Merriman Winner Interview: Melissa Cantrell

NASIG Newsletter, Aug 2017

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1858&context=nasig

Merriman Winner Interview: Melissa Cantrell

Interview with Melissa Cantrell, the 2017 NASIG Merriman Award Winner Please start by describing your current position and how you've been involved with serials? My current position is as the Scholarly Communication Librarian at the University of Colorado - Boulder. However, when I received this award I was still working as the Collections Analyst at the University of Colorado - Denver. My main role then was to provide assessment for our collections, including serials. My main role now is much more focused on promoting open access and open education. - What prompted you to apply for the Merriman award? How did you react when you found out that you were the recipient? I can’t say that prospect of going to England wasn’t alluring, but I also applied because I thought it would be a great opportunity to get a sense of the big picture conversations going on in serials and scholarly communication. I think it is really important as an early career professional to try to reach into some of those broader conversations happening in the field, so in that way I thought attending UKSG would be a great learning 1 NASIG Newsletter attend this year’s conference. I am very much hoping to be able to attend next year’s conference, though! What was your favorite USKG session and why was it your favorite? It’s hard to pick just one! A plenary session by Barend Mons on open and interoperable data exploded my mind in a good way, and the closing session by Charlotte Roueché as well as a breakout session on values-based leadership by Jo Alcock and Sarah Durrant were both eye-opening and inspiring. As useful as practical guide sessions are sometimes, I prefer sessions that force me to think about issues in new ways and then I can take those ideas back and apply them in my own context. All of these sessions checked that box in a huge way. What are the differences between the two organizations, USKG and NASIG? It seems to me that the open access movement is more strongly emphasized at UKSG, but I think this is becoming increasingly important to NASIG as well. I also think they are different just because of the nature of publishing, policy, and education in Europe versus in the United States. There are definitely important overlaps in trends, challenges, and conversations that are being had, but the approaches are perhaps a bit different. For those who might be interested in going to UKSG and perhaps applying for the Merriman award, what advice would you give them? First of all, just go for it. As an early career librarian, I didn’t think I had any chance of actually receiving the award, but I worked hard on my essay and tried to bring some originality to it so that it would stand out. I would also say to try to think about how you might use the experience of attending UKSG when you return to your home institution, and how it can benefit you and your colleagues in the future, then try to articulate that in the application as well. NASIG Newsletter


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1858&context=nasig

Merriman Winner Interview: Melissa Cantrell, NASIG Newsletter, 2017,