SEED: a tool for disseminating systematic review data into Wikipedia

Systematic Reviews, Oct 2017

Wikipedia, the free-content online encyclopaedia, contains many heavily accessed pages relating to healthcare. Cochrane systematic reviews contain much high-grade evidence but dissemination into Wikipedia has been slow. New skills are needed to both translate and relocate data from Cochrane reviews to implant into Wikipedia pages. This letter introduces a programme to greatly simplify the process of disseminating the summary of findings of Cochrane reviews into Wikipedia pages.

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13643-017-0607-3?site=systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com

SEED: a tool for disseminating systematic review data into Wikipedia

Schmidt et al. Systematic Reviews SEED: a tool for disseminating systematic review data into Wikipedia Lena Schmidt 2 Johannes Friedel 2 Clive E. Adams 0 1 0 Institute of Mental Health , Jubilee Campus , University of Nottingham Innovation Park , Triumph Road, Nottingham NG7 2TU , UK 1 University of Nottingham , Nottingham , UK 2 Hochschule Furtwangen University of Applied Sciences in Furtwangen im Schwarzwald , Furtwangen im Schwarzwald , Germany Wikipedia, the free-content online encyclopaedia, contains many heavily accessed pages relating to healthcare. Cochrane systematic reviews contain much high-grade evidence but dissemination into Wikipedia has been slow. New skills are needed to both translate and relocate data from Cochrane reviews to implant into Wikipedia pages. This letter introduces a programme to greatly simplify the process of disseminating the summary of findings of Cochrane reviews into Wikipedia pages. Wikipedia; Summary of findings; Automation; Systematic reviews; Reducing waste Background Wikipedia contains over 40 million articles with 5.3 m in the English language [ 1 ]. Since its creation in 2001, Wikipedia has expanded to attract over 374 million unique visitors each month and around 20% of healthcare-related online searches direct to Wikipedia pages [ 2, 3 ]. Every year health pages on Wikipedia receive over 4.8 billion views [4]. Wikipedia is openly editable so any user can access and edit the majority of articles. Wikipedia policy states, however, that all information presented in pages must be “verifiable against a published reliable source” [ 5 ]. The Cochrane Collaboration is a non-for profit organisation producing, and maintaining systematic reviews of health care [ 6 ]. A systematic review “attempts to collate all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria in order to answer a specific research question. It uses explicit, systematic methods that are selected with a view to minimising bias, thus providing more reliable findings from which conclusions can be drawn and decisions made” [ 7 ]. These findings are acceptable on Wikipedia pages if referenced and reliable. The Cochrane Collaboration uses a writing tool—RevMan [ 8 ]—to produce its reviews but disseminating the findings of the reviews within Wikipedia necessitates more work. Data have to be extracted, summarised and Procedure The programme was created by students of Applied Health Science with close-to-zero previous knowledge in programming and the help of printed popular texts [ 9 ], numerous YouTube tutorials and internet fora. For creating the SEED tool, the integrated development environment ‘Eclipse’ was used (Neon version) [ 9 ]. This open-source programme allows the developed application to run on the programming language Java. RevMan (v5.3) is an open-access text editor for authors of reviews [ 8 ]. It produces structured XML (Extensible Markup Language) review files (.rm5) within which Summary of Findings tables (SoF)—in turn produced by GradePro [ 10 ]—are embedded. Because the development team worked within Cochrane Schizophrenia’s editorial base they had access to RevMan files. The team had identified Wikipedia pages specific enough to be appropriately seeded with evidence from particular reviews’ SoF tables [ 11 ]. Because each .rm5 file has basically the same shading. We used Swing [ 14 ] to build the graphical structure, this makes it simple to read content auto- interface of SEED. Swing is a GUI (Graphical user matically. Eclipse parses the XML structure with its interface) tool allowing those with low IT knowledge ‘chapters’ and ‘subchapters’ (children). The parser to create a typical window with buttons, text fields programme reads and follows relevant roots of and icons. XML-format and can jump to the SoF tables section and the references. In combination with the code we generated to parse through the files attributes or ele- Output ments of the SoF part of the XML file can be con- SEED allows the user to select their RevMan file, verted into ‘strings’ and these, in turn, embedded in choose the relevant SoF table, and then produce comprepared phrases. These phrases were developed with patible Code of Wikipedia tables (Fig. 1) that can be the help of Sense about Science [ 12 ], to ensure both pasted directly into the editing box of the relevant accuracy and clarity for Wikipedia readers. After Wikipedia page. This code will produce a clear and SEED captures the SoF content, it converts it into attractive table with an accompanying reference to the special format of Wikipedia tables. This format that Cochrane review. One such ‘effect of treatment’ is standardised [ 13 ] and includes code for generating table is embedded in the Wikipedia page relevant to the correct size, font, formatting, colour and Early Intervention in Psychosis—Fig. 2 [ 15 ]. Fig. 2 Output of SEED as it appears in Wikipedia TdDhaayetasrepsuweprapmsonorontnchgleitanhrhisdoififfsnpedirtieannlgicneartbeheebtawinseteeedrnvoegnrnomuoopndsegarrlaothtueopuqsguwhaaltisthyseoeamvvideeewranhgcaeet.nlouwmebre.r of lMowDe1r.1to1 0lo.9w9ehri(g3h.2e1r) Moderate Specialized team probably causes li le or no increase to the chance of euxsepde,ribeuntcitnhgetdhieffeoruetnccoembeesttwoedeon wthitehthwoowtrmeautcmhehnotsspiistanlo/ctocmleamru.Dniattyacare is RR 1.05 (0.9 to 1.22) Moderate suppor ng this finding are based on moderate quality evidence. Conclusions The time of researchers and staff involved in knowledge transfer is finite. As the reviewing process becomes more sophisticated and dissemination in one format is increasingly seen as inadequate more shortcuts will be needed to produce output. SEED is open-access (see Availability of data and materials, below) and greatly increases the efficiency of knowledge transfer into one highly-accessed format. Abbreviations EU: European Union; GUI: Graphical user interface; NIHR: National Institute of Health Research; SEED: Systematic EvidEnce Disseminator; SoF: Summary of Findings tables; XML: Extensible Markup Language Acknowledgements We acknowledge the use of the graphic of the Dandelion in Fig. 1 created by Alice Noir of the Noun Project (https://thenounproject.com/). Funding This work was supported though intramural UK NIHR funding along with EU Erasmus support for the student work experience. Availability of data and materials SEED is available to download—including the source code https:// github.com/CochraneSchizophrenia/SEED/releases/tag/FirstRelease. Examples of pages already containing SEED-produced expandable (press ‘open’) tables (static versions). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/ index.php?title=Token_economy&oldid=800992548. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Asenapine&oldid=798881863. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hypersalivation&oldid=798766696. Authors’ contributions LS undertook the main body of the programming and research into extraction from XML, undertook the testing and contributed to the write up. JF undertook the main body of the design of the graphical user interface, helped undertake the testing and contributed to the write up. CEA thought up the idea and did none of the programming but helped test and contributed to the write up. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and we will help you at every step: 1. Wikipedia: Size of Wikipedia . In: Wikipedia [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Apr 10 ]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia: Size_of_Wikipedia&oldid= 774170077 . 2. Makovsky . Online Health Research eclipsing patient-doctor conversations [Internet] . 2013 [cited 2016 Apr 8 ]. Available from: http://www.makovsky. com/news/online-health -research-eclipsing-patient-doctor-conversations/. 3. Laurent M , Vickers T. Seeking health information online: does Wikipedia matter ? J Am Med Inform Assoc . 2009 ; 16 ( 4 ): 471 - 9 . 4. Heilman J , West A . Wikipedia and medicine: quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of natural language . J Med Internet Res . 2015 ; 17 ( 3 ) [ cited 2016 Aug 4 ]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC4376174/ 5. Wikipedia . Wikipedia:About [Internet]. Wikipedia:About. 2016 [cited 2016 Aug 4 ]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About. 6. The Cochrane Collaboration | working together to provide the best evidence for health care [Internet] . [cited 2011 May 16 ]. Available from: http://www.cochrane.org/. 7. Higgins J , Green S , editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. In: 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011 [cited 2016 Aug 4 ]. p. 1 . 2 . 2 What is a systematic review? Available from : http://handbook. cochrane.org/chapter_1/1_2_ 2_what_is_a_systematic_review .htm. 8. Cochrane Informatics and Knowledge Management Department . RevMan 5 .3 [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2014 Jul 9 ]. Available from: http://tech.cochrane.org/Revman. 9. Burd B . Java for dummies . 4th ed. Foster City: IDG Books Worldwide; 2006 . p. 365 . United Kingdom 10. GRADEpro | GDT [Internet]. [cited 2017 Apr 10 ]. Available from: https:// gradepro.org/. 11. White D , Adams CE . What proportion of Cochrane Reviews are Wikicompatible? | Cochrane Community [Internet] . [cited 2017 Apr 10 ]. Available from: http://community.cochrane.org/news/what -proportion-cochranereviews-are-wiki-compatible. 12. Sense about Science-because evidence matters [Internet] . [cited 2017 Jul 10 ]. Available from: http://senseaboutscience.org/. 13. Help:Table. In: Wikipedia [Internet]. 2017 . Available from: https://en. wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= Help:Table&oldid=789051822. Accessed 16 Oct 2017 . 14. Swing ( Java) . In: Wikipedia [Internet] . 2017 . Available from: https://en. wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swing_(Java)& oldid=788349087. Accessed 16 Oct 2017 . 15. Early intervention in psychosis . In: Wikipedia [Internet]. 2017 . Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Early_intervention_in _ psychosis&oldid=790208123. Accessed 16 Oct 2017 .


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13643-017-0607-3?site=systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com

Lena Schmidt, Johannes Friedel, Clive E. Adams. SEED: a tool for disseminating systematic review data into Wikipedia, Systematic Reviews, 2017, 206, DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0607-3