Edited Panel Transcript: An Update on Energy/Natural Resource Issues of Interest

Wyoming Law Review, Oct 2017

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://repository.uwyo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1377&context=wlr

Edited Panel Transcript: An Update on Energy/Natural Resource Issues of Interest

Tom Sansonetti, Dessa Reimer, Bret Sumner, Peter Forbes, Andrew Emrich, & Ryan Lance, Edited Panel Transcript: An Update on Energy/Natural Resource Issues of Interest Edited Panel Transcript: An Update on Energ y/ Natural Resource Issues of Interest Number SPECIAL SECTION: Energy Law Tom Sansonetti Recommended Citation Article 10 See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uwyo.edu/wlr Part of the Law Commons Edited Panel Transcript: An Update on Energy/Natural Resource Issues of Interest Authors Tom Sansonetti, Dessa Reimer, Bret Sumner, Peter Forbes, Andrew Emrich, and Ryan Lance EDITED PANEL TRANSCRIPT AN UPDATE ON ENERGY/NATURAL RESOURCE ISSUES OF INTEREST ENERGY LAW AND POLICY IN THE ROCKIES OCTOBER 14, 2016 Tom Sansonetti (moderator), Dessa Reimer, Bret Sumner, PeterForbes, Andrew Emrich, Ryan Lance 1. INTRODUCTION BY TOM SANSONETTI The panel entitled "An Update on Energy and Natural Resource Issues of Interest" was designed to educate the conference participants on a wide variety of topics with impacts, not only in Wyoming, but across the Rocky Mountain states. The goal was to provide more of an in-depth review of important policies and litigation than afforded in newspaper stories, online articles, or radio summaries. The first panelist, Dessa Reimer, an of counsel attorney in the Jackson office of Holland & Hart LLP, reviewed the "Litigation Over the Bureau of Indian Affair's (BIA) New Pipeline Right-of-Way Rule," which became effective in April 2016, as it applies on the Wind River Reservation and elsewhere in Indian Country. The panel discussed the potential for extensive negotiations and lengthy litigation between pipeline owners seeking Right-of-Way (ROW) renewals from tribes as a result of the new rule provisions. The second panelist, Bret Sumner, a partner in the Denver office of Beatty Wozniak LLP, spoke about "The Sage Grouse Rebellion: Litigation Update." He sorted out the issues involved in the seven pending cases in a variety of federal courts over the Endangered Species Act's key provisions protecting the bird and the eleven impacted states. He further addressed the inevitability of other western range-wide issues on behalf of other species once the sage grouse litigation is resolved. The third panelist, Peter Forbes, a partner in the Denver firm of Carver, Schwarz, McNab, Kamper & Forbes LLP, in "Whose Lease Trumps, Oil or Coal," addressed a novel case of first impression faced by the Campbell County District Court. He explored the question of when the operations of two valid federal mineral lessees collide, and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lessor refuses to choose between the two, how does state law determine which lessee has priority to proceed and at what cost? The fourth and final panelist, Andrew Emrich, a partner in the Denver office of Holland & Hart LLP, tackled the topic of "BLM's Programmatic Coal Leasing Review and What it Means for Wyoming." The presentation included a sobering appraisal of the federal government's decision-making and its impacts on Wyoming employment figures and state budget. II. COMMENTARY' Tom SANSONETTI: . . . We do have a very diverse panel today. You're going to be hearing a little bit about Indian law and right-of-ways and coal and oil, and gas, and endangered species. I think it should hopefully provoke a lot of good questions along the way. So our first topic is going to be all about the current litigation that is going on over the Bureau of Indian Affairs new pipeline right-of-way rules, which a lot of people don't even know have come into existence because it's that new. And our speaker will be Dessa Reimer from the law firm of Holland & Hart. Dessa advocates for clients involving federal and state environmental regulation including environmental impact assessments, endangered species, and permitting aspects of project development on private, public, and tribal lands.... DESSA REIMER: Thank you, Tom, and thank you to the University ofWyoming for having me here. It's great to be on a panel with such really great speakers and a diverse array of topics.... I'm going to talk today about rights-of-way in Indian country, and you might wonder why is this relevant in Wyoming. We've got one reservation, and there's not a lot of energy, new energy development going on there or new rights-of-way being put in place. One of the questions earlier sort of reflected why this is important, and that's because, when we have interstate pipelines that are spanning potentially over a thousand miles and only a small bit may be on a reservation or there may be tribal interests involved, those particular interests can be the lynchpin or the trigger point for federal involvement and also may be the source of controversy that holds up your pipeline. So when you hear the terms "Indian country" and "pipelines," maybe today this is what you're thinking about because this is what is in the news. An (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://repository.uwyo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1377&context=wlr

Tom Sansonetti, Dessa Reimer, Bret Sumner, Peter Forbes, Andrew Emrich, Ryan Lance. Edited Panel Transcript: An Update on Energy/Natural Resource Issues of Interest, Wyoming Law Review, 2017, Volume 17, Issue 1,