"Appunti su P. Fam. Tebt. 15", Giuseppe Flore, "Studi in onore di V. Arangio-Ruiz", IV : [recenzja]

The Journal of Juristic Papyrology, Apr 2018

Rafał Taubenschlag, Giuseppe Flore (aut. dzieła rec.)

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:


"Appunti su P. Fam. Tebt. 15", Giuseppe Flore, "Studi in onore di V. Arangio-Ruiz", IV : [recenzja]

- JOURNAL OF PAPYROLOGY In this Romanistic dissertation the author discusses on page 141 communio pro diviso frequently attested in the Greco-Egyptian law. Moreover are worth of attention his assertions: on p. 162 — amending W e n g e r's interpretation of Tebt. 780 and on p. 166 — concerning the validity of the provincial laws after the Constitutio Antoniniana. G i u s e p p e F l o r e , Appunti su P.Fam.Tebt. 15 (Studi in onore di Y. Arangio-Ruiz I Y , 387—394). V a n G r o n i n g e n who published the full text of Lond. Inv. 1885 ( = P. Fam. Tebt. 15) had expressed the opinion that the attested in this papyrus longevity and partial marasmus of the unceasingly mentioned here βιβλιοθήκη of Arsinoite although referring apparently to the βιβλιοθήκη των δημοσίων λόγων shall be surely attributed also to the βιβλιοθήκη έγκτήσεων of this district. The author of this article on the contrary asserts that the document concerns only the βιβλιοθήκη των δημοσίων λόγων in Arsinoite separated, as it is known, from the corresponding institution founded in the year 72 A. D. M. S a n N i c o l ô , Ein Beitrag zu den Grunddienstbarkeiten im neubabylonischen Recht (Studi in onore di Y. Arangio-Ruiz I, 57—74). This essay is interesting for the papyrologists, because it deals with the matters which have their analogy in the papyri. The Babylonian law even in the last period of its more than two thousand years evolution had not arrived at the conception of real rights upon things of others while in the case of servitudes it was satisfied with merely obligatory agreements. This was the case of the rights of passage and of the rights of water-conduit (cf. for the law of the papyri my Law I, 193 ff.). Sometimes there is a recourse to divided property, single property or to joint property. Particular attention deserve his remarks on page 69, that also in Babylonia existed an independent property on trees, as it is attested for Egypt by the papyri, and the note on page 63, that in the Neo-Babylonian law the exit-paths were not considered to be a mere appurtenance of the house-estate, as it is assumed in the case of εί'σοδος καί έξοδος in the papyri. U. E. P a o l i , Digesta 10 , I, 13 . (Atti Congr., Verona I [ 1951 ], 121 - 131 ).

This is a preview of a remote PDF: http://czashum.hist.pl/media//files/The_Journal_of_Juristic_Papyrology/The_Journal_of_Juristic_Papyrology-r1953_1954-t7_8/The_Journal_of_Juristic_Papyrology-r1953_1954-t7_8-s384b/The_Journal_of_Juristic_Papyrology-r1953_1954-t7_8-s384b.pdf

Rafał Taubenschlag, Giuseppe Flore (aut. dzieła rec.). "Appunti su P. Fam. Tebt. 15", Giuseppe Flore, "Studi in onore di V. Arangio-Ruiz", IV : [recenzja], The Journal of Juristic Papyrology, 384,