Surface bioactivation through the nanostructured layer on titanium modified by facile HPT treatment
Facile fabrication of nanostructured surface is of great importance for the use of titanium (Ti) implants in biomedical field. In this study, a low-cost and easy-to-operate method called HPT (hydrothermal & pressure) here has been developed and used to fabricate the expected nanostructured surface on Ti substrates. The effects of experimental parameters on the morphology of Ti surface were investigated and characterized. The results indicated that by altering the hydrothermal pressure, NaOH concentration and treating time, surface nanostructure like nanopetals or nanoflakes could be formed on the surface of Ti substrates. The orthogonal experiments were conducted to demonstrate the optimized operation conditions. A formation mechanism of the nanostructured titanate layer was proposed, revealing that the nanostructured layer could be formed via a special upward and downward co-growth manner. In vitro cell culture showed that the HPT treated Ti substrates, especially the T-10 sample, could greatly enhance the cell-material interactions, i.e. the cell proliferation and differentiation, focal protein adhesion, and osteogenic factor expression. The HPT method paves a new way to modify the surface of Ti implants with better bioactivity and promising prospect for future biomedical applications.
Titanium (Ti) and its alloys have been the most commonly employed implant materials for dental and orthopaedic applications owing to their excellent mechanical property, corrosion resistance in body fluid, and good biocompatibility with human tissues1,2,3,4,5. Ti is a relatively light metal that possesses good ductility, high tensile strength and an elastic modulus matching to human cortical bone. However, as a bioinert material, titanium implants without surface modification generally lack osseointegration with the surrounding bone tissue, leading to a short lifespan or even implantation failure6. So, suitable surface treatment for Ti implants is essential to enhance their integration with bone tissue. It has been reported that the formation of a porous structure on Ti substrate was proved to be very effective in providing nucleation sites for Ca-P precipitation, and in integration with surrounding bone tissue2. In recent years, a nanostructured surface on Ti substrate is also expected to further improve its bioavailability and bioreactivity7, 8, and to enhance the biological response of protein attachment, cell adhesion and growth, and bonding with bone tissue. But it is still a challenge that how to fabricate a nanostructured porous surface on titanium using an easy and cost-effective method9, 10. Therefore, we still need to find a promising route to achieve a nanostructured porous surface and demonstrate its effectiveness in endowing high bioactivity.
In literatures, various methods have been used to prepare the expected surfaces on Ti and its alloys, such as chemical treatment11, sol-gel method12, chemical vapor deposition13, anodization14, hydrothermal (HT) method15 and electro-deposition16, plasma or microarc oxidation17,18,19. Among them, chemical treatment in alkali solutions is a strong contender to produce a nanoscaled network structure on the surface of Ti and its alloys. Wu et al.20. prepared a nanostructured titanate layer on Ti substrate in 10 M NaOH solution at 60 °C for 240 h and found that the layer displayed super-hydrophilic ability, favoring the rapid deposition of hydroxyapatite (HA) and accelerating the cell’s attachment and proliferation. The hydrothermal (HT) method is another approach to fabricate nanostructured titanate surface by soaking Ti or Ti alloy in alkali solution, which showed high crystallinity due to the dissolution- recrystallization process21. By treating Ti substrate in a concentrated NaOH solution at 110 °C for 90 h, Yu et al.22. Obtained polycrystalline titania nanotubes with an outer diameter of 9−12 nm and a length of 100−600 nm. However, both the chemical treatment and the HT method require a long reaction time (about 3 days) to achieve the nanostructured titanate layer on Ti substrates23, that might be high-cost, time consuming and difficult to operate.
For HT method, it has confirmed that the use of a higher pressure could often generate unexpected effect in preparation of new compounds with higher growth rate due to its higher energy than other usual methods24, 25. And an increased reaction temperature could also result in the formation of multi-layer nanostructure instead of nanotubes26. Therefore, in this study, we designed a rapid fabricating method to achieve a nanostructured porous titanate layer on the surface of Ti substrate by selecting relatively high reaction pressure and temperature in HT treatment. A pressurized reactor with 147 KPa (about 0.15 MPa) pressure and 120 °C reaction temperature was used to treat Ti substrates in NaOH solution (we named the high pressure and temperature hydrothermal method as HPT in this paper). The relationship and function between NaOH concentration and Ti surface morphology were investigated in detail to find the appropriate concentration of NaOH solution in treating Ti substrates. Some Ti samples with special or different surface structure were chosen to evaluate their influence on behaviors of BMSCs in vitro.
Materials and Methods
Surface modification of Ti substrates
Commercially pure Ti substrates (Ti > 99.5%, Baoji Titanium industry Co. Ltd., China) were cut into rectangular plates of 10 × 10 × 1 mm3. Firstly, these plates were chemically washed with a mixture solution of HF: HNO3: H2O2 at a volume ratio of 1:3:5 for 5 min to remove the naturally formed oxide layer on the Ti surface. Then, they were ultrasonicly washed with acetone, 2-propanol, alcohol and deionized water for 30 min separately and dried in a vacuum freeze drier. Afterwards, the cleaned Ti plates were immersed into 80 ml NaOH aqueous solutions with the concentration of 0.5 M, 1 M, 3 M, 5 M, 7.5 M, 10 M 12.5 M, 15 M and 18 M respectively, and put in a 200 mL Teflon-lined autoclave for hydrothermal treatment at 0.15 MPa and 120 °C for 10, 30, 60, 120, 240 and 480 min. Finally, these treated Ti plates were gently washed with deionized water thoroughly and dried in air at room temperature for 24 h. The obtained samples were stored for further use. The untreated pure Ti sample, and 3M-Ti, 10M-Ti, 12.5M-Ti samples treated for 240 min, were designated as PT, T-3, T-10 and T-12.5, respectively.
The Ti plates treated at different conditions were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-6510LV, JEOL). Their microscopic morphologies were also observed by atomic force microscope (AFM, MFP-3D Asylum Research, Santa Barbara, CA). The crystallographic structures of the samples were detected with X-ray diffraction (XRD, RINT-2000, Rigaku, Japan). The surface elements were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscope (XPS, VG Scientific, ESCALAB 250, Sussex, UK) performed with Al Kα (hν = 1486.6 eV) as the X-ray source. The wettability and surface free energy of the samples were analyzed using contact angle goniometer (TL101, Biolin Scientific AB). The concentration of Ti released into alkaline solution was measured using an inductive coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES, IRIS Adv). The morphology and composition of Ca-P precipitates deposited on nanostructured titanate layer were analyzed by SEM and its coupled energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS).
In vitro cell behaviourCell isolation and culture
Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) were isolated from the femurs of 2-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats (Animal Research Center, Sichuan University, China). All animal care and experiments were guided in line with the standards of the Animal Research Committee of the West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, and conducted in accordance with international guidance on animal welfare. BMSCs were cultured in alpha-modified Eagle’s medium (α-MEM, Gibco, Gaithersburg, USA), which was supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Gaithersburg, USA), 50 mg/L ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA), 10 mM Na-β-glycerophosphate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA), 10−8 M dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA), and 1% penicillin-streptomycin antibiotic antimycotic solution (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA). The cells were incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37 °C.
PT, T-3, T-10 and T-12.5 were sterilized and placed in the wells of 24-well culture plate, respectively. The cells at passage 3 were seeded onto these Ti samples with a density of 5 × 104 cells/ml, and after 2 h of culture, the Ti samples with attached cells were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyd and dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol (20%, 40%, 60%, 75%, 90%, 100%). The Ti samples were dried by a EMS 850 critical point dryer (Electron Microscopy Science Co., Hillsboro, USA), and sputter-coated with a palladium layer using a JFC-1600 ion sputtering apparatus (Electronics Co., Ltd, Saitama, Japan) for SEM examination. Cell proliferation on PT, T-3, T-10 and T-12.5 samples was determined using a 3(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)−2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide assay (MTT, M-2128, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) after culturing for 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 days. Meanwhile, the cells seeded on all Ti samples after incubation for 7, 10, and 14 days were fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with Alkaline phosphates (ALP) kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) and the ALP activity was obtained through measurement of optical density using the spectrophotometer at 405 nm.
Focal adhesion staining
After cell seeding on PT, T-3, T-10 and T-12.5 samples for 24 h, the BMSCs were stained to show their F-actin filaments and vinculin, using the Actin Cytoskeleton and Focal Adhesion Staining Kit (FAK100) (Millipore) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cells were also stained with Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated phalloidin and FITC-conjugated anti-vinculin antibodies to detect cytoskeletal and focal adhesion proteins, respectively. The stained cells were observed under a confocal microscope (LSM700, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis (qRT-PCR) was performed to examine the expression of various osteogenic factors, including runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), osteocalcin (OCN), osteopontin (OPN), and collagen type I (COL-1) (shown in Table 1). After incubation with the disk-shaped PT, T-3, T-10 and T-12.5 samples for 3, 7, and 14 days, the cells were detached by 0.25% trypsin-1 mM EDTA (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and reversely transcribed to cDNA employing a first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Takara, Shiga, Japan). The mRNA expression of the above-mentioned osteogenic factors was determined using a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The GAPDH was used as the internal RNA control, and the relative expression levels of the osteogenic factors were obtained according to the 2−ΔΔCt method.
Table 1 Real-time polymerase chain reaction primers used in this study.
Full size table
The data were treated with a SPSS 22.0 statistical package (SPSS 22.0, USA) and analyzed by ANOVA software for multiple comparisons. The difference was considered statistically significant for p < 0.05.
Results and Discussion
Surface morphology versus hydrothermal conditions
It can be seen that the untreated Ti plate shows a smooth surface relatively (Fig. 1a). After HPT treatment in 10 M NaOH solution for 240 mins under different temperature and pressure, the Ti plate treated at 100 °C and atmospheric pressure presents a nanoscale network on the surface with a pore size of 300–500 nm (Fig. 1b), while the Ti plate treated at 120 °C and 0.15 MPa displays a uniform 3D flake-like nanostructure (Fig. 1c) with the pore size ranging from 600 to 900 nm. For a single flake in Fig. 1c, the flake width is about 400–800 nm and the flake thickness is less than 50 nm. It indicates that the hydrothermal temperature and pressure have obvious effect on the surface morphology or surface nanostructure of the Ti plates; higher temperature and pressure could provide an additional driving force for the nucleation and growth of surface nanostructured layer in alkali solution and make the flakes grow faster.
SEM images of surface morphologies for Ti plates: (a) pure Ti surface, (b) treated at 100 °C for 4 h in 10 M NaOH solution under atmospheric pressure and (c) treated at 120 °C for 240 mins in 10 M NaOH solution under 0.15 MPa.
Full size image
Figure 2 shows the influence of NaOH solution concentration and treating time on the morphologies of Ti samples. The surface of Ti plate treated in 0.5 M NaOH solution has almost no apparent change, and still keeps relatively smooth until 240 min When treated in 3 M NaOH solution, a petal-like structure, but not a uniform interconnected porous structure, has formed on the Ti surface at all time points. The width of these petals is from 800 nm to 1.3 µm and the thickness is less than 50 nm. When treated in 7.5 M NaOH solution, nanoscale network structure can be obtained on the surface of Ti plate, the pore size is from 100 nm and 400 nm after treating for 240 min. By further increase to 10 M of the NaOH concentration, the Ti surface changes from nanoscale network to flake-like morphology with larger pore size and an interconnected porous structure. After treating in 12.5 M NaOH solution for 10, 60 and 240 min, a surface layer with cracks and smaller pore network can be observed on Ti plate. When the NaOH concentration is more than 15 M, there are no special structure features present, and just a little round granules are dotted on the Ti surface (see Fig. S1 in Supporting Information). These results demonstrate that the NaOH solution concentration and the treating time significantly affect the surface morphology of the Ti plates. A preferred NaOH concentration and treating time can be determined as 7.5–10.0 M and 240 min (4 h) for the HPT method to fabricate flake-like nanostructured porous surface on Ti substrate. Four samples with different surface morphologies, i.e. untreated PT, and treated T-3, T-10, T-12.5 for 240 min, are chosen to evaluate their in vitro cell-material interaction.
SEM images of Ti surfaces treated by HPT method at 120 °C for 10, 60 and 240 min in NaOH solution of different concentrations. Bar = 1 µm.
Full size image
Figure 3a shows that the treated T-10 sample has a surface roughness of about 112.7 nm, which is much higher than that of untreated PT sample (about 20.7 nm). Compared with the surface free energy (SFE, 39.03 mJ/m2) of PT sample (Table 2), the treated T-10 sample has an increased SFE value of about 70.46 mJ/m2. The water contact angle is about 62.7° on the surface of untreated Ti plate, whereas it decreases significantly to about 17.9° for T-10 sample. The results indicate that the flake-like nanostructured layer can markedly improve the surface roughness and hydrophilicity of Ti substrate. It has been reported that the microtopography, surface roughness and wettability of Ti substrate have great impacts on the attachments of proteins or biomacromolecules, which in turn will determine the rate of cell proliferation and influence the osteointegration of Ti implants27, 28. Zhang et al. also reported that both the roughness and the hydrophilicity of Ti surface could promote the proliferation of osteoblast-like cells29. In addition, the flake-like nanostructured surface of T-10 sample has proved to be very effective in enhancement of the surface bioactivity of Ti substrate by providing more nucleation sites and promoting the Ca-P precipitation (see Figs S2, S3 in Supporting Information).
Surface roughness and composition of T-10 sample treated at 120 °C in 10 M NaOH solution for 4 h: (a) AFM micrograph, (b) X-ray diffraction patterns and (c) wide-range survey scan of XPS spectrum.
Full size image
Table 2 Contact angle (θ) and surface free energy (SFE) of untreated PT sample and treated T-10 sample.
Full size table
The XRD pattern of PT sample in Fig. 3b shows the sharp characteristic peaks of untreated Ti substrate, while the treated T-10 sample only presents poorly crystallized diffraction peaks. However, some characteristic peaks belonging to H2Ti2O5•H2O can be found in T-10 sample, when comparing with XRD database (JCPDS No. 47–124) and those reported in previous research20. Although the peaks assigned to Na2Ti2O5•H2O are difficult to distinguish because of possible overlapping with H2Ti2O5•H2O or too weak to be clearly defined, but Na2Ti2O5•H2O is regarded to be definitely existed. Kim et al. reported that the treated porous layer on Ti substrate obtained in NaOH solution certainly contained alkali titanates, and should mainly consist of an amorphous Na2Ti2O5•H2O30. It has been found that the crystallized water molecules could broaden the diffraction peaks and lower their intensities30, 31. The broadening of these peaks can also originate from a change in the average crystallite size, the introduction of lattice defects and/or an increase in the internal strain. Therefore, the increase in surface hydrophilicity of the treated T-10 substrate should be related to the chemical structure of sodium titanate (Na2Ti2O5) which could easily absorb water in the environment.
As shown in the XPS spectrum (Fig. 3c, Fig. S4), the major elements on the treated T-10 surface are Ti, O and Na, and the C1s peak at 284.6 eV is often used as a reference binding energy for calibration. Based on this, we deduced that the flake-like nanostructured layer should be mainly composed of Na2Ti2O5•H2O, and the ion exchange between Na+ and H+ in water might result in the existence of H2Ti2O5•H2O. It is still debated in literatures for the final products of Ti substrates after hydrothermal treatment in NaOH solution32,33,34. Several possible compositions have been proposed, including TiO2, Na2Ti9O19, Na2Ti6O13, Na2Ti2O4(OH)2, Na2Ti3O7•nH2O, H2TiO3O7, H2Ti2O5, HxTi2−x/4□x/4O4(□ = vacancy), etc refs 32, 34,35,36,37,38,39,40. Bavykin et al. reported that Ti substrate treated in alkali solution was a complex process involving the formation of several intermediate structures participating in sequential chemical reaction25. Riss et al. revealed that Na2Ti3O7 nanowires could turn into H2Ti3O7 nanotubes by washing with diluted HCl41. The Na2Ti3O7-like nanocrystals were considered to be unstable and just existed as an intermediate phase. Hence, we conclude that the nanostructured layer on the Ti surface is composed of both H2Ti2O5•H2O and Na2Ti2O5•H2O.
Formation mechanism of nanostructured titanate layer
As observed in Fig. 2, various surface morphologies could be formed on the surface of Ti substrates after HPT treatment in different NaOH solutions for different time. By investigating the Ti concentration in solution, we may indirectly determine the effects of NaOH concentration and treating time on the surface of Ti substrate. An orthogonal experiment was conducted with a NaOH concentration ranging from 0.5 M to 18 M for a period of 10 min to 480 min. It can be seen from the 3D graph in Fig. 4a that the Ti concentration in solution generally rises with the increase of NaOH concentration for all treating time point (Fig. 4b). There are two obvious Ti concentration peaks during the change of NaOH concentration from 0.5 M to 18 M, the small peak covers a NaOH range of 5–10 M and the large peak covers the range of 10–18 M. The small peak range corresponds very well to the preferred NaOH concentration (7.5–10.0 M) determined by SEM observation in Fig. 2, during which the treating time seems the second predominant factor. This may suggest that a NaOH concentration lower than 5 M (i.e. only small amount of Ti leaves the surface of Ti plate during HPT treatment) or more than 10 M (i.e. large amount of Ti leaves the surface of Ti plate) is not beneficial to the obtaining of the desired surface nanostructured layer. In other words, the formation of surface titanate layer is strongly related to both the NaOH concentration and the Ti exchange between the surface and solution (dissolution and deposition) during HPT treatment. Bavykin et al. also suggest the importance of Ti concentration in alkaline solution in the surface modification of titanium substrate42, which is in coincidence with the result obtained in this study. To establish a relationship between the dissolved Ti concentration (CTi) in solution and the observed morphology of Ti surface (i.e. corresponding to the NaOH concentration, CNaOH), we used polynomial function to fit the data (Fig. 4c) and obtained an approximate equation as the following:
Where a i is a constant with 95% confident bounds, in which a0 = −4.336, a1 = 12.07, a2 = −7.322, a3 = 1.946, a4 = −0.2396, a5 = 0.0136, a6 = −2.87 e−4. According to the equation and the observed morphologies in Fig. 2, we can conclude that nanopetals formation on Ti surface corresponds to a dissolved Ti concentration of 3~5 μg∙mL−1 in NaOH solution, while the flake-like nanostructured layer relates to the dissolved Ti concentration range of 5~15 μg∙mL−1.
The 3D graph of Ti concentration as a function of NaOH concentration and treating time (a), and the functional relationship of Ti concentration vs. NaOH concentration (b), (c) fitting curve of Ti concentration vs. NaOH concentration.
Full size image
After stripping the treated surface layer, we can see that both the top region and bottom region of the stripped layer are composed of nanoflakes, and the layer shows a porous structure (Fig. 5). It is obvious that the bottom region is not as interconnected as the top region, i.e., much denser than the top region (Fig. 5a). The thickness of top region and bottom region is about 1.5 μm and 2.5 μm respectively, and the sublayer between them is a corrosion region with a thickness of about 0.5 μm (Fig. 5b). On this basis, we proposed a schematic formation mechanism for the flake-like nanostructured titanate layer on Ti substrate, as shown in Fig. 6. Firstly, NaOH in solution reacted with the titanium oxide layer, resulting in the appearance of random defects (so-called “pitting attack”) and enlarged Ti surface area, which in turn increased the surface free energy and chemical potential43, 44. With the progress of reaction, more Na+ and OH− ions were incorporated into the active surface and made the reaction more intensively. The continuous occurrence of pitting attack led to large number of pore spaces at the bottom of corrosion region45. At the same time, a plenty of Ti, Na and titanate ions spilled from the bottom pores and dissolved in the alkaline solution. When the Ti concentration in solution was close to the dynamic equilibrium in solid/liquid phases, the deposition of sodium titanate occurred, followed by continuous growth upward and downward and final formation of the nanoflakes on Ti surface46. According to this hypothesis, the Ti substrate surface might involve in two reactions: Ti dissolution and sodium titanate accumulation. The Ti dissolution caused a relatively dense bottom region and titanate accumulation/deposition resulted in a more porous top region. The flat flakes could curl to curled flakes (like petals) by reaction of the dangling bonds on the surface of titanate flakes with the hydroxide ions in solution, as reported by Chen el al.47.
SEM images of flake-like nanostructured layer (a) top and bottom view, (c) cross section.
Full size image
Schematic formation mechanism of flake-like nanostructured titanate layer on Ti substrate.
Full size image
In vitro cell behaviorCell morphology
The initial adhesion of cells after incubation for 2 h is shown in Fig. 7, where the BMSCs cultured on PT sample show a round shape and almost no spreading presents on the surface, although many filopodial extensions can be observed. In contrast, the spreading of BMSCs cultured on T-3, T-10 and T-12.5 samples are observed, among which the T-10 sample exhibits complete spreading.
Initial cell adhesion after incubation for 2 h: (a) PT; (b) T-3; (c) T-10 and (d) T-12.5.
Full size image
The proliferation of BMSCs cultured on the PT, T-3, T-10 and T-12.5 samples is shown in Fig. 8(a). The OD values for all samples increase continuously with the incubation time, indicating a normal growth trend and good cytocompatibility. It should be noted that all treated samples are better than the untreated PT sample, and sample T-10 owns the highest cell proliferation rate than others (P < 0.05). This means surface modification by HPT method, especially the flake-like nanostructured layer on treated Ti surface is beneficial to cell proliferation or growth. The rank order from highest to lowest for cell proliferation is T-10 > T-12.5 > T-3 > PT (P < 0.05).
In vitro cell behaviours on the PT, T-3, T-10, and T-12.5 samples: (a) cell viability; (b) ALP activity. *p < 0.05 vs PT, $p < 0.05 vs T-3, #p < 0.05 vs T-10.
Full size image
The relative ALP activity of BMSCs cultured on PT, T-3, T-10 and T-12.5 samples is demonstrated in Fig. 8 (b). It can be seen that the relative ALP activity increases progressively from Day 7 to Day 14, of which the T-10 and T-12.5 samples are significantly higher than the PT and T-3 samples (p < 0.05), and T-10 sample owns the highest value, indicating an enhanced osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs on the treated T-10 surface.
Cell seeing and staining
The cytoskeleton and focal protein adhesion of BMSCs cultured on PT, T-3, T-10 and T-12.5 are shown in Fig. 9. The stained F-actin images indicate that BMSCs on different samples spread very well, with the presence of many F-actin filaments aggregation. Additionally, after 24 h of culture, green fluorescence stained vinculin in BMSCs cultured on T-10 sample is more abundant than other samples. Although T-12.5 sample also displays strong vinculin expression, the difference between the two groups is significant.
The expression of F-actin and vinculin detected by immunofluorescence assay, and the merged images of F-actin, vinculin and DAPI nuclei on different treated surface.
Full size image
qRt-PCR of osteogenic factors
The mRNA expression levels of various osteogenic factors (Runx2, OCN, OPN, and COL I) were determined by qRT-PCR for PT, T-3, T-10 and T-12.5 samples, as shown in Fig. 10. Obviously, the mRNA expression levels of Runx2 and COL I increase markedly with the culture time, in an order of T-10 > T-12.5 > T3 > PT (p < 0.05). For OCN expression, T-10 and T-12.5 samples show much higher level than T-3 and PT on Day 14. The OPN expressions of T-10 and T-12.5 are also higher than T-3 and PT on Day 7 and Day 14. These results indicate that the T-10 and T-12.5 samples, especially the T-10 sample, can obviously facilitate the early osteogenic transformation of BMSCs.
The mRNA expression levels of various osteogenic factors determined by qRT-PCR. *p < 0.05 vs untreated-Ti, #p < 0.05 vs 3.0M-Ti, $p < 0.05 vs 10.0M-Ti.
Full size image
It can be seen from the results mentioned above, the HPT treatment is a useful method to achieve high surface bioactivity of Ti substrate and enhance the in vitro cell-material interactions. The reasons maybe as follows: nano-sized surface treatment can stimulate cell adhesion and rapid osteoblast mineralization as well as accelerate osseointegration in vivo. At the same time, the presence of interconnected micro-pores can reduce the relative movement at the bone–implant interface, provide a route for blood circulation and nutrition supply, and achieve a mechanical interlocking, which is particularly beneficial for the biomechanical stability48, 49. Furthermore, it has been proved that normal bone trabecula is hierarchical with the presence of micro/nano-structure, which implies that the endosseous implant should have surface features not only on the nanometer scale but also on the micrometer scale50, 51. Among all the treated samples, the T-10 sample with a flake-like nanostructured layer possesses relatively the best surface bioactivity, especially in terms of cell adhesion, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation, suggesting its beneficial and promising effect to improve the osseointegration of Ti implants.
A novel technique called HPT method here was developed to produce nanostructured surface on Ti substrate, which greatly reduced the time-consumption and the manufacturing cost. By carefully controlling the conditions of HPT treatment, we could get different morphological nanostructures on Ti surface. The optimum operation conditions including NaOH concentration and treating time were obtained by orthogonal experiments. which are key factors in determining the formation of surface titanate nanostructure. On this basis, the formation mechanism of flake-like nanostructured titanate layer was simulated and analyzed, revealing that the nanoflake-like layer was formed via an upward and downward co-growth route. HPT treatment could provide an additional driving force for the faster nucleation and growth of nanostructured titanate in alkali solution. In addition, the treated surface could greatly enhance the in vitro cell-material interactions and exhibited commendable biocompatibility. Especially, the treated Ti-10 sample displayed the best surface bioactivity, representing an effective way for surface modification of endosseous implants.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Liu, X., Chu, P. K. & Ding, C. Surface nano-functionalization of biomaterials. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 70, 275–302 (2010).
Article Google Scholar2.
Nakai, M., Niinomi, M., Zhao, X. & Zhao, X. Self-adjustment of Young’s modulus in biomedical titanium alloys during orthopaedic operation. Materials Letters 65, 688–690 (2011).
CASArticle Google Scholar3.
Wang, Q. et al. TiO2 nanotube platform for smart drug delivery: a review. International Journal of Nanomedicine 11, 4819–4834 (2016).
ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar4.
Lai, Y. K. et al. Bioinspired Patterning with Extreme Wettability Contrast on TiO2 Nanotube Array Surface: A Versatile Platform for Biomedical Applications. Small 9, 2945–2953 (2013).
CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar5.
Guo, Z. J. et al. Fabrication of silver-incorporated TiO2 nanotubes and evaluation on its antibacterial activity. Materials Letters 137, 464–467 (2014).
CASArticle Google Scholar6.
Gellynck, K. et al. Small molecule stimulation enhances bone regeneration but not titanium implant osseointegration. Bone 57, 405–412 (2013).
CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar7.
Divya Rani, V. V. et al. Osteointegration of titanium implant is sensitive to specific nanostructure morphology. Acta Biomater 8, 1976–1989 (2012).
CASArticle Google Scholar8.
Liao, H. et al. Response of rat osteoblast-like cells to microstructured model surfaces in vitro. Biomaterials 24, 649–654 (2003).
CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar9.
Shen, X. et al. Regulation of the Biological Functions of Osteoblasts and Bone Formation by Zn-Incorporated Coating on Microrough Titanium. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 6, 16426–16440 (2014).
CASArticle Google Scholar10.
Ma, X. Y. et al. The promotion of osteointegration under diabetic conditions using chitosan/hydroxyapatite composite coating on porous titanium surfaces. Biomaterials 35, 7259–7270 (2014).
CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar11.
Brack, N. & Rider, A. N. The influence of mechanical and chemical treatments on the environmental resistance of epoxy adhesive bonds to titanium. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 48, 20–27 (2014).
CASArticle Google Scholar12.
Chang, Y. C., Lee, C. Y. & Chiu, H. T. Porous Inorganic Materials from Living Porogens: Channel-like TiO2 from Yeast-Assisted Sol–Gel Process. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 6, 31–35 (2013).
ADSArticle Google Scholar13.
Shi, J. & Wang, X. Growth of Rutile Titanium Dioxide Nanowires by Pulsed Chemical Vapor Deposition. Crystal Growth & Design 11, 949–954 (2011).
CASArticle Google Scholar14.
Sjöström, T. et al. Novel Anodization Technique Using a Block Copolymer Template for Nanopatterning of Titanium Implant Surfaces. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 4, 6354–6361 (2012).
Article Google Scholar15.
Cheng, W. Y. et al. Surfactant-Free Hydrothermal Method for Syntheses of Mesoporous TiO2 Nanoparticle Aggregates and Their Applications in High Efficiency Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Chemistry of Materials 24, 3255–3262 (2012).
CASArticle Google Scholar16.
Metoki, N. et al. Preparation and Characterization of Alkylphosphonic Acid Self-Assembled Monolayers on Titanium Alloy by Chemisorption and Electrochemical Deposition. Langmuir 30, 6791–6799 (2014).
CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar17.
Wang, H. Y. et al. Preparation and properties of plasma electrolytic oxidation coating on sandblasted pure titanium by a combination treatment. Materials Science and Engineering: C 42, 657–664 (2014).
CASArticle Google Scholar18.
Ou, K. L. et al. Preparation of bioactive amorphous-like titanium oxide layer on titanium by plasma oxidation treatment. Applied Surface Science 255, 2046–2051 (2008).
ADSCASArticle Google Scholar19.
Liu, F. et al. Formation characterization of hydroxyapatite on titanium by microarc oxidation and hydrothermal treatment. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 100, 100–104 (2005).
CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar20.
Wu, S. et al. A Biomimetic Hierarchical Scaffold: Natural Growth of Nanotitanates on Three-Dimensional Microporous Ti-Based Metals. Nano Lett. 8, 3803–3808 (2008).
ADSCASArticlePubMed Google Scholar21.
Wen, B. M., Liu, C. Y. & Liu, Y. Solvothermal synthesis of ultralong single-crystalline TiO2 nanowires. New Journal of Chemistry 29, 969–971 (2005).
CASArticle Google Scholar22.
Yu, K. P. et al. Pt/titania-nanotube: A potential catalyst for CO2 adsorption and hydrogenation. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 84, 112–118 (2008).
CASArticle Google Scholar23.
Haberer, A. & Huppertz, H. High-pressure synthesis and crystal structure of the mixed-valent titanium borate Ti5B12O26. Journal of Solid State Chemistry 182, 484–490 (2009).
ADSCASArticle Google Scholar24.
Shirooyeh, M., Xu, J. & Langdon, T. G. Microhardness evolution and mechanical characteristics of commercial purity titanium processed by high-pressure torsion. Materials Science and Engineering: A 614, 223–231 (2014).
CASArticle Google Scholar25.
Bavykin, D. V., Kulak, A. N. & Walsh, F. C. Metastable Nature of Titanate Nanotubes in an Alkaline Environment. Crystal Growth & Design 10, 4421–4427 (2010).
CASArticle Google Scholar26.
Kokubo, T. & Takadama, H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials 27, 2907–2915 (2006).
CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar27.
Eriksson, C. & Nygren, H. Polymorphonuclear leukocytes in coagulating whole blood recognize hydrophilic and hydrophobic titanium surfaces by different adhesion receptors and show different patterns of receptor expression. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 137, 296–302 (2001).
CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar28.
Lai, Y. K. Bioinspired TiO2 nanostructures films with specila wettability and adhesion for droplet manipulation and patterning. Scientific Reports 3, Srep 03009 (2013).
Zhang, Y. et al. Osteogenic properties of hydrophilic and hydrophobic titanium surfaces evaluated with osteoblast-like cells (MG63) in coculture with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials 26, 1043–51 (2010).
Article Google Scholar30.
Kim, H. M., Miyaji, F., Kokubo, T. & Nakamura, T. Preparation of bioactive Ti and its alloys via simple chemical surface treatment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 32, 409–417 (1996).
CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar31.
Kokubo, T. et al. Apatite formation on surfaces of ceramics, metals and polymers in body environment. Acta Materialia 46, 2519–2527 (1998).
CASArticle Google Scholar32.
Zárate, R. A. et al. Chemical composition and phase identification of sodium titanate nanostructures grown from titania by hydrothermal processing. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 68, 628–637 (2007).
ADSArticle Google Scholar33.
Gutsul, E. I. et al. Low-Temperature IR and NMR Studies of the Interaction of Group 8 Metal Dihydrides with Alcohols. Chemistry – A European Journal 9, 2219–2228 (2003).
CASArticle Google Scholar34.
Ma, R. et al. Structural Features of Titanate Nanotubes/Nanobelts Revealed by Raman, X-ray Absorption Fine Structure and Electron Diffraction Characterizations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 109, 6210–6214 (2005).
CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar35.
Chen, C. Y. et al. Bioactive Titanium Oxide-Based Nanostructures Prepared by One-Step Hydrothermal Anodization. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 116, 8054–8062 (2012).
CASArticle Google Scholar36.
Chen, X. & Mao, S. S. Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties, Modifications, and Applications. Chemical Reviews 107, 2891–2959 (2007).
CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar37.
Kukovecz, Á. et al. Oriented Crystal Growth Model Explains the Formation of Titania Nanotubes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 109, 17781–17783 (2005).
CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar38.
Kasuga, T. et al. Formation of Titanium Oxide Nanotube. Langmuir 14, 3160–3163 (1998).
CASArticle Google Scholar39.
Chen, Q., Zhou, W., Du, G. H. & Peng, L. M. Trititanate Nanotubes Made via a Single Alkali Treatment. Advanced Materials 14, 1208–1211 (2002).
CASArticle Google Scholar40.
Wang, H. et al. Tuning the surface microstructure of titanate coating on titanium implant of enchacing bioactivity of implants. Internatiional Journal of Nanomedicine 10, 3887–3896 (2015).
CASArticle Google Scholar41.
Riss, A. et al. Charge Separation in Layered Titanate Nanostructures: Effect of Ion Exchange Induced Morphology Transformation. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 47, 1496–1499 (2008).
CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar42.
Dmitry, V. B. et al. An aqueous, alkaline route to titanate nanotubes under atmospheric pressure conditions. Nanotechnology 19, 275604 (2008).
Article Google Scholar43.
Jinming, W., Xiaomei, S. & Mi, Y. Alkaline hydrothermal synthesis of homogeneous titania microspheres with urchin-like nanoarchitechtures for dye effluent treatments. Journal of Hazardous Materials 194, 338–344 (2011).
Article Google Scholar44.
Dmitry, V. B., Alexander, N. K. & Frank, C. W. Metastable nature of titanate nanotubes in an alkali environment. Crystal Growth & Design 10, 4421–4427 (2010).
Article Google Scholar45.
Thomas, P. F. & Peter, K. D. The soft chemical synthesis of TiO2 (B) from layered titanates. Journal of Solid State Chemistry 101, 275–295 (1992).
Article Google Scholar46.
Dong, W. J. et al. Multifunctional Nanowire Bioscaffolds on Titanium. Chemistry of Materials 19, 4454–4459 (2007).
CASArticle Google Scholar47.
Chen, Y. F., Lee, C. Y., Yeng, M. Y. & Chiu, H. T. Preparing titanium oxide with various morphologies. Materials Chemistry and Physics 81, 39–44 (2003).
CASArticle Google Scholar48.
Rubin, M. A. et al. TEM analysis of the nanostructure of normal and osteoporotic human trabecular bone. Bone 33, 270–282 (2003).
ArticlePubMed Google Scholar49.
Gautieri, A., Vesentini, S., Redaelli, A. & Buehler, M. J. Hierarchical structure and nanomechanics of collagen microfibrils from the atomistic scale up. Nano Letters 11, 757–766 (2011).
ADSCASArticlePubMed Google Scholar50.
Wu, S. et al. A biomimetic hierarchical scaffold: natural growth of nanotitanates on three-dimensional microporous Ti-based metals. Nano Letters 8, 3803–3808 (2008).
ADSCASArticlePubMed Google Scholar51.
Jiang, N. et al. Development of a novel biomimetic micro/nano-hierarchical interface for enhancement of osseointegration. RSC Advances 6, 49954–49965 (2016).
CASArticle Google Scholar
This work was supported by the National natural science foundation of China (No.51673131); National Basic Research Program of China (2012CB933902); China National Key R&D Program (No.2016YFA0201703).
Zhijun Guo and Nan Jiang contributed equally to this work.
AffiliationsThe Research Center for Nano Biomaterials, Analytical & Testing Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, ChinaZhijun Guo, Chen Chen, Li Zhang & Yubao LiState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Disease, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610064, ChinaNan Jiang & Songsong Zhu
AuthorsSearch for Zhijun Guo in:Nature Research journals • PubMed • Google Scholar Search for Nan Jiang in:Nature Research journals • PubMed • Google Scholar Search for Chen Chen in:Nature Research journals • PubMed • Google Scholar Search for Songsong Zhu in:Nature Research journals • PubMed • Google Scholar Search for Li Zhang in:Nature Research journals • PubMed • Google Scholar Search for Yubao Li in:Nature Research journals • PubMed • Google Scholar
Zhijun Guo, Yubao Li and Li Zhang conceived experiments. Zhijun Guo performed all materials experiments. Zhijun Guo and Chen Chen analysed the data. Nanjiang and Songsong Zhou performed all in vitro experiments. Zhijun Guo, Li Zhang and Yubao Li wrote and reviewed the manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Correspondence to Li Zhang or Yubao Li.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
30 January 2017
15 May 2017
23 June 2017