Maternal cancer and congenital anomalies in children – a Danish nationwide cohort study
Maternal cancer and congenital anomalies in children ± a Danish nationwide cohort study
Natalie C. Momen 1 2
Andreas Ernst 1 2
Linn Håkonsen Arendt 1 2
Jørn Olsen 0 2
Jiong Li 0 2
Mika Gissler 2
Finn Rasmussen 2
Cecilia Høst Ramlau-Hansen 1 2
0 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark , 3 Department of Epidemiology, University of California Los Angeles , Los Angeles, CA , United States of America, 4 THL National Institute for Health and Welfare , Helsinki , Finland , 5 Karolinska Institute, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden, 6 Department of Health Sciences, Lund University , Lund , Sweden
1 Department of Public Health, Section for Epidemiology, Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark
2 Editor: Marly Augusto Cardoso, Universidade de Sao Paulo , BRAZIL
Several studies on pregnancy-associated cancers have suggested an association with congenital anomalies in offspring. Previous studies have included maternal cancers diagnosed up to 2 years after pregnancy; however, long latency periods of some cancers mean that cancers diagnosed many years postpartum might have been present during pregnancy in a preclinical state. This paper considers the association between maternal cancers diagnosed from 2 years prior to pregnancy until the mother reaches 50 years of age, and congenital anomalies, as diagnosed at birth or within the first year of life. The current population-based study looks at associations of cancers in mothers with congenital anomalies in their children. Children were followed up from birth to diagnosis of a congenital anomaly, death, emigration or end of follow-up (whichever occurred first). A total of 56,016 children (2.6%) were considered exposed to a maternal cancer of any type; and they had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00, 1.09) compared with unexposed children. The greatest HR was seen among children whose mothers had been diagnosed with cancers before or during pregnancy (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.75). Similar results were seen when paternal cancers were used as a `negative control'. Statistically significant associations were seen for some specific congenital anomalies of organ systems (congenital anomalies of the musculoskeletal system [HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.25]) and for some specific types of maternal cancer (leukaemia [HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.61], The results of the main analyses suggest a small increase in risk of congenital anomalies in offspring of mothers diagnosed with cancer from 2 years before pregnancy, until the mother reaches 50 years of age; with the greatest increase seen for exposure in the pre-pregnancy and pregnancy period. These results may reflect shared causes for some cancers and some congenital anomalies. The similar results seen for paternal cancers indicate that the cause may be genetic or related to the families' social and environmental conditions.
Data Availability Statement: All data is stored at
the secure platform of Denmark Statistics, which is
the central authority on Danish statistics with the
mission to collect, compile and publish statistics
on the Danish society. By legislations, researchers
who want to get access to the data must apply for
permissions from both Statistics Denmark and
Danish Data Protection Agency. Anyone with
interests in this data can contact the authors of the
Cancer Union (http://www.ncu.nu/, 2013_129830,
2015_176673), the European Research Council
ERC-2010-StG-260242PROGEURO), Danish Council for Independent
DFF-611000019), and Karen Elise Jensens Fond (http://
www.kejfond.dk/, 2016). The funders had no role
in study design, data collection and analysis,
decision to publish, or preparation of the
The prevalence of pregnancy-associated cancers is estimated at 1 in 1000 to 1 in 1500 of
pregnancies [1±4]. The most common cancer forms affecting pregnant women are cervical cancers,
breast cancers, melanomas, lymphomas, and leukaemias . Generally, cancers diagnosed
during or shortly after pregnancy, within one or two years after childbirth are considered to be
pregnancy-associated cancers [5±8]; but, long periods can pass between an exposure initiating
the growth of an abnormal cell, invasion of the cancer, symptoms becoming apparent, and a
diagnosis and treatment being made. The minimum latency periods to clinical diagnoses for
cancers in adults, were determined by the World Trade Center Health Program to be 0.4 years
for lymphoproliferative and haematopoietic cancers and 4 years for solid tumours (excluding
mesotheliomas [11 years] and thyroid cancers [2.5 years]) . Additionally, a study using data
on over 1.6 million cancers from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology,
and End Results (SEER) program concluded that most types of cancer progressed for 10 years
or more before being detected . It is also possible that some cancers have even longer
induction and latency times than these. Therefore, cancers diagnosed postpartum may have
been initiated, but remained undetected, during pregnancy, possibly affecting the developing
fetus. Pregnancy-associated cancers, in this paper, are defined as all cancers diagnosed from 2
years prior to pregnancy and up to 50 years of age in the mothers.
The risk of congenital anomalies has been suggested to be greater in children born to
mothers who were diagnosed with a pregnancy-associated cancer , including lymphomas 
and breast cancer ; however, the results have not been consistent [5±7;13;14] and more
studies are warranted. Three of these studies, looking at different types of cancers, were carried
out using Danish data [5±7], considering cancers diagnosed up to two years after pregnancy.
Further Danish studies have found that cancers (specifically, lymphomas and leukaemias)
were more common among parents who had had a child born with a congenital anomaly 
and that cancers and birth defects tend to cluster in families . A few mechanisms through
which pregnancy-associated cancers may increase the risk of congenital anomalies in the
offspring have been suggested, however knowledge in this area is limited. Firstly, for cancers that
are diagnosed during the gestational period, treatment regimens or psychological stress could
impact risk of congenital anomalies [17±19]. Secondly, cancer development presents the body
with metabolic [20;21], hormonal  and nutritional challenges [21±24], which could affect the
growing conceptus. Further, it has been suggested that hyperthermia is more common among
cancer patients , which may impact risk of congenital anomalies [6;26;27]. If the presence of
a cancer coincides with pregnancy, some of these fetal challenges could have occurred even if a
diagnosis was not received for several years after the pregnancy. Alternatively, there may be
shared environmental or genetic factors influencing development of cancer in the mother and
congenital anomalies in the offspring [15;16;21]. Even, if these exposures were present shortly
before or during pregnancy, due to the induction and latency periods, the cancer may not be
diagnosed for a number of years.
Since results from previous studies investigating the risk of congenital anomalies in
children of mothers with pregnancy-associated cancer, with or without treatment during
pregnancy, have been mixed [5±7;11;13;14], further research is needed on this topic, in particular
using a larger cohort with longer follow-up time.
This study thus aims to investigate the association between maternal cancer and congenital
anomalies in the offspring. In our study, exposure to maternal cancer is indicated by a
diagnosis of cancer before the age of 50 years. Timing of the cancer diagnosis, in relation to the in
utero period, will be considered in an attempt to separate the side effects of treatment from
other fetal challenges related to the cancer itself. We hypothesised that there is a higher risk of
2 / 12
congenital malformations among children whose mothers are diagnosed with cancer before or
during pregnancy due to treatments and psychological stress; additionally, we hypothesised
that there are increased risks among children whose mothers are diagnosed in the years soon
after pregnancy, as these cancers would be most likely to have been present during the
Study participants and follow-up
All residents of Denmark are assigned a unique civil registration number, at birth or
immigration, which can be used to accurately link data from the nationwide registers. We identified all
children born from 1st January 1977 to 31st December 2008 in Denmark whose mother had not
received a diagnosis of cancer prior to 2 years before conception. We obtained information on
whether these children received diagnoses of congenital anomalies or their mothers received
The main exposure of interest was any maternal cancers (International Classification of
Diseases 7th Revision [ICD-7] codes: 140±207 before 1994, ICD-10 codes: C00- C97 from 1994 to
2010) which were diagnosed from two years prior to the index child's birth, up to the mother
reaching 50 years of age. As the risk of death is low up to 50 years of age, this cut off was chosen
to reduce immortal observation time bias: if a mother died from a cause other than cancer
before the cut-off point her child would be considered unexposed, despite the fact a diagnosis
may have been made later, had she survived past her death date. Paternal cancer (diagnosed at
the same time points) was considered as a 'negative control'. Maternal and paternal cancer
diagnoses were extracted from the Danish Cancer Register. The registration and coding of
cancers in Denmark have been described previously . These data were linked to data in the
Civil Person Register on the birth dates of the mother, to ascertain age at cancer diagnosis, and
child, to limit to diagnoses in the exposure window.
Exposure was considered further by identifying the time point at which maternal (and
paternal) cancer diagnoses were received: from 2 years prior to pregnancy, until the child's
birth; within the 5 years postpartum; >5 years to 10 years postpartum; >10 years postpartum;
or in multiple time points (diagnoses received in more than one of the previously described
time points). However, exposure ascertainment extended only up until the mother reached 50
years of age. A sensitivity analysis used a cut-off of 45 years of age, to see whether this changed
the results. As we expect numbers of cancers diagnosed from 2 years prior to pregnancy until
the child's birth to be small, we combined these groups for the main analyses, but we carried
out additional analyses where these two time periods were considered separately
(pre-pregnancy and pregnancy).
Additionally, type of cancer diagnosis according to the ICD classification grouping was
considered: lip, oral cavity and pharynx (ICD-7: 140±148, ICD-10: C00-C14); digestive organs
(ICD-7: 150±159, ICD-10: C15-C26); respiratory and intrathoracic organs (ICD-7: 160±165,
ICD-10: C03-C39); bone and articular cartilage (ICD-7: 196, ICD-10: C40-C41); skin (ICD-7:
190±191, ICD-10: C43-C44); mesothelial and soft tissue (ICD-7: 197, ICD-10: C45-C49); breast
(ICD-7: 170, ICD-10: C50); female genital organs (ICD-7: 171±176, ICD-10: C51-C58); urinary
tract (ICD-7: 180±181, ICD-10: C60-C63); central nervous system (ICD-7: 192±193, ICD-10:
C69-C72); endocrine (ICD-7: 194±195, ICD-10: C73-C75); other solid tumours (ICD-7: 198±
199, ICD-10: C76-C80 and C97); leukaemias (ICD-7: 204, ICD-10: C91-C95); and lymphomas
and other lymphoid and haemopoetic systems neoplasms (ICD-7: 196, ICD-10: C40-C41).
3 / 12
Due to some cancers clustering in families and some cancers being associated with
particular congenital anomalies, we also carried out analyses with mother-child pairs removed if both
had a diagnosis of cancer recorded in the Danish Cancer Register.
Information on diagnoses of congenital anomalies (ICD-8 codes 740±759 from 1977 to 1993,
ICD10 codes Q00-Q99 from 1994±2010) in the children was obtained from the Danish National
Patient Register [29;30]. Offspring were followed up from birth to the first of the following events:
diagnosis of a congenital anomaly, death, emigration or end of the data (December 31st 2010). The
main analyses included diagnoses of congenital anomalies before the child reached 1 year of age, as
these are expected to be more severe and the diagnoses more valid. In a sub-analysis congenital
anomaly diagnoses made throughout the entire follow-up period were included, to assess whether
this altered the results. Additionally, sub-analyses considered type of congenital anomaly: nervous
system (ICD-8: 740±743, ICD-10: Q00-Q07); eye, ear or nose (ICD-8: 744±745, ICD-10:
Q10Q18); circulatory system (ICD-8: 746±746, ICD-10: Q20-Q28); respiratory system (ICD-8: 748,
ICD-10: Q30-Q34); orofacial clefts (ICD-8: 749, ICD-10: Q35-Q37); digestive system (ICD-8: 750±
751, ICD-10: Q38-Q45); genital organs (ICD-8: 752, ICD-10: Q50-Q56); urinary system (ICD-8:
753, ICD-10: Q60-Q64); musculoskeletal system (ICD-8: 754±756, ICD-10: Q65-Q79); other
congenital anomalies and chromosomal abnormalities (ICD-8: 757±759, ICD-10: Q80-Q99).
We identified the following covariates in the Danish Medical Birth Register and the Integrated
Database for Labour Market Research and included them in our models: maternal age at time
of birth (15±26 years, 27±30 years, 31 years), paternal age at time of birth (15±26 years, 27±
30 years, 31 years), birth year (continuous), offspring sex (male, female). Further models
were run with the addition of socioeconomic variables recorded at time of the child's birth:
maternal highest education (lower secondary, higher secondary, higher education, graduate
studies), maternal cohabitation (yes, no), maternal residence (capital area [Copenhagen], big
cities [Aarhus, Aalborg, Odense], other), maternal income (no income, lowest tertile, middle
tertile, highest tertile).
Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated in Stata 11 using Cox
proportional hazards regression with robust estimation, to account for some mothers in the
cohort having more than one child. The child's age was used as the underlying time axis. The
assumption of proportional hazards was evaluated graphically.
The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (j nr. 2008-41-2680) and
Scientific Ethics Committee of Central Jutland Region (VEK, sagnr. M-20100252).
The comprised of 2,123,228 children and 2.6% of the children (n = 56,016) were considered
exposed (their mother received a diagnosis of cancer from between two years prior to
pregnancy up to 50 years of age). There were 95,815 children (4.5%) who received any congenital
anomaly diagnosis during their first year of life. Extending follow-up to cover the entire
follow-up period (therefore including some more minor anomalies) resulted in 204,378 children
4 / 12
(9.6%) with congenital anomalies. Of the 95,815 children with a congenital anomaly registered
before 1 year of age, 9,408 (9.8%) had a sibling who also had a congenital anomaly registered
prior 1 year of age; and 9,568 (10.0%) had more than one anomaly registered in their first year.
Table 1 displays the characteristics of the study population. Fewer exposed children were
seen in the lowest tertile for maternal income; however there were more missing data among
the exposed, especially for socioeconomic variables.
The associations between maternal cancer and congenital anomalies in the offspring,
diagnosed before 1 year of age, are shown in Table 2. When we compared the exposed group to the
unexposed group, we observed an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.04 (95% confidence interval
[CI]: 1.00, 1.09). The additional adjustment for socioeconomic variables resulted in a lower
HR of 1.02 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.07). When considering timing of cancer diagnosis in relation to
the in utero period, we observed a higher risk of congenital anomalies in children exposed to
cancers diagnosed before or during pregnancy (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.75). Splitting this
further to look at the period 2 years pre-pregnancy and the pregnancy period separately, we
found HRs of 1.41 (95% CI 1.03, 1.93) and 1.33 respectively (95% CI 0.91, 1.94) (data not
displayed). When considering exposure during the postpartum period, a statistically significant
HR was seen only for children who were exposed to cancers diagnosed more than 10 years
postpartum (HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.16).
Including all congenital anomalies diagnosed throughout the entire follow-up period
resulted in 204,378 children with diagnoses (9.6% of the study population) and gave a HR of
1.03 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.05) (data not displayed). The sensitivity analysis using 45 years of age as
the maximum cut off for maternal diagnosis of cancer resulted in a similar HR of 1.05 (95%
CI: 1.00, 1.10) (data not displayed).
Using paternal cancer diagnosed during the same window as the exposure gave HR results
close to that of the main analysis (HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.14). We further assessed timing of
cancer diagnosis in relation to the in utero period and we observed a similar pattern for HRs
with regards to timing: pre-pregnancy or during pregnancy HR 1.26 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.55); in
the 5 years postpartum HR 0.97 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.09); >5 years to 10 years postpartum HR 1.14
(95% CI: 1.04, 1.26); >10 years postpartum HR 1.07 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.16); or in multiple time
points HR 1.07 (95% CI: 0.61, 1.87).
In Table 3 results are shown for specific groups of congenital anomalies among the exposed
during the entire follow-up period compared with the unexposed. The largest point estimates
were seen for congenital anomalies of the musculoskeletal system (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.02,
1.25) and congenital anomalies of the respiratory system (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.88, 1.41),.
Among the exposed, the most common congenital anomalies in these groups were congenital
anomalies of the feet (39%) and of the larynx, trachea and bronchus (67%) respectively. The
lowest point estimates were seen for congenital anomalies of the nervous system (HR: 0.80,
95% CI: 0.61, 1.04), orofacial clefts (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.55, 1.23) and congenital anomalies of
the genital organs (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.68, 1.1).
Table 4 displays results for all congenital malformations, according to the type of cancer the
mother was diagnosed with. Statistical significance was reached for children whose mothers
were diagnosed with leukaemia (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.69). The largest, insignificant point
estimates were seen for cancer of the lip, oral cavity or pharynx (HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.83, 1.59)
and cancer of the respiratory or intrathoracic organs (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.39). Among
cases, the most common type of lip, oral or pharynx cancer they were exposed to was cancer of
the tonsil (24%) and the most common type of respiratory or intrathoracic cancer they were
exposed to was cancer of the bronchus and lung (88%). Largest, but statistically insignificant
negative HRs were seen for cancer or the bone or articular cartilage (HR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.29,
1.76) and cancer of the endocrine glands (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.66, 1.04).
5 / 12
Total (N = 2,123,228)
Maternal cancer diagnosis in the two years before pregnancy and the years after pregnancy
was associated with a slightly higher risk of congenital anomalies in children. The highest risk
was seen children of mothers who were diagnosed before or during pregnancy, with smaller
risk estimates in those whose mothers were diagnosed within 5 years postpartum or after 10
years postpartum. Similar associations were seen for paternal cancers which indicate that
maternal cancer does not influence risk of offspring congenital anomalies, and genetic factors
or other time stable factors, like socio-economic factors, play a role instead.
Immortal observation time bias and reverse causation should also be considered. To be
diagnosed up to the age of 50 years, the mother needs to stay alive. Some of the cancers may
have been diagnosed following increased monitoring because of the presence of a congenital
anomaly in the offspring (although it could be argued that this is unlikely). The first type of
bias may lead to an underestimation of effects, and the second type to an overestimation; but
both types of bias would only have small effects.
7 / 12
a Adjusted for maternal age group, paternal age group, birth year and sex
b Additionally adjusted for socioeconomic variables at time of birth: maternal highest education, maternal cohabitation, maternal cohabitation, maternal
residence, maternal income
While the majority of previous studies have not reported an association [7;13;14], some
studies have suggested an increase in prevalence of congenital anomalies among offspring of
mothers diagnosed with pregnancy-associated cancers [7;11;12]. Similar to our study, positive
associations have been seen for all cancers ,breast cancers  and lymphomas . The
comparisons that can be drawn between our results and those of previous studies are, however,
limited due to limited power and differences in the exposure definitions: we were unable to
distinguish between major and minor congenital anomalies, and other studies have limited the
exposure window to pregnancy or from conception up to two years postpartum.
The associations seen with cancers diagnosed during pregnancy and the pre-pregnancy
period (the time period in which we observed the highest HR) could be due to cancer
treatments or stress following a diagnosis, rather than the cancer itself. Cancers diagnosed soon
after pregnancy would have been more likely to be initiated before or during gestation than
cancers initiated many years after; and, therefore, larger HRs would have been expected in the
earlier postpartum years if the cancer itself and its metabolic consequences had an effect on
offspring congenital anomaly risk. There was not, however, a clear pattern with regards to risk
and timing of maternal cancer diagnosis.
The similar pattern of results seen when paternal cancer was substituted as the exposure
suggests that any increase in congenital anomalies in the offspring is not specific to cancers in
the mother; rather, it could be an indication that uncontrolled genetic or family-related
confounding factors are causing the observed association. If a true association exists between
8 / 12
a Adjusted for maternal age group, paternal age group, birth year and sex
b Additionally adjusted for socioeconomic variables at time of birth: maternal highest education, maternal cohabitation, maternal cohabitation, maternal
residence, maternal income
maternal cancer and also paternal cancer, and congenital anomalies in the children, this lends
support to the theory of shared genetic and pre-pregnancy environmental factors, as suggested
by Zhu et al . An alternative mechanism we discussed was the presence and development
of maternal cancer resulting in nutritional and metabolic challenges which fetal
morphogenesis or organogenesis; in this scenario a positive association would be unexpected in the analysis
on paternal cancer.
The main strength of this study is the use of complete data from the Danish nationwide
register system. The registers cover the whole of Denmark. This provides data on the entire
population, with minimal selection bias. In the study of specific types of congenital anomalies or
types of maternal cancers, numbers are small, resulting in a lack of power, which can be seen
from the wide confidence intervals for some of our analyses. Cancer data are considered to be
of high quality and completeness . Data on congenital anomalies in the Danish National
Patient Register is considered to be 90% complete; a level considered by some to be acceptable
for some types of research . Completeness would be expected to be poorer in the earlier
years of the data and for minor congenital anomalies, especially if they are not visible. We
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0173355
9 / 12
were unable to distinguish between major and minor congenital anomalies in our data,
however restricting the main analyses to congenital anomalies diagnosed in the first year of life will
most likely limit these analyses to more major anomalies.
Although the inclusion of the entire population of Denmark minimised selection bias, the
study only includes information on live births. As major congenital anomalies are associated
with early fetal loss, stillbirth and termination [31±33], it is possible that bias occurs due to
conditioning on live births . Bias due to differences in terminations between the exposed
and unexposed groups would be more likely to be an issue when considering children of
mothers who received a diagnosis during pregnancy or the pre-pregnancy period, who may be
more likely to terminate a pregnancy due to concerns about a fetotoxic treatment. It is less
likely that there would be a link between postpartum diagnoses and termination. Bias due to
early fetal loss and stillbirth could occur when considering any exposure category, if losses or
prenatal screening for congenital anomalies are more common among mothers with cancer at
any stage of development.
Another limitation of the study is the fact that it conditions on the future. Although
maternal cancer susceptibility will exist and a tumour may already be initiated before a child's birth,
the exposure status of the child is based on a future event: diagnosis of a maternal cancer. It is
unlikely that cancer would be differentially diagnosed among mothers who have a child with a
congenital malformation. However, in order for a diagnosis to be made and a child considered
exposed, mothers have to survive long enough to receive a cancer diagnosis, not dying of
alternative causes before this point.
There is potential for misclassification of exposure status due to incomplete exposure
follow-up. Children were considered exposed if their mother was diagnosed with cancer from
two years before conception, up until the mother reached 50 years of age. However, not all
mothers in the cohort reached 50 years before December 31st 2010, the final date cancer data
were available until, and some children will therefore have been incorrectly classified as
unexposed in some analyses. However, the sensitivity analysis, reducing the maximum maternal
age to 45 years, provided similar results.
There was some suggestion of an increased prevalence of congenital anomalies among
children of mothers who were diagnosed with cancer between 2 years prior to pregnancy and in
the years after pregnancy (up to 50 years of age). However, the finding of a positive association
between paternal cancer and congenital anomalies suggest that genetic factors or
environmental factors, in either the mother or the father, prior to conception influence risk. The presence
of a developing maternal cancer whilst the offspring is in utero may not greatly alter congenital
anomaly risk, at least for those who survive until birth. Our results should be interpreted in
light of the limitations of the study. Additionally, it should be considered that a large number
of analyses were carried out and some chance findings cannot be ruled out. With a larger
sample size, it may be interesting to investigate associations between more specific types of cancer
and specific congenital malformations to further consider some of our results.
Conceptualization: CHRH LHA AE JO JL NCM.
Formal analysis: NCM.
Funding acquisition: CHRH JL.
Methodology: CHRH LHA AE JO MG FR JL NCM.
Writing ± original draft: NCM.
10 / 12
Writing ± review & editing: CHRH LHA AE JO MG FR JL NCM.
11 / 12
1. Pavlidis NA . Coexistence of pregnancy and malignancy . Oncologist 2002 ; 7 ( 4 ): 279 ± 87 . PMID: 12185292
2. Lee YY , Roberts CL , Dobbins T , Stavrou E , Black K , Morris J , et al. Incidence and outcomes of pregnancy-associated cancer in Australia, 1994 ±2008: a population-based linkage study . BJOG 2012 Dec; 119 ( 13 ): 1572 ± 82 . doi: 10 .1111/j.1471- 0528 . 2012 . 03475 . x PMID : 22947229
3. Lambe M , Ekbom A . Cancers coinciding with childbearing: delayed diagnosis during pregnancy ? BMJ 1995 Dec 16 ; 311 ( 7020 ): 1607 ± 8 . PMID: 8555804
4. Eibye S , Kjaer SK , Mellemkjaer L . Incidence of pregnancy-associated cancer in Denmark, 1977 ± 2006 . Obstet Gynecol 2013 Sep; 122 ( 3 ): 608 ± 17 . doi: 10 .1097/AOG.0b013e3182a057a2 PMID: 23921869
5. Langagergaard V , Gislum M , Skriver MV , Norgard B , Lash TL , Rothman KJ , et al. Birth outcome in women with breast cancer . Br J Cancer 2006 Jan 16 ; 94 ( 1 ): 142 ±6. doi: 10 .1038/sj.bjc. 6602878 PMID: 16306874
6. Langagergaard V . Birth outcome in women with breast cancer, cutaneous malignant melanoma, or Hodgkin's disease: a review . Clin Epidemiol 2011 ; 3 :7± 19 .
7. Langagergaard V , Horvath-Puho E , Norgaard M , Norgard B , Sorensen HT . Hodgkin's disease and birth outcome: a Danish nationwide cohort study . Br J Cancer 2008 Jan 15 ; 98 ( 1 ): 183 ±8. doi: 10 .1038/sj.bjc. 6604126 PMID: 18059394
8. Navrozoglou I , Vrekoussis T , Kontostolis E , Dousias V , Zervoudis S , Stathopoulos EN , et al. Breast cancer during pregnancy: a mini-review . Eur J Surg Oncol 2008 Aug; 34 ( 8 ): 837 ± 43 . doi: 10 .1016/j.ejso. 2008 . 01 .029 PMID: 18343083
9. Howard J. Minimum Latency & Types or Categories of Cancer . World Trade Center Health Program; 2013 .
10. Nadler DL , Zurbenko IG . Estimating cancer latency times using a Weibull Model . Advances in Epidemiology 2014; Article ID 746769 , 8 pages, 2014 .
11. Cardonick E , Usmani A , Ghaffar S. Perinatal outcomes of a pregnancy complicated by cancer, including neonatal follow-up after in utero exposure to chemotherapy: results of an international registry . Am J Clin Oncol 2010 Jun; 33 ( 3 ): 221 ±8. doi: 10 .1097/COC.0b013e3181a44ca9 PMID: 19745695
12. Dalberg K , Eriksson J , Holmberg L . Birth outcome in women with previously treated breast cancerÐa population-based cohort study from Sweden . PLoS Med 2006 Sep; 3(9):e336 . doi: 10.1371/journal. pmed.0030336 PMID: 16968117
13. Garcia-Manero M , Royo MP , Espinos J , Pina L , Alcazar JL , Lopez G . Pregnancy associated breast cancer . Eur J Surg Oncol 2009 Feb; 35 ( 2 ): 215 ±8. doi: 10 .1016/j.ejso. 2008 . 04 .010 PMID: 18550321
14. van Calsteren K , Heyns L , De Smet F , Van Eycken L , Gziri MM , Van Gemert W , et al. Cancer during pregnancy: an analysis of 215 patients emphasizing the obstetrical and the neonatal outcomes . J Clin Oncol 2010 Feb 1 ; 28 ( 4 ): 683 ±9. doi: 10 .1200/JCO. 2009 . 23 .2801 PMID: 19841323
15. Zhu JL , Basso O , Hasle H , Winther JF , Olsen JH , Olsen J . Do parents of children with congenital malformations have a higher cancer risk? A nationwide study in Denmark . Br J Cancer 2002 Aug 27 ; 87 ( 5 ): 524 ±8. doi: 10 .1038/sj.bjc. 6600488 PMID: 12189550
16. Sun Y , Wu CS , Arah OA , Olsen J . Cancer risk in siblings of children with congenital malformations . Cancer Epidemiol 2016 Aug 1 ; 44 : 59 ± 64 . doi: 10 .1016/j.canep. 2016 . 07 .011 PMID: 27491083
17. Braems G , Denys H , De WO , Cocquyt V , Van den Broecke R. Use of tamoxifen before and during pregnancy . Oncologist 2011 ; 16 ( 11 ): 1547 ± 51 . doi: 10 .1634/theoncologist.2011-0121 PMID: 22020212
18. Hedegaard M , Henriksen TB , Sabroe S , Secher NJ . Psychological distress in pregnancy and preterm delivery . BMJ 1993 Jul 24 ; 307 ( 6898 ): 234 ± 9 . PMID: 8369684
19. Hansen D , Lou HC , Olsen J . Serious life events and congenital malformations: a national study with complete follow-up . Lancet 2000 Sep 9 ; 356 ( 9233 ): 875 ± 80 . doi: 10 .1016/S0140- 6736 ( 00 ) 02676 - 3 PMID: 11036891
20. Douglas RG , Shaw JH . Metabolic effects of cancer . Br J Surg 1990 Mar; 77 ( 3 ): 246 ± 54 . PMID: 2108784
21. Vainio H. Carcinogenesis and teratogenesis may have common mechanisms . Scand J Work Environ Health 1989 Feb; 15(1):13±7. PMID: 2537999
22. Argiles JM . Cancer-associated malnutrition . Eur J Oncol Nurs 2005 ; 9 Suppl 2 : S39 ± S50 .
23. Ryan AM , Power DG , Daly L , Cushen SJ , Ni BE , Prado CM . Cancer-associated malnutrition, cachexia and sarcopenia: the skeleton in the hospital closet 40 years later . Proc Nutr Soc 2016 May; 75 ( 2 ): 199 ± 211 . doi: 10 .1017/S002966511500419X PMID: 26786393
24. Nitenberg G , Raynard B . Nutritional support of the cancer patient: issues and dilemmas . Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2000 Jun; 34 ( 3 ): 137 ± 68 . PMID: 10838261
25. Koren G , Lishner M , Farine D. Cancer in pregnancy: maternal and fetal risks . 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996 .
26. Chambers CD , Johnson KA , Dick LM , Felix RJ , Jones KL . Maternal fever and birth outcome: a prospective study . Teratology 1998 Dec; 58 ( 6 ): 251 ±7. doi: 10 .1002/(SICI) 1096 - 9926 ( 199812 )58: 6 < 251 : :AIDTERA6>3.0 .CO;2- L PMID : 9894674
27. Tikkanen J , Heinonen OP . Maternal hyperthermia during pregnancy and cardiovascular malformations in the offspring . Eur J Epidemiol 1991 Nov; 7 ( 6 ): 628 ± 35 . PMID: 1783056
28. Gjerstorff ML . The Danish Cancer Registry . Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 2011 Jul; 39 ( 7 Suppl) : 42 ±5. doi: 10 .1177/1403494810393562 PMID: 21775350
29. Lynge E , Sandegaard JL , Rebolj M. The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health 2011 Jul; 39 ( 7 Suppl) : 30 ±3. doi: 10 .1177/1403494811401482 PMID: 21775347
30. Larsen H , Nielsen GL , Bendsen J , Flint C , Olsen J , Sorensen HT . Predictive value and completeness of the registration of congenital abnormalities in three Danish population-based registries . Scand J Public Health 2003 ; 31 ( 1 ): 12 ± 6 . PMID: 12623519
31. Frey HA , Odibo AO , Dicke JM , Shanks AL , Macones GA , Cahill AG . Stillbirth risk among fetuses with ultrasound-detected isolated congenital anomalies . Obstet Gynecol 2014 Jul; 124 ( 1 ): 91 ±8. doi: 10 . 1097/AOG.0000000000000335 PMID: 24901272
32. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Abnormality in England, Scotland and Wales . London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2010 .
33. Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group. Causes of death among stillbirths . JAMA 2011 Dec 14 ; 306 ( 22 ): 2459 ± 68 . doi: 10 .1001/jama. 2011 . 1823 PMID: 22166605
34. Liew Z , Olsen J , Cui X , Ritz B , Arah OA . Bias from conditioning on live birth in pregnancy cohorts: an illustration based on neurodevelopment in children after prenatal exposure to organic pollutants . Int J Epidemiol 2015 Feb; 44 ( 1 ): 345 ± 54 . doi: 10 .1093/ije/dyu249 PMID: 25604449