Short versus conventional hydration for prevention of kidney injury during pre-TAVI computed tomography angiography
Netherlands Heart Journal
pp 1–8 | Cite as
Short versus conventional hydration for prevention of kidney injury during pre-TAVI computed tomography angiography
AuthorsAuthors and affiliations
M. S. van MourikF. van KesterenR. N. PlankenJ. StokerE. M. A. WiegerinckJ. J. PiekJ. G. TijssenM. G. KoopmanJ. P. S. HenriquesJ. BaanJr.M. M. Vis
Original Article - E‑Learning
First Online: 23 July 2018
Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is required in the work-up for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, CTA may cause contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). We hypothesised that a short (1 h, 3 ml/kg/h sodium bicarbonate) hydration protocol is not inferior to conventional (24 h, 1 ml/kg/h saline) hydration in avoiding a decline in renal function in patients with impaired renal function.
Methods and results
Single-centre randomised non-inferiority trial in patients with impaired renal function who underwent pre-TAVI CTA. Patients were randomised on a 1:1 ratio to short hydration (SHORT; 1 h sodium bicarbonate, 3 ml/kg/h) or conventional hydration (CONV; 24 h saline, 1 ml/kg/h). Outcomes included percentage change in serum creatinine until 2–6 days after CTA with a non-inferiority margin of 10% and an increase on the Borg dyspnoea scale ≥1 point. Seventy-four patients were included. Increase in creatinine was 6 µmol/l (95% CI 2.5–9.3) in the SHORT versus 2 µmol/l (95% CI-1.4 to 6.3) in the CONV arm (p = 0.167). The percentage change was 4.6% (95% CI 2.0–7.3%) in the SHORT arm versus 2.5% (95% CI: 0.8 to 5.8%) in the CONV arm. The difference in percentage increase in creatinine between the two arms was 2.1% (95% CI: 2.0–6.2%; p-value non-inferiority: <0.001). CI-AKI and a need for dialysis were not observed. An increase of ≥1 point on the Borg scale (dyspnoea scale ranging from 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest)) was seen in 1 patient in the SHORT arm versus 5 patients in the CONV arm (2.9% vs 16.1%, p = 0.091).
For patients with impaired renal function undergoing pre-TAVI CTA, a short 1‑h, low-volume hydration protocol with sodium bicarbonate is not inferior to conventional 24-h, high-volume saline hydration.
KeywordsContrast media Transcatheter aortic valve implantation Computed tomography angiography Acute kidney injury Contrast-induced acute kidney injury prophylaxis
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article ( https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-018-1133-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
A short, 1‑h hydration with sodium bicarbonate is not inferior to conventional 24-h, high-volume sodium chloride hydration for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in computed tomography angiography in the work-up for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
In the short hydration arm, a trend towards less dyspnoea was reported by patients compared to the conventional hydration strategy.
None of the patients in the study developed CI-AKI.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an appropriate treatment for patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis . Prior to TAVI, contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) is performed for assessment of the anatomy [2, 3]. However, the iodinated contrast media used for CTA may cause contrast-induced (CI) acute kidney injury (AKI) . Usually serum creatinine levels peak at 2–5 days after contrast administration. CI-AKI is associated with permanent and irreversible kidney injury and mortality rates of more than 20% . Of the TAVI population, 70% have a preprocedural renal impairment and are therefore at increased risk for CI-AKI . Moreover, several other factors that are often observed in TAVI patients are associated with an elevated CI-AKI risk, including advanced age, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure and use of nephrotoxic medication [5, 7, 8]. In order to mitigate the effects of contrast media [9, 10, 11, 12, 13] in patients with impaired renal function, most guidelines recommended hydration with sodium chloride 0.9% (saline) or sodium bicarbonate (1.4%) before and after contrast administration [10, 11, 12]. We hypothesised that a short hydration protocol of 1 h sodium bicarbonate is not inferior to conventional hydration with 24 h sodium chloride as regards the decline of renal function while reducing dyspnoea caused by hydration.
The study population consisted of consecutive patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis and impaired renal function who underwent pre-TAVI CTA. All patients were screened for CI-AKI prevention . Inclusion criteria were chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification 3a or above (estimated glomular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 based on the modification of diet in renal disease formula ), age >18 years and planned for CTA prior to TAVI. Exclusion criteria were known iodine allergy, contrast administration <7 days, already on haemodialysis, multiple myeloma, Waldenstrom’s disease and left ventricular ejection fraction <20% (not eligible to be randomised to conventional hydration).
Study design and randomisation
The study was designed as an open-label single-centre, unblinded, randomised non-inferiority trial and followed CONSORT (Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials) guidelines for non-inferiority trials . The protocol was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR5014), complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local ethics committee. All participants provided written informed consent before randomisation.
Randomisation was performed electronically at admission on a 1:1 ratio to either a short hydration protocol (SHORT; 1 h sodium bicarbonate prior to CTA, 1.4% 3 ml/kg/h) or conventional hydration (CONV; 24 h sodium chloride, 0.9% 1 ml/kg/h, 8 h prior to CTA, 16 h post-CTA). Block randomisation was used (block size 4, 6 and 8), stratified into four groups corresponding to CKD classification 3a, 3b, 4 and 5. The eGFR ranges per group were (3a) 45–59, (3b) 30–44, (4) 15–29 or (5) <15 ml/min/1.73 m2.
Prior to CTA, patients were instructed to temporarily discontinue all nephrotoxic medication on the day of CTA. According to hospital protocol all patients with impaired renal function in TAVI work-up were hospitalised on the day of CTA. Hydration volumes were based on body weight. If patients developed acute heart failure, hydration was discontinued according to hospital protocol. Contrast administration at CTA was performed with 90 ml iopromide 300 mg I/ml (Ultravist 300; Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany; low osmolar, non-ionic) at a rate of 5 ml/s. No other CI-AKI preventive measures were used. Directly prior to the start of hydration blood serum and urine samples were collected. The level of dyspnoea was scored using the Borg CR10 scale at baseline and within 1 h after completing the hydration. The follow-up blood sample was collected 2–5 days after CTA at the outpatient clinic or general practitioner and sent to the regional laboratory service for analysis.
The primary outcome was the percentage change in serum creatinine between the two hydration protocols at 2–5 days after contrast administration as compared to baseline creatinine. Based on previous research the non-inferiority margin for the percentage change was set at a 10% difference between the two hydration groups .
Predefined secondary outcomes were the absolute change in creatinine, the occurrence of CI-AKI (defined as an increase in creatinine >25% or 44.2 µmol/l within 2–5 days ), an increase on the self-reported level of dyspnoea according to the Borg scale and, as a marker for acute heart failure, the absolute change in N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) within 2 and 5 days. In addition we analysed the mean change in eGFR and hydration volumes.
The trial was designed as a non-inferiority study and was powered on the relative change in creatinine based on a prior hydration trial . A predefined non-inferiority margin of 10% was used. The one-sided two-sample t-test of equivalence of means was used to compare means. With a‑one sided α = 0.025 and β = 0.15, it was calculated that 35 patients per arm would be sufficient (70 patients in total). To correct for a dropout of approximately 15% the target sample size was determined as 80 patients.
Study results were analysed on a modified intention to treat (mITT) basis; all patients that did not receive the allocated intervention (hydration) or with failed follow-up measurements were excluded from the main analysis. Baseline categorical variables were presented as numbers with percentages, continuous variables as means with standard deviations (SD) or medians with inter-quartile ranges (IQR). Non-inferiority for the percentage change in creatinine was calculated using a two-sided, two-sample t-test. The mean of the difference with its 95% confidence interval was compared with the predefined non-inferiority margin; a mean difference between the two hydration protocols of less than 10% was considered non-inferior. A p-value for the non-inferiority test was calculated using a one-sided, two-sample t-test. All secondary outcomes were calculated using superiority testing applying two-sided t-tests or Fisher exact test as appropriate.
A p-value of <0.050 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA).
Between January 2015 and August 2016, 84 patients were enrolled in the study and randomised to either the short or conventional hydration protocol. The primary endpoint could be analysed in 74 patients (mITT population), 39 in the SHORT arm and 35 in the CONV arm (for study profile see Fig. 1). Follow-up tests were performed after a median of 4 days in both arms (IQR 3–5 days and 3–6 days in the CONV and SHORT arm respectively). Details of the excluded patients are described in the electronic supplementary table. The median age of the study participants was 82.9 years (IQR 78.9–85.4); 41 patients were women (55.4%). The clinical characteristics of all 74 patients are described in Tab. 1. The number of patients per eGFR category was equally distributed over the two arms. No patients with eGFR <15 ml/min were enrolled (Tab. 1).
Open image in new window
Trial profile. CONV conventional hydration, SHORT short hydration
Short hydration/Sodium bicarbonate (n = 39)
Conventional hydration/Sodium chloride (n = 35)
Female gender—n (%)
Diabetes mellitus—n (%)
Peripheral artery disease—n (%)
Coronary artery disease—n (%)
COPD— n (%)
NYHA class III or IV—n (%)
LVEF <40%)—n (%)
Aortic valve maximal gradient (mm Hg)b
eGFR 45–60 ml/min—n (%)
eGFR 30–45 ml/min—n (%)
eGFR 15–30 ml/min—n (%)
eGFR <15 ml/min—n (%)
Admission creatinine (µmol/l)
Microalbuminuria —n (%)d
On diuretics—n (%)
On NSAIDs— n (%)
On other nephrotoxic medication—n (%)
Nephrotoxic medication stopped—n (%)f
Continuous data are presented as a median (inter-quartile range 25–75). Categorical data are presented as a number with a percentage
BMI body mass index, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, NYHA New York Heart Association, LVEF left ventricle ejection fraction, AVA aortic valve area, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, NT-proBNP N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, STS-PROM the Society of Thoracic Surgery—predicted risk of mortality, NSAIDs non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs
aData missing in 11 patients in the modified intention to treat (mITT) group and in 1 of the excluded group
bData missing in 6 patients in the mITT group and in 1 in the excluded group
cCalculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula
dDetermined in spot urine before hydration started and defined as an albumin/creatinine ratio of ≥3.5 mg/mmol for women and ≥2.5 mg/mmol for men; data missing in 2 patients in the short hydration group and 3 patients in the conventional hydration group
eDefined as any glucose in spot urine; data missing in 4 patients in the short hydration group and 2 patients in the conventional hydration group
fNumber of patients who stopped nephrotoxic medication as a percentage of all patients that used nephrotoxic medication
The percentage change in creatinine was an increase of 4.6% (95% CI: 2.0–7.3%) in the SHORT arm versus 2.5% (95% CI: −0.8 to 5.8%) in the CONV arm (Tab. 2). The difference in the percentage change in creatinine between the two both arms was 2.1% (95% CI: 2.0–6.2%). This was below the non-inferiority margin of 10% and corresponded to a p-value for non-inferiority of 0.00045 (Fig. 2a). The absolute change in serum creatinine was an increase of 6 µmol/l (95% CI: 2.5–9.3) in the SHORT arm versus an increase of 2 µmol/l (CI%: −1.4 to 6.3) in the CONV arm (p = 0.167). The mean eGFR change was −2.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 (SD: 4.3) versus 1.2 (SD: 5.8) ml/min/1.73 m2 in the SHORT and CONV arm respectively (p = 0.41; Tab. 2). None of the patients developed CI-AKI or a need for dialysis (the same applies to randomised patients excluded from the mITT analysis).
Baseline and follow-up (2–5 days) differences in serum creatinine, eGFR, haemoglobin, IgG and NT-proBNP, split between short and conventional hydration
Short hydration/Sodium bicarbonate
Conventional hydration/Sodium chloride
p-value of difference
118 ± 37
124 ± 42
6 ± 10
110 ± 33
112 ± 35
2 ± 11
eGFR (MDRD; ml/min/1.73 m2)a
50.7 ± 12.3
48.5 ± 12.6
−2.2 ± 4.3
51.5 ± 12.7
−1.2 ± 5.8
7.6 ± 1.1
7.6 ± 1.1
0.1 ± 0.4
7.7 ± 1.0
7.8 ± 0.9
0.1 ± 0.5
10.3 ± 3.6
10.5 ± 3.8
0.2 ± 0.9
10.0 ± 2.9
10.6 ± 3.1
0.6 ± 1.0
−100 (−1,449 to 176)
75 (−886 to 371)
p-values represent the difference between randomisation groups in the change in blood markers
eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, MDRD modification of diet in renal disease, IgG immunoglobulin G, NT-proBNP N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide. The numbers of patients included in the analysis, sodium bicarbonate and sodium chloride respectively: an: 39–35, bn : 37–33, c n : 27–30, d n : 25–24
Open image in new window
Trial outcomes. a Difference of serum creatinine before computed tomography angiography (CTA) and 2–5 days after CTA between the two study arms: Short hydration indicates hydration with 1 h sodium bicarbonate 1.4% (3 ml/kg/h); conventional hydration indicates hydration with 24 h sodium chloride 0.9% (1 ml/kg/h). b Increase of at least one point on the Borg scale per hydration group. The Borg scale of perceived exertion ranges from 0 to 10, whereby 0 = least perceived exertion, 10 = most perceived exertion
The median hydration volume was 228 ml (IQR: 204–261) for patients in the SHORT arm versus 1,759 ml (IQR: 1,536–1,920) in the CONV arm. One patient randomised to the CONV protocol developed acute decompensation at the end of hydration for which the fluid administration was stopped and intravenous furosemide (40 mg) given once.
Data completion of the Borg scale was successful in 66 patients (35 patients in the SHORT and 31 in the CONV arm). An increase in the level of dyspnoea by at least one point on the Borg scale was seen in 1 patient in the SHORT arm (2.9%) compared to 5 patients in the CONV arm (16.1%; p = 0.091; Fig. 2b). There was no difference in left ventricular function between patients with an increase in level of dyspnoea compared to those without (p = 0.580). There was no change in the level of NT-proBNP measured between 2 and 5 days post-CTA in the two arms; the difference in NT-proBNP before and after hydration was −100 ng/l (IQR: −1,449 to 176) in the SHORT versus 75 ng/l (IQR: −866 to 371) in the CONV arm (p = 0.342; Tab. 2).
In this randomised non-inferiority trial we are the first to demonstrate that for pre-TAVI CTA, a short hydration protocol with 1 h sodium bicarbonate (3 ml/kg/h) is not inferior to conventional hydration with 24 h sodium chloride (1 ml/kg/h) and does not result in a significant decline in renal function. The difference in the change of creatinine was below the non-inferiority margin. The absolute changes in creatinine were small (only 6 µmol/l and 2 µmol/l for short and conventional hydration respectively, which is well below the clinically significant change in creatinine.
Our results are in line with a randomised clinical trial in a mixed population of 570 patients undergoing CTA in which 1 h hydration with 250 ml sodium bicarbonate (1.4%) prior to scanning was described to be as effective as 2,000 ml saline (1,000 ml prior to and 1,000 ml after CTA) to prevent decline of renal function . A newer study even suggests that no hydration prophylaxis is necessary at all in patients with an eGFR ≥30 ml/min/1.73 m2 . In this study we observed a trend towards more hydration-induced dyspnoea in the patients hydrated according to the conventional procotol.
Acute heart failure
Hydration with the short protocol has the advantage of lower fluid load administration, decreasing the risk of acute heart failure. In our trial, only one patient hydrated with the conventional protocol developed acute heart failure. We used NT-proBNP as a marker for decompensation and found no difference between the two hydration arms at 2–5 days after contrast administration. Shortness of breath was a more sensitive symptom of developing acute heart failure in this population, increasing the importance of dyspnoea assessment. Although the study sample was not powered to detect any statistical differences on the Borg CR10 dyspnoea scale, we did see a substantial difference in patients with increased dyspnoea between the two groups.
This single-centre study had its limitations. We had a small but appropriate sample size for the primary endpoint. Although there were no patients in our study who developed CI-AKI, we are aware that the definition of CI-AKI is based on the cut-off values for serum creatinine change and differs across guidelines [19, 20, 21]. Our primary outcome was the percentage change in serum creatinine. We used a common definition for the development of CI-AKI, which is not the most strict definition but is predictive for long-term mortality and corresponds closely to a high degree of kidney injury according to the RIFLE criteria (risk, injury, failure, loss of kidney function, and end-stage kidney disease ) and the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) [19, 20, 21]. Even when analysing our data using the most strict definitions to detect kidney injury, none of the patients were considered to have developed CI-AKI. This is remarkable, since most studies with follow-up after CTA report at least a small percentage of patients developing CI-AKI. A possible reason could be that despite the broad inclusion criteria, most patients in our study had a relatively ‘high’ eGFR >30 ml/min/1.73 m2, with a lower risk of developing CI-AKI. Nevertheless, this distribution of eGFR represents our current TAVI cohort and the results can be interpreted as those of a real-world TAVI population. Furthermore, this is a population at high risk of developing renal injury based on their high age and a high prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and albuminuria. This would make it easier to extend the results to other patient groups at lower risk for CI-AKI.
Lastly, although we examined dyspnoea, this study was underpowered to detect a significant difference in patient-perceived exertion. The trend towards more dyspnoea in patients hydrated with the conventional protocol was clear but not significant.
Future directions and implementation of the results
We included a homogeneous but complex population of high age, with severe aortic valve stenosis and multiple comorbidities, prone to develop CI-AKI. Since the short hydration protocol was feasible and safe for these patients, a more general population is likely to benefit equally from the same strategy.
New indications for CTA with similar amounts of contrast, such as coronary CTA, are emerging. Most likely implementation of a short hydration protocol will induce more flexible CTA planning in an outpatient setting, a reduction of admission days as well as of the risk of hospital-acquired complications, and a reduction of costs while improving patient comfort .With the current technological advances in CTA, the volume of contrast agent necessary per study for quality imaging is decreasing [22, 23]. It is conceivable that with current techniques, the risks for CI-AKI after CTA will diminish over time.
Our findings are in line with recent guideline changes by the Dutch Society for Radiology and embedded in the guideline database of the Dutch Society for Clinical Specialists .
For patients undergoing pre-TAVI CTA, short and low-volume 1 h hydration with sodium bicarbonate is not inferior to conventional, 24-h high-volume sodium chloride hydration as CI-AKI prophylaxis. The non-inferiority warrants safe clinical implementation of this short hydration protocol in daily clinical practice for pre-TAVI CTA. Since patients with severe CKD were underreported in this study, the results might be limited to patients with an eGFR > 30 ml/min/1.73 m2.
Conflict of interest
M. S. van Mourik, F. van Kesteren, R.N. Planken, J. Stoker, E.M.A. Wiegerinck, J.J. Piek, J.G. Tijssen, M.G. Koopman, J.P.S. Henriques, J. Baan Jr. and M.M. Vis declare that they have no competing interests.
12471_2018_1133_MOESM1_ESM.doc (60 kb)
Supplemental Table 1: Demographic and clinical characteristics of all patients who underwent randomization. Modified intention to treat (mITT)-population versus the randomized but excluded population
Otto CM, Kumbhani DJ, Alexander KP, et al. 2017 ACC expert consensus decision pathway for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the management of adults with aortic stenosis: a report of the American College of Cardiology task force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:1313–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Binder RK, Webb JG, Willson AB, et al. The impact of integration of a multidetector computed tomography annulus area sizing algorithm on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective, multicenter, controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:431–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield GS, Gillam LD, Hahn RT, et al. A practical guide to multimodality imaging of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:441–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Fliser D, Laville M, Covic A, et al. A European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) position statement on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guidelines on acute kidney injury: part 1: definitions, conservative management and contrast-induced nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:4263–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Aubry P, Brillet G, Catella L, Schmidt A, Benard S. Outcomes, risk factors and health burden of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: an observational study of one million hospitalizations with image-guided cardiovascular procedures. BMC Nephrol. 2016;17:167.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Thourani VH, Forcillo J, Beohar N, et al. Impact of preoperative chronic kidney disease in 2,531 high-risk and inoperable patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER Trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:1172–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Moos SI, van Vemde DN, Stoker J, Bipat S. Contrast induced nephropathy in patients undergoing intravenous (IV) contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and the relationship with risk factors: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:e387–e99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Kooiman J, Pasha SM, Zondag W, et al. Meta-analysis: serum creatinine changes following contrast enhanced CT imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:2554–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media. Manual on Contrast Media v10.2. American College of Radiology. 2016Google Scholar
Stacul F, van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, et al. Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:2527–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Owen RJ, Hiremath S, Myers A, Fraser-Hill M, Barrett BJ. Canadian Association of Radiologists consensus guidelines for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: update 2012. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2014;65:96–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
VMS Veiligheidsprogramma. Voorkomen van nierinsufficiëntie bij intravasculair gebruik van jodiumhoudende contrastmiddelen. 2009.Google Scholar
Ohno I, Hayashi H, Aonuma K, et al. Guidelines on the use of iodinated contrast media in patients with kidney disease 2012: digest version : JSN, JRS, and JCS Joint Working Group. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2013;17:441–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
KDIGO CKD Work group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3:1–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ, Altman DG. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA. 2012;308:2594–604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Kooiman J, Sijpkens YW, de Vries JP, et al. A randomized comparison of 1‑h sodium bicarbonate hydration versus standard peri-procedural saline hydration in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing intravenous contrast-enhanced computerized tomography. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29:1029–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Morcos SK, Thomsen HS, Webb JA. Contrast-media-induced nephrotoxicity: a consensus report. Contrast Media Safety Committee, European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). Eur Radiol. 1999;9:1602–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Nijssen EC, Rennenberg RJ, Nelemans PJ, et al. Prophylactic hydration to protect renal function from intravascular iodinated contrast material in patients at high risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (AMACING): a prospective, randomised, phase 3, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10076):1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30057-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
McCullough PA, Adam A, Becker CR, et al. Epidemiology and prognostic implications of contrast-induced nephropathy. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98(6a):5k–13k.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P. Acute renal failure—definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care. 2004;8:R204–R12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah SV, et al. Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2007;11:R31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Higashigaito K, Schmid T, Puippe G, et al. CT Angiography of the aorta: prospective evaluation of individualized low-volume contrast media protocols. Radiology. 2016;280:960–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Seehofnerova A, Kok M, Mihl C, et al. Feasibility of low contrast media volume in CT angiography of the aorta. European J Radiol Open. 2015;2:58–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Working group of the Radiological Society of the Netherlands. Guideline safe use of contrast media—part 1. NVVR. 2017.Google Scholar
© The Author(s) 2018
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Authors and Affiliations
M. S. van Mourik1Email authorView author's OrcID profileF. van Kesteren12R. N. Planken2J. Stoker2E. M. A. Wiegerinck1J. J. Piek1J. G. Tijssen1M. G. Koopman3J. P. S. Henriques1J. BaanJr.1M. M. Vis11.Heart Centre, Amsterdam Cardiovascular SciencesAmsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands2.Department of RadiologyAmsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands3.Department of NephrologyAmsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands