Looking to the Past in Planning for the Future: Does the Modern Estate Tax Fit within the Ideals of the Founding Fathers?

Nevada Law Journal, Dec 2006

By Alicia Lerud, Published on 01/01/06

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1371&context=nlj

Looking to the Past in Planning for the Future: Does the Modern Estate Tax Fit within the Ideals of the Founding Fathers?

NEVADA LAW JOURNAL THE FOUNDING 0 J.D. candidate 2006, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law , USA Essentially, the estate tax debate has become one of inherent freedoms, societal obligations, and fundamental fairness. The federal estate tax finds its constitutional basis in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution, which reads, "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States." 6 - FUTURE: OF FATHERS? Alica Lerud* I. INTRODUCTION In recent years, the federal estate tax has garnered a great deal of attention from lawmakers, the media, and the general public.' Dubbed the "death tax," the federal estate tax is levied upon estates that exceed a certain value.2 The estate tax has been attacked as being immoral and unfair by opponents.3 Supporters of the estate tax have argued that it is essential in the preservation of democracy.4 Regarding this debate, one commentator has said: Never in the course of human taxation has so much furor been generated by so many about a tax that affects so few. While only 2 percent of estates in this country are taxed and account for slightly more than 1 percent of all federal revenues, tempers over the estate tax co5ntinue to flare in a strange combustion of moral indignation and economic erudition. B.S., University of Nevada, Reno, 2003. The author would like to thank Professor Steve Johnson for his help and insights in preparing this Note. The author would also like to thank Terry Lerud and Eva Wick-Lerud for their constant support. l Karen C. Burke & Grayson M.P. McCouch, Estate Tax Repeal: Through the Looking Glass, 22 VA. TAX REV. 187, 188 (2002). 2 Estate tax is levied only on the portion of the estate that exceeds the unified credit. In 2005, the amount of the credit was $1,500,000. From 2006 through 2008, the amount of the credit will be $2,000,000. In 2009, the credit will be raised to $3,500,000. I.R.C. § 2010. (2004). 1 Burke & McCouch, supra note 1, at 188. 4 See James R. Repetti, Democracy, Taxes, and Wealth, 76 N.Y.U. L. REV. 825 (2001) (concluding that the estate tax works to further democracy by decreasing the concentration of dynastic wealth and raising revenue). I Jim Grote, The Estate of the Union, PLANNED GIVING TODAY, April 2001, at 1, available at http://pgtoday.com/pgt/articles/the-estate_f-the-union.htm (last visited Mar. 20, 2006). 6 U.S. CONST. art. I, § 8, cl. 1. With this clause, the Founders granted the United States Congress power to impose taxes on the citizenry of the United States, with very few limitations. 7 Although many have tried to attack the constitutionality of the federal estate tax on the basis of unequal treatment, this argument has repeatedly failed.8 In upholding the constitutionality of the estate tax in 1921, writing for the court Justice Holmes said: [The] matter ...is disposed of . not by an attempt to make some scientific distinction, which would be at least difficult, but on an interpretation of language by its traditional use-on the practical and historical ground that this kind of tax always hhaisstobreyenis rwegoarrtdhead vaosl uthmee aonftiltohegsiics.9of a direct tax .... Upon this point a page of What history has to show us with regard to the estate tax will be an increasingly important topic in upcoming years as Congress continues to debate the estate tax. The purpose of this Note is not to debate the constitutionality of the federal estate tax, but rather to examine how our Founding Fathers would view the modem estate tax, and how the modern estate tax works to further the founding vision. In 1789, Benjamin Franklin was quoted as saying, "In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes."' 0 The question that this Note examines is whether Franklin, and other members of the Founding Generation, would advocate these two certainties of life coinciding at the same moment in time. In order to discern whether the Founders would support the modern formulation of the estate tax, this Note first examines the purpose and history behind the federal estate tax. Although much debate regarding the estate tax revolves around its use as a way to level inherited wealth, the estate tax has historically been a revenue-generating device.' In addition, historical death taxes were used only during times of exigency and war. 2 The modern estate tax was originally enacted in 1916 to raise revenue for World War .13 However, unlike previous taxes, the estate tax was not repealed at the conclusion of World War I, and today continues to exist in largely the same form. 4 A close analysis of the federal estate tax provides evidence that the Founders did not foresee the use of a federal estate tax as a permanent means by which to generate everyday revenue. Instead, the Founders apparently intended to primarily use taxes upon commerce to fund the fede (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1371&context=nlj

Alicia Lerud. Looking to the Past in Planning for the Future: Does the Modern Estate Tax Fit within the Ideals of the Founding Fathers?, Nevada Law Journal, 2006, Volume 6, Issue 2,