Di Nezza73 , B. Di Ruzza109 , M.A. Diaz Corchero10 , T. Dietel91 , P. Dillenseger61 , R. Divia35 , . Djuvsland22 , A. Dobrin83 ,35 , D. Domenicis Gimenez122 , B. Donigus61 , O. Dordic21 , T. Drozhzhova61 , A.K. Dubey136 , A. Dubla99 , L. Ducroux133 , A.K. Duggal89 , P. Dupieux71 , R.J. Ehlers140 , D. Elia105 , E. Endress104 , H. Engel60 , E. Epple140 , B. Erazmus115 , F. Erhardt132 , B. Espagnon52 , M. Estienne115 , S. Esumi131 , G. Eulisse35 , J. Eum98 , D. Evans103 , S. Evdokimov113 , G. Eyyubova39 , L. Fabbietti36 ,96 , D. Fabris109 , J. Faivre72 , A. Fantoni73 , M. Fasel75 , L. Feldkamp62 , A. Feliciello112 , G. Feo lov135 , J. Ferencei85 , A. Fernandez Tellez2 , E.G. Ferreiro17 , A. Ferretti26 , A. Festanti29 , V.J.G. Feuillard71 ,15 , J. Figiel119 , R. Gupta92 , I.B. Guzman2 , R. Haake62 ,35 , C. Hadjidakis52 , M. Haiduc59 , H. Hamagaki130 ,77 , G. Hamar139 , J.C. Hamon65 , J.W. Harris140 , A. Harton13 , D. Hatzifotiadou106 , S. Hayashi130 , S.T. Heckel61 , E. Hellbar61 , H. Helstrup37 , A. Herghelegiu79 , G. Herrera Corral11 , F. Herrmann62 , B.A. Hess94 , K.F. Hetland37 , H. Hillemanns35 , B. Hippolyte65 , D. Horak39 , R. Hosokawa131 , P. Hristov35 , C. Hughes128 , T.J. Humanic19 , N. Hussain44 , T. Hussain18 , D. Hutter42 , D.S. Hwang20 , R. Ilkaev101 , M. Inaba131 , E. Incani24 , M. Ippolitov81 ,76 , M. Irfan18 , V. Isakov53 , M. Ivanov35 ,99 , V. Ivanov87 , V. Izucheev113 , B. Jacak75 , N. Jacazio27 , P.M. Jacobs75 , M.B. Jadhav48 , S. Jadlovska117 , J. Jadlovsky56 ,117 , C. Jahnke122 ,36 , M.J. Jakubowska137 , M.A. Janik137 , P.H.S.Y. Jayarathna125 , C. Jena80 , S. Jena125 , R.T. Jimenez Bustamante99 , P.G. Jones103 , H. Jung43 , A. Jusko103 , P. Kalinak56 , A. Kalweit35 , J.H. Kang141 , V. Kaplin76 , S. Kar136 , A. Karasu Uysal70 , O. Karavichev53 , T. Karavicheva53 , L. Karayan99 ,95 , E. Karpechev53 , U. Kebschull60 , R. Keidel142 , D.L.D. Keijdener54 , M. Keil35 , M. Mohisin Khan18 ,iii, P. Khan102 , S.A. Khan136 , A. Khanzadeev87 , Y. Kharlov113 , A. Khatun18 , A. Khuntia49 , B. Kileng37 , D.W. Kim43 , D.J. Kim126 , D. Kim141 , H. Kim141 , J.S. Kim43 , J. Kim95 , M. Kim51 , M. Kim141 , S. Kim20 , T. Kim141 , S. Kirsch42 , I. Kisel42 , S. Kiselev55 , A. Kisiel137 ,35 , G. Kiss139 , J.L. Klay6 , C. Klein61 , J. Klein35 , C. Klein-Bosing62 , S. Klewin95 , A. Kluge35 , M.L. Knichel95 , A.G. Knospe120 ,125 , C. Kobdaj116 , M. Kofarago35 , T. Kollegger99 , A. Kolojvari135 , V. Kondratiev135 , N. Kondratyeva76 , E. Kondratyuk113 , A. Konevskikh53 , M. Kopcik117 , M. Kour92 , C. Kouzinopoulos35 , O. Kovalenko78 , V. Kovalenko135 , M. Kowalski119 , G. Koyithatta Meethaleveedu48 , I. Kralik56 , A. Kravcakova40 , M. Krivda103 ,56 , F. Krizek85 , E. Kryshen87 ,35 , M. Krzewicki42 , A.M. Kubera19 , V. Kucera85 , C. Kuhn65 , P.G. Kuijer83 , A. Kumar92 , J. Kumar48 , L. Kumar89 , S. Kumar48 , S. Kundu80 , P. Kurashvili78 , A. Kurepin53 , A.B. Kurepin53 , A. Kuryakin101 , M.J. Kweon51 , Y. Kwon141 , S.L. La Pointe42 , P. La Rocca28 , C. Lagana Fernandes122 , I. Lakomov35 , R. Langoy41 , K. Lapidus36 ,140 , C. Lara60 , A. Lardeux15 , A. Lattuca26 , E. Laudi35 , L. Lazaridis35 , R. Lea25 , L. Leardini95 , S. Lee141 , F. Lehas83 , S. Lehner114 , J. Lehrbach42 , R.C. Lemmon84 , V. Lenti105 , E. Leogrande54 , I. Leon Monzon121 , H. Leon Vargas64 , M. Leoncino26 , P. Levai139 , S. Li7 , X. Li14 , J. Lien41 , R. Lietava103 , S. Lindal21 , V. Lindenstruth42 , C. Lippmann99 , M.A. Lisa19 , H.M. Ljunggren34 , D.F. Lodato54 , P.I. Loenne22 , V. Loginov76 , C. Loizides75 , X. Lopez71 , E. Lopez Torres9 , A. Lowe139 , P. Luettig61 , M. Lunardon29 , G. Luparello25 , M. Lupi35 , T.H. Lutz140 , A. Maevskaya53 , M. Mager35 , S. Mahajan92 , S.M. Mahmood21 , A. Maire65 , HJEP07(21)5 J.D. Mulligan140 , M.G. Munhoz122 , K. Munning45 , R.H. Munzer61 ,96 ,36 , H. Murakami130 , S. Murray66 , L. Musa35 , J. Musinsky56 , B. Naik48 , R. Nair78 , B.K. Nandi48 , R. Nania106 , E. Nappi105 , M.U. Naru16 , H. Natal da Luz122 , C. Nattrass128 , S.R. Navarro2 , K. Nayak80 , R. Nayak48 , T.K. Nayak136 , S. Nazarenko101 , A. Nedosekin55 , R.A. Negrao De Oliveira35 , L. Nellen63 , F. Ng125 , M. Nicassio99 , M. Niculescu59 , J. Niedziela35 , B.S. Nielsen82 , S. Nikolaev81 , S. Nikulin81 , V. Nikulin87 , F. Noferini12 ,106 , P. Nomokonov67 , G. Nooren54 , J.C.C. Noris2 , J. Norman127 , A. Nyanin81 , J. Nystrand22 , H. Oeschler95 , S. Oh140 , S.K. Oh68 , A. Ohlson35 , A. Okatan70 , T. Okubo47 , L. Olah139 , J. Oleniacz137 , A.C. Oliveira Da Silva122 , M.H. Oliver140 , J. Onderwaater99 , C. Oppedisano112 , R. Orava46 , M. Oravec117 , A. Ortiz Velasquez63 , A. Oskarsson34 , J. Otwinowski119 , K. Oyama95 ,77 , M. Ozdemir61 , Y. Pachmayer95 , D. Pagano134 , P. Pagano30 , G. Paic63 , S.K. Pal136 , P. Palni7 , J. Pan138 , A.K. Pandey48 , V. Papikyan1 , G.S. Pappalardo108 , P. Pareek49 , J. Park51 , W.J. Park99 , S. Parmar89 , A. Passfeld62 , V. Paticchio105 , R.N. Patra136 , B. Paul112 , H. Pei7 , T. Peitzmann54 , X. Peng7 , H. Pereira Da Costa15 , D. Peresunko76 ,81 , E. Perez Lezama61 , V. Peskov61 , Y. Pestov5 , V. Petracek39 , V. Petrov113 , M. Petrovici79 , C. Petta28 , S. Piano111 , M. Pikna38 , P. Pillot115 , L.O.D.L. Pimentel82 , O. Pinazza35 ,106 , L. Pinsky125 , D.B. Piyarathna125 , M. Ploskon75 , M. Planinic132 , J. Pluta137 , S. Pochybova139 , P.L.M. Podesta-Lerma121 , M.G. Poghosyan86 , B. Polichtchouk113 , N. Poljak132 , W. Poonsawat116 , A. Pop79 , H. Poppenborg62 , S. Porteboeuf-Houssais71 , J. Porter75 , J. Pospisil85 , S.K. Prasad4 , R. Preghenella106 ,35 , F. Prino112 , C.A. Pruneau138 , I. Pshenichnov53 , M. Puccio26 , G. Puddu24 , P. Pujahari138 , V. Punin101 , J. Putschke138 , H. Qvigstad21 , A. Rachevski111 , S. Raha4 , S. Rajput92 , J. Rak126 , A. Rakotoza ndrabe15 , L. Ramello32 , F. Rami65 , R. Raniwala93 , S. Raniwala93 , S.S. Rasanen46 , B.T. Rascanu61 , D. Rathee89 , V. Ratza45 , I. Ravasenga26 , K.F. Read86 ,128 , K. Redlich78 , A. Rehman22 , P. Reichelt61 , F. Reidt35 ,95 , X. Ren7 , R. Renfordt61 , A.R. Reolon73 , A. Reshetin53 , K. Reygers95 , V. Riabov87 , R.A. Ricci74 , T. Richert34 , M. Richter21 , P. Riedler35 , W. Riegler35 , F. Riggi28 , C. Ristea59 , M. Rodr guez Cahuantzi2 , K. R ed21 , E. Rogochaya67 , D. Rohr42 , D. Rohrich22 , F. Ronchetti35 ,73 , L. Ron ette115 , P. Rosnet71 , A. Rossi29 , F. Roukoutakis90 , A. Roy49 , C. Roy65 , P. Roy102 , A.J. Rubio Montero10 , R. Rui25 , R. Russo26 , E. Ryabinkin81 , Y. Ryabov87 , A. Rybicki119 , S. Saarinen46 , S. Sadhu136 , S. Sadovsky113 , K. Safar k35 , B. Sahlmuller61 , P. Sahoo49 , R. Sahoo49 , S. Sahoo58 , P.K. Sahu58 , J. Saini136 , S. Sakai131 ,73 , M.A. Saleh138 , J. Salzwedel19 , S. Sambyal92 , V. Samsonov87 ,76 , L. Sandor56 , A. Sandoval64 , M. Sano131 , D. Sarkar136 , N. Sarkar136 , P. Sarma44 , E. Scapparone106 , F. Scarlassara29 , C. Schiaua79 , R. Schicker95 , C. Schmidt99 , H.R. Schmidt94 , M. Schmidt94 , J. Schukraft35 , Y. Schutz115 ,35 , K. Schwarz99 , K. Schweda99 , G. Scioli27 , E. Scomparin112 , R. Scott128 , M. Sefc k40 , J.E. Seger88 , Y. Sekiguchi130 , HJEP07(21)5 O. Vazquez Doce96 ,36 , V. Vechernin135 , A.M. Veen54 , A. Velure22 , E. Vercellin26 , S. Vergara Limon2 , R. Vernet8 , R. Vertesi139 , L. Vickovic118 , S. Vigolo54 , J. Viinikainen126 , Z. Vilakazi129 , O. Villalobos Baillie103 , A. Villatoro Tello2 , A. Vinogradov81 , L. Vinogradov135 , T. Virgili30 , V. Vislavicius34 , A. Vodopyanov67 , M.A. Volkl95 , K. Voloshin55 , S.A. Voloshin138 , G. Volpe139 ,33 , B. von Haller35 , I. Vorobyev36 ,96 , D. Voscek117 , D. Vranic35 ,99 , J. Vrlakova40 , B. Vulpescu71 , B. Wagner22 , J. Wagner99 , H. Wang54 , M. Wang7 , D. Watanabe131 , Y. Watanabe130 , M. Weber114 , S.G. Weber99 , D.F. Weiser95 , J.P. Wessels62 , U. Westerho 62 , A.M. Whitehead91 , J. Wiechula61 ,94 , J. Wikne21 , G. Wilk78 , J. Wilkinson95 , G.A. Willems62 , M.C.S. Williams106 , B. Windelband95 , M. Winn95 , S. Yalcin70 , P. Yang7 , S. Yano47 , Z. Yin7 , H. Yokoyama131 ,72 , I.-K. Yoo35 ,98 , J.H. Yoon51 , V. Yurchenko3 , V. Zaccolo82 , A. Zaman16 , C. Zampolli35 ,106 , H.J.C. Zanoli122 , S. Zaporozhets67 , N. Zardoshti103 , A. Zarochentsev135 , P. Zavada57 , N. Zaviyalov101 , H. Zbroszczyk137 , I.S. Zgura59 , M. Zhalov87 , H. Zhang22 ,7 , X. Zhang7 ,75 , Y. Zhang7 , C. Zhang54 , Z. Zhang7 , C. Zhao21 , N. Zhigareva55 , D. Zhou7 , Y. Zhou82 , Z. Zhou22 , H. Zhu22 ,7 , J. Zhu115 ,7 , A. Zichichi27 ,12 , A. Zimmermann95 , M.B. Zimmermann62 ,35 , G. Zinovjev3 , J. Zmeskal114 i Deceased ii Also at: Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States iii Also at: Also at Department of Applied Physics, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India iv Also at: M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, D.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear, Physics, 1 2 3 4 5 Moscow, Russia Armenia A.I. Alikhanyan National Science Laboratory (Yerevan Physics Institute) Foundation, Yerevan, Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kiev, Ukraine Bose Institute, Department of Physics and Centre for Astroparticle Physics and Space Science (CAPSS), Kolkata, India Budker Institute for Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China Centre de Calcul de l'IN2P3, Villeurbanne, Lyon, France Centro de Aplicaciones Tecnologicas y Desarrollo Nuclear (CEADEN), Havana, Cuba Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas Medioambientales y Tecnologicas (CIEMAT), Madrid, Spain Centro de Investigacion y de Estudios Avanzados (CINVESTAV), Mexico City and Merida, Mexico Centro Fermi - Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche \Enrico Fermi', Rome, Italy Chicago State University, Chicago, Illinois, United States China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique, IRFU, Saclay, France COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (CIIT), Islamabad, Pakistan Departamento de F sica de Part culas and IGFAE, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain Department of Physics, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India Department of Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States Department of Physics, Sejong University, Seoul, South Korea Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Universita 'La Sapienza' and Sezione INFN, Rome, Italy Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Universita and Sezione INFN, Cagliari, Italy Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Universita and Sezione INFN, Trieste, Italy Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Universita and Sezione INFN, Turin, Italy Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia dell'Universita and Sezione INFN, Bologna, Italy Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia dell'Universita and Sezione INFN, Catania, Italy Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia dell'Universita and Sezione INFN, Padova, Italy Dipartimento di Fisica `E.R. Caianiello' dell'Universita and Gruppo Collegato INFN, Salerno, Italy Dipartimento DISAT del Politecnico and Sezione INFN, Turin, Italy Dipartimento di Scienze e Innovazione Tecnologica dell'Universita del Piemonte Orientale and INFN Sezione di Torino, Alessandria, Italy Dipartimento Interateneo di Fisica `M. Merlin' and Sezione INFN, Bari, Italy Division of Experimental High Energy Physics, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland Excellence Cluster Universe, Technische Universitat Munchen, Munich, Germany Faculty of Engineering, Bergen University College, Bergen, Norway Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic Faculty of Science, P.J. Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia Faculty of Technology, Buskerud and Vestfold University College, Tonsberg, Norway Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitat Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, South Korea Gauhati University, Department of Physics, Guwahati, India Helmholtz-Institut fur Strahlen- und Kernphysik, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn, Bonn, Germany Helsinki Institute of Physics (HIP), Helsinki, Finland Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IIT), Mumbai, India Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore, India Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Jakarta, Indonesia Inha University, Incheon, South Korea Institut de Physique Nucleaire d'Orsay (IPNO), Universite Paris-Sud, CNRS-IN2P3, Orsay, France Institute for Subatomic Physics of Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow, Russia Institute of Experimental Physics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Kosice, Slovakia Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar, India Institute of Space Science (ISS), Bucharest, Romania Institut fur Informatik, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitat Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany Institut fur Kernphysik, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitat Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany Institut fur Kernphysik, Westfalische Wilhelms-Universitat Munster, Munster, Germany Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico Instituto de F sica, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien (IPHC), Universite de Strasbourg, CNRS-IN2P3, Strasbourg, France iThemba LABS, National Research Foundation, Somerset West, South Africa Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR), Dubna, Russia Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon, South Korea KTO Karatay University, Konya, Turkey Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire (LPC), Clermont Universite, Universite Blaise Pascal, CNRS{IN2P3, Clermont-Ferrand, France Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie, Universite Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS-IN2P3, Grenoble, France Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN, Frascati, Italy Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, INFN, Legnaro, Italy Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, Moscow, Russia Nagasaki Institute of Applied Science, Nagasaki, Japan National Centre for Nuclear Studies, Warsaw, Poland National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest, Romania National Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhubaneswar, India National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russia Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Nikhef, Nationaal instituut voor subatomaire fysica, Amsterdam, Netherlands Nuclear Physics Group, STFC Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, United Kingdom Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rez u Prahy, Czech Republic Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina, Russia Physics Department, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska, United States Physics Department, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India Physics Department, University of Athens, Athens, Greece Physics Department, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa Physics Department, University of Jammu, Jammu, India Physics Department, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, India Physikalisches Institut, Eberhard Karls Universitat Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany Physik Department, Technische Universitat Munchen, Munich, Germany Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States Pusan National University, Pusan, South Korea Research Division and ExtreMe Matter Institute EMMI, GSI Helmholtzzentrum fur 100 Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany Rudjer Boskovic Institute, Zagreb, Croatia 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kolkata, India School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom Seccion F sica, Departamento de Ciencias, Ponti cia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Lima, Peru SUBATECH, Ecole des Mines de Nantes, Universite de Nantes, CNRS-IN2P3, Nantes, France Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand Technical University of Kosice, Kosice, Slovakia Technical University of Split FESB, Split, Croatia The Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow, Poland The University of Texas at Austin, Physics Department, Austin, Texas, United States Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa, Culiacan, Mexico Universidade de Sa~o Paulo (USP), Sa~o Paulo, Brazil Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo Andre, Brazil University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States University of Jyvaskyla, Jyvaskyla, Finland University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia Universite de Lyon, Universite Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IPN-Lyon, Villeurbanne, Lyon, France Universita di Brescia, Brescia, Italy V. Fock Institute for Physics, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre, Kolkata, India Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary Zentrum fur Technologietransfer und Telekommunikation (ZTT), Fachhochschule Worms, Worms, Germany [1] Wuppertal-Budapest collaboration , S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor , et al., Is there still any Tc [13] N. Armesto , A. Dainese , C.A. Salgado and U.A. Wiedemann , Testing the color charge and [14] N. Armesto , Nuclear shadowing, J. Phys. G 32 ( 2006 ) R367 [ hep -ph/0604108] [INSPIRE]. [15] H. Fujii , F. Gelis and R. Venugopalan , Quark pair production in high energy pA collisions: general features , Nucl. Phys. A 780 ( 2006 ) 146 [ hep -ph/0603099] [INSPIRE]. [16] J.W. Cronin et al., Production of hadrons with large transverse momentum at 200 , 300 and [17] R. Sharma , I. Vitev and B.-W. Zhang , Light-cone wave function approach to open heavy avor dynamics in QCD matter , Phys. Rev. C 80 ( 2009 ) 054902 [arXiv: 0904 .0032] [18] Z.-B. Kang , I. Vitev , E. Wang , H. Xing and C. Zhang , Multiple scattering e ects on heavy meson production in p+A collisions at backward rapidity , Phys. Lett. B 740 ( 2015 ) 23 [19] M.L. Miller , K. Reygers , S.J. Sanders and P. Steinberg , Glauber modeling in high energy nuclear collisions , Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci . 57 ( 2007 ) 205 [ nucl -ex/0701025] [INSPIRE]. [20] STAR collaboration, M.M. Aggarwal et al., Measurement of the Bottom contribution to [30] M. Cacciari , S. Frixione and P. Nason , The pT spectrum in heavy avor photoproduction , [31] M. Cacciari , S. Frixione , N. Houdeau , M.L. Mangano , P. Nason and G. Ridol , Theoretical [50] PHENIX collaboration, A . Adare et al., Cold-nuclear-matter e ects on heavy-quark [67] Particle Data Group collaboration, K.A . Olive et al., Review of particle physics , Chin. [70] P.Z. Skands , Tuning Monte Carlo generators: the Perugia tunes , Phys. Rev. D 82 ( 2010 ) [71] R. Brun et al., GEANT: detector description and simulation tool , CERN-W- 5013 ( 1994 ). coupling approach , Phys. Lett. B 735 ( 2014 ) 445 [arXiv: 1401 .3817] [INSPIRE]. [85] Y. Oh , C.M. Ko , S.H. Lee and S. Yasui , Heavy baryon/meson ratios in relativistic heavy ion collisions , Phys. Rev. C 79 ( 2009 ) 044905 [arXiv: 0901 .1382] [INSPIRE]. [86] R. Averbeck , N. Bastid , Z.C. del Valle , P. Crochet , A. Dainese and X. Zhang , Reference [99] K. Werner , I. Karpenko, M. Bleicher , T. Pierog and S. Porteboeuf-Houssais , Jets, bulk matter and their interaction in heavy ion collisions at several TeV , Phys. Rev. C 85 ( 2012 ) [100] R. Baier , Y.L. Dokshitzer , S. Peigne and D. Schi , Induced gluon radiation in a QCD medium , Phys. Lett. B 345 ( 1995 ) 277 [ hep -ph/9411409] [INSPIRE]. [101] E. Braaten and R.D. Pisarski , Soft amplitudes in hot gauge theories: a general analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 337 ( 1990 ) 569 [INSPIRE]. N. Agrawal48 , Z. Ahammed136 , S. Ahmad18 , S.U. Ahn69 , S. Aiola140 , A. Akindinov55 , S.N. Alam136 , D.S.D. Albuquerque123 , D. Aleksandrov81 , B. Alessandro112 , D. Alexandre103 , R. Alfaro Molina64 , A. Alici106 ,12 , A. Alkin3 , J. Alme22 ,37 , T. Alt42 , S. Altinpinar22 , I. Altsybeev135 , C. Alves Garcia Prado122 , M. An7 , C. Andrei79 , H.A. Andrews103 , A. Andronic99 , V. Anguelov95 , C. Anson88 , T. Anticic100 , F. Antinori109 , P. Antonioli106 , L. Aphecetche115 , H. Appelshauser61 , S. Arcelli27 , R. Arnaldi112 , O.W. Arnold96 , 36 , I.C. Arsene21 , M. Arslandok61 , B. Audurier115 , A. Augustinus35 , R. Averbeck99 , M.D. Azmi18 , M.A.S. Figueredo122 , S. Filchagin101 , D. Finogeev53 , F.M. Fionda24 , E.M. Fiore33 , M. Floris35 , S. Foertsch66 , P. Foka99 , S. Fokin81 , E. Fragiacomo111 , A. Francescon35 , A. Francisco115 , U. Frankenfeld99 , G.G. Fronze26 , U. Fuchs35 , C. Furget72 , A. Furs53 , M. Fusco Girard30 , J.J. Gaardh je82 , M. Gagliardi26 , A.M. Gago104 , K. Gajdosova82 , M. Gallio26 , C.D. Galvan121 , D.R. Gangadharan75 , P. Ganoti35 ,90 , C. Gao7 , C. Garabatos99 , E. Garcia-Solis13 , K. Garg28 , P. Garg49 , C. Gargiulo35 , P. Gasik96 ,36 , E.F. Gauger120 , M. Germain115 , M. Gheata59 , 35 , P. Ghosh136 , S.K. Ghosh4 , P. Gianotti73 , P. Giubellino35 ,112 , P. Giubilato29 , E. Gladysz-Dziadus119 , P. Glassel95 , D.M. Gomez Coral64 , A. Gomez Ramirez60 , A.S. Gonzalez35 , V. Gonzalez10 , P. Gonzalez-Zamora10 , S. Gorbunov42 , L. Gorlich119 , S. Gotovac118 , V. Grabski64 , O.A. Grachov140 , L.K. Graczykowski137 , K.L. Graham103 , A. Grelli54 , C. Grigoras35 , V. Grigoriev76 , A. Grigoryan1 , S. Grigoryan67 , B. Grinyov3 , N. Grion111 , J.M. Gronefeld99 , J.F. Grosse-Oetringhaus35 , R. Grosso99 , L. Gruber114 , F. Guber53 , R. Guernane72 ,35 , B. Guerzoni27 , K. Gulbrandsen82 , T. Gunji130 , A. Gupta92 , P. Malzacher99 , A. Mamonov101 , V. Manko81 , F. Manso71 , V. Manzari105 , Y. Mao7 , M. Marchisone129 ,66 , J. Mares57 , G.V. Margagliotti25 , A. Margotti106 , J. Margutti54 , A. Mar n99 , C. Markert120 , M. Marquard61 , N.A. Martin99 , P. Martinengo35 , M.I. Mart nez2 , G. Mart nez Garc a115 , M. Martinez Pedreira35 , A . Mas122 , S. Masciocchi99 , M. Masera26 , A. Masoni107 , A. Mastroserio33 , A. Matyja119 ,128 , C. Mayer119 , J. Mazer128 , M. Mazzilli33 , M.A. Mazzoni110 , F. Meddi23 , Y. Melikyan76 , A. Menchaca-Rocha64 , E. Meninno30 , J. Mercado Perez95 , M. Meres38 , S. Mhlanga91 , Y. Miake131 , M.M. Mieskolainen46 , K. Mikhaylov55 ,67 , J. Milosevic21 , A. Mischke54 , A.N. Mishra49 , T. Mishra58 , D. Miskowiec99 , J. Mitra136 , C.M. Mitu59 , N. Mohammadi54 , B. Mohanty80 , L. Molnar65 , E. Montes10 , D.A. Moreira De Godoy62 , L.A.P. Moreno2 , S. Moretto29 , A. Morreale115 , A. Morsch35 , V. Muccifora73 , E. Mudnic118 , D. Muhlheim62 , S. Muhuri136 , M. Mukherjee136 , A. Sevcenco59 , A. Shabanov53 , A. Shabetai115 , O. Shadura3 , R. Shahoyan35 , A. Shangaraev113 , A. Sharma92 , A. Sharma89 , M. Sharma92 , M. Sharma92 , N. Sharma128 , A.I. Sheikh136 , K. Shigaki47 , Q. Shou7 , K. Shtejer26 ,9 , Y. Sibiriak81 , S. Siddhanta107 , K.M. Sielewicz35 , T. Siemiarczuk78 , D. Silvermyr34 , C. Silvestre72 , G. Simatovic132 , G. Simonetti35 , R. Singaraju136 , R. Singh80 , V. Singhal136 , T. Sinha102 , B. Sitar38 , M. Sitta32 , T.B. Skaali21 , M. Slupecki126 , N. Smirnov140 , R.J.M. Snellings54 , T.W. Snellman126 , J. Song98 , M. Song141 , Z. Song7 , F. Soramel29 , S. Sorensen128 , F. Sozzi99 , E. Spiriti73 , I. Sputowska119 , M. Spyropoulou-Stassinaki90 , J. Stachel95 , I. Stan59 , P. Stankus86 , E. Stenlund34 , G. Steyn66 , J.H. Stiller95 , D. Stocco115 , P. Strmen38 , A.A.P. Suaide122 , T. Sugitate47 , C. Suire52 , M. Suleymanov16 , M. Suljic25 , R. Sultanov55 , M. Sumbera85 , S. Sumowidagdo50 , K. Suzuki114 , S. Swain58 , A. Szabo38 , I. Szarka38 , A . Szczepankiewicz137 , M. Szymanski137 , U. Tabassam16 , J. Takahashi123 , G.J. Tambave22 , N. Tanaka131 , M. Tarhini52 , M. Tariq18 , M.G. Tarzila79 , A . Tauro35 , G. Tejeda Mun~oz2 , A. Telesca35 , K. Terasaki130 , C. Terrevoli29 , B. Teyssier133 , J. Thader75 , D. Thakur49 , D. Thomas120 , R. Tieulent133 , A. Tikhonov53 , A.R. Timmins125 , A. Toia61 , S. Tripathy49 , S. Trogolo26 , G. Trombetta33 , V. Trubnikov3 , W.H. Trzaska126 , T. Tsuji130 , A. Tumkin101 , R. Turrisi109 , T.S. Tveter21 , K. Ullaland22 , A. Uras133 , G.L. Usai24 , A. Utrobicic132 , M. Vala56 , J. Van Der Maarel54 , J.W. Van Hoorne35 , M. van Leeuwen54 , T. Vanat85 , P. Vande Vyvre35 , D. Varga139 , A. Vargas2 , M. Vargyas126 , R. Varma48 , M. Vasileiou90 , A. Vasiliev81 , A . Vauthier72 ,


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FJHEP07%282017%29052.pdf

J. Adam, D. Adamová, M.M. Aggarwal, G. Aglieri Rinella, M. Agnello, N. Agrawal, Z. Ahammed, S. Ahmad, S.U. Ahn, S. Aiola, A. Akindinov, S.N. Alam, D.S.D. Albuquerque, D. Aleksandrov, B. Alessandro, D. Alexandre, R. Alfaro Molina, A. Alici, A. Alkin, J. Alme, T. Alt, S. Altinpinar, I. Altsybeev, C. Alves Garcia Prado, M. An, C. Andrei, H.A. Andrews, A. Andronic, V. Anguelov, C. Anson, T. Antičić, F. Antinori, P. Antonioli, L. Aphecetche, H. Appelshäuser, S. Arcelli, R. Arnaldi, O.W. Arnold, I.C. Arsene, M. Arslandok, B. Audurier, A. Augustinus, R. Averbeck, M.D. Azmi, A. Badalà, Y.W. Baek, S. Bagnasco, R. Bailhache, R. Bala, S. Balasubramanian, A. Baldisseri, R.C. Baral, A.M. Barbano, R. Barbera, F. Barile, G.G. Barnaföldi, L.S. Barnby, V. Barret, P. Bartalini, K. Barth, J. Bartke, E. Bartsch, M. Basile, N. Bastid, S. Basu, B. Bathen, G. Batigne, A. Batista Camejo, B. Batyunya, P.C. Batzing, I.G. Bearden, H. Beck, C. Bedda, N.K. Behera, I. Belikov, F. Bellini, H. Bello Martinez, R. Bellwied, E. Belmont-Moreno, L.G.E. Beltran, V. Belyaev, G. Bencedi, S. Beole, I. Berceanu, A. Bercuci, Y. Berdnikov, D. Berenyi, R.A. Bertens, D. Berzano, L. Betev, A. Bhasin, I.R. Bhat, A.K. Bhati, B. Bhattacharjee, J. Bhom, L. Bianchi, N. Bianchi, C. Bianchin, J. Bielčík, J. Bielčíková, A. Bilandzic, G. Biro, R. Biswas, S. Biswas, S. Bjelogrlic, J.T. Blair, D. Blau, C. Blume, F. Bock, A. Bogdanov, H. Bøggild, L. Boldizsár, M. Bombara, M. Bonora, J. Book, H. Borel, A. Borissov, M. Borri, F. Bossú, E. Botta, C. Bourjau, P. Braun-Munzinger, M. Bregant, T.A. Broker, T.A. Browning, M. Broz, E.J. Brucken, E. Bruna, G.E. Bruno, D. Budnikov, H. Buesching, S. Bufalino, P. Buhler, S.A.I. Buitron, P. Buncic, O. Busch, Z. Buthelezi, J.B. Butt, J.T. Buxton, J. Cabala, D. Caffarri, X. Cai, H. Caines, A. Caliva, E. Calvo Villar, P. Camerini, F. Carena, W. Carena, F. Carnesecchi, J. Castillo Castellanos, A.J. Castro, E.A.R. Casula, C. Ceballos Sanchez, J. Cepila, P. Cerello, J. Cerkala, B. Chang, S. Chapeland, M. Chartier, J.L. Charvet, S. Chattopadhyay, S. Chattopadhyay, A. Chauvin, V. Chelnokov, M. Cherney, C. Cheshkov, B. Cheynis, V. Chibante Barroso, D.D. Chinellato, S. Cho, P. Chochula, K. Choi, M. Chojnacki, S. Choudhury, P. Christakoglou, C.H. Christensen, P. Christiansen, T. Chujo, S.U. Chung, C. Cicalo, L. Cifarelli, F. Cindolo, J. Cleymans, F. Colamaria, D. Colella, A. Collu, M. Colocci, G. Conesa Balbastre, Z. Conesa del Valle, M.E. Connors, J.G. Contreras, T.M. Cormier, Y. Corrales Morales, I. Cortés Maldonado, P. Cortese, M.R. Cosentino, F. Costa, J. Crkovská, P. Crochet, R. Cruz Albino, E. Cuautle, L. Cunqueiro, T. Dahms, A. Dainese, M.C. Danisch, A. Danu, D. Das, I. Das, S. Das, A. Dash, S. Dash, S. De, A. De Caro, G. de Cataldo, C. de Conti, J. de Cuveland, A. De Falco, D. De Gruttola, N. De Marco, S. De Pasquale, R.D. De Souza, A. Deisting, A. Deloff, C. Deplano, P. Dhankher, D. Di Bari, A. Di Mauro, P. Di Nezza, B. Di Ruzza, M.A. Diaz Corchero, T. Dietel, P. Dillenseger, R. Divià, Ø. Djuvsland, A. Dobrin, D. Domenicis Gimenez, B. Dönigus, O. Dordic, T. Drozhzhova, A.K. Dubey, A. Dubla, L. Ducroux, A.K. Duggal, P. Dupieux, R.J. Ehlers, D. Elia, E. Endress, H. Engel, E. Epple, B. Erazmus, F. Erhardt, B. Espagnon, M. Estienne, S. Esumi, G. Eulisse, J. Eum, D. Evans, S. Evdokimov, G. Eyyubova, L. Fabbietti, D. Fabris, J. Faivre, A. Fantoni, M. Fasel, L. Feldkamp, A. Feliciello, G. Feofilov, J. Ferencei, A. Fernández Téllez, E.G. Ferreiro, A. Ferretti, A. Festanti, V.J.G. Feuillard, J. Figiel, M.A.S. Figueredo, S. Filchagin, D. Finogeev, F.M. Fionda, E.M. Fiore, M. Floris, S. Foertsch, P. Foka, S. Fokin, E. Fragiacomo, A. Francescon, A. Francisco, U. Frankenfeld, G.G. Fronze, U. Fuchs, C. Furget, A. Furs, M. Fusco Girard, J.J. Gaardhøje, M. Gagliardi, A.M. Gago, K. Gajdosova, M. Gallio, C.D. Galvan, D.R. Gangadharan, P. Ganoti, C. Gao, C. Garabatos, E. Garcia-Solis, K. Garg, P. Garg, C. Gargiulo, P. Gasik, E.F. Gauger, M. Germain, M. Gheata, P. Ghosh, S.K. Ghosh, P. Gianotti, P. Giubellino, P. Giubilato, E. Gladysz-Dziadus, P. Glässel, D.M. Goméz Coral, A. Gomez Ramirez, A.S. Gonzalez, V. Gonzalez, P. González-Zamora, S. Gorbunov, L. Görlich, S. Gotovac, V. Grabski, O.A. Grachov, L.K. Graczykowski, K.L. Graham, A. Grelli, C. Grigoras, V. Grigoriev, A. Grigoryan, S. Grigoryan, B. Grinyov, N. Grion, J.M. Gronefeld, J.F. Grosse-Oetringhaus, R. Grosso, L. Gruber, F. Guber, R. Guernane, B. Guerzoni, K. Gulbrandsen, T. Gunji, A. Gupta, R. Gupta, I.B. Guzman, R. Haake, C. Hadjidakis, M. Haiduc, H. Hamagaki, G. Hamar, J.C. Hamon, J.W. Harris, A. Harton, D. Hatzifotiadou, S. Hayashi, S.T. Heckel, E. Hellbär, H. Helstrup, A. Herghelegiu, G. Herrera Corral, F. Herrmann, B.A. Hess, K.F. Hetland, H. Hillemanns, B. Hippolyte, D. Horak, R. Hosokawa, P. Hristov, C. Hughes, T.J. Humanic, N. Hussain, T. Hussain, D. Hutter, D.S. Hwang, R. Ilkaev, M. Inaba, E. Incani, M. Ippolitov, M. Irfan, V. Isakov, M. Ivanov, V. Ivanov, V. Izucheev, B. Jacak. Measurement of electrons from beauty-hadron decays in p-Pb collisions at \( \sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02 \) TeV and Pb-Pb collisions at \( \sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76 \) TeV, Journal of High Energy Physics, 2017, 1-40, DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2017)052