Book Notes

Fordham Law Review, Aug 2018

By Fordham Law Review, Published on 01/01/42

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5327&context=flr

Book Notes

Fordham Law Review, Book Notes Book Notes Fordham Law Review 0 0 Thi s Note is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The F ordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The F ordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information , please contact - In an era of great orators, Mr. Evarts became one of the foremost, if not the foremost, orator of his time. But, above all, he was a lawyer and such was his ability that he was slated to become Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. This honor was denied him, however, due to political enmities incurred when .he successfully defended President Andrew Johnson against impeachment charges. Granted that Mr. Evarts was a remarkable man, it seems incredible that he could have accomplished so much in one lifetime, albeit it was a long one! He was Secretary of State, Attorney-General, Counsel at Geneva where the Alabama claims were settled, authority on international law, corporation lawyer and in between times, he found time to oppose the ablest lawyers of the day and to win favorable decisions approximately three-quarters of the time! He also helped crack the Tweed ring, was a charter member of the Republican party and was first president of the New York Bar Association. His learning and his capacity to learn he attributed to the formal discipline instilled in him in the Boston Latin School and his later studies at Yale and Harvard under Professors Story and Greenleaf. But it was really his intense love of the law plus his remarkable gift of oratory that made him the most outstanding lawyer of the nineteenth century. Excerpts from a few of his great speeches show his farsightedness, e.g., his advocacy of Pan-Americanism, his concern with national problems and his desire to perpetuate the America way of life. In fact, these words "held to a strict measure of accountability", framed in 1879 when American interests were threatened, and used again by Woodrow Wilson in the Lusitania note of 1915, could again be used today. The biographer cleverly weaves quotations from the more famous' speeches into the story and holds the reader's interest to the end. Lawyer and historian alike should acknowledge this work of Chester L. Barrows; the former, for the able telling of the tale of a great lawyer; the latter, for an insight into the politics and political scandals of the day, authenticated by an extensive bibliography. From either viewpoint the American public is properly introduced to a great man-William M. Evarts. ARBITRATION IN ACTION. pp. ix, 412. $3.50. By Frances Kellor. New York: Harper & Brothers. 1941. "Arbitration in Action" was, the preface says, written "... in response to an overwhelming number of inquiries ... by men, organizations, companies, and unions who want to know how, when and where to arbitrate disputes. . . ." That the work accomplishes this with eminent success is obvious. It goes, however, much further in that it proves itself to be of value to the legal profession. Today the nation is engaged in a gigantic effort to immunize itself against aggression. Production time lost in dispute may be as costly a defeat as one suffered on the battlefield. Arbitration assures the speedy solution of disputes. To those who would arbitrate, "Arbitration in Action" is an indispensable primer. Starting with the nature and purpose of arbitration, Miss Kellor takes the reader in hand and step by RORDHAM LAW REVIEW


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5327&context=flr

Fordham Law Review. Book Notes, Fordham Law Review, 1942,