Correction to: The semantic plights of the ante-rem structuralist

Philosophical Studies, Apr 2018

Bahram Assadian

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11098-018-1091-x.pdf

Correction to: The semantic plights of the ante-rem structuralist

Correction to: The semantic plights of the ante-rem structuralist Bahram Assadian 0 0 Department of Philosophy, Birkbeck College , Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX , UK In the original publication of the article, footnote 17 was incorrectly published. The corrected footnote is given below. Footnote 17: Hellman (2001, pp. 193-6), Button and Walsh (2016, §2.3), and Ketland (ms.) have briefly discussed the permutation argument in the context of ante-rem structuralism. I will expand the argument and the structuralist's possible responses. Hellman's paper is the original source of the permutation argument in this context. (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11098-018-1091-x.pdf

Bahram Assadian. Correction to: The semantic plights of the ante-rem structuralist, Philosophical Studies, 2018, pp. 1, DOI: 10.1007/s11098-018-1091-x