Erratum to: Gluon-fusion Higgs production in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory

Journal of High Energy Physics, Feb 2018

Nicolas Deutschmann, Claude Duhr, Fabio Maltoni, Eleni Vryonidou

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FJHEP02%282018%29159.pdf

Erratum to: Gluon-fusion Higgs production in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory

HJE Erratum: Gluon-fusion Higgs production in the Standard Model E ective Field Theory Nicolas Deutschmann 0 1 2 4 5 6 7 Claude Duhr 0 1 2 3 5 6 7 Fabio Maltoni 0 1 2 5 6 7 Eleni Vryonidou 0 1 2 5 6 7 0 Chemin du Cyclotron 2 , 1348 Louvain-La-Neuve , Belgium 1 Universite catholique de Louvain 2 F-69622 , Villeurbanne , France 3 Theoretical Physics Department , CERN 4 Univ. Lyon , Universite Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IPNL 5 Modi cations 6 Science Park 105 , 1098 XG, Amsterdam , The Netherlands 7 CH-1211 Geneva 23 , Switzerland We have found that the de nition of the operator O1 given in equation (2.2) and the one actually used to derive our results, including the renormalisation matrix, the anomalous dimension matrix and the RGE solutions presented in the paper, di er by an overall minus sign. We have therefore recomputed our results using the de nition of the operator O1 given in equation (2.2). The main results of our paper, namely the cross sections presented in table 1 and the distributions shown in gures 4, 5 and 6 are however not a ected, since they are de ned with respect to the Born (and therefore insensitive to the sign of O1). are, however, induced in the sign of the A1 amplitude, the renormalisation matrix, the anomalous dimension matrix and the RGE solutions with respect to those presented in the paper, which should read: Relation between A0 an A1, equation (3.27): dNikhef - Standard A(11) = mt A(01) : 0.7 C1 C2 C3 (10 TeV) C1 C2 C3 (10 TeV) i C 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 mH/2 Z(1) = BB 0 0 z23 CC : C 0 1 0 8mt2 1 v2 Renormalization matrix, equation (3.20): Equation (3.19) is however correct since it only contains trivial terms in the rst lign or column. Anomalous dimension matrix, equation (3.39): 0 Solution to the RGE for C1, rst line of equation (3.40): C1( 2) = C1(Q2) s(Q2) log 2 Q2 C1(Q2) 8 C3(Q2) mt2(Q2) + O( s(Q2)2) : As a consequence, gures 2 and 7 have to be corrected: 1 A v2 { 2 { b −150 solid: NLO, dashed: LO 100 µEF T [GeV] 1000 . at the LHC at 13 TeV as a function of the EFT scale. Starting from one non-zero coe cient at EFT = mH =2 we compute the EFT contributions at di erent scales, taking into account the running and mixing of the operators. LO and NLO predictions are shown in dashed and solid lines respectively. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. 0m.6H/2


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FJHEP02%282018%29159.pdf

Nicolas Deutschmann, Claude Duhr, Fabio Maltoni, Eleni Vryonidou. Erratum to: Gluon-fusion Higgs production in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, Journal of High Energy Physics, 2018, 159, DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2018)159