Overnight Polysomnography versus Respiratory Polygraphy in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Sleep, Feb 2014

Substantial discrepancies exist in the type of sleep studies performed to diagnose pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in different countries. Respiratory polygraphic (RP) recordings are primarily performed in sleep laboratories in Europe, whereas polysomnography (PSG) constitutes the majority in the US and Australia. Home RP show consistent apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) underscoring, primarily because the total recording time is used as the denominator when calculating the AHI compared to total sleep time (TST). However, laboratory-based RP are less likely affected, since the presence of sleep technicians and video monitoring may enable more accurate TST estimates. We therefore examined differences in AHI in PSG and in-lab RP, and whether RP-based AHI may impact clinical decision making.

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://academic.oup.com/sleep/article-pdf/37/2/255/13674801/aasm.37.2.255.pdf

Overnight Polysomnography versus Respiratory Polygraphy in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Overnight Polysomnography versus Respiratory Polygraphy in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hui-Leng Tan 0 1 2 David Gozal 1 2 Helena Molero Ramirez 1 2 Hari P. R. Bandla 1 2 Leila Kheirandish-Gozal 1 0 Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital , London , UK 1 Polygraphy and Polysomnography in Children-Tan et al 2 Section of Pediatric Sleep Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Pritzker School of Medicine, Biological Sciences Division, The University of Chicago , Chicago, IL , USA Background: Substantial discrepancies exist in the type of sleep studies performed to diagnose pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in different countries. Respiratory polygraphic (RP) recordings are primarily performed in sleep laboratories in Europe, whereas polysomnography (PSG) constitutes the majority in the US and Australia. Home RP show consistent apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) underscoring, primarily because the total recording time is used as the denominator when calculating the AHI compared to total sleep time (TST). However, laboratory-based RP are less likely affected, since the presence of sleep technicians and video monitoring may enable more accurate TST estimates. We therefore examined differences in AHI in PSG and in-lab RP, and whether RP-based AHI may impact clinical decision making. Methods: Of all the children assessed for possible OSA who underwent PSG evaluation, 100 were identified and divided into 4 groups: (A) those with AHI < 1/h TST (n = 20), (B) 1 ≤ AHI < 5/h TST (n = 40), (C) 5 ≤ AHI < 10/h TST (n = 20), and (D) AHI ≥ 10/h TST (n = 20). Electroencephalography, electrooculography, and electromyography channels were deleted from the original unscored recordings to transform them into RP, and then rescored in random sequence. AHI-RP were compared to AHI-PSG, and therapeutic decisions based on AHI-RP and AHI-PSG were formulated and analyzed using clinical details derived from the patient's clinic letter. Results: Bland Altman analysis showed that in lab RP underestimated the AHI despite more accurate estimates of TST. This underestimation was due to missed hypopneas causing arousals without desaturation. Basing the therapeutic management decision on RP instead of PSG results changed the clinical management in 23% of all patients. The clinical management for patients in groups A and D was unaffected. However, 27.5% of patients in group B would have been given no treatment, as they would be diagnosed as having no OSA (AHI < 1/h TST) when they should have received a trial of anti-inflammatory therapy or been referred for ear, nose, and throat (ENT) review. Sixty percent of patients in group C would have received either a trial of medical treatment to treat mild OSA or no treatment, instead of referral to ENT services or commencement of continuous positive airway pressure. Conclusion: Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) is underestimated in respiratory polygraphy (RP), and the disparity in AHI-RP and AHI-polysomnography can significantly affect clinical management decisions, particularly in children with mild and moderate obstructive sleep apnea (1 < AHI < 10/h total sleep time). INTRODUCTION There is a significant discrepancy in the type of sleep studies performed in the context of diagnosing pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in different countries. In the US and Australia, polysomnography (PSG) is the accepted gold standard, as recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics.1-3 In Europe, the vast majority of laboratories perform respiratory polygraphy (RP).4-6 A substantial number of physicians believe that RP is sufficient to diagnose OSA, and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Working party on Sleep Physiology and Respiratory Control Disorders in Childhood has recommended that RP provides a satisfactory approach to diagnose OSA in uncomplicated children over the age of 2 years.7 However, if the 2 types of diagnostic studies, i.e., RP and PSG, yield different results, then centers that currently perform RP may need to change and adopt PSG as the only valid gold-standard approach. Conversely, if the results derived from RP and PSG are comparable, then performing RP would be both simpler and more cost-effective—a serious consideration in these current economically constrained times. Considering the potentially significant ramifications of such dilemma, there have been surprisingly few pediatric studies directly comparing RP and PSG,8-10 and none that have examined the clinical management implications. Studies comparing home RP with in-lab PSGs have shown that home RPs underscore the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), primarily because the total recording time (TRT) is used as the denominator when calculating the AHI, as compared to the use of the total sleep time (TST) that can be derived from the PSG.11 However, sleep and wakefulness can be quite accurately determined in children using cardiorespiratory and videotape recordings,12 such that laborato (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://academic.oup.com/sleep/article-pdf/37/2/255/13674801/aasm.37.2.255.pdf

Tan, Hui-Leng, Gozal, David, Ramirez, Helena Molero, Bandla, Hari P. R., Kheirandish-Gozal, Leila. Overnight Polysomnography versus Respiratory Polygraphy in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Sleep, 2014, pp. 255-260, Volume 37, Issue 2, DOI: 10.5665/sleep.3392