Advanced search    

Search: authors:"Mike Clarke"

86 papers found.
Use AND, OR, NOT, +word, -word, "long phrase", (parentheses) to fine-tune your search.

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries

: Katherine Davis, Paula R. Williamson. Writing ± review & editing: Katherine Davis, Sarah L. Gorst, Nicola Harman, Valerie Smith, Elizabeth Gargon, Douglas G. Altman, Jane M. Blazeby, Mike Clarke, Sean Tunis

Core outcome sets and systematic reviews

Systematic reviews seek to bring together research evidence to answer the question for the review. The reviewers usually wish to compare, contrast and, if appropriate, combine the findings of the existing research studies. However, these intentions are often thwarted by inconsistencies in the outcomes that were measured and reported in the individual studies. This, in turn, makes...

The use of anti stretch marks’ products by women in pregnancy: a descriptive, cross-sectional survey

Background Stretch marks (Striae gravidarum) are a cutaneous change occurring commonly during pregnancy. A variety of products are available and promoted as ways to prevent or reduce their development, but it is not clear what products are used most commonly. The objective of this study was to identify topical products used during pregnancy to prevent or reduce the development of...

Core outcome sets and trial registries

Some reasons for registering trials might be considered as self-serving, such as satisfying the requirements of a journal in which the researchers wish to publish their eventual findings or publicising the trial to boost recruitment. Registry entries also help others, including systematic reviewers, to know about ongoing or unpublished studies and contribute to reducing research...

Recruiting faith- and non-faith-based schools, adolescents and parents to a cluster randomised sexual-health trial: experiences, challenges and lessons from the mixed-methods Jack Feasibility Trial

Background The move toward evidence-based education has led to increasing numbers of randomised trials in schools. However, the literature on recruitment to non-clinical trials is relatively underdeveloped, when compared to that of clinical trials. Recruitment to school-based randomised trials is, however, challenging, even more so when the focus of the study is a sensitive issue...

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps

Background The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative promotes the development and application of core outcome sets (COS), including relevant studies in an online database. In order to keep the database current, an annual search of the literature is undertaken. This study aimed to update a previous systematic review, in order to identify any further...

Impact of non-pharmacological interventions on prevention and treatment of delirium in critically ill patients: protocol for a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative research

Background Critically ill patients have an increased risk of developing delirium during their intensive care stay. To date, pharmacological interventions have not been shown to be effective for delirium management but non-pharmacological interventions have shown some promise. The aim of this systematic review is to identify effective non-pharmacological interventions for reducing...

How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline

Maarten Boers 0 Peter Tugwell Mike Clarke Paula R. Williamson Caroline B. Terwee 0 0 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center

Recruiting schools, adolescents and parents to a sexual-health trial: experiences, challenges and lessons learned from the Jack Trial (NCT02092480)

Mike Clarke Maria Lohan Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK Background Recruitment to school-based randomised trials is challenging; even more so when the focus of the study is a sensitive