A covariant Lagrangian for stable nonsingular bounce

Journal of High Energy Physics, Sep 2017

The nonsingular bounce models usually suffer from the ghost or gradient instabilities, as has been proved recently. In this paper, we propose a covariant effective theory for stable nonsingular bounce, which has the quadratic order of the second order derivative of the field ϕ but the background set only by P (ϕ, X). With it, we explicitly construct a fully stable nonsingular bounce model for the ekpyrotic scenario.

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FJHEP09%282017%29027.pdf

A covariant Lagrangian for stable nonsingular bounce

HJE A covariant Lagrangian for stable nonsingular bounce Yong Cai 0 1 3 Yun-Song Piao 0 1 2 3 0 P. O. Box 2735, Beijing 100190 , China 1 Beijing 100049 , China 2 Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences 3 School of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences The nonsingular bounce models usually suffer from the ghost or gradient instabilities, as has been proved recently. In this paper, we propose a covariant effective theory for stable nonsingular bounce, which has the quadratic order of the second order derivative of the field φ but the background set only by P (φ, X). With it, we explicitly construct a fully stable nonsingular bounce model for the ekpyrotic scenario. Classical Theories of Gravity; Spacetime Singularities 1 Introduction 2 3 4 15] (see also [16, 17]), along the road beyond the cubic Galileon (even the Horndeski theory [18–20]). Moreover, the developments of scalar-tensor theory (the GLPV [21] and DHOST theory [22–24], the mimetic gravity [25, 26]) might also be able to provide us with some chances to implement stable nonsingular cosmologies. However, due to the complexity of relevant theories, which component is required for a stable bounce is not clear. Thus so far building a realistic and stable model is still difficult. In refs. [8, 9], with the EFT of nonsingular cosmologies, it has been found that the operator R(3)δg00 is significant for the stability of nonsingular bounce. Actually, in unitary gauge, without getting involved in the specific theories, Ladd−oper ∼ M24(t) 2 (δg00)2 + 2 m˜24(t) R(3)δg00 (1.1) – 1 – ∼ (∂ζ)2 at quadratic order. might be the least set of operators added to GR to cure the instabilities, since (δg00)2 ∼ ζ ˙2 In this paper, based on the covariant description of the R(3)δg00 operator, we propose a covariant theory for stable nonsingular bounce, which has the quadratic order of the second order derivative of the field φ but the background set only by P (φ, X). We illuminate its application by constructing a fully stable nonsingular bounce model for the ekpyrotic scenario [27, 28]. Note added. Several days after our paper appeared in arXiv, the preprint [29] appeared, in which somewhat similar analysis is done in beyond Horndeski model with sort of similar where X = φμφμ, φμ = ∇μφ and φμ = ∇μφ. Codazzi relation, it is straightforward (though tedious) to find R(3) is the Ricci scalar on the 3-dimensional spacelike hypersurface. Using the GaussR(3) = R − φμν φμν − ( φ)2 + 2(φννμφμ − φνμμφν ) + , X X 2φμφμν φνσφσ X2 − 2φμφμν φν φ X2 with φμν = ∇ν ∇μφ and φννμ = ∇μ∇ν ∇ν φ. It is simple to check that the right hand side of eq. (2.2) is 0 at the background level. We define Sδg00R(3) = R d4x√ −gLδg00R(3) , and have Lδg00R(3) = f1(φ) 2 f 2 + R − 2 f 2X δg00R(3) X Z = fφφd ln X − fφ + Z fφ d ln X 2 φ X2 φμν φμν − ( φ)2 − f − 2XfX [φμφμρφρν φν − ( φ)φμφμν φν ] after integration by parts, where f (φ, X) = f1 1 + fX2 has the dimension of mass squared, f2(φ) is defined in (2.1), and the total derivative terms have been discarded. One useful formula for obtaining eq. (2.3) is 2B(φ, X)φμφμν φν = ∇μ φ BdX − X μ Z Z ∂B dX − ∂φ φ Z BdX . – 2 – S = Z d x 4 √ −g 2 Mp2 R + P (φ, X) ! + Sδg00R(3) , which is a covariant theory equivalent to GR plus the set of operators in (1.1), since M24(t) = φ˙4PXX and m˜24(t) = f1(φ). The covariant action (3.1) actually belongs to a subclass of the DHOST theory [22, 23] (see appendix A for details), which could avoid the Ostrogradski instability, up to quadratic order of the second order derivative of φ. Ijjas and Steinhardt used the quartic Horndeski action in [13]. In (2.3), though the nonminimal coupling f (φ, X)R is similar to that in [13], terms ∼ φ, φμν φμν , ( φ)2, ( φ)φμφμν φν and φμφμρφρν φν also appear simultaneously with the coefficients set by δg00R(3), so that the effect of Sδg00R(3) on background is canceled accurately. Here, the background is set only by P (φ, X). In [14], ( φ)2 is used, which shows itself the Ostrogradski ghost, see also earlier [30], how to remove it requires argumentation. The quadratic action of scalar perturbation for (3.1) is in which ζ S(2) = Z ˙2 a3Qs ζ − cs a2 2 (∂ζ)2 d4x , Qs = 2φ˙4PXX − Mp2H˙ H2 , cs2Qs = Mp2 c˙3 a − 1 3.1 The covariant theory Here, the EFT proposed is 2f1(φ) = H Z a a Qscs2 + Mp2 dt − Mp2. – 3 – and c3 = a(1 + M2fp12 )/H. We can see that the sound speed of scalar perturbation can be directly modified by f1(φ), namely, the function before δg00R(3) operator. Therefore, the gradient instability of scalar perturbation could be cured by proper choice of f1(φ), while that of tensor perturbation is unaffected by Sδg00R(3) , hence is same with that of GR. A fully stable nonsingular bounce (Qs > 0 and cs2 = 1) can be designed with (3.1). In the bounce phase, H˙ > 0. However, Qs > 0 can be obtained, since P (φ, X) contributes φ˙4PXX in Qs. While around the bounce point H ≃ 0, 2 cs ∼ −H ˙ 1 + 2f1 Mp2 . Thus we will have cs2 > 0 for 2f1 < −Mp2, as has been clarified in refs. [8, 10]. It should be mentioned that if f1 = 0, we have cs2 ∼ −H˙ < 0 around the bounce point, thus Sδg00R(3) is needed to contribute f1. Here, we always could set cs2 ∼ O(1) with a suitable f1(φ) (see also [10]) which satisfies (3.1) (3.2) (3.3) (3.4) (3.5) HJEP09(217) With (3.1), building a nonsingular bounce model is simple. The ghost-free nonsingular 2 bounce is set by P (φ, X), while cs ≃ 1 is set by using suitable f1 and f2 in (2.1). As a specific model, we set P (φ, X) in (3.1) as k0 P (φ, X) = Around φ ≃ 0, we have where the potential is ekpyrotic-like V (φ) = − 2 V0 eφ/M1 1 − tanh φ M2 , with constant M1, M2, V0, and k0, κ1 responsible for the switching of the sign before X/2 around φ ≃ 0, and q0, κ2 for the appearance of X2 around φ ≃ 0, see [31] for a similar P (φ, X), which might allow for a supersymmetric counterpart [32]. The background equations are Initially φ ≪ −M2, −1/√κ1, −1/√κ2, we have P (φ, X) = −X/2+V0eφ/M1 , the Universe is in the ekpyrotic phase with the equation of state parameter 3Mp2H2 = −2φ˙2PX − P , Mp2H˙ = φ˙2PX . Mp2 3M1 ωekpy = given by (3.5), and f2(φ) = φ˙(t(φ)). can be obtained, while cs2 = 1 can be obtained by setting suitable f1(φ) in (2.3), which is The background evolution is numerically plotted in figure 1. We show the behaviors of f1(φ) and f2(φ) with respect to φ in figure 2 while we require cs2 = 1 throughout. In both figures 1 and 2, we set k0 = 1.2, κ1 = 30, q0 = 1.25, κ2 = 20, V0 = 2 × 10−7, M1 = 0.22 and M2 = 0.1. We set the initial condition of φ as φini = −0.54 and φ˙ini = 2.24 × 10−4, while the initial value of t is tini = −2000. We see that with f1 and f2 plotted in figure 2, the Lagrangian (3.1) with P (φ, X) in (3.6) will bring a fully stable nonsingular bounce (Qs > 0 and cs2 = 1). (3.6) (3.7) 0.6 0.4 1.5 1.0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 (a) f1(φ) for cs2 ≡ 1. (b) f2(φ) for cs2 ≡ 1. φ [6–9]. Actually, in [10, 38], it is observed that the Galileon HJEP09(217) The exploration of stable nonsingular bounce has been still a significant issue. Recently, it has been found in refs. [8, 9] that the operator R(3)δg00 in EFT of nonsingular cosmologies is significant for the stability of bounce. Here, based on the covariant description of the R(3)δg00 operator, we propose a covariant theory (3.1) for stable nonsingular bounce. Our (3.1) is actually a subclass of the DHOST theory [22, 23], but the cosmological background is set only by P (φ, X). The P (φ, X) nonsingular bounce model could be ghostfree [31, 37], but suffers the problem of cs2 < 0, which can not be dispelled by using the Galileon interaction ∼ interaction only moves the period of cs2 < 0 to the outside of the bounce phase, but can not remove it, see also earlier [39]. Thus it could be imagined that the quadratic order of the second order derivative of φ, i.e., φμν φμν , ( φ)2, φμφμρφρν φν and ( φ)φμφμν φν , might play crucial roles in stable nonsingular bounce model. However, due to the complexity of relevant theories, what kind of combination of these components is required for a stable cosmological bounce is unclear. Here, the corresponding combination (2.3) is just what told by the covariant description of the R(3)δg00 operator. With (3.1), the design of stable nonsingular bounce model is simple, as illuminated for the ekpyrotic scenario. Our work actually offers a concise way to the fully stable nonsingular cosmologies. See also [40–48] for other interesting studies. Here, the importance of the EFT of nonsingular cosmologies is obvious. Actually, the role of R(3)δK in EFT [8] is similar to that of R(3)δg00, where Kμν is the extrinsic curvature on the 3-dimensional spacelike hypersurfaces. The covariant description of R(3)δK involves the term ∼ ( φ)R, which might have the Ostrogradski ghost unless certain constraint is imposed. This issue will be revisited. In mimetic gravity [25, 26] (see e.g. [ 49 ] for review), since the mimetic constraint suggests δg00 = 0 (which is the source of instabilities [ 50– 53 ]), one might apply the operator R(3)δK to make the (possibly-built) nonsingular bounce stable,1 instead of R(3)δg00. The mimetic gravity with the couple ( φ)R has been proposed in ref. [54]. We will back to the relevant issues. Acknowledgments We thank Mingzhe Li, Taotao Qiu and Youping Wan for helpful discussions. This work is supported by NSFC, No. 11575188, 11690021, and also supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of CAS, No. XDA04075000, XDB23010100. A Correspondence with a subclass of DHOST theory Up to cubic order of φμν , the covariant action of DHOST can be written as (see e.g., [24]) SDHOST = Z d x 4 √ −g hp(φ, X) + q(φ, X) φ + g2(φ, X)R + C(μ2ν)ρσφμν φρσ +g3(φ, X)Gμν φμν + C(μ3ν)ρσαβφμν φρσφαβi , (A.1) 1Communication with Mingzhe Li. – 6 – with and with where R and Gμν denote the usual 4-dimensional Ricci scalar and Einstein tensor associated with the metric gμν , respectively; C(μ2ν)ρσφμν φρσ = X aA(φ, X) L(A2) , L(2) = φμν φμν , 1 2 L(2) = ( φ)2 , L(2) = φμφμρφρν φν , L(2) = (φμφμν φν )2 , 4 5 L(2) = ( φ)φμφμν φν , 3 C(μ3ν)ρσαβφμν φρσφαβ = X bA(φ, X)L(A3) , 5 A=1 10 A=1 1 L(3) = ( φ)3 , L(3) = ( φ)φμν φμν , 2 L(3) = ( φ)2 φμφμν φν , 4 L(3) = 5 φ φμφμν φνρφρ , L(3) = φμφμν φνρφρσφσ , L(3) = φμφμν φνρφρ φσφσλφλ , 7 8 L(3) = 9 φ (φμφμν φν )2 , L(130) = (φμφμν φν )3 ; L(3) = φμν φνρφρμ , 3 L(3) = φμν φμν φρφρσφσ , 6 extra conditions on the functions aA and bA need to be satisfied so that there is no extra propagating degree of freedom, see [24] and references therein for further discussions. Comparing with (A.1), we find our model (3.1) corresponds to the covariant form of DHOST theory with p(φ, X) = P (φ, X) − 2 X Z g2(φ, X) = Mp2 + f 2 a1 = −a2 = , f 2X , and bA = 0. fφφd ln X , q(φ, X) = −fφ − g3(φ, X) = 0 , a3 = −a4 = Z fφ d ln X , 2 f − 2XfX , X2 (A.6) a5 = 0 , In the EFT formalism, the quadratic action for DHOST theory can be written as SD(2H)OST =Z d3xdta3 M 2 2 δKμν δKμν − 1+ 3 αL δK2 +(1+αT ) R(3) δ h 2 a3 +δ2R(3) (A.7) √ ! +H2αK δN 2 +4HαBδKδN +(1+αH )R(3)δN +4β1δKδN˙ +β2δN˙ 2 + βa23 (∂iδN )2 , where δN = δg00/2, δ2R(3) stands for the second order term in the perturbative expansion of R(3), the dimensionless time-dependent functions αL, αT , αK , αB, αH , β1, β2 and β3 satisfy certain conditions so that there is no extra propagating degree of freedom, see [24] for details. – 7 – (A.2) (A.3) (A.4) (A.5) HJEP09(217) Comparing with (A.7), we find our model (3.1) corresponds to M = Mp , αK = 4M24 Mp2H2 = 4XM2p2PHX2X , αH = 2Mm˜p224 = 2f1(φ) Mp2 . αL = αT = αB = 0 , β1 = β2 = β3 = 0 , (A.8) Note that the results in eqs. (A.8) should be evaluated at background level in the quadratic action if we derive them from eqs. (A.6) by using formulae given in eqs. (2.14) of [24]. According to the above results, our model (3.1) belongs to a subclass of the DHOST theory with αL = 0 and αT = 0. As has been pointed out in ref. [24], in such a DHOST HJEP09(217) positive times. theory, in the linear regime for a Minkowski background (namely, at the limit a = 1 and 1 1 H = 0) the Newton’s constant is GN = 8πMp2 (1+αH)2 . In our specific numerical example, the Universe is nearly slowly expanding Friedmann Universe at large positive times, which is nearly Minkowskian. However, in that limit, the contribution from Lδg00R(3) (or the value 1 of f1(φ)) is already vanishing, i.e., αH = 0, hence GR is retrieved and GN = 8πMp2 at large Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. [1] S.W. Hawking and R. Penrose, The singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 314 (1970) 529 [INSPIRE]. [2] A. Borde and A. Vilenkin, Eternal inflation and the initial singularity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 3305 [gr-qc/9312022] [INSPIRE]. [3] A. Borde, A.H. Guth and A. Vilenkin, Inflationary space-times are incompletein past directions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 151301 [gr-qc/0110012] [INSPIRE]. [4] Y.-F. Cai, T. Qiu, Y.-S. Piao, M. Li and X. Zhang, Bouncing universe with quintom matter, JHEP 10 (2007) 071 [arXiv:0704.1090] [INSPIRE]. [5] V.A. Rubakov, The null energy condition and its violation, Phys. Usp. 57 (2014) 128 [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 184 (2014) 137] [arXiv:1401.4024] [INSPIRE]. [6] M. Libanov, S. Mironov and V. Rubakov, Generalized Galileons: instabilities of bouncing and genesis cosmologies and modified genesis, JCAP 08 (2016) 037 [arXiv:1605.05992] [7] T. Kobayashi, Generic instabilities of nonsingular cosmologies in Horndeski theory: a no-go theorem, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 043511 [arXiv:1606.05831] [INSPIRE]. [8] Y. Cai, Y. Wan, H.-G. Li, T. Qiu and Y.-S. Piao, The effective field theory of nonsingular cosmology, JHEP 01 (2017) 090 [arXiv:1610.03400] [INSPIRE]. [9] P. Creminelli, D. Pirtskhalava, L. Santoni and E. Trincherini, Stability of geodesically complete cosmologies, JCAP 11 (2016) 047 [arXiv:1610.04207] [INSPIRE]. [10] Y. Cai, H.-G. Li, T. Qiu and Y.-S. Piao, The effective field theory of nonsingular cosmology: II, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 369 [arXiv:1701.04330] [INSPIRE]. – 8 – [INSPIRE]. [11] R. Kolevatov and S. Mironov, Cosmological bounces and Lorentzian wormholes in Galileon theories with an extra scalar field, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 123516 [arXiv:1607.04099] [12] S. Akama and T. Kobayashi, Generalized multi-Galileons, covariantized new terms and the no-go theorem for nonsingular cosmologies, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 064011 [arXiv:1701.02926] [INSPIRE]. [13] A. Ijjas and P.J. Steinhardt, Fully stable cosmological solutions with a non-singular classical bounce, Phys. Lett. B 764 (2017) 289 [arXiv:1609.01253] [INSPIRE]. [14] C. de Rham and S. Melville, Unitary null energy condition violation in P (X) cosmologies, HJEP09(217) Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 123523 [arXiv:1703.00025] [INSPIRE]. and stability of nonsingular cosmologies with limiting curvature, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 043502 [arXiv:1704.04184] [INSPIRE]. [15] D. Yoshida, J. Quintin, M. Yamaguchi and R.H. Brandenberger, Cosmological perturbations [INSPIRE]. [arXiv:1612.00346] [INSPIRE]. [16] Y. Misonoh, M. Fukushima and S. Miyashita, Stability of singularity-free cosmological solutions in Hoˇrava-Lifshitz gravity, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 044044 [arXiv:1612.09077] [17] M. Giovannini, Stringy bounces and gradient instabilities, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 083506 [18] G.W. Horndeski, Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10 (1974) 363 [INSPIRE]. [19] C. Deffayet, S. Deser and G. Esposito-Farese, Generalized Galileons: all scalar models whose curved background extensions maintain second-order field equations and stress-tensors, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 064015 [arXiv:0906.1967] [INSPIRE]. [20] T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama, Generalized G-inflation: inflation with the most general second-order field equations, Prog. Theor. Phys. 126 (2011) 511 [arXiv:1105.5723] [INSPIRE]. [21] J. Gleyzes, D. Langlois, F. Piazza and F. Vernizzi, Healthy theories beyond Horndeski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 211101 [arXiv:1404.6495] [INSPIRE]. [22] D. Langlois and K. Noui, Degenerate higher derivative theories beyond Horndeski: evading the Ostrogradski instability, JCAP 02 (2016) 034 [arXiv:1510.06930] [INSPIRE]. [23] D. Langlois and K. Noui, Hamiltonian analysis of higher derivative scalar-tensor theories, JCAP 07 (2016) 016 [arXiv:1512.06820] [INSPIRE]. [24] D. Langlois, M. Mancarella, K. Noui and F. Vernizzi, Effective description of higher-order scalar-tensor theories, JCAP 05 (2017) 033 [arXiv:1703.03797] [INSPIRE]. [25] A.H. Chamseddine, V. Mukhanov and A. Vikman, Cosmology with mimetic matter, JCAP 06 (2014) 017 [arXiv:1403.3961] [INSPIRE]. JCAP 03 (2017) 009 [arXiv:1612.05860] [INSPIRE]. [26] A.H. Chamseddine and V. Mukhanov, Resolving cosmological singularities, [27] J. Khoury, B.A. Ovrut, P.J. Steinhardt and N. Turok, The ekpyrotic universe: colliding branes and the origin of the hot big bang, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 123522 [hep-th/0103239] [INSPIRE]. – 9 – [arXiv:0806.1245] [INSPIRE]. beyond Horndeski, arXiv:1705.06626 [INSPIRE]. [29] R. Kolevatov, S. Mironov, N. Sukhov and V. Volkova, Cosmological bounce and genesis [30] M.-Z. Li, B. Feng and X.-M. Zhang, A single scalar field model of dark energy with equation of state crossing −1, JCAP 12 (2005) 002 [hep-ph/0503268] [INSPIRE]. [31] M. Koehn, J.-L. Lehners and B. Ovrut, Nonsingular bouncing cosmology: consistency of the effective description, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 103501 [arXiv:1512.03807] [INSPIRE]. [astro-ph/0502343] [INSPIRE]. [35] Y.-S. Piao, S. Tsujikawa and X.-M. Zhang, Inflation in string inspired cosmology and suppression of CMB low multipoles, Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 4455 [hep-th/0312139] [36] Z.-G. Liu, Z.-K. Guo and Y.-S. Piao, Obtaining the CMB anomalies with a bounce from the contracting phase to inflation, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 063539 [arXiv:1304.6527] [INSPIRE]. [37] E.I. Buchbinder, J. Khoury and B.A. Ovrut, New ekpyrotic cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 123503 [hep-th/0702154] [INSPIRE]. [38] A. Ijjas and P.J. Steinhardt, Classically stable nonsingular cosmological bounces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 121304 [arXiv:1606.08880] [INSPIRE]. [39] D.A. Easson, I. Sawicki and A. Vikman, G-bounce, JCAP 11 (2011) 021 [arXiv:1109.1047] [40] T. Biswas, E. Gerwick, T. Koivisto and A. Mazumdar, Towards singularity and ghost free theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 031101 [arXiv:1110.5249] [INSPIRE]. [41] T. Biswas, A.S. Koshelev, A. Mazumdar and S. Yu. Vernov, Stable bounce and inflation in non-local higher derivative cosmology, JCAP 08 (2012) 024 [arXiv:1206.6374] [INSPIRE]. [42] S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou, Matter bounce loop quantum cosmology from F (R) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 124083 [arXiv:1410.8183] [INSPIRE]. [43] S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou, ΛCDM bounce cosmology without ΛCDM: the case of modified gravity, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 064036 [arXiv:1502.06125] [INSPIRE]. [44] S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou, Bouncing cosmology with future singularity from modified gravity, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 024016 [arXiv:1504.06866] [INSPIRE]. [45] S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou, Bounce universe history from unimodular F (R) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 084050 [arXiv:1601.04112] [INSPIRE]. [46] S. Banerjee and E.N. Saridakis, Bounce and cyclic cosmology in weakly broken Galileon theories, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 063523 [arXiv:1604.06932] [INSPIRE]. HJEP09(217) developments and applications to cosmology and astrophysics, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2017 (2017) 3156915 [arXiv:1612.08661] [INSPIRE]. and mimetic Horndeski gravity: cosmological solutions and perturbations, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 225014 [arXiv:1601.00102] [INSPIRE]. perturbations, JCAP 07 (2017) 031 [arXiv:1703.02923] [INSPIRE]. mimetic cosmological perturbations, JCAP 07 (2017) 009 [arXiv:1704.06031] [INSPIRE]. with higher derivatives, arXiv:1704.06834 [INSPIRE]. [32] M. Koehn , J.-L. Lehners and B.A. Ovrut , Cosmological super-bounce, Phys. Rev. D 90 ( 2014 ) 025005 [arXiv: 1310 .7577] [INSPIRE]. [33] Y.-S. Piao , B. Feng and X.-M. Zhang , Suppressing CMB quadrupole with a bounce from contracting phase to inflation , Phys. Rev. D 69 ( 2004 ) 103520 [ hep -th/0310206] [INSPIRE]. [34] Y.-S. Piao , A possible explanation to low CMB quadrupole , Phys. Rev. D 71 ( 2005 ) 087301 [47] S.H. Hendi , M. Momennia , B. Eslam Panah and M. Faizal , Nonsingular universes in Gauss-Bonnet gravity's rainbow, Astrophys . J. 827 ( 2016 ) 153 [arXiv: 1703 .00480] [48] S.H. Hendi , M. Momennia , B. Eslam Panah and S. Panahiyan , Nonsingular universe in massive gravity's rainbow , Universe 16 ( 2017 ) 26 [arXiv: 1705 .01099] [INSPIRE]. [49] L. Sebastiani , S. Vagnozzi and R. Myrzakulov , Mimetic gravity: a review of recent [50] G. Cognola , R. Myrzakulov , L. Sebastiani , S. Vagnozzi and S. Zerbini , Covariant Hoˇrava-like [51] A. Ijjas , J. Ripley and P.J. Steinhardt , NEC violation in mimetic cosmology revisited , Phys. Lett. B 760 ( 2016 ) 132 [arXiv: 1604 .08586] [INSPIRE]. [52] H. Firouzjahi , M.A. Gorji and S.A. Hosseini Mansoori , Instabilities in mimetic matter


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FJHEP09%282017%29027.pdf

Yong Cai, Yun-Song Piao. A covariant Lagrangian for stable nonsingular bounce, Journal of High Energy Physics, 2017, 27, DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2017)027