Arrestins: structural disorder creates rich functionality

Protein & Cell, Feb 2018

Arrestins are soluble relatively small 44–46 kDa proteins that specifically bind hundreds of active phosphorylated GPCRs and dozens of non-receptor partners. There are binding partners that demonstrate preference for each of the known arrestin conformations: free, receptor-bound, and microtubule-bound. Recent evidence suggests that conformational flexibility in every functional state is the defining characteristic of arrestins. Flexibility, or plasticity, of proteins is often described as structural disorder, in contrast to the fixed conformational order observed in high-resolution crystal structures. However, protein-protein interactions often involve highly flexible elements that can assume many distinct conformations upon binding to different partners. Existing evidence suggests that arrestins are no exception to this rule: their flexibility is necessary for functional versatility. The data on arrestins and many other multi-functional proteins indicate that in many cases, “order” might be artificially imposed by highly non-physiological crystallization conditions and/or crystal packing forces. In contrast, conformational flexibility (and its extreme case, intrinsic disorder) is a more natural state of proteins, representing true biological order that underlies their physiologically relevant functions.

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs13238-017-0501-8.pdf

Arrestins: structural disorder creates rich functionality

Arrestins: structural disorder creates rich functionality Vsevolod V. Gurevich 2 Eugenia V. Gurevich 2 Vladimir N. Uversky 0 1 0 Institute for Biological Instrumentation, Russian Academy of Sciences , Pushchino, Moscow Region , Russia 142290 1 Department of Molecular Medicine and USF Health Byrd Alzheimer's Research Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida , Tampa, FL 33612 , USA 2 Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, TN 37232 , USA arrestin; GPCR; crystal structure; NMR; EPR; disorder; protein-protein interactions Arrestins are soluble relatively small 44–46 kDa proteins that specifically bind hundreds of active phosphorylated GPCRs and dozens of non-receptor partners. There are binding partners that demonstrate preference for each of the known arrestin conformations: free, receptor-bound, and microtubule-bound. Recent evidence suggests that conformational flexibility in every functional state is the defining characteristic of arrestins. Flexibility, or plasticity, of proteins is often described as structural disorder, in contrast to the fixed conformational order observed in high-resolution crystal structures. However, protein-protein interactions often involve highly flexible elements that can assume many distinct conformations upon binding to different partners. Existing evidence suggests that arrestins are no exception to this rule: their flexibility is necessary for functional versatility. The data on arrestins and many other multi-functional proteins indicate that in many cases, “order” might be artificially imposed by highly non-physiological crystallization conditions and/or crystal packing forces. In contrast, conformational flexibility (and its extreme case, intrinsic disorder) is a more natural state of proteins, representing true biological order that underlies their physiologically relevant functions. INTRODUCTION Arrestins are globular proteins found throughout the animal kingdom, with four subtypes present in vertebrates (Gurevich and Gurevich, 2006; Indrischek et al., 2017) . Structurally, arrestins are elongated two-domain molecules (Granzin et al., 1998; Hirsch et al., 1999; Han et al., 2001; Milano et al., 2002; Sutton et al., 2005; Zhan et al., 2011) (Fig. 1), with relatively few inter-domain interactions (Fig. 1). Specific binding to active phosphorylated receptor was the first arrestin function discovered (Kuhn et al., 1984) . Arrestins suppress G protein activation (Wilden et al., 1986) by direct competition (Wilden, 1995; Krupnick et al., 1997) . Crystal structures of active rhodopsin in complex with transducin (visual G protein) peptide (Scheerer et al., 2008), of related G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)β2-adrenergic receptor in complex with heterotrimeric Gs protein (Rasmussen et al., 2011) , of adenosine A2A receptor with an engineered single-subunit Gs protein (Carpenter et al., 2016) , and of arrestin-11 complex with rhodopsin (Kang et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2017) reveal the structural basis for this competition: the C-terminus of G protein α-subunit and central “finger loop” of arrestin-1 (Figs. 1 and 2) occupy the same cavity between the cytoplasmic ends of the α-helices that opens upon activation of rhodopsin (Farrens et al., 1996) and other GPCRs (Rasmussen et al., 2011) (Table 1). Virtually every discovery in the GPCR field was first made in the visual system. The arrestin structure was no exception: the first crystallographic studies revealed three-dimensional structures of visual arrestin-1. Despite their differences in resolution and proposed positions of the Nand C-termini, crystal structures in both studies did not resolve the same elements: the loop between the C-domain and the point of contact that the C-tail makes with the N-domain, as well as distal C-tail (residues 363–404) (Granzin et al., 1998; Hirsch et al., 1999) (Fig. 1). Subsequent structures of arrestin-2 (Han et al., 2001; Milano et al., 2002) , arrestin-4 (Sutton et al., 2005), and arrestin-3 (Zhan et al., 2011) also did not reveal these elements. The N-terminus (residues 1–9) is also missing in all structures. Crystal structures indicate disordered elements in several ways. First, some are so flexible that they cannot be even detected in the electron density map: the N-terminus, distal C-terminus, and the connector between the C-domain and the βstrand XX (Figs. 1 and 2). Second, some elements have high B-factors, suggesting that they have alternative positions, but are not disordered enough to become invisible. Third, other elements have distinct conformations in different protomers of crystal oligomer, or in different crystals of the same protein. This applies to many arrestin loops connecting core β-strands in both domains. The correlation of arrestin structural elements (even those with high structural flexibility) with their functions has been intensively studied. These studies have yielded a significant amount of information on the overall flexibility of these proteins and on the potential roles of such flexibility in arrestin functions. For example, by inserting the six amino-acid motif, C-C-P-G-C-C, into the arrestin-3 (non-visual β-arrestin-2) sequence at sites not directly involved in interactions of this protein with major partners, a set of intramolecular fluorescent arsenical hairpin (FlAsH) bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) probes (Hoffmann et al., 2005) was created to analyze the effect of various G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) on the conformational dynamics and function of this protein (Lee et al., 2016) . The analysis using such probes revealed that arrestin-3 structure represents a dynamic conformational ensemble. Different GPCRs are capable of induction of significant structural changes in this protein, generating distinctive arrestin “conformational signatures”, information about which is encoded within the population average arrestin-3 conformation (Lee et al., 2016) . It was also shown that in living human cells, the GPCR-arrestin-3 interaction rapidly results in the receptorspecific conformational changes leading to activation of arrestin-3. However, this protein is able to keep receptorspecific conformation and remain active after dissociation from receptors (Nuber et al., 2016) . Similarly, different phosphorylated GPCRs were shown to induce distinct IV II I XX VI V III X N-Domain C-Domain Hinge C-Tail N-Domain part missing in the crystal structure C-Tail: parts missing in the crystal structure Finger loop Middle (139) loop β-Strand I β-Strand II β-Strand III β-Strand IV β-Strand V β-Strand VI β-Strand X β-Strand XX structural states of arrestin-2 (β-arrestin-1) required for different specific functions of this protein (Yang et al., 2015) . The interaction of visual arrestin (arrestin-1) with light-activated, phosphorylated rhodopsin is accompanied by significant movements of the arrestin loop between β-strands V–VI (“finger loop”) (Fig. 1), suggesting that the ability of arrestin-1 to adopt a high affinity binding state critically depends on the conformational flexibility of this loop (Sommer et al., 2007) . A noticeable difference in the conformational flexibility of arrestins-2 and -3 potentially related to their different receptor selectivity has been recently demonstrated using hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDXMS) (Yun et al., 2015) . The basal state of arrestin-3 was characterized by higher flexibility of β-strands II, III, and IV (Fig. 1), whereas high dynamics of the middle loop (called “139-loop” in arrestin-1; Figs. 1 and 2) was characteristic for the basal state of arrestin-2. Although both non-visual arrestins became more flexible as a result of their pre-activation, the scale of such pre-activation-induced increase in structural flexibility was noticeably larger in arrestin-2 (Yun et al., 2015) . Based on the solution NMR analysis it was concluded that different sets of arrestin-1 regions are utilized for interaction with different functional states of rhodopsin (such as dark-state phosphorylated rhodopsin (P-Rh), phosphorylated opsin (P-opsin), unphosphorylated light-activated rhodopsin (Rh*), and phosphorylated light-activated rhodopsin (P-Rh*)), and that global conformational changes accompany the binding of arrestin-1 to P-Rh* or P-opsin leading to the formation of a dynamic molten globule-like structure. Since activation of arrestin-1 by P-Rh* is achieved via displacement of the long C-tail of arrestin from its polar core by phosphate groups of receptor (Figs. 1 and 2), and arginine 175 located at the polar core serves as the phosphosensor, mutation of this residue to glutamic acid (R175E) produces a pre-active form of arrestin-1 (Granzin et al., 2015) . Analysis of the crystal structure of the R175E mutant revealed the presence of noticeable structural differences with the basal state of wild type arrestin-1, most notably several disordered residues in the receptor-binding finger loop and the C-terminus (residues 361–404) (Granzin et al., 2015) (Figs. 1 and 2). Therefore, arrestins in general are characterized by high conformational dynamics, and some of their regions demonstrate high structural flexibility and might be intrinsically disordered. What does “disorder” as the opposite of “order” mean in relation to protein functionality? The classic paradigm posits that biologically active proteins should have unique rigid 3D structures; therefore, intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) can be ignored. However, the reality is more complex. Well before the IDP concept was introduced at the end of 20th century (Wright and Dyson, 1999; Uversky et al., 2000; Dunker et al., 2001) , it became clear that protein molecules are inherently flexible, and this flexibility is crucial for their biological activity. In fact, many globular proteins possess marginal conformational stability under physiological conditions, with ΔGfolding ranging from −5 to −10 kcal/mol (Privalov and Khechinashvili, 1974; Savage et al., 1993; Ruvinov et al., 1997; Vogl et al., 1997; Giver et al., 1998; Taverna and Goldstein, 2002; Williams et al., 2006) . Such marginal stability is related to the protein functionality (Tsou, 1998a, b; Zavodszky et al., 1998) , ensuring higher flexibility needed for function-related conformational changes (Artymiuk et al., 1979; Frauenfelder et al., 1979; Wagner and Wuthrich, 1979; Wrba et al., 1990; Varley and Pain, 1991; Daniel et al., 1996; Tang and Dill, 1998; Williams et al., 2006) . For example, the internal dynamics of enzymes appears to be linked to the mechanism of catalysis (Agarwal, 2005; Eisenmesser et al., 2005) . Although globular proteins are flexible, some parts are more rigid than others. A protein with several stable structural units can form conformational isomers, determined by its overall flexibility and the locations of the more flexible joints (Ma et al., 1999) . Whole proteins or various regions can be ordered or disordered to a different degree (Uversky, 2013) . Functional proteins contain differently structured regions, some of which are spontaneously folded (foldons), others fold upon interaction with binding partners (inducible foldons), some are always in semi-folded state (semi-foldons), whereas others do not fold at all (non-foldons) or even need to undergo order-disorder transition to become functional (unfoldons) (Uversky, 2013) . IDPs and hybrid proteins containing ordered domains and IDPRs constitute a very important addition to the more “traditional” set of globular, trans-membrane, and fibrous proteins (Wright and Dyson, 1999; Uversky et al., 2000; Dunker et al., 2001; Uversky and Dunker, 2010; Tompa, 2012; Uversky, 2013; Habchi et al., 2014; van der Lee et al., 2014; Uversky, 2016) . The functions of IDPs/IDPRs and ordered proteins/domains are complementary (Dunker et al., 2001; Radivojac et al., 2007) . Many IDPs bind multiple partners and act as signaling molecules controlling various aspects of cell behavior (Uversky et al., 2000; Dunker et al., 2001; Iakoucheva et al., 2002; Uversky et al., 2005; Uversky, 2013; Habchi et al., 2014; van der Lee et al., 2014; Uversky, 2015) . IDPs/IDPRs are tightly regulated via post-translational modifications (Iakoucheva et al., 2004; Pejaver et al., 2014) and alternative splicing (Romero et al., 2006; Buljan et al., 2013) . Dysfunctions of IDPs are associated with human diseases, including amyloidosis, cancer, cardiovascular disorders, and neurodegeneration (Uversky et al., 2008; Uversky et al., 2014) . Arrestins are typical hybrid proteins: they consist of two domains with fairly rigid cores and flexible loops connecting the β-strands, along with mostly disordered C-tail and N-terminus (Fig. 1). Upon arrestin activation, several elements significantly change conformation, some becoming disordered in this state. Here we analyze the connections of structural disorder in arrestins with known functions. The emerging picture is intriguing: structural disorder of arrestin elements appears to be linked to their functionality. The propensity of different parts to be l l i t disordered is a surprisingly good predictor of their functional importance. CONFORMATIONAL DYNAMICS OF ARRESTINS First, let us explore the basal structure of free arrestins and destabilizing mutations that likely enhance disorder. The idea that the conformations of free and receptor-bound arrestin are dramatically different was first expressed on the basis of high arrestin-1 activation energy (Schleicher et al., 1989) , long before any structures were solved. Wild type (WT) arrestin-1 has remarkable selectivity for active phopshorylated rhodopsin (P-Rh*), demonstrating many times lower binding to active unphosphorylated (Rh*) and inactive phosphorylated (P-Rh) forms, and virtually no binding to inactive unphosphorylated rhodopsin (Gurevich and Benovic, 1992, 1993) . The mutations that “activate” arrestin-1, facilitating its binding to non-preferred forms of rhodopsin, fall into four categories: 1) C-terminal deletions (Gurevich and Benovic, 1992) and alanine substitutions of hydrophobic residues in the C-tail (Gurevich, 1998) , which eliminate the C-tail or release it from its basal position; 2) short N-terminal deletions (Gurevich and Benovic, 1993; Gurevich et al., 1994) ; 3) charge elimination/reversal mutations in the polar core (Hirsch et al., 1999) (Fig. 2A), particularly Arg-175 (Gurevich and Benovic, 1995, 1997) in arrestin-1, or homologous Arg-169 in arrestin-2 (Kovoor et al., 1999; Pan et al., 2003) and Arg-170 in arrestin-3 (Celver et al., 2002); 4) point mutations on the receptor-binding surface (Hanson and Gurevich, 2006; Vishnivetskiy et al., 2013) and small deletions of the “139-loop” in the central crest of the molecule (Figs. 1 and 2B) (Vishnivetskiy et al., 2013). Curiously, the first three categories of mutations affect residues that, according to the crystal structure of the complex (Kang et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2017) , are not directly involved in receptor binding. Crystal structure of free arrestin-1 revealed two intramolecular interactions that serve as “clasps” holding the molecule in the basal state (Granzin et al., 1998; Hirsch et al., 1999) (Fig. 2A). The first three types of activating mutations disrupt these clasps. One of these clasps, the polar core, is an arrangement of five interacting charged residues between the two arrestin domains (Fig. 2A). These charges are virtually solvent-excluded (Hirsch et al., 1999) , which is very unusual for a soluble protein, where charged side chains are normally solvent-exposed. The other clasp is the three-element interaction of β-strand I and α-helix in the N-domain, and β-strand XX in the C-tail (Hirsch et al., 1999) (Figs. 1 and 2A). The C-tail binds to the N-domain via hydrophobic residues, replacement of which with alanines “activates” arrestin-1 (Gurevich, 1998) . Thus, for high-affinity binding, active phospho-receptor needs to disrupt key interactions that support basal conformation (Gurevich and Gurevich, 2004) , thereby making arrestin more flexible. Receptor-attached phosphates destabilize both the polar core (Vishnivetskiy et al., 1999) and three-element c interaction (Vishnivetskiy et al., 2000) , enabling transition into high-affinity receptor-binding state. Scanning mutagenesis of the whole arrestin-1 molecule (Ostermaier et al., 2014) confirmed earlier findings regarding the role of the polar core and three-element interaction in maintaining the basal arrestin conformation, as well as the role of Arg18 and Lys20 in phosphate binding (Hanson and Gurevich, 2006) . In addition, this comprehensive study revealed the role of Arg29 in phosphate binding that was not explored before (Ostermaier et al., 2014) . It also confirmed the role of the finger loop (Fig. 1) in receptor binding proposed earlier (Hanson et al., 2006b; Vishnivetskiy et al., 2011) and suggested that the lariat loop containing two of the three negative charges in the polar core (Fig. 2A) also engages the receptor (Ostermaier et al., 2014). The most unexpected was the finding that the distal tip of the C-domain (part of 344 loop in Fig. 2B) likely engages the membrane (Ostermaier et al., 2014) , which was subsequently confirmed by fluorescence quenching experiments (Lally et al., 2017) . Several methods, such as hydrogen/deuterium exchange (Carter et al., 2005) , measurements of spin label mobility in free and receptor-bound arrestin-1 by EPR (Hanson et al., 2006b) , and NMR of isotopically labeled arrestin-1 (Zhuang et al., 2010; Zhuang et al., 2013a) , indicate that in both free and receptor-bound states arrestin-1 is flexible, likely exploring a wide range of conformations. This applies to disordered elements that were not resolved in crystal and parts that clearly show up in 3D structures. Several loops demonstrate conformational variability in different protomers within crystallographic tetramer of arrestin-1 (Hirsch et al., 1999) , or in different crystal forms of arrestin-2 (Han et al., 2001). Structural variability within the same protein is as A Polar core N-Domain C-Domain Hinge C-Tail Three-element interaction L100, L104, L108 I386, V387, F388 V8, F9 D26, D290, D297 R169, R393 Clathrin binding site AP-2 binding site R393-polar core and AP-2 binding site Finger loop 139 loop 157 loop 344 loop T1A Arrestin Arrestin-1 Arrestin-1 Arrestin-1, p44 Arrestin-1, p44 Arrestin-1 Arrestin-1 Arrestin-1-R175E Arrestin-2 Arrestin-2 Arrestin-2-IP6 Arrestin-2 Arrestin-3 Arrestin-3-IP6 Arrestin-4 State Basal Basal Basal Active Active Active Basal Basal Basal Active Basal Active Basal Intermediate PDB ID 1AYR 1CF1 3UGX 4J2Q 4ZWJ 5W0P 4ZRG 1G4R 1JSY 1ZSH 4JQI 3P2D 5TV1 1SUJ (Granzin et al., 1998) (Hirsch et al., 1999) (Granzin et al., 2012) (Kim et al., 2013) (Kang et al., 2015) (Zhou et al., 2017) (Granzin et al., 2015) (Han et al., 2001) (Milano et al., 2002) (Milano et al., 2006) (Shukla et al., 2013) (Zhan et al., 2011) (Chen et al., 2017) (Sutton et al., 2005) great as the variations between different subtypes, indicating that it reflects flexibility of these regions, rather than their subtype-specific conformations. Although arrestins appear to assume another distinct conformation upon binding to microtubules (Hanson et al., 2006a; Hanson et al., 2007) , due to the lack of structural information about this state we will limit the discussion to free and GPCR-bound forms. To illustrate the range of structural flexibility in the visual arrestin-1, Fig. 3A shows two structures of this protein (PDB IDs: 1AYR and 1CF1) with several loops demonstrating noticeable structural divergence. Whereas in the structures of arrestin-1 (Hirsch et al., 1999) , arrestin-2 (Han et al., 2001), and arrestin-3 (Sutton et al., 2005) some of these loops participate in contacts with other protomers, their structural differences do not seem to be explained solely by lattice contacts: the first β-strand on the concave face of the N-domain and the first β-strand on the convex face of the C-domain are engaged by the sister protomers in all arrestin crystals (Zhan et al., 2011) , yet their conformation is identical in all protomers. Fig. 3B provides structural alignment of bovine arrestin-1 (1CF1), arrestin-2 (1G4M), arrestin-3 (3P2D), and Salamander arrestin-4 (1SUJ) and shows that the greatest structural variability is observed in the loop regions. Fig. 3C–E show disorder profiles generated for these arrestins by several common disorder predictors. Both N- and C-termini are predicted to be disordered (disorder scores exceed the threshold of 0.5). Several internal regions with disorder scores between 0.2 and 0.5 are expected to have high conformational flexibility. Sequence analysis suggests that arrestin-3 is the most disordered subtype (Fig. 3). Indeed, it is the most promiscuous non-visual arrestin with the lowest preference for phosphorylated over unphosphorylated receptor (Celver et al., 2002; Zhan et al., 2011) , the lowest receptor subtype selectivity (Barak et al., 1997; Zhan et al., 2011) , and higher affinity for many nonreceptor partners (Goodman et al., 1996; Ahmed et al., 2011) . Molecular dynamics simulations suggest that the flexibility of wild type arrestin-3 approaches that of the preactivated R175E mutant of bovine arrestin-1 (Sensoy et al., 2016) . The crystal structures confirm conformational flexibility of elements predicted to be disordered by sequence analysis: N- and C-termini are not resolved in the crystal structures, loops in the central crest of the molecule and at the tips of both domains are identifiable in the electron density maps and therefore resolved in most cases, but assume distinct conformations in different protomers in crystal oligomers and in different crystal forms of the same protein. DISORDERED ELEMENTS OF ARRESTINS CONTAIN KEY BINDING SITES FOR CLATHRIN AND AP2 The binding to active phosphorylated GPCRs was long considered the only function of arrestins. Clathrin (Goodman et al., 1996) and clathrin adaptor AP2 (Laporte et al., 1999) were the first discovered non-receptor binding partners of arrestins. Clathrin binds the loop between β-strands XIX and XX, whereas AP2 interacts with the distal C-tail (Fig. 2A), both disordered elements of arrestin (Fig. 1) not resolved in crystal structures. Longer isoform of arrestin-2 contains an additional clathrin binding site also localized in the disordered part (Kang et al., 2009) . Interestingly, when these arrestin elements are co-crystallized with clathrin, both demonstrate highly ordered structures (ter Haar et al., 2000; Kang et al., 2009) , in line with the idea of coupled binding and folding (Shoemaker et al., 2000; Sugase et al., 2007) . Disorder does not mean that these elements are equally accessible in free and receptor-bound arrestins. The release of the C-tail in all arrestins is induced by receptor binding (Palczewski et al., 1991; Hanson et al., 2006b; Vishnivetskiy et al., 2010) , and poly-anions heparin (Palczewski et al., 1991; Vishnivetskiy et al., 2002; Zhuang et al., 2010) , IP6 (Zhuang et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2017) , and multi-phosphorylated C-terminus of rhodopsin (Puig et al., 1995) or vasopressin V2 receptor (Xiao et al., 2004; Nobles et al., 2007) . While free arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 bind clathrin (Goodman et al., 1996), the affinity of both arrestins is greatly increased by the release of the C-tail (Xiao et al., 2004; Nobles et al., 2007) . Activating mutations destabilizing inter-domain polar core significantly enhance clathrin and AP2 binding (Milano et al., 2002), likely by increasing overall flexibility of the molecule and the probability of the C-tail release in free arrestins. The C-tail release was observed upon a small deletion in 139-loop (Kim et al., 2012) , which is also an activating mutation increasing arrestin binding to non-preferred forms of rhodopsin (Vishnivetskiy et al., 2013) . Thus, while the range of conformations sampled by the arrestin elements that bind clathrin and AP2 in the basal state is wide enough to prevent their visibility in crystal, it shifts upon arrestin binding to receptors, making the C-tail even more flexible. However, the order (or lack thereof) is not the only factor affecting the interactions of the C-tail of non-visual arrestins with the trafficking machinery. It has been reported that phosphorylation of arrestin-2 at Ser-412 by ERK1/2 inhibits its interactions with clathrin (and possibly clathrin adaptor AP2, that binds the distal part of the arrestin C-tail (Laporte et al., 1999) ) (Fig. 2A) and arrestin-dependent internalization of βAR (Lin et al., 1997) . Similar consequences of arrestin-3 phosphorylation at Thr-383 by casein kinase II were also described (Kim et al., 2002; Lin et al., 2002) . In both cases receptor binding and consequent release of the C-tail was shown to facilitate dephosphorylation of non-visual arrestins, which enhances clathrin binding just when it is needed to recruit the arrestin-receptor complexes to the coated pit (Lin et al., 1997, 2002; Kim et al., 2002) . It is unlikely that phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of these inherently disordered parts of the arrestin C-tail affects their secondary structure. Thus, the presence or absence of phosphates likely directly regulates the interactions of the arrestin C-tail with components of the internalization machinery of the coated pit. An unexpected effect of PKC phosphorylation of arrestin2 (β-arrestin1) has been described in the process of T cell activation (Fernández-Arenas et al., 2014) . Sustained signaling requires constant supply of antigen-binding T cell receptors to the immunological synapse. To achieve this, T cell needs to internalize peripheral T cell receptors not engaged by the antigen and then deliver them to the immunological synapse, where they can bind the antigen and become activated. Arrestin-2 appears to mediate this process upon its phosphorylation at Ser-163, localized in the cavity of the N-domain (Fig. 1), where the GPCR-attached phosphates bind (Shukla et al., 2013; Zhuo et al., 2014) . This phosphorylation apparently activates arrestin-2, with the phosphate attached by PKC (which is activated by T cell receptors) to arrestin itself acting as its activator in lieu of receptor-attached phosphates (Gurevich and Gurevich, 2014) . While exact mechanism of triggering the arrestin-2 phosphate sensor by the phosphate attached to Ser-163 was not elucidated, triggering of the phosphate sensor by other means, including polar core mutations and bound polyanions, has been shown to release the C-tail of arrestins (Kim et al., 2002; Zhuang et al., 2010) and increase the affinity of non-visual arrestin subtypes for the components of internalization machinery (Kim et al., 2002; Xiao et al., 2004) . Molecular recognition of IDPs and IDPRs is associated with their ability to undergo a disorder-to-order transition upon binding to their partners (Dunker and Obradovic, 2001; Dyson and Wright, 2002; Uversky et al., 2005) . There are elements, known as molecular recognition features (MoRFs), located within longer IDPRs, that are disordered in their unbound state and fold upon interaction with specific partners (Oldfield et al., 2005) , mediating IDP/IDPR binding via disorder-to-order-transition-based recognition involved in many biological processes (Disfani et al., 2012) . Often, in corresponding disorder profiles, MoRFs are indicated as “dips”; i.e., regions with locally increased order propensity within long IDPRs. Potential MoRFs in arrestins (the regions spanning residues 372–383 in arrestin-1, residues 143–151, 165–170, 343–351, and 375–397 in arrestin-2, residues 143–153 and 167–172 in arrestin-3, and residues 341–348 and 364–371 in arrestin-4) were identified by the ANCHOR algorithm (Dosztanyi et al., 2009) . Figure 4 maps known functional elements and arrestin switches (ASw, regions that significantly change conformation upon activation) on arrestin-3 structure. These functional elements include T1A peptide (residues 1–25) needed for the JNK3 activation (see also Fig. 2C) (Zhan et al., 2016) , JNK3-binding peptides T3 (residues 172–208) and T6 (residues 287–318) (Zhan et al., 2014) , ASwI (residues 89–97), ASwII (residues 176–191), and ASwIII (residues 307–316) (Chen et al., 2017) , clathrinbinding element (residues 373–377), and clathrin adaptor AP2 binding site (residues 393–399). Importantly, ASwII and ASwIII are parts or the JNK3-binding peptides T3 and T6, respectively. Also, JNK3-binding peptide T3 and ASwII are located in close proximity of one of the MoRFs (residues 167–172). In addition to two real MoRFs, ANCHOR profile for arrestin-3 contains 9 filtered potential disorder-based regions (which are either short regions with length below 6 residues or regions with an average disorder score below 0.1), residues 80–82 (located in close proximity of ASwI), 116–120, 208–209 (overlaps with C-terminal region of the JNK3-binding peptide T3), 238–247, 271–274, 317–326 (located next to ASwIII), 342, 399 (located within clathrin adaptor AP2 binding site), and 402. Therefore, the l l i t e0.2 M 0.0 0 D F 1.0 b comparison of Figs. 3 and 4 shows that functional significance of several MoRFs is already established, whereas the role of other disorder-based binding sites in arrestin interactions with various proteins needs to be tested experimentally. CAN THE “ORDERED” PART OF ARRESTIN BECOME “DISORDERED”? The ∼350-residue core of all arestins, from residue ∼10 to ∼360, is relatively well ordered in all crystal structures of the basal state, with the exception of loops connecting βstrands. C-terminal truncations by alternative splicing (Smith et al., 1994; Pulvermuller et al., 1997) or mutagenesis (Gurevich and Benovic, 1992, 1993) significantly reduce thermal stability of arrestin-1, implying increased flexibility of the remaining part, which lowers energy barrier for the receptor interaction (Pulvermuller et al., 1997; Ahmed et al., 2011) and significantly enhances the arrestin binding to nonpreferred forms of GPCRs (Gurevich, 1998; Celver et al., 2002) , supporting the idea that less ordered proteins are more inclined to bind their partners. A virtually perfect correlation between increased binding of arrestin-1 mutants to non-preferred forms of rhodopsin and the reduction of their thermal stability was established (Vishnivetskiy et al., 2013). Interestingly, the effects of the C-terminal deletions are not limited to GPCR interactions, facilitating the binding of some non-receptor partners. A recent study illustrates how nature uses this phenomenon as a gain-of-function change. A common feature of apoptotic cell death is a massive activation of specialized proteases, caspases, that cleave numerous structural and signaling proteins (Lüthi and Martin, 2007) , yielding characteristic morphological and biochemical changes. The cleavage of arrestin-2 by caspases at Asp-380 generates a truncated form lacking the C-tail, arrestin-21–380 (Kook et al., 2014) . Full-length (FL) arrestin-2 is evenly distributed in the cell (Barak et al., 1997; Song et al., 2006) , whereas arrestin21–380 is recruited to mitochondria, even though it does not have recognizable mitochondrial localization signal. In contrast to FL protein, arrestin-21–380 avidly binds another product of caspase activity, truncated Bid (tBid). Although tBid localizes to mitochondria, arrestin-21–380 moves to this compartment independently, because its mitochondrial localization does not require the presence of tBid or Bid (Kook et al., 2014). Thus, the C-terminal truncation of arrestin-2 confers two new functions: the ability to bind mitochondria and tBid. Both are equally important for the role of arrestin-21–380 in apoptosis, where it enhances tBid-induced cytochrome c release from mitochondria, which is the point of no return in the apoptotic cell death (Danial and Korsmeyer, 2004) . Apparently, the removal of the C-tail by caspases promotes arrestin-2 interactions with tBid and resident mitochondrial protein(s) by increasing its flexibility, helping arrestin-21–380 fit partners that the more rigid FL protein does not bind. Similarly, C-terminal deletions or C-tail detachment enhance the binding of all arrestin subtypes to microtubules (Hanson et al., 2007) . However, increased flexibility of the core does not indiscriminately enhance arrestin interactions with all possible partners. The C-tail of all arrestins can be forcibly detached by triple alanine substitution of the hydrophobic residues that anchor it to the N-domain (3A) (Gurevich, 1998; Celver et al., 2002; Pan et al., 2003; Song et al., 2009b) (Fig. 2A). These 3A mutations increase the flexibility of the molecule, as revealed by faster H/D exchange (Carter et al., 2005), and reduce activation energy for receptor binding (Gurevich et al., 2011) , suggesting that these mutants are in conformation intermediate between basal and receptor-bound. The opposite conformational bias is conferred by seven-residue deletion in the inter-domain hinge (Δ7) (Figs. 1 and 2) that strongly inhibits receptor binding (Vishnivetskiy et al., 2002; Hanson et al., 2007) . Interestingly, the binding of two E3 ubiquitin ligases, Mdm2 and parkin, is inhibited by 3A and enhanced by Δ7 mutations (Song et al., 2006; Ahmed et al., 2011) . These data do not necessarily demonstrate that these partners prefer “ordered” arrestins over “disordered”. It has been shown that Δ7 mutation also results in the C-tail release (Hanson et al., 2006a) , suggesting that it produces a different flavor of disorder, conducive to the binding of Mdm2 and parkin. However, these flavors must have some similarities: the binding of ERK1/2 is facilitated by both 3A and Δ7 mutations in arrestin-2 and -3 (Coffa et al., 2011a) . Thus, l l i t >0.8 0.7–0.8 0.6–0.7 0.5–0.6 0.4–0.5 0.3–0.4 0.2–0.3 0.15–0.2 0.10–0.15 0.09–0.10 0.08–0.09 0.07–0.08 0.06–0.07 ASWI 89 97 Clathrin Clathrin 399 AP2 393 25 172 T1A 11 aa insert 316 different mechanisms of destabilization of the basal arrestin structure appear to increase its flexibility in distinct partially overlapping ways, enhancing the binding of different, or sometimes the same, partners. FLEXIBILITY OF RECEPTOR-BOUND ARRESTINS The arrestin-receptor complexes initiate several signaling cascades that free arrestins do not (Peterson and Luttrell, 2017) . For example, ERK1/2 binds free arrestin with low affinity (Luttrell et al., 2001; Coffa et al., 2011a) , whereas this interaction is greatly enhanced by the arrestin recruitment to the receptor (Luttrell et al., 2001) . The arrestin-dependent ERK1/2 activation occurs only upon GPCR stimulation (Luttrell et al., 2001; Coffa et al., 2011b) . From structural perspective, the simplest explanation is that receptor-bound arrestin presents a different “face” to the world, where elements engaged by particular partners, such as ERK1/2, become more accessible or better aligned (Gurevich and Gurevich, 2003) . However, for a long time the release of the C-tail remained the only conformational rearrangement in arrestins directly ascribed to the receptor binding. Recent study using pulse EPR technique DEER for intra-molecular distance measurements in free and P-Rh*-bound arrestin-1 detected additional rearrangements. These included the movement of the finger loop on the receptor-binding surface (Figs. 1 and 2B) in the direction of the incoming receptor, a dramatic repositioning of the neighboring 139-loop towards the N-domain and to the side, and movements of two loops containing residues 344 and 157 at the tips of the two arrestin domains (Fig. 2B) towards and away from the receptor, respectively (Kim et al., 2012). Interestingly, the 344 loop in the stretch with elevated disorder potential in all arrestins (Fig. 3C–F) directly engages membrane lipids (Lally et al., 2017) , consistent with its position in the arrestin1-rhodopsin complex (Kang et al., 2015) . Earlier findings that deletions in the inter-domain hinge impede the receptor binding (Vishnivetskiy et al., 2002; Hanson et al., 2007) suggested that long hinge is needed for the two arrestin domains to “grab” the receptor like a pincer (Gurevich and Gurevich, 2004) . However, DEER studies of arrestin-1 (Kim et al., 2012) and both non-visual subtypes (Zhuo et al., 2014) ruled out such “clam-like” movement of the domains. In an alternative model, the receptor binding is enabled by the two domains rotating relative to each other by ∼20° (Modzelewska et al., 2006) . Two crystal structures of presumably “active” arrestin-1 and arrestin-2 are consistent with this model. Pre-activated arrestin-2 with C-terminal deletion (Kovoor et al., 1999) was co-crystallized with multiphosphorylated C-terminus of vasopressin V2 receptor and conformationally selective antibody fragment (Shukla et al., 2013) . This structure revealed a large movement of the 139-loop homologue (called “middle loop” in this study), similar to that detected in arrestin-1 by DEER (Kim et al., 2012) , rearrangement of the finger loop, and the rotation of N- and C-domains by ∼20o (Shukla et al., 2013) . The short splice variant of arrestin-1 lacking the C-tail, p44, expressed in some mammalian species, was also shown to be “preactivated” and bind unphosphorylated Rh* (Pulvermuller et al., 1997) . In one crystal structure, this protein looked similar to FL arrestin-1 (Granzin et al., 2012) , but the second structure revealed a very different conformation, with characteristic rearrangement of the finger loop, movement of the 139-loop, and ∼21° rotation of the two domains (Kim et al., 2013) . These studies have obvious caveats. Both DEER (Kim et al., 2012) and NMR (Zhuang et al., 2013a) were done with arrestin-1 bound to a bona fide receptor, purified rhodopsin, but neither method yields atomic resolution. In higher resolution crystal structures, “active” arrestin-1 (Kim et al., 2013) and arrestin-2 (Shukla et al., 2013) were not bound to a receptor. The recent crystal structure of the arrestin-1-rhodopsin complex, the only structure of the GPCR-bound arrestin so far, solved using innovative method suitable for very small crystals, femtosecond X-ray laser, revealed similar movements of flexible loops and the twisting of the two arrestin-1 domains (Kang et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2017) . GPCRs are very dynamic proteins (Manglik and Kobilka, 2014; Manglik et al., 2015) , which makes them challenging targets for X-ray crystallography. Virtually all structures were solved using heavily engineered receptors, where some elements were deleted and/or replaced with small soluble proteins that provide crystal contacts. The arestin-1-rhodopsin complex was no exception. First, a fusion of human rhodopsin with T4 lysozyme was used. Second, this rhodopsin carried two mutations, M257Y and E113Q, making it fully active even in the absence of retinal, and an additional disulfide bridge between residues 2 and 282 that were replaced with cysteines, which is widely used for rhodopsin stabilization (Standfuss et al., 2007). Third, rhodopsin was not phosphorylated to the level required for tight wild type arrestin-1 binding (Mendez et al., 2000; Vishnivetskiy et al., 2007) . Thus, pre-activated mouse arrestin-1-3A mutant that binds Rh* with high affinity was used (Song et al., 2009b; Vishnivetskiy et al., 2013) . Finally, although individually expressed rhodopsin and arrestin-1 mutants were able to bind each other, a complex stable enough for crystallization was obtained only when both were expressed as a fusion protein. However, the arrangement of arrestin-1 and rhodopsin in the structure of the complex that was expressed and crystallized as a fusion protein, was confirmed using separately expressed and purified arrestin-1 and rhodopsin by several methods: a) changes in the rate of H/D exchange upon binding; b) disulfide cross-linking between residues in arrestin-1 and rhodopsin predicted to be within range by the crystal structure, and lack of cross-linking between residues predicted to be too far apart; and c) measurements of distances between selected positions in the two proteins using DEER (Kang et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2017) . Well-diffracting crystals form only when protein conformations are fixed, either naturally, or artificially, by crystallization conditions and/or crystal packing forces. In this crystal, all four arrestin-rhodopsin complexes in the asymmetric unit look very similar (Kang et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2017) , strongly suggesting biological relevance of this structure. In the arrestin-rhodopsin complex three distances were measured by DEER: from rhodopsin residue 74 to arrestin-1 residues 61, 140, and 241 (Kang et al., 2015); four distances were measured to confirm the position of the rhodopsin C-terminus relative to the N-domain of arrestin-1: from rhodopsin positions 335, 337, and 342 to residue 107 in arrestin-1, and from 342 in rhodopsin to 106 in arrestin-1 (Zhou et al., 2017) . It is remarkable that the most probable distance in each case matched the crystal structure. However, it is equally remarkable that in every case, multiple additional distances were detected, clearly indicating that the complex explores fairly wide conformational space (Kang et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2017) . This notion is supported by the finding that the distributions of intra-molecular distances measured by DEER in free arrestin-1 are wide, and remain wide upon rhodopsin binding (Kim et al., 2012). The same is true for intra-molecular distances in free and receptor-bound arrestin-2 and -3 (Zhuo et al., 2014) . NMR data for 13C-15Nlabeled arrestin-1 also suggest its high flexibility in rhodopsin-bound form (Zhuang et al., 2013a) . Thus, all evidence indicates that receptor-bound arrestins, which organize a variety of signaling complexes, are very flexible. This appears to be necessary for their functional versatility. Arrestin-dependent activation of JNKs illustrates one mechanism whereby flexibility translates into function. Out of the four vertebrate arrestins, only arrestin-3 activates JNKs (McDonald et al., 2000; Song et al., 2009a, 2011) . Highly homologous arrestin-2 (Attramadal et al., 1992; Sterne-Marr et al., 1993) also binds kinases in the ASK1-MKK4-JNK3 l l i t cascade, but does not activate JNKs (Song et al., 2009a, 2011) . Although JNK3 and MKK4 binding was discovered first (McDonald et al., 2000) , subsequent studies showed that arrestin-3 also binds MKK7 (Zhan et al., 2013) needed for full activation of JNKs (Lawler et al., 1998), as well as ubiquitously expressed JNK1 and JNK2 (Kook et al., 2013) . Therefore, the mechanism described below applies to arrestin-3 scaffolding of all JNK activation cascades. JNK3 engages three arrestin-3 elements (Fig. 4), with the N-terminal 25 residues (T1A peptide) being the most potent binding site (Zhan et al., 2014) . This peptide binds all kinases in the pathway and facilitates JNK activation in vitro and in cells (Zhan et al., 2016) . The concentration dependence of the scaffold effect is usually bell-shaped (Levchenko et al., 2004) : low scaffold concentrations facilitate productive interactions, which are suppressed when there is more scaffold molecules than the components of the cascade. The optimal concentration of the scaffold yielding the highest reaction rate depends on scaffold affinities for the proteins it brings together (Zhan et al., 2013) . Interestingly, optimal concentrations of T1A peptide for scaffolding of MKK4-JNK3 and MKK7-JNK3 modules are 10 times lower than those of FL arrestin-3 (Zhan et al., 2016). Arrestin-3 structure suggests an explanation for this. Even though free arrestin-3 acts as a scaffold (Song et al., 2009a; Breitman et al., 2012) , receptor binding enhances this action (McDonald et al., 2000) . In the basal state of arrestin-3, T1A peptide, which includes the N-terminal extension not resolved in crystal and β-strands I and II (Zhan et al., 2014) (Figs. 1 and 4), is partially shielded by the C-tail (Fig. 2C), which is released upon receptor binding (Zhuo et al., 2014), ensuring better exposure of this element. This explains higher effectiveness of the receptor-bound arrestin-3 as JNK3 activator (McDonald et al., 2000) , as well as higher apparent affinity of T1A for JNK3, MKK4, and MKK7 (Zhan et al., 2016). Furthermore, expressed as a YFP-fusion, T1A peptide is likely fully exposed and flexible, activating JNK3 more efficiently than full-length arrestin-3 (Zhan et al., 2016) . Thus, enhanced flexibility of a protein element facilitates its function. DOES DISORDER POTENTIAL HAVE PREDICTIVE VALUE? It is instructive to compare disorder potential of arrestin elements (Fig. 3C–F) with available functional data (Fig. 4). The N-terminus and the C-tail, with high predicted disorder in all arrestins (Fig. 3C–F), are biologically important. The first 25 residues of arrestin-3 (Figs. 2C and 4) are the highest affinity binding site for JNK3 (Zhan et al., 2014) , bind all the upstream kinases in JNK3 activation cascade, and serve as a functional scaffold in cells (Zhan et al., 2016) . The part of the C-terminus of both arrestin-2 and -3 between the C-domain and β-strand XX (Fig. 1), which is disordered and never resolved in crystal structures, contains both the major (Goodman et al., 1996) and minor (in arrestin-2) (Kang et al., 2009) clathrin-binding sites (Fig. 2A). The distal C-tail (also never resolved in crystal structures) binds clathrin adaptor AP2 (Laporte et al., 1999; Milano et al., 2002; Moaven et al., 2013) (Fig. 2A). Upon receptor binding, when the interactions with clathrin and AP2 come into play, the C-tail of arrestins is released and becomes even more disordered. The comparison of the structure of bovine arrestin-3 activated by IP6 (Chen et al., 2017) with the structures of arrestin-2 activated by receptor phospho-peptide (Shukla et al., 2013) , pre-activated arrestin-1 splice variant p44 (Kim et al., 2013) , and arrestin-1 in complex with rhodopsin (Kang et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2017) identified three regions that invariably assume different conformations in basal and active arrestins, termed arrestin switch (ASw) regions (Chen et al., 2017). These include ASwI (one of the long “legs” connecting the α-helix to the body of the N-domain, residues 89–97 in bovine arrestin-3), ASwII (inter-domain hinge and the first β-strand in the C-domain, residues 176–191), and ASwIII (the extension of the lariat loop supplying two of the three negative charges of the polar core, residues 307–316) (Fig. 4). Switches likely serve as docking sites for the nonreceptor partners that discriminate between active and inactive arrestins (Chen et al., 2017) . Interestingly, all these elements are predicted to have high disorder potential in both non-visual subtypes (Figs. 3D, 3E, and 4) implicated in arrestin-mediated signaling, and appear to be more ordered in visual arrestin-1 and -4 (Fig. 3C and 3F), which lack these functions. Importantly, two other regions implicated in JNK3 binding, peptides T3 (residues 172–208) and T6 (residues 287–318) (Zhan et al., 2014) contain ASwII and ASwIII, respectively (Chen et al., 2017) (Fig. 4). While other protein partners that engage different switch regions still await identification, there is a provocative tendency for the elements with the highest disorder potential to mediate arrestin interactions with other proteins. CONCLUSIONS Biologically, the most remarkable characteristic of arrestins is their ability to bind hundreds of different GPCRs and numerous non-receptor partners. Arrestins exist in at least three distinct conformations: free, receptor-bound, and microtubule-bound. Structurally, an important feature of arrestins is high flexibility in every state. X-ray crystallography and biophysical studies clearly show that in both free and receptor-bound state arrestins explore a wide range of conformations. Conceivably, the conformational spaces covered by free, receptor- and microtubule-bound arrestins partially overlap. This flexibility likely underlies remarkable functional versatility of arrestins and represents the structural basis for the ability of arrestins to scaffold signaling pathways. The functionality of free arrestins and their separated elements paves the way for the use of arrestin-based molecular tools to manipulate cellular signaling for experimental and, potentially, therapeutic purposes. The correlation of functional capabilities with high probability of disorder suggests that in search of arrestin elements engaging signaling proteins the field needs to pay closer attention to more disordered parts. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding: NIH RO1 Grants EY011500, GM077561 and GM109955 (the latter two RO1s were replaced by R35 GM122491) (VVG), NS065868 and DA030103 (EVG). ABBREVIATIONS ASK, apoptosis signal-regulated kinase; ASw, arrestin switch; DEER, double electron-electron resonance; EPR electron paramagnetic resonance; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; FL, full length; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; IDP, intrinsically disordered protein; IDPR, intrinsically disordered protein region; IP6, inositol hexakisphosphate; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; MKK, MAP kinase kinase; MoRFs, molecular recognition features; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; PKC, protein kinase C; P-Rh, dark (inactive) phosphorylated rhodopsin; P-Rh*, light-activated phosphorylated rhodopsin; Rh*, light-activated rhodopsin; WT, wild type. FOOTNOTE 1Here we use the systematic names of arrestins, where the number after the dash indicates the order of cloning: arrestin-1 (historic names S-antigen, 48 kDa protein, visual or rod arrestin), arrestin-2 (β-arrestin or β-arrestin1), arrestin-3 (β-arrestin2 or hTHY-ARRX), and arrestin-4 (cone or X-arrestin). COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICS GUIDELINES Vsevolod V. Gurevich, Eugenia V. Gurevich, and Vladimir N. Uversky declare that they have no conflict of interest. OPEN ACCESS This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. l l e C l l e C l l i t Agarwal PK ( 2005 ) Role of protein dynamics in reaction rate enhancement by enzymes . J Am Chem Soc 127 : 15248 - 15256 Ahmed MR , Zhan X , Song X , Kook S , Gurevich VV , Gurevich EV ( 2011 ) Ubiquitin ligase parkin promotes Mdm2-arrestin interaction but inhibits arrestin ubiquitination . Biochemistry 50 : 3749 - 3763 Artymiuk PJ , Blake CC , Grace DE , Oatley SJ , Phillips DC , Sternberg MJ ( 1979 ) Crystallographic studies of the dynamic properties of lysozyme . Nature 280 : 563 - 568 Attramadal H , Arriza JL , Aoki C , Dawson TM , Codina J , Kwatra MM , Snyder SH , Caron MG , Lefkowitz RJ ( 1992 ) Beta-arrestin2, a novel member of the arrestin/beta-arrestin gene family . J Biol Chem 267 : 17882 - 17890 Barak LS , Ferguson SS , Zhang J , Caron MG ( 1997 ) A betaarrestin/green fluorescent protein biosensor for detecting G protein-coupled receptor activation . J Biol Chem 272 : 27497 - 27500 Breitman M , Kook S , Gimenez LE , Lizama BN , Palazzo MC , Gurevich EV , Gurevich VV ( 2012 ) Silent scaffolds: inhibition of c-Jun N-terminal kinase 3 activity in the cell by a dominantnegative arrestin-3 mutant . J Biol Chem 287 : 19653 - 19664 Buljan M , Chalancon G , Dunker AK , Bateman A , Balaji S , Fuxreiter M , Babu MM ( 2013 ) Alternative splicing of intrinsically disordered regions and rewiring of protein interactions . Curr Opin Struct Biol 23 : 443 - 450 Carpenter B , Nehmé R , Warne T , Leslie AG , Tate CG ( 2016 ) Structure of the adenosine A(2A) receptor bound to an engineered G protein . Nature 536 : 104 - 107 Carter JM , Gurevich VV , Prossnitz ER , Engen JR ( 2005 ) Conformational differences between arrestin2 and pre-activated mutants as revealed by hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry . J Mol Biol 351 : 865 - 878 Celver J , Vishnivetskiy SA , Chavkin C , Gurevich VV ( 2002 ) Conservation of the phosphate-sensitive elements in the arrestin family of proteins . J Biol Chem 277 : 9043 - 9048 Chen Q , Perry NA , Vishnivetskiy SA , Berndt S , Gilbert NC , Zhuo Y , Singh PK , Tholen J , Ohi MD , Gurevich EV et al ( 2017 ) Structural basis of arrestin-3 activation and signaling . Nat Commun 8 : 1427 Coffa S , Breitman M , Hanson SM , Callaway K , Kook S , Dalby KN , Gurevich VV ( 2011a ) The effect of arrestin conformation on the recruitment of c-Raf1, MEK1, and ERK1/2 activation . PLoS ONE 6:e28723 Coffa S , Breitman M , Spiller BW , Gurevich VV ( 2011b ) A single mutation in arrestin-2 prevents ERK1/2 activation by reducing c-Raf1 binding . Biochemistry 50 : 6951 - 6958 Danial NN , Korsmeyer SJ ( 2004 ) Cell death: critical control points . Cell 116 : 205 - 219 Daniel RM , Dines M , Petach HH ( 1996 ) The denaturation and degradation of stable enzymes at high temperatures . Biochem J 317 : 1 - 11 Disfani FM , Hsu WL , Mizianty MJ , Oldfield CJ , Xue B , Dunker AK , Uversky VN , Kurgan L ( 2012 ) MoRFpred, a computational tool for sequence-based prediction and characterization of short disorder-to-order transitioning binding regions in proteins . Bioinformatics 28 : i75 - 83 Dosztanyi Z , Csizmok V , Tompa P , Simon I ( 2005 ) IUPred: web server for the prediction of intrinsically unstructured regions of proteins based on estimated energy content . Bioinformatics 21 : 3433 - 3434 Dosztanyi Z , Meszaros B , Simon I ( 2009 ) ANCHOR: web server for predicting protein binding regions in disordered proteins . Bioinformatics 25 : 2745 - 2746 Dunker AK , Obradovic Z ( 2001 ) The protein trinity-linking function and disorder . Nat Biotechnol 19 : 805 - 806 Dunker AK , Lawson JD , Brown CJ , Williams RM , Romero P , Oh JS , Oldfield CJ , Campen AM , Ratliff CM , Hipps KW et al ( 2001 ) Intrinsically disordered protein . J Mol Graph Model 19 : 26 - 59 Dyson HJ , Wright PE ( 2002 ) Coupling of folding and binding for unstructured proteins . Curr Opin Struct Biol 12 : 54 - 60 Eisenmesser EZ , Millet O , Labeikovsky W , Korzhnev DM , Wolf-Watz M , Bosco DA , Skalicky JJ , Kay LE , Kern D ( 2005 ) Intrinsic dynamics of an enzyme underlies catalysis . Nature 438 : 117 - 121 Farrens DL , Altenbach C , Yang K , Hubbell WL , Khorana HG ( 1996 ) Requirement of rigid-body motion of transmembrane helices for light activation of rhodopsin . Science 274 : 768 - 770 Fernández-Arenas E , Calleja E , Martínez-Martín N , Gharbi SI , Navajas R , García-Medel N , Penela P , Alcamí A , Mayor FJ , Albar JP et al ( 2014 ) β-Arrestin-1 mediates the TCR-triggered rerouting of distal receptors to the immunological synapse by a PKC-mediated mechanism . EMBO J 33 ( 6 ): 559 - 577 Frauenfelder H , Petsko GA , Tsernoglou D ( 1979 ) Temperaturedependent X-ray diffraction as a probe of protein structural dynamics . Nature 280 : 558 - 563 Giver L , Gershenson A , Freskgard PO , Arnold FH ( 1998 ) Directed evolution of a thermostable esterase . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95 : 12809 - 12813 Goodman OB Jr, Krupnick JG , Santini F , Gurevich VV , Penn RB , Gagnon AW , Keen JH , Benovic JL ( 1996 ) Beta-arrestin acts as a clathrin adaptor in endocytosis of the beta2-adrenergic receptor . Nature 383 : 447 - 450 Granzin J , Wilden U , Choe HW , Labahn J , Krafft B , Buldt G ( 1998 ) X-ray crystal structure of arrestin from bovine rod outer segments . Nature 391 : 918 - 921 Granzin J , Cousin A , Weirauch M , Schlesinger R , Büldt G , BatraSafferling R ( 2012 ) Crystal structure of p44, a constitutively active splice variant of visual arrestin . J Mol Biol 416 : 611 - 618 Granzin J , Stadler A , Cousin A , Schlesinger R , Batra-Safferling R ( 2015 ) Structural evidence for the role of polar core residue Arg175 in arrestin activation . Sci Rep 5 : 15808 Gurevich VV ( 1998 ) The selectivity of visual arrestin for lightactivated phosphorhodopsin is controlled by multiple nonredundant mechanisms . J Biol Chem 273 : 15501 - 15506 Gurevich VV , Benovic JL ( 1992 ) Cell-free expression of visual arrestin. Truncation mutagenesis identifies multiple domains involved in rhodopsin interaction . J Biol Chem 267 : 21919 - 21923 Gurevich VV , Benovic JL ( 1993 ) Visual arrestin interaction with rhodopsin: sequential multisite binding ensures strict selectivity towards light-activated phosphorylated rhodopsin . J Biol Chem 268 : 11628 - 11638 Gurevich VV , Benovic JL ( 1995 ) Visual arrestin binding to rhodopsin: diverse functional roles of positively charged residues within the phosphorylation-recignition region of arrestin . J Biol Chem 270 : 6010 - 6016 Gurevich VV , Benovic JL ( 1997 ) Mechanism of phosphorylationrecognition by visual arrestin and the transition of arrestin into a high affinity binding state . Mol Pharmacol 51 : 161 - 169 Gurevich VV , Gurevich EV ( 2003 ) The new face of active receptor bound arrestin attracts new partners . Structure 11 : 1037 - 1042 Gurevich VV , Gurevich EV ( 2004 ) The molecular acrobatics of arrestin activation . Trends Pharmacol Sci 25 : 105 - 111 Gurevich EV , Gurevich VV ( 2006 ) Arrestins are ubiquitous regulators of cellular signaling pathways . Genome Biol 7 : 236 Gurevich VV , Gurevich EV ( 2014 ) Arrestin makes T cells stop and become active . EMBO J 33 : 531 - 533 Gurevich VV , Chen C-Y , Kim CM , Benovic JL ( 1994 ) Visual arrestin binding to rhodopsin: Intramolecular interaction between the basic N-terminus and acidic C-terminus of arrestin may regulate binding selectivity . J Biol Chem 269 : 8721 - 8727 Gurevich VV , Hanson SM , Song X , Vishnivetskiy SA , Gurevich EV ( 2011 ) The functional cycle of visual arrestins in photoreceptor cells . Prog Retin Eye Res 30 : 405 - 430 Habchi J , Tompa P , Longhi S , Uversky VN ( 2014 ) Introducing protein intrinsic disorder . Chem Rev 114 : 6561 - 6588 Han M , Gurevich VV , Vishnivetskiy SA , Sigler PB , Schubert C ( 2001 ) Crystal structure of beta-arrestin at 1.9 A: possible mechanism of receptor binding and membrane translocation . Structure 9 : 869 - 880 Hanson SM , Gurevich VV ( 2006 ) The differential engagement of arrestin surface charges by the various functional forms of the receptor . J Biol Chem 281 : 3458 - 3462 Hanson SM , Francis DJ , Vishnivetskiy SA , Klug CS , Gurevich VV ( 2006a ) Visual arrestin binding to microtubules involves a distinct conformational change . J Biol Chem 281 : 9765 - 9772 Hanson SM , Francis DJ , Vishnivetskiy SA , Kolobova EA , Hubbell WL , Klug CS , Gurevich VV ( 2006b) Differential interaction of spin-labeled arrestin with inactive and active phosphorhodopsin . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 : 4900 - 4905 Hanson SM , Cleghorn WM , Francis DJ , Vishnivetskiy SA , Raman D , Song X , Nair KS , Slepak VZ , Klug CS , Gurevich VV ( 2007 ) Arrestin mobilizes signaling proteins to the cytoskeleton and redirects their activity . J Mol Biol 368 : 375 - 387 Hirsch JA , Schubert C , Gurevich VV , Sigler PB ( 1999 ) The 2.8 A crystal structure of visual arrestin: a model for arrestin's regulation . Cell 97 : 257 - 269 Hoffmann C , Gaietta G , Bunemann M , Adams SR , Oberdorff-Maass S , Behr B , Vilardaga JP , Tsien RY , Ellisman MH , Lohse MJ ( 2005 ) A FlAsH-based FRET approach to determine G protein-coupled receptor activation in living cells . Nat Methods 2 : 171 - 176 Humphrey W , Dalke A , Schulten K ( 1996 ) VMD: visual molecular dynamics . J Mol Graph 14 ( 1 ): 33 - 38 Iakoucheva LM , Brown CJ , Lawson JD , Obradovic Z , Dunker AK ( 2002 ) Intrinsic disorder in cell-signaling and cancer-associated proteins . J Mol Biol 323 : 573 - 584 Iakoucheva LM , Radivojac P , Brown CJ , O'Connor TR , Sikes JG , Obradovic Z , Dunker AK ( 2004 ) The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation . Nucleic Acids Res 32 : 1037 - 1049 Indrischek H , Prohaska SJ , Gurevich VV , Gurevich EV , Stadler PF ( 2017 ) Uncovering missing pieces: duplication and deletion history of arrestins in deuterostomes . BMC Evol Biol 17 : 163 Kang DS , Kern RC , Puthenveedu MA , von Zastrow M , Williams JC , Benovic JL ( 2009 ) Structure of an arrestin2-clathrin complex reveals a novel clathrin binding domain that modulates receptor trafficking . J Biol Chem 284 : 29860 - 29872 Kang Y , Zhou XE , Gao X , He Y , Liu W , Ishchenko A , Barty A , White TA , Yefanov O , Han GW et al ( 2015 ) Crystal structure of rhodopsin bound to arrestin determined by femtosecond X-ray laser . Nature 523 : 561 - 567 Kim YM , Barak LS , Caron MG , Benovic JL ( 2002 ) Regulation of arrestin-3 phosphorylation by casein kinase II . J Biol Chem 277 : 16837 - 16846 Kim M , Vishnivetskiy SA , Van Eps N , Alexander NS , Cleghorn WM , Zhan X , Hanson SM , Morizumi T , Ernst OP , Meiler J et al ( 2012 ) Conformation of receptor-bound visual arrestin . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109 : 18407 - 18412 Kim YJ , Hofmann KP , Ernst OP , Scheerer P , Choe HW , Sommer ME ( 2013 ) Crystal structure of pre-activated arrestin p44 . Nature 497 : 142 - 146 Kook S , Zhan X , Kaoud TS , Dalby KN , Gurevich VV , Gurevich EV ( 2013 ) Arrestin-3 binds JNK1α1 and JNK2α2 and facilitates the activation of these ubiquitous JNK isoforms in cells via scaffolding . J Biol Chem 288 : 37332 - 37342 Kook S , Zhan X , Cleghorn WM , Benovic JL , Gurevich VV , Gurevich EV ( 2014 ) Caspase-cleaved arrestin-2 and BID cooperatively facilitate cytochrome C release and cell death . Cell Death Differ 21 : 172 - 184 Kovoor A , Celver J , Abdryashitov RI , Chavkin C , Gurevich VV ( 1999 ) Targeted construction of phosphorylation-independent b-arrestin mutants with constitutive activity in cells . J Biol Chem 274 : 6831 - 6834 Krupnick JG , Gurevich VV , Benovic JL ( 1997 ) Mechanism of quenching of phototransduction. Binding competition between arrestin and transducin for phosphorhodopsin . J Biol Chem 272 : 18125 - 18131 Kuhn H , Hall SW , Wilden U ( 1984 ) Light-induced binding of 48-kDa protein to photoreceptor membranes is highly enhanced by phosphorylation of rhodopsin . FEBS Lett 176 : 473 - 478 Lally CC , Bauer B , Selent J , Sommer ME ( 2017 ) C-edge loops of arrestin function as a membrane anchor . Nat Commun 8 : 14258 Laporte SA , Oakley RH , Zhang J , Holt JA , Ferguson SSG , Caron MG , Barak LS ( 1999 ) The 2-adrenergic receptor/arrestin complex recruits the clathrin adaptor AP-2 during endocytosis . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96 : 3712 - 3717 Lawler S , Fleming Y , Goedert M , Cohen P ( 1998 ) Synergistic activation of SAPK1/JNK1 by two MAP kinase kinases in vitro . Curr Biol 8 : 1387 - 1390 Lee MH , Appleton KM , Strungs EG , Kwon JY , Morinelli TA , Peterson YK , Laporte SA , Luttrell LM ( 2016 ) The conformational signature of beta-arrestin2 predicts its trafficking and signalling functions . Nature 531 : 665 - 668 Levchenko A , Bruck J , Sternberg PW ( 2004 ) Regulatory modules that generate biphasic signal response in biological systems . Syst Biol (Stevenage) 1 : 139 - 148 Lin FT , Krueger KM , Kendall HE , Daake Y , Fredericks ZL , Pitcher JA , Lefkowitz RJ ( 1997 ) Clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the betaadrenergic receptor is regulated by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of beta-arrestin1 . J Biol Chem 272 : 31051 - 31057 Lin FT , Chen W , Shenoy S , Cong M , Exum ST , Lefkowitz RJ ( 2002 ) Phosphorylation of beta-arrestin2 regulates its function in internalization of beta(2)-adrenergic receptors . Biochemistry 41 : 10692 - 10699 Lüthi AU , Martin SJ ( 2007 ) The CASBAH: a searchable database of caspase substrates . Cell Death Differ 14 : 641 - 650 Luttrell LM , Roudabush FL , Choy EW , Miller WE , Field ME , Pierce KL , Lefkowitz RJ ( 2001 ) Activation and targeting of extracellular signal-regulated kinases by beta-arrestin scaffolds . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98 : 2449 - 2454 Ma B , Kumar S , Tsai CJ , Nussinov R ( 1999 ) Folding funnels and binding mechanisms . Protein Eng 12 : 713 - 720 Manglik A , Kobilka B ( 2014 ) The role of protein dynamics in GPCR function: insights from the β2AR and rhodopsin . Curr Opin Cell Biol 27 : 136 - 143 Manglik A , Kim TH , Masureel M , Altenbach C , Yang Z , Hilger D , Lerch MT , Kobilka TS , Thian FS , Hubbell WL et al ( 2015 ) Structural insights into the dynamic process of beta2-adrenergic receptor signaling . Cell 161 : 1101 - 1111 McDonald PH , Chow CW , Miller WE , Laporte SA , Field ME , Lin FT , Davis RJ , Lefkowitz RJ ( 2000 ) Beta-arrestin 2: a receptorregulated MAPK scaffold for the activation of JNK3 . Science 290 : 1574 - 1577 Mendez A , Burns ME , Roca A , Lem J , Wu LW , Simon MI , Baylor DA , Chen J ( 2000 ) Rapid and reproducible deactivation of rhodopsin requires multiple phosphorylation sites . Neuron 28 : 153 - 164 Milano SK , Pace HC , Kim YM , Brenner C , Benovic JL ( 2002 ) Scaffolding functions of arrestin-2 revealed by crystal structure and mutagenesis . Biochemistry 41 : 3321 - 3328 Milano SK , Kim YM , Stefano FP , Benovic JL , Brenner C ( 2006 ) Nonvisual arrestin oligomerization and cellular localization are regulated by inositol hexakisphosphate binding . J Biol Chem 281 : 9812 - 9823 Moaven H , Koike Y , Jao CC , Gurevich VV , Langen R , Chen J ( 2013 ) Visual arrestin interaction with clathrin adaptor AP-2 regulates photoreceptor survival in the vertebrate retina . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110 : 9463 - 9468 Modzelewska A , Filipek S , Palczewski K , Park PS ( 2006 ) Arrestin interaction with rhodopsin: conceptual models . Cell Biochem Biophys 46 : 1 - 15 Nobles KN , Guan Z , Xiao K , Oas TG , Lefkowitz RJ ( 2007 ) The active conformation of beta-arrestin1: direct evidence for the phosphate sensor in the N-domain and conformational differences in the active states of beta-arrestins1 and -2 . J Biol Chem 282 : 21370 - 21381 Nuber S , Zabel U , Lorenz K , Nuber A , Milligan G , Tobin AB , Lohse MJ , Hoffmann C ( 2016 ) beta-Arrestin biosensors reveal a rapid, receptor-dependent activation/deactivation cycle . Nature 531 : 661 - 664 Oldfield CJ , Cheng Y , Cortese MS , Romero P , Uversky VN , Dunker AK ( 2005 ) Coupled folding and binding with alpha-helix-forming molecular recognition elements . Biochemistry 44 : 12454 - 12470 Ostermaier MK , Peterhans C , Jaussi R , Deupi X , Standfuss J ( 2014 ) Functional map of arrestin-1 at single amino acid resolution . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111 : 1825 - 1830 Palczewski K , Pulvermuller A , Buczylko J , Hofmann KP ( 1991 ) Phosphorylated rhodopsin and heparin induce similar conformational changes in arrestin . J Biol Chem 266 : 18649 - 18654 Pan L , Gurevich EV , Gurevich VV ( 2003 ) The nature of the arrestin x receptor complex determines the ultimate fate of the internalized receptor . J Biol Chem 278 : 11623 - 11632 Pejaver V , Hsu WL , Xin F , Dunker AK , Uversky VN , Radivojac P ( 2014 ) The structural and functional signatures of proteins that undergo multiple events of post-translational modification . Protein Sci 23 : 1077 - 1093 Peng K , Vucetic S , Radivojac P , Brown CJ , Dunker AK , Obradovic Z ( 2005 ) Optimizing long intrinsic disorder predictors with protein evolutionary information . J Bioinform Comput Biol 3 : 35 - 60 Peng K , Radivojac P , Vucetic S , Dunker AK , Obradovic Z ( 2006 ) Length-dependent prediction of protein intrinsic disorder . BMC Bioinform 7 : 208 Peterson YK , Luttrell LM ( 2017 ) The diverse roles of arrestin scaffolds in G protein-coupled receptor signaling . Pharmacol Rev 69 : 256 - 297 Privalov PL , Khechinashvili NN ( 1974 ) A thermodynamic approach to the problem of stabilization of globular protein structure: a calorimetric study . J Mol Biol 86 : 665 - 684 Puig J , Arendt A , Tomson FL , Abdulaeva G , Miller R , Hargrave PA , McDowell JH ( 1995 ) Synthetic phosphopeptide from rhodopsin sequence induces retinal arrestin binding to photoactivated unphosphorylated rhodopsin . FEBS Lett 362 : 185 - 188 Pulvermuller A , Maretzki D , Rudnicka-Nawrot M , Smith WC , Palczewski K , Hofmann KP ( 1997 ) Functional differences in the interaction of arrestin and its splice variant, p44, with rhodopsin . Biochemistry 36 : 9253 - 9260 Radivojac P , Iakoucheva LM , Oldfield CJ , Obradovic Z , Uversky VN , Dunker AK ( 2007 ) Intrinsic disorder and functional proteomics . Biophys J 92 : 1439 - 1456 Rasmussen SG , DeVree BT , Zou Y , Kruse AC , Chung KY , Kobilka TS , Thian FS , Chae PS , Pardon E , Calinski D et al ( 2011 ) Crystal structure of the β2 adrenergic receptor-Gs protein complex . Nature 477 : 549 - 555 Romero PR , Zaidi S , Fang YY , Uversky VN , Radivojac P , Oldfield CJ , Cortese MS , Sickmeier M , LeGall T , Obradovic Z et al ( 2006 ) Alternative splicing in concert with protein intrinsic disorder enables increased functional diversity in multicellular organisms . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 : 8390 - 8395 Ruvinov S , Wang L , Ruan B , Almog O , Gilliland GL , Eisenstein E , Bryan PN ( 1997 ) Engineering the independent folding of the subtilisin BPN' prodomain: analysis of two-state folding versus protein stability . Biochemistry 36 : 10414 - 10421 Savage HJ , Elliott CJ , Freeman CM , Finney JL ( 1993 ) Lost hydrogen-bonds and buried surface-area-rationalizing stability in globular-proteins . J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 89 : 2609 - 2617 Scheerer P , Park JH , Hildebrand PW , Kim YJ , Krauss N , Choe HW , Hofmann KP , Ernst OP ( 2008 ) Crystal structure of opsin in its G-protein-interacting conformation . Nature 455 : 497 - 502 Schleicher A , Kuhn H , Hofmann KP ( 1989 ) Kinetics, binding constant, and activation energy of the 48-kDa protein-rhodopsin complex by extra-metarhodopsin II . Biochemistry 28 : 1770 - 1775 Sensoy O , Moreira IS , Morra G ( 2016 ) Understanding the differential selectivity of arrestins toward the phosphorylation state of the receptor . ACS Chem Neurosci 7 : 1212 - 1224 Shatsky M , Nussinov R , Wolfson HJ ( 2004 ) A method for simultaneous alignment of multiple protein structures . Proteins 56 : 143 - 156 Shoemaker BA , Portman JJ , Wolynes PG ( 2000 ) Speeding molecular recognition by using the folding funnel: the fly-casting mechanism . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97 : 8868 - 8873 Shukla AK , Manglik A , Kruse AC , Xiao K , Reis RI , Tseng WC , Staus DP , Hilger D , Uysal S , Huang LY et al ( 2013 ) Structure of active β- arrestin-1 bound to a G-protein-coupled receptor phosphopeptide . Nature 497 : 137 - 141 Smith WC , Milam AH , Dugger D , Arendt A , Hargrave PA , Palczewski K ( 1994 ) A splice variant of arrestin. Molecular cloning and localization in bovine retina . J Biol Chem 269 : 15407 - 15410 Sommer ME , Farrens DL , McDowell JH , Weber LA , Smith WC ( 2007 ) Dynamics of arrestin-rhodopsin interactions: loop movement is involved in arrestin activation and receptor binding . J Biol Chem 282 : 25560 - 25568 Song X , Raman D , Gurevich EV , Vishnivetskiy SA , Gurevich VV ( 2006 ) Visual and both non-visual arrestins in their “inactive” conformation bind JNK3 and Mdm2 and relocalize them from the nucleus to the cytoplasm . J Biol Chem 281 : 21491 - 21499 Song X , Coffa S , Fu H , Gurevich VV ( 2009a) How does arrestin assemble MAPKs into a signaling complex ? J Biol Chem 284 : 685 - 695 Song X , Vishnivetskiy SA , Gross OP , Emelianoff K , Mendez A , Chen J , Gurevich EV , Burns ME , Gurevich VV ( 2009b ) Enhanced arrestin facilitates recovery and protects rod photoreceptors deficient in rhodopsin phosphorylation . Curr Biol 19 : 700 - 705 Song X , Vishnivetskiy SA , Seo J , Chen J , Gurevich EV , Gurevich VV ( 2011 ) Arrestin-1 expression in rods: balancing functional performance and photoreceptor health . Neuroscience 174 : 37 - 49 Standfuss J , Xie G , Edwards PC , Burghammer M , Oprian DD , Schertler GF ( 2007 ) Crystal structure of a thermally stable rhodopsin mutant . J Mol Biol 372 : 1179 - 1188 Sterne-Marr R , Gurevich VV , Goldsmith P , Bodine RC , Sanders C , Donoso LA , Benovic JL ( 1993 ) Polypeptide variants of betaarrestin and arrestin3 . J Biol Chem 268 : 15640 - 15648 Sugase K , Dyson HJ , Wright PE ( 2007 ) Mechanism of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein . Nature 447 : 1021 - 1025 Sutton RB , Vishnivetskiy SA , Robert J , Hanson SM , Raman D , Knox BE , Kono M , Navarro J , Gurevich VV ( 2005 ) Crystal structure of cone arrestin at 2.3Å: evolution of receptor specificity . J Mol Biol 354 : 1069 - 1080 Tang KES , Dill KA ( 1998 ) Native protein fluctuations: The conformational-motion temperature and the inverse correlation of protein flexibility with protein stability . J Biomol Struct Dyn 16 : 397 - 411 Taverna DM , Goldstein RA ( 2002 ) Why are proteins marginally stable? Proteins 46 : 105 - 109 ter Haar E , Harrison SC , Kirchhausen T ( 2000 ) Peptide-in-groove interactions link target proteins to the beta-propeller of clathrin . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97 : 1096 - 1100 Tompa P ( 2012 ) Intrinsically disordered proteins: a 10-year recap . Trends Biochem Sci 37 : 509 - 516 Tsou CL ( 1998a) Active site flexibility in enzyme catalysis . Enzyme Eng XIV 864 : 1 - 8 Tsou CL ( 1998b ) The role of active site flexibility in enzyme catalysis . Biochemistry 63 : 253 - 258 Uversky VN ( 2013 ) Unusual biophysics of intrinsically disordered proteins . Biochim Biophys Acta 1834 : 932 - 951 Uversky VN ( 2015 ) Functional roles of transiently and intrinsically disordered regions within proteins . FEBS J 282 : 1182 - 1189 Uversky VN ( 2016 ) Dancing protein clouds: the strange biology and chaotic physics of intrinsically disordered proteins . J Biol Chem 291 : 6681 - 6688 Uversky VN , Dunker AK ( 2010 ) Understanding protein non-folding . Biochim Biophys Acta 1804 : 1231 - 1264 Uversky VN , Gillespie JR , Fink AL ( 2000 ) Why are “natively unfolded” proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? Proteins 41 : 415 - 427 Uversky VN , Oldfield CJ , Dunker AK ( 2005 ) Showing your ID: intrinsic disorder as an ID for recognition, regulation and cell signaling . J Mol Recognit 18 : 343 - 384 Uversky VN , Oldfield CJ , Dunker AK ( 2008 ) Intrinsically disordered proteins in human diseases: introducing the D2 concept . Annu Rev Biophys 37 : 215 - 246 Uversky VN , Dave V , Iakoucheva LM , Malaney P , Metallo SJ , Pathak RR , Joerger AC ( 2014 ) Pathological unfoldomics of uncontrolled chaos: intrinsically disordered proteins and human diseases . Chem Rev 114 : 6844 - 6879 van der Lee R , Buljan M , Lang B , Weatheritt RJ , Daughdrill GW , Dunker AK , Fuxreiter M , Gough J , Gsponer J , Jones DT et al ( 2014 ) Classification of intrinsically disordered regions and proteins . Chem Rev 114 : 6589 - 6631 Varley PG , Pain RH ( 1991 ) Relation between stability, dynamics and enzyme-activity in 3-phosphoglycerate kinases from yeast and thermus-thermophilus . J Mol Biol 220 : 531 - 538 Vishnivetskiy SA , Paz CL , Schubert C , Hirsch JA , Sigler PB , Gurevich VV ( 1999 ) How does arrestin respond to the phosphorylated state of rhodopsin? J Biol Chem 274 : 11451 - 11454 Vishnivetskiy SA , Schubert C , Climaco GC , Gurevich YV , Velez M-G , Gurevich VV ( 2000 ) An additional phosphate-binding element in arrestin molecule: implications for the mechanism of arrestin activation . J Biol Chem 275 : 41049 - 41057 Vishnivetskiy SA , Hirsch JA , Velez M-G , Gurevich YV , Gurevich VV ( 2002 ) Transition of arrestin in the active receptor-binding state requires an extended interdomain hinge . J Biol Chem 277 : 43961 - 43968 Vishnivetskiy SA , Raman D , Wei J , Kennedy MJ , Hurley JB , Gurevich VV ( 2007 ) Regulation of arrestin binding by rhodopsin phosphorylation level . J Biol Chem 282 : 32075 - 32083 Vishnivetskiy SA , Francis DJ , Van Eps N , Kim M , Hanson SM , Klug CS , Hubbell WL , Gurevich VV ( 2010 ) The role of arrestin alphahelix I in receptor binding . J Mol Biol 395 : 42 - 54 Vishnivetskiy SA , Gimenez LE , Francis DJ , Hanson SM , Hubbell WL , Klug CS , Gurevich VV ( 2011 ) Few residues within an extensive binding interface drive receptor interaction and determine the specificity of arrestin proteins . J Biol Chem 286 : 24288 - 24299 Vishnivetskiy SA , Chen Q , Palazzo MC , Brooks EK , Altenbach C , Iverson TM , Hubbell WL , Gurevich VV ( 2013 ) Engineering visual arrestin-1 with special functional characteristics . J Biol Chem 288 : 11741 - 11750 Vogl T , Jatzke C , Hinz HJ , Benz J , Huber R ( 1997 ) Thermodynamic stability of annexin V E17G: equilibrium parameters from an irreversible unfolding reaction . Biochemistry 36 : 1657 - 1668 Wagner G , Wuthrich K ( 1979 ) Correlation between the amide protonexchange rates and the denaturation temperatures in globularproteins related to the basic pancreatic trypsin-inhibitor . J Mol Biol 130 : 31 - 37 Wilden U ( 1995 ) Duration and amplitude of the light-induced cGMP hydrolysis in vertebrate photoreceptors are regulated by multiple phosphorylation of rhodopsin and by arrestin binding . Biochemistry 34 : 1446 - 1454 Wilden U , Hall SW , Kühn H ( 1986 ) Phosphodiesterase activation by photoexcited rhodopsin is quenched when rhodopsin is phosphorylated and binds the intrinsic 48-kDa protein of rod outer segments . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83 : 1174 - 1178 Williams PD , Pollock DD , Goldstein RA ( 2006 ) Functionality and the evolution of marginal stability in proteins: inferences from lattice simulations . Evol Bioinform 2 : 91 - 101 Wrba A , Schweiger A , Schultes V , Jaenicke R , Zavodszky P ( 1990 ) Extremely thermostable D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase from the eubacterium thermotoga-maritima . Biochemistry 29 : 7584 - 7592 Wright PE , Dyson HJ ( 1999 ) Intrinsically unstructured proteins: reassessing the protein structure-function paradigm . J Mol Biol 293 : 321 - 331 Xiao K , Shenoy SK , Nobles K , Lefkowitz RJ ( 2004 ) Activationdependent conformational changes in {beta}-arrestin 2 . J Biol Chem 279 : 55744 - 55753 Xue B , Dunbrack RL , Williams RW , Dunker AK , Uversky VN ( 2010 ) PONDR-FIT: a meta-predictor of intrinsically disordered amino acids . Biochim Biophys Acta 1804 : 996 - 1010 Yang F , Yu X , Liu C , Qu CX , Gong Z , Liu HD , Li FH , Wang HM , He DF , Yi F et al (2015 ) Phospho-selective mechanisms of arrestin conformations and functions revealed by unnatural amino acid incorporation and (19)F-NMR . Nat Commun 6 : 8202 Yun Y , Kim DK , Seo MD , Kim KM , Chung KY ( 2015 ) Different conformational dynamics of beta-arrestin1 and beta-arrestin2 analyzed by hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry . Biochem Biophys Res Commun 457 : 50 - 57 Zavodszky P , Kardos J , Svingor A , Petsko GA ( 1998 ) Adjustment of conformational flexibility is a key event in the thermal adaptation of proteins . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95 : 7406 - 7411 Zhan X , Gimenez LE , Gurevich VV , Spiller BW ( 2011 ) Crystal structure of arrestin-3 reveals the basis of the difference in receptor binding between two non-visual arrestins . J Mol Biol 406 : 467 - 478 Zhan X , Kaoud TS , Kook S , Dalby KN , Gurevich VV ( 2013 ) JNK3 binding to arrestin-3 differentially affects the recruitment of upstream MAP kinase kinases . J Biol Chem 288 : 28535 - 28547 Zhan X , Perez A , Gimenez LE , Vishnivetskiy SA , Gurevich VV ( 2014 ) Arrestin-3 binds the MAP kinase JNK3α2 via multiple sites on both domains . Cell Signal 26 : 766 - 776 Zhan X , Stoy H , Kaoud TS , Perry NA , Chen Q , Vucak G , Perez A , Els-Heindl S , Slagis JV , Iverson TM et al ( 2016 ) Peptide miniscaffold facilitates JNK3 activation in cells . Sci Rep 6 : 21025 Zhou XE , He Y , de Waal PW , Gao X , Kang Y , Van Eps N , Yin Y , Pal K , Goswami D , White TA et al ( 2017 ) Structural identification of phosphorylation codes for arrestin recruitment by G proteincoupled receptors . Cell 170 : 457 - 469 Zhuang T , Vishnivetskiy SA , Gurevich VV , Sanders CR ( 2010 ) Elucidation of IP6 and heparin interaction sites and conformational changes in arrestin-1 by solution NMR . Biochemistry 49 : 10473 - 10485 Zhuang T , Chen Q , Cho M-K , Vishnivetskiy SA , Iverson TM , Gurevich VV , Sanders CR ( 2013a) Involvement of distinct arrestin-1 elements in binding to different functional forms of rhodopsin . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110 : 942 - 947 Zhuo Y , Vishnivetskiy SA , Zhan X , Gurevich VV , Klug CS ( 2014 ) Identification of receptor binding-induced conformational changes in non-visual arrestins . J Biol Chem 289 : 20991 - 21002


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs13238-017-0501-8.pdf

Vsevolod V. Gurevich, Eugenia V. Gurevich, Vladimir N. Uversky. Arrestins: structural disorder creates rich functionality, Protein & Cell, 2018, 1-18, DOI: 10.1007/s13238-017-0501-8