Racism in the Credit Card Industry

North Carolina Law Review, Jul 2017

By Andrea Freeman, Published on 05/01/17

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4957&context=nclr

Racism in the Credit Card Industry

R acism in the Credit Card Industr y Andrea Freeman Follow this and additional works at; http; //scholarship; law; unc; edu/nclr - RACISM IN THE CREDIT CARD INDUSTRY* ANDREA FREEMAN** In a social and financial climate characterized by deep racial and socioeconomic divide, racism against credit card applicants and consumers is a core piece of the systemic inequality that perpetuates dramatic disparities in wealth, employment, health, and education. Over several decades, credit cards have evolved into an essential tool for lower- and middle-class families to maintain financial stability through strategic balancing between debt and disposable income. Now, without a credit card, many households cannot manage to meet the basic needs of their families. Credit card companies take advantage of this reality, imposing exploitative fees, interest rates, and other conditions on consumers who have no choice but to use the companies’ products. Even worse, the companies do so in a racially discriminatory way, burdening Black and Latino customers with the worst credit card terms, often unrelated to credit risk. This type of consumer racism dates back to the Reconstruction era and reflects an unbroken chain of laws and policies cementing racial economic inequality. Social norms and stereotypes make the resulting inequality appear cultural and personal instead of systemic and structural. This Article is the first to apply a critical race theory analysis to the problem of racism against credit card consumers. After describing the role that history and stereotyping play in allowing credit card * © 2017 Andrea Freeman. ** Visiting Professor, U.C. Berkeley School of Law (Spring 2017); Assistant Professor of Law, University of Hawaii at Manoa William S. Richardson School of Law; J.D., U.C. Berkeley School of Law; B.A., University of Toronto. This Article benefited immensely from careful readings by Angela P. Harris, Robin Lenhardt, Jasmine B. Gonzales Rose, Meera Deo, Margaret Russell, and Lauren Willis; lengthy conversations with Charles Lawrence III; comments received at the 2016 Yale/Harvard/Stanford Junior Faculty Forum from Ian Ayres, Jessica Clarke, Erika Wilson, Katie Young, and other participants; the faculty at the University of Miami School of Law, particularly Charlton Copeland, Osamudia James, Mary Ann Franks, Caroline Bradley, Ileana Porras, David Abaraham, Donna Coker, Patrick Gudridge, Stephen Halpert, Felix Mormann, Kunal Parker, Leigh Osofsky, and Andrew Dawson; at the 2015 AALS Consumer Law panel from Jim Hawkins and Nathalie Martin; and at the 2016 Marquette University Law School Junior Faculty Works-in-Progress Workshop from David Papke, Alexandra Roberts, Ifeoma Ajunwa, Janie Kim, and Erik Girvan; and from tireless research assistance from Mykie Ozoa, Darene Matsuoka, Rochelle Sugawa, and Fern Ann Grether, as well as Berkeley librarian extraordinaire Dean Rowan. NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 95 corporations to discriminate against consumers, it identifies fatal flaws in the two laws designed to address racial discrimination and inequality in credit, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Community Reinvestment Act. It then proposes amendments to the Consumer Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act based on rehabilitative reparations theory and slavery disclosure laws that would require credit card companies to make significant investments into the communities they harm. II. HOW CONSUMER LAW FAILS TO PROTECT CONSUMERS FROM RACIAL DISCRIMINATION .............................................1118  A.  The Equal Credit Opportunity Act ....................................1119  B.  The Community Reinvestment Act ....................................1128 III. CALL TO REFORM CONSUMER LAW BASED ON REHABILITATIVE REPARATIONS THEORY............................1140  A.  Proposal to Reform Consumer Law..................................1141  B.  Rehabilitative Reparations ..................................................1143  C.  Slavery Disclosure Laws .....................................................1151  CONCLUSION .........................................................................................1158 INTRODUCTION I’m Kan, the Louis Vuitton Don Bought my mom a purse, now she Louis Vuitton Mom I ain’t play the hand I was dealt, I changed my cards I prayed to the skies and I changed my stars I went to the malls and I balled too hard ‘Oh my god, is that a Black Card?’ I turned around and replied, why yes, but I prefer the term African American Express Kanye West, Last Call1 When Karyn Morton applied for a Capital One credit card online, the company’s website offered her two cards based on information gathered from a data mining company after Karyn clicked once on the company’s website.2 To its credit, Capital One accurately identified Karyn as a Black, Detroit homeowner who reads major metropolitan newspapers and watches the NAACP Image Awards.3 But Capital One also got a (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4957&context=nclr

Andrea Freeman. Racism in the Credit Card Industry, North Carolina Law Review, 2017, Volume 95, Issue 4,