Perilous and Fair: Women in the Works and Life of J.R.R. Tolkien (2015) ed. Janet Brennan Croft and Leslie A. Donovan

Journal of Tolkien Research, Dec 2014

Perilous and Fair: Women in the Works and Life of J.R.R. Tolkien (2015), ed. by Janet Brennan Croft and Leslie A. Donovan

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://scholar.valpo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=journaloftolkienresearch

Perilous and Fair: Women in the Works and Life of J.R.R. Tolkien (2015) ed. Janet Brennan Croft and Leslie A. Donovan

Journal of Tolkien Research Perilous and Fair: Women in the Works and Life of J.R .R . Tolkien (2015) ed. Janet Brennan Croft and Leslie A . Donovan Deidre A. Dawson Part of the English Language and Literature Commons; and the Women's Studies Commons - Article 8 This excellent collection of essays is long overdue, for in spite of the breadth and depth of scholarship dealing with female characters or feminist themes in Tolkien’s work, there has not been, to my knowledge, an entire volume devoted to this topic. Furthermore, as Croft and Donovan note in their introduction there remains “a continuing and alarming tendency among some current Tolkien scholars to remain unfamiliar with or to disregard outright the more positive readings of Tolkien’s female characters and gender politics found easily in both classic and recent research”(2). Examples are Candice Frederick and Sam McBride’s Women Among The Inklings: Gender, C.S. Lewis, J.R.R. Tolkien and Charles Williams (2001) and more recently Adam Roberts’s essay “Women” in A Companion to J.R.R. Tolkien (2014). Croft and Donovan express dismay that in spite of the impressive amount of scholarship on female characters in Tolkien, Roberts stresses “female passivity” in The Lord of the Rings (2). Similarly, Nancy Enright’s essay cites Frederick and McBride’s categorical statement about gender roles in The Lord of the Rings: “Men are the doers, workers, thinkers and leaders. Women are homemakers, nurses and distant love interests” (119) as an example of the erroneous and oft-repeated assumption that Tolkien was biased against women, simply because he worked in a primarily male environment and was a members of the Inklings, which Frederick and McBride decry as “blatantly sexist” (119). To rectify these misapprehensions about the role of women in Tolkien’s life and work, the editors have included here seven “classic” essays published between 1984 and 2007, and seven new essays “that build on past studies and point to new directions for the topic.” Croft and Donovan present their collection of essays as a “representative sample, rather than a definitive canon,” and explain their choice of the words “perilous” and “fair” as a metaphor for the rich and complex “issues of female power” explored in the essays (3). The essays are grouped under thematic headings: Historical Perspectives, Power of Gender, Specific Characters, Earlier Literary Contexts, and Women Readers. My review does not always follow this arrangement, however, for my own reading of the volume sometimes led me to find connections between essays from different groups. Robin Anne Reid’s “The History of Scholarship on Female Characters in J.R.R. Tolkien’s Legendarium: A Feminist Bibliographic Essay,” is far more than an expanded annotated bibliography, because Reid not only comments on the essays and articles presented, she also draws connections between them and thus provides a comprehensive overview of the relevant work. The essay is organized chronologically, which allows Reid to trace the evolution of scholarship on Tolkien’s female characters over time, revealing “not only the increasing attention paid to these characters, but also a growing application of newer critical theories and methods” (13). For example, in the 1970s only two articles specifically about female characters in Tolkien’s work were published; in the 1980s, this increased to four; in the 1990s, there were only three. By contrast, Reid notes, “During the first decade of the twenty-first century, twenty-three articles and book chapters were published on Tolkien’s female characters” (23). As milestones in the evolution of Tolkien scholarship Reid cites the publication of the first encyclopedia devoted to Tolkien’s work, The J.R.R. Tolkien Encyclopedia: Scholarship and Critical Assessment (ed. Michael D.C. Drout, 2007) and the transition of Tolkien-themed publications such as Mythlore from fanzines to peerreviewed journals. Reid concurs with the MLA International Bibliography, however, that work that has been published outside of traditional peer-reviewed academic journals, such as Mallorn, the Minis-Tirith Evening Star and early issues of Mythlore should be included in bibliographies of scholarship on Tolkien, for they often contained pioneering work. For example, of the ten articles dealing with female characters in Tolkien published between 1971 and 1996, six appeared in Mythlore. Regarding scholarship on Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings films (The Hobbit had not yet been released at the time this essay was written), Reid discusses “essays that, in dealing with the film, also develop an original analysis of female characters in Tolkien’s text to the extent that the discussion includes new and relevant approaches to them” (26). Reid’s bibliographical excavations reveal a “daunting” amount of Tolkien scholarship—in a footnote she mentions that a search she conducted in June of 2014 on Tolkien subjects not related to film returned “1,89 (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://scholar.valpo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=journaloftolkienresearch

Deidre A. Dawson. Perilous and Fair: Women in the Works and Life of J.R.R. Tolkien (2015) ed. Janet Brennan Croft and Leslie A. Donovan, Journal of Tolkien Research, 2014, Volume 1, Issue 1,