High Molybdenum availability for evolution in a Mesoproterozoic lacustrine environment

Nature Communications, May 2015

Trace metal data for Proterozoic marine euxinic sediments imply that the expansion of nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria and diversification of eukaryotes were delayed while the availability of bioessential metals such as molybdenum in the ocean was limited. However, there is increasing recognition that the Mesoproterozoic evolution of nitrogen fixation and eukaryotic life may have been promoted in marginal marine and terrestrial environments, including lakes, rather than in the deep ocean. Molybdenum availability is critical to life in lakes, just as it is in the oceans. It is, therefore, important to assess molybdenum availability to the lacustrine environment in the Mesoproterozoic. Here we show that the flux of molybdenum to a Mesoproterozoic lake was 1 to 2 orders of magnitude greater than typical fluxes in the modern and ancient marine environment. Thus, there was no barrier to availability to prevent evolution in the terrestrial environment, in contrast to the nutrient-limited Mesoproterozoic oceans.

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:


High Molybdenum availability for evolution in a Mesoproterozoic lacustrine environment

Abstract Trace metal data for Proterozoic marine euxinic sediments imply that the expansion of nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria and diversification of eukaryotes were delayed while the availability of bioessential metals such as molybdenum in the ocean was limited. However, there is increasing recognition that the Mesoproterozoic evolution of nitrogen fixation and eukaryotic life may have been promoted in marginal marine and terrestrial environments, including lakes, rather than in the deep ocean. Molybdenum availability is critical to life in lakes, just as it is in the oceans. It is, therefore, important to assess molybdenum availability to the lacustrine environment in the Mesoproterozoic. Here we show that the flux of molybdenum to a Mesoproterozoic lake was 1 to 2 orders of magnitude greater than typical fluxes in the modern and ancient marine environment. Thus, there was no barrier to availability to prevent evolution in the terrestrial environment, in contrast to the nutrient-limited Mesoproterozoic oceans. Introduction The content of Molybdenum (Mo) in ancient carbonaceous shales is a valuable indicator of palaeo-redox conditions. Both the bulk concentration of Mo and the ratio of Mo to total organic carbon (% TOC) have been used to track the concentration of Mo in sea water through geologic time1,2,3,4,5,6,7. The data have been used particularly to infer the record of availability of nutrients in the ocean to allow the expansion of N-fixing cyanobacteria and the diversification of eukaryotic life1,5,8,9,10. However, growing evidence for the importance of shallow marine or terrestrial environments to the development of both N fixers and eukaryotes11,12,13,14 requires an assessment of nutrient availability to the Mesoproterozoic surficial environment. Molybdenum is a key element limiting life in lakes, especially through control of N-fixation15,16,17,18. Most of the Mo supplied to the oceans is derived from weathering of the continents6,19,20. Lakes and other terrestrial environments are important reservoirs for the Mo between weathering and entry to the marine environment21,22. Lake sediments can exhibit significant enrichment in Mo relative to the surrounding bedrock composition23. For example, lake sediments in Canada and Sweden show concentrations of Mo 1 to 2 orders of magnitude greater than in parent granites21,24. Thus, ancient lake sediments are a good archive of Mo availability. Well-preserved Mesoproterozoic lacustrine sediments of 1.18 Ga age occur in the Stoer Group, Torridonian Supergroup, UK25. The 2-km-thick Stoer Group was deposited in an extensional setting on the passive margin of the palaeocontinent Laurentia26,27,28. The basin was a few hundred kilometres from the ocean, unconformable upon a basement of Lewisian (Archaean) gneisses. Provenance, palaeocurrent and sedimentological studies all indicate that the Stoer Group sediments were derived from the Lewisian basement. Rapid lateral and vertical fluctuations in coarse to fine siliciclastic facies (breccias, conglomerates, sandstones, mudrocks) and variability/reversals in palaeocurrent data are regarded as characteristically continental26,28. Almost all of the rocks are red-coloured, also characteristically continental. Depositional environments are interpreted as alluvial fans, fluviatile, aeolian and lacustrine, interfingering with each other. Laminated mudrocks are interpreted as lacustrine. Numerous horizons of desiccation cracks indicate emergence from shallow water in most lacustrine rocks. A single unit of sulphide-bearing black shale/laminated limestone is interpreted as a permanent lake deposit. Outcrop over 40 km suggests a minimum area of ∼1,000 km2 for the lake basin, but possibly only 10% (100 km2) may have deposits of sulphidic black shale. Clay geochemistry data confirm that this unit is lacustrine, not marine29. Pseudomorphs after gypsum occur in both the black shale and red beds. The climate was semi-arid, in palaeo-latitudes between 20 and 30° N (refs 30, 31). The high sedimentation rate of the Stoer Group, characteristic of a continental basin, means that the carbon burial rate in lake sediments was much higher than in contemporary marine sediments32. A single marker horizon consisting of fine red sediment mixed with melt fragments (Stac Fada Member) is interpreted as an impact ejecta deposit33. Ar–Ar analysis of authigenic K-feldspar in the impact deposit yields a date of 1.18 Ga (ref. 25). The rocks have experienced mild metamorphism, but all sedimentary features are well preserved26 and the sedimentary geochemistry is undisturbed34.The Stoer Group sediments present an unparalleled opportunity for measurement of Mo flux because the timescale of sedimentation can be measured accurately. By analogue with recent lake deposits, it has been demonstrated that the lacustrine lamination was annual35. This interpretation was augmented by the discovery of solar cycles within the laminated succession35. Therefore, the rate of deposition and the Mo concentration can be measured to yield a burial flux. The calculated Mo flux for the Stoer Group black shales is 1 to 2 orders of magnitude greater than typical Mo fluxes in the modern and ancient marine environment. Both Mo levels and Mo/TOC ratios are more comparable to values in much younger Phanerozoic marine black shales than Proterozoic marine black shales. The Mo is resident in both organic matter and sulphides, as in modern lakes. The Mesoproterozoic lacustrine environment, therefore, represented an important reservoir for Mo. The high Mo levels indicate that there was no barrier to the availability of Mo to prevent evolution in the terrestrial environment, in contrast to the nutrient-limited Mesoproterozoic oceans. Results Burial rates The Stoer Group includes a single unit of finely laminated, pyritic black shale within the Poll a’Mhuilt Member at Bay of Stoer (Fig. 1), interpreted as the deposit of a stratified, sulphate-rich lake26. All samples were collected from this section (for precise locations see Supplementary Fig. 1), at National Grid Reference NC 032285. This unit has yielded a microfossil assemblage26, a record of solar cyclicity35 and sulphur isotope data indicative of microbial activity36. The lamination indicates a burial rate averaging 0.27 mm per year (see Supplementary Table 1). This rate, in common with lacustrine sedimentation rates in general37, greatly exceeds rates in the deep ocean. Figure 1: Study area of NW Scotland and details of sample localities. (a,b) Mo values are high in black shale unit, low in other rocks. Section and regional geology adapted from ref. 26. Expanded grey section represents a 1.2-m section at the base of 6 m black shale, archived in the School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen. Logged samples are from specific levels in archived section; other samples are not located precisely within the section, but are all from within the black shale. BoS indicates Bay of Stoer sampling locality. Full size image Molybdenum contents Measurements of the Mo content in 20 samples of black shale and 7 samples from the overlying/underlying succession, show that there is a marked enrichment of Mo in the black shale compared with the background. The black shales have a wide range of Mo contents, with maximum and mean contents of 232 p.p.m. (Figs 1 and 2) and 82 p.p.m., respectively (Supplementary Table 1). The background samples average 0.7 p.p.m. The mean total organic carbon (TOC) content of the shale is 0.27%. Mo/TOC ratios are up to 859, with a mean of 304. Re/Mo ratios are in the range 10−5 to 10−3 (Fig. 3), consistent with euxinic conditions of deposition38. Figure 2: Compilation of Mo concentrations and Mo/TOC ratios for black shales deposited under euxinic conditions. One point is shown for each sample. The mean Mo content (82 p.p.m.) for Stoer Group black shales is over three times that of Proterozoic marine shales. The mean Mo/TOC value for Stoer Group black shales (304 p.p.m. per wt%) is substantially higher than the Proterozoic average of 6.4 p.p.m. per wt%. Marine data from ref. 6. GOE, great oxidation event. Full size image Figure 3: Cross-plot of Mo and Re concentrations for Stoer Group black shale samples. Reference fields38 show that Stoer Group shales were deposited in a euxinic environment. Other samples have Re contents below the detection limit. Full size image Sulphur contents The Stoer Group samples have a mean sulphur content of 2.2%, and S/C ratios averaging 8.5, indicating deposition in a sulphidic setting, most commonly characteristic of marine rocks but also sulphate-rich lacustrine basins39. Mo is readily sequestered in sulphidic environments, where hydrogen sulphide is generated in the water column or pore waters by microbial sulphate reduction, and the Mo is partially incorporated in authigenic sulphide minerals, either directly or via thiomolybdates1,3,18. Accordingly, in the Stoer Group, the Mo is a trace component of pyrite, which precipitated early, before compaction of the host shale, due to microbial reduction of sulphate in the lake waters36. Mo in modern euxinic stratified lake waters is similarly sequestered rapidly into iron sulphides40,41. A broad correlation between Mo content and S content (Supplementary Fig. 2) reflects this residence of some Mo in the Stoer Group pyrite. However, element maps show that much Mo is also resident in the organic matter-rich laminae (Supplementary Fig. 3). Laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry analysis of the pyrite confirms that some Mo is resident there, at concentrations of up to 1,000 p.p.m. In addition to pyrite, the Stoer Group shale contains authigenic cadmium sulphide (greenockite), which suggests precipitation from a sulphidic water column42. Discussion The mean Mo content of the Stoer Group shale is over three times the average Mo content in Precambrian euxinic shales, which is ∼25 p.p.m. (ref. 1). The concentration of Mo is especially remarkable given the high sedimentation rate of the Stoer Group sediments, as other studies suggest that a high sedimentation rate dilutes the authigenic enrichment of trace metals including Mo3,43. The Mo/TOC data are much higher than the Proterozoic average of 6.4 p.p.m. per wt% (ref. 2). Mo/TOC ratios in marine euxinic sediments1,4,6 remained <25 until a marked increase in atmospheric oxidation at the end of the Proterozoic. The Mo enrichments and elevated Mo/TOC ratios are more similar to those of Phanerozoic marine black shales than Proterozoic black shales (Fig. 2), reflecting the high degree of sulphidation in the Stoer Group shales. The variability in the Mo/TOC results in some scatter on a cross-plot of Mo versus TOC (Supplementary Fig. 4), contrary to the more coherent trends normally exhibited by these components44, which further indicates that the Mo content is controlled by both the S content and TOC content. Possibly the Mo was first associated with organic matter as a molybdate, as in modern anoxic lakes45, then partially reacted with sulphide to precipitate out. The Mo/TOC ratios are particularly high because the carbon content of the Stoer Group shales is comparatively low. The carbon content would have been higher before thermal maturation and liberation of hydrocarbons, but still probably <1% TOC. Nevertheless, at the relatively low levels of oxygenation in the Mesoproterozoic, lake stratification would have occurred readily and engendered the euxinic conditions, which precipitated sulphide minerals and sequestered trace metals including Mo. The combination of sedimentation rate and molybdenum content for individual samples allows the determination of Mo burial flux data. Sixteen samples yield a range of Mo fluxes from 2.7 to 14 × 10−4 mol Mom−2 a−1 (Supplementary Fig. 5). The mean values for burial rate and Mo content give a Mo flux of 6.5 × 10−4 mol Mom−2 a−1. These values are comparable with those in some modern lakes22,23, and in modern anoxic marine sediments44, despite much lower carbon contents (Fig. 4; Supplementary Table 2). The values are 1 to 3 orders of magnitude higher than in modern continental margin sediments19 (Fig. 4). Comparison can be made with fluxes from episodes of anoxic marine sedimentation in the Phanerozoic geological record. Black shales from the Cambrian Alum Shale (Sweden), Ordovician Dictyonema shale (Norway), Jurassic Kimmeridge Shale (England) and Cretaceous Oceanic Anoxic Event II (USA) record fluxes 1 to 3 orders of magnitude less than in the Stoer Group (data sources in refs 19, 22, 23, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 and Supplementary Table 2). Figure 4: Molybdenum burial fluxes for modern and ancient sediments. The mean flux for the Stoer Group is comparable with those in modern anoxic environments, and exceeds modern continental margins and ancient black shales. Data plotted against mean organic carbon contents (data sources in refs 19, 22, 23, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 and Supplementary Table 2). Full size image Data from the Stoer Group indicate that Mo was being sequestered before it reached the open ocean, in this case in a euxinic lake. In lakes that were not euxinic, Mo would not be sequestered to the same degree. However, in a separate study, a more limited contrast between Mo levels in epicratonic (higher contents) and craton margin (lower contents) marine sediments of 1.1 Ga age6 similarly suggests an ocean-ward gradient of declining Mo availability. An important control on high Mo levels in the Stoer Group was the high content of sulphide in the lake water, which reflects a high enough level of atmospheric oxygenation to allow ready weathering of sulphides on the continents36 and hence the ready availability of sulphate to surface environments in the late Mesoproterozoic. Mo is essential to biological N fixation57,58,59, so the record of Mo availability to the Stoer Group lake supports models in which N-fixing cyanobacteria could flourish in the Mesoproterozoic lacustrine environment while being inhibited in the ocean. The high burial rates for Mo in the Stoer Group could be interpreted to imply a high concentration of Mo in the water column, assuming steady-state conditions. However, the Mo levels in the waters of modern lakes with Mo-rich sediments are low22,23, so the Stoer Group lake waters may not have had exceptional Mo concentrations. Nevertheless, the high Mo levels in the sediments imply that Mo input to the lake was not a limiting factor. The critical advantage to the availability of Mo in the lacustrine environment compared with the marine environment may be in the speciation of Mo, and the associated bioavailability. Mo occurs in sea water as the relatively unreactive molybdate oxyanion in the VI oxidation state, whereas in lakes up to 50% should be in the V oxidation state16. The anoxic conditions in a stratified lake, as envisaged for Stoer Group deposition26,35, would enhance the relative abundance of the Mo (V) form. Not only is the Mo(V) form more bioavailable60,61, but it is not inhibited by dissolved sulphate in the way that Mo (VI) is inhibited, hence the lacustrine environment strongly favours the stimulation of nitrogen fixation by its dissolved Mo content16. A high Mo content in the underlying lacustrine sediments may also be significant to productivity, despite low levels of Mo in lake waters, due to diffusion of Mo upwards into the water from the sediments. This additional source of Mo would allow biological uptake higher than predicted61. Several studies of modern lakes show that their Mo levels are adequate to support N-fixing cyanobacteria16,17,18, so it is possible that the Stoer Group lake was similarly adequate to host N fixers. In the particular case of a sulphate-rich lake, high availability of Mo helps to mitigate the inhibition of N fixation by the sulphate17. As the dating and palaeogeography of rocks of this age become better constrained62, it is becoming clear that sulphate deposits in continental and shallow marine deposits were more prevalent in the late Mesoproterozoic63 than hitherto appreciated (Supplementary Table 3). This implies a high potential for the sequestration of metals as sulphides, a possibility which merits further research. The Stoer Group data are also consistent with evidence for a greater diversity of eukaryotes in marginal marine environments compared with offshore marine environments, which was hypothesized to reflect the scarcity of Mo in offshore waters distant from continental run-off13.The availability of trace metals was a key influence on the development of multicellular life57,64, and Mo-dependent enzymes in particular are essential to eukaryotic cell biology57,58,64,65,66. The evolution of Mo usage is regarded as a fundamental aspect of the diversification of eukaryotes, probably from 1.5 to 1.0 Ga (ref. 58). The data reported here show that Mo was readily available to support such a diversification in the terrestrial environment at this critical time. Methods Measurement of burial rates in Stoer Group samples The laminites of the Poll a’Mhuilt Member were deposited in a lacustrine setting35. Individual laminae comprise silt-clay, carbonate and organic components, which reflect seasonal variations in sedimentation and are comparable to annual laminae from more recent and present day lacustrine settings35. These annually deposited laminae allow depositional rates to be calculated with high precision from thin sections or cut and etched hand specimens. In thin section, measurement of individual laminae was possible to a precision of 10 μm using equipment originally developed for the measurement of tree rings (digital positionometer under a petrographic microscope). Depositional rates were calculated from cut and etched hand specimens by dividing the total thickness of the laminae present by the number of laminae counted under magnification. Many hundreds of laminae were measured to give high precision statistics35. Measurement of molybdenum contents Molybdenum and rhenium contents were measured using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) using an Agilent 7,700 instrument. Samples of 100 g rock were milled and homogenized, and 0.25 g digested with perchloric, nitric, hydrofluoric and hydrochloric acids to near dryness. The residue was topped up with dilute hydrochloric acid and analysed by inductively coupled plasma-emission spectroscopy using a Varian 725 instrument. Samples with high concentrations were diluted with hydrochloric acid to make a solution of 12.5 ml, homogenized, then analysed by ICP-MS. Results were corrected for spectral inter-element interferences. The limits of detection of Mo analysis are 0.05 and 10,000 p.p.m. The lower limit of Re analysis is 0.002 p.p.m. Measurement of four standards at the same time as analysis of the Stoer Group samples fell within pre-defined target boundaries of 3–4 p.p.m., 13–17 p.p.m., 49–61 p.p.m. and 57–71 p.p.m. Analyses of blanks were <0.05 p.p.m. Mo. Duplicate analyses for blanks, standards and analysed samples were all within 1% of each other. Duplicate analyses are not plotted separately in figures. Duplicate analyses include samples processed through the entire analytical procedure. Measurement of molybdenum flux Calculations for the flux in the Stoer Group samples assume a rock density of 2.8 g cm−3 (measured on Stoer Group samples), atomic mass of molybdenum 95.94 and mean burial rate of 0.27 mm a−1. For mean Mo content of 82 p.p.m., this equates to Mo flux of 6.5 × 10−4 mol Mom−2 a−1. The range of fluxes calculated is shown in Supplementary Fig. 2. Calculations for other modern and ancient systems assume mean Mo and maximum sedimentation rates from the cited literature to give upper limits to fluxes. Where a range of TOC is cited rather than a mean value, the upper limit is used in Fig. 4. The data plotted in Fig. 4 is shown in Supplementary Table 2. Carbon and sulphur contents The carbon and sulphur contents of the shale were measured using a LECO CS225 elemental analyser, after decarbonatization with hydrochloric acid. Analyses are run concurrently with standards 501–024 (Leco Instruments, 3.23±0.03% C, 0.047±0.003% S, instrument uncertainty±0.05% C,±0.002% S) and BCS-CRM 362 (Bureau of Analysed Samples Ltd., 1.48% S). The repeatability of samples is consistently within 1%. Element mapping Mapping was undertaken using a Bruker M4 Tornado XRF Mapper, based at the CSIRO Advanced Characterization Facility, Perth, Australia. The mapping used a pixel size of 25 μm, with data acquired over 10 ms per pixel. The MCBM 50–0.6B Rh X-ray tube voltage was 50 kV and the anode current was 500 μA. Additional information How to cite this article: Parnell, J. et al. High Molybdenum availability for evolution in a Mesoproterozoic lacustrine environment. Nat. Commun. 6:6996 doi: 10.1038/ncomms7996 (2015). References 1. Scott, C. T. et al. Tracing the stepwise oxygenation of the Proterozoic ocean. Nature 452, 456–459 (2008). CASPubMedArticleGoogle Scholar2. Dahl, T. W. et al. Molybdenum evidence for expansive sulfidic water masses in ∼750 Ma oceans. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 311, 264–274 (2011). CASArticleGoogle Scholar3. Scott, C. & Lyons, T. W. Contrasting molybdenum cycling and isotopic properties in euxinic versus non-euxinic sediments and sedimentary rocks: Refining the paleoproxies. Chem. Geol. 324–325, 19–27 (2012). Google Scholar4. Sahoo, S. K. et al. Ocean oxygenation in the wake of the Marinoan glaciation. Nature 489, 546–549 (2012). CASPubMedArticleGoogle Scholar5. Reinhard, C. T. et al. Proterozoic ocean redox and biogeochemical stasis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 5357–5362 (2013). CASPubMedArticleGoogle Scholar6. Gilleaudeau, G. J. & Kah, L. C. Oceanic molybdenum drawdown by epeiric sea expansion in the Mesoproterozoic. Chem. Geol. 356, 21–37 (2013). CASArticleGoogle Scholar7. Large, R. R. et al. Trace element content of sedimentary pyrite as a new proxy for deep-time ocean-atmosphere evolution. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 389, 209–220 (2014). CASArticleGoogle Scholar8. Anbar, A. D. & Knoll, A. H. Proterozoic ocean chemistry and evolution: a bioinorganic bridge? Science 297, 1137–1142 (2002). CASPubMedArticleGoogle Scholar9. Saito, M. A., Sigman, D. M. & Morel, F. M. M. The bioinorganic chemistry of the ancient ocean: the co-evolution of cyanobacterial metal requirements and biogeochemical cycles at the Archean-Proterozoic boundary? Inorg. Chim. Acta 356, 308–318 (2003). CASArticleGoogle Scholar10. Zerkle, A. L., House, C. H., Cox, R. P. & Canfield, D. E. Metal limitation of cyanobacterial N2 fixation and implications for the Precambrian nitrogen cycle. Geobiology 4, 285–297 (2006). CASArticleGoogle Scholar11. Strother, P. K., Battison, L., Brasier, M. D. & Wellman, C. H. Earth’s earliest non-marine eukaryotes. Nature 473, 505–509 (2011). CASPubMedArticleGoogle Scholar12. Blank, C. E. Origin and early evolution of photosynthetic eukaryotes in freshwater environments – reinterpreting Proterozoic paleobiology and biogeochemical processes in light of trait evolution. J. Phycol. 49, 1040–1055 (2013). CASArticleGoogle Scholar13. Javaux, E. J., Knoll, A. H. & Walter, M. R. Morphological and ecological complexity in early eukaryotic ecosystems. Nature 412, 66–69 (2001). CASPubMedArticleGoogle Scholar14. Stüeken, E. E. A test of the nitrogen-limitation hypothesis for retarded eukaryote radiation: nitrogen isotopes across a Mesoproterozoic basinal profile. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 120, 121–139 (2013). CASArticleGoogle Scholar15. Goldman, C. R. Molybdenum as a factor limiting primary productivity in Castle Lake, California. Science 132, 1016–1017 (1960). CASPubMedArticleGoogle Scholar16. Romero, I. C., Klein, N. J., Sañudo-Wilhelmy, S. A. & Capone, D. G. Potential trace metal co-limitation controls on N2 fixation and NO3− uptake in lakes with varying trophic status. Front. Microbiol. 4, 54 (2013). CASPubMedArticleGoogle Scholar17. Marino, R., Howarth, R. W., Shamess, J. & Prepas, E. Molybdenum and sulphate as controls on the abundance of nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria in saline lakes in Alberta. Limnol. Ocean. 35, 245–259 (1990). CASArticleGoogle Scholar18. Thiam, A. et al. Biogeochemical dynamics of molybdenum in a crater lake: seasonal impact and long-term removal. J. Water Res. Protect. 6, 256–271 (2014). CASArticleGoogle Scholar19. McManus, J. et al. Molybdenum and uranium geochemistry in continental margin sediments: paleoproxy potential. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 70, 4643–4662 (2006). CASArticleGoogle Scholar20. Miller, C. A., Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B., Walker, B. D. & Marcantonio, F. Re-assessing the surface cycling of molybdenum and rhenium. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 7146–7179 (2011). CASArticleGoogle Scholar21. Malinovsky, D., Hammarlund, D., Ilyashuk, B., Martinsson, O. & Gelting, J. Variations in the isotopic composition of molybdenum in freshwater lake systems. Chem. Geol. 236, 181–198 (2007). CASArticleGoogle Scholar22. Glass, J. B. et al. Molybdenum geochemistry in a seasonally dysoxic Mo-limited lacustrine ecosystem. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 114, 204–219 (2013). ArticleGoogle Scholar23. Dahl, T. W. et al. The behaviour of molybdenum and its isotopes across the chemocline and in the sediments of sulfidic Lake Cadagno, Switzerland. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 74, 144–163 (2010). CASArticleGoogle Scholar24. Cook, S. J. Distribution and dispersion of molybdenum in lake sediments adjacent to porphyry molybdenum mineralization, central British Columbia. J. Geochem. Explor. 71, 13–50 (2000). CASArticleGoogle Scholar25. Parnell, J., Mark, D., Fallick, A. E., Boyce, A. & Thackrey, S. The age of the Mesoproterozoic Stoer Group sedimentary and impact deposits, NW Scotland. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 168, 349–358 (2011). CASArticleGoogle Scholar26. Stewart, A. D. The later Proterozoic Torridonian Rocks of Scotland: their Sedimentology, Geochemistry and Origin Geological Society of London (2002). Google Scholar27. Cawood, P. A., Nemchin, A. A., Strachan, R., Prave, T. & Krabbendam, M. Sedimentary basin and detrital zircon record along East Laurentia and Baltica during assembly and breakup of Rodinia. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 164, 257–275 (2007). ArticleGoogle Scholar28. Kinnaird, T. C. et al. The late Mesoproterozoic-early Neoproterozoic tectonostratigraphic evolution of NW Scotland: the Torridonian revisited. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 164, 541–551 (2007). ArticleGoogle Scholar29. Stewart, A. D. & Parker, A. Palaeosalinity and environmental interpretation of red beds from the late Precambrian (‘Torridonian’) of Scotland. Sed. Geol. 22, 229–241 (1979). CASArticleGoogle Scholar30. Buchan, K. L. et al. Rodinia: the evidence from integrated palaeomagnetism and U-Pb geochronology. Precamb. Res. 110, 9–32 (2001). CASArticleGoogle Scholar31. Darabi, M. H. & Piper, J. D. A. Palaeomagnetism of the (Late Mesoproterozoic) Stoer Group, Northwest Scotland: implications for diagenesis, age and relationship to the Grenville Orogeny. Geol. Mag. 141, 15–39 (2004). ArticleGoogle Scholar32. Spinks, S. C., Parnell, J., Bowden, S., Taylor, R. A. D. & Maclean, M. E. Enhanced organic carbon burial in large Proterozoic lakes: implications for atmospheric oxygenation. Precamb. Res. 255, 202–215 (2014). CASArticleGoogle Scholar33. Amor, K., Hesselbo, S. P., Porcelli, D., Thackrey, S. & Parnell, J. A Precambrian proximal ejecta blanket from Scotland. Geology 36, 303–306 (2008). CASArticleGoogle Scholar34. Parnell, J., Blamey, N. J. F., Costanzo, A., Feely, M. & Boyce, A. J. Preservation of Mesoproterozoic age deep burial fluid signatures, NW Scotland. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 55, 275–281 (2014). ArticleGoogle Scholar35. Andrews, S. D., Trewin, N. H., Hartley, A. J. & Weedon, G. P. Solar variance recorded in lacustrine deposits from the Devonian and Proterozoic of Scotland. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 167, 847–856 (2010). ArticleGoogle Scholar36. Parnell, J., Boyce, A. J., Mark, D., Bowden, S. & Spinks, S. Early oxygenation of the terrestrial environment during the Mesoproterozoic. Nature 468, 290–293 (2010). CASPubMedArticleGoogle Scholar37. Dean, W. E. & Gorham, E. Magnitude and significance of carbon burial in lakes, reservoirs, and peatlands. Geology 26, 535–538 (1998). ArticleGoogle Scholar38. Ross, D. J. K. & Bustin, R. M. Investigating the use of sedimentary geochemical proxies for paleoenvironment interpretation of thermally mature organic-rich strata: examples from the Devonian-Mississippian shales, Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. Chem. Geol. 260, 1–19 (2009). CASArticleGoogle Scholar39. Berner, R. A. & Raiswell, R. C/S method for distinguishing freshwater from marine sedimentary rocks. Geology 12, 365–368 (1984). CASArticleGoogle Scholar40. Helz, G. R., Bura-Nakić, E., Mikac, N. & Ciglenečki, I. New model for molybdenum behaviour in euxinic waters. Chem. Geol. 284, 323–332 (2011). CASArticleGoogle Scholar41. Dahl, T. W., Chappaz, A., Fitts, J. P. & Lyons, T. W. Molybdenum reduction in a sulfidic lake: evidence from X-ray absorption fine-structure spectroscopy and implications for the Mo paleoproxy. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 103, 213–231 (2013). CASArticleGoogle Scholar42. Parnell, J., Still, J., Spinks, S., Thayalan, W. & Bowden, S. Cadmium sulfide in a Mesoproterozoic terrestrial environment. Min. Mag. 78, 47–54 (2014). CASArticleGoogle Scholar43. Sageman, B. B. et al. A tale of shales: the relative roles of production, decomposition, and dilution in the accumulation of organic-rich strata, Middle-Upper Devonian, Appalachian basin. Chem. Geol. 195, 229–273 (2003). CASArticleGoogle Scholar44. Algeo, T. J. & Lyons, T. W. Mo-total organic carbon covariation in modern anoxic marine environments: implications for analysis of paleoredox and paleohydrographic conditions. Paleoceanography 21, PA1016 (2006). ArticleGoogle Scholar45. Albéric, P., Viollier, E., Jézéquel, D., Grosbois, C. & Michard, G. Interactions between trace elements and dissolved organic matter in the stagnant anoxic deep layer of a meromictic lake. Limnol. Ocean. 45, 1088–1096 (2000). ArticleGoogle Scholar46. Legeleux, F., Reyss, J. L., Bonte, P. & Organo, C. Concomitant enrichments of uranium, molybdenum and arsenic in suboxic continental margin sediments. Oceanol. Acta 17, 417–429 (1994). CASGoogle Scholar47. Relexans, J. C., Deming, J., Dinet, A., Gaillard, J. F. & Sibuet, M. Sedimentary organic matter and micro-meiobenthos with relation to trophic conditions in the tropical northeast Atlantic. Deep Sea Res. I 43, 1343–1368 (1996). CASArticleGoogle Scholar48. Sundby, B., Martinez, P. & Gobiel, C. Comparative geochemistry of cadmium, rhenium, uranium, and molybdenum in continental margin sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 68, 2485–2493 (2004). CASArticleGoogle Scholar49. Thickpenny, A. & Leggett, J. K. Stratigraphic distribution and palaeo-oceanographic significance of European early Palaeozoic organic-rich sediments. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ. 26, 231–247 (1987). ArticleGoogle Scholar50. Leventhal, J. Comparative geochemistry of metals and rare earth elements from the Cambrian alum shale and kolm of Sweden. Spec. Publ. Int. Assoc. Sed. 11, 203–215 (1990). Google Scholar51. Wilde, P., Quinby-Hunt, M. S., Berry, W. B. N. & Orth, C. J. Palaeo-oceanography and biogeography in the Tremadoc (Ordovician) Iapetus Ocean and the origin of the chemostratigraphy of Dictyonema flabelliforme black shales. Geol. Mag. 126, 19–27 (1989). CASArticleGoogle Scholar52. Schovsbo, N. H. The geochemistry of Lower Palaeozoic sediments deposited on the margins of Baltica. Bull. Geol. Soc. Denmark 50, 11–27 (2003). CASGoogle Scholar53. Waterhouse, H. K. High-resolution palynofacies investigation of Kimmeridgian sedimentary cycles. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ. 85, 75–114 (1995). ArticleGoogle Scholar54. Pearce, C. R., Coe, A. L. & Cohen, A. S. Seawater redox variations during the deposition of the Kimmeridge Clay Formation, United Kingdom (Upper Jurassic): evidence from molybdenum isotopes and trace metal ratios. Paleoceanography 25, PA4213 (2010). ArticleGoogle Scholar55. Meyers, S. R., Sageman, B. B. & Lyons, T. W. Organic carbon burial rate and the molybdenum proxy: theoretical framework and application to Cenomanian-Turonian oceanic anoxic event 2. Paleoceanography 20, PA2002 (2005). ArticleGoogle Scholar56. Dale, A. W., Meyers, S. R., Aguilera, D. R., Arndt, S. & Wallmann, K. Controls on organic carbon and molybdenum accumulation in Cretaceous marine sediments from the Cenomanian-Turonian interval including Oceanic Anoxic Event 2. Chem. Geol. 324–325, 28–45 (2012). Google Scholar57. Zerkle, A. L., House, C. H. & Brantley, S. L. Biogeochemical signatures through time as inferred from whole microbial genomes. Am. J. Sci. 305, 467–502 (2005). CASArticleGoogle Scholar58. Wang, D. Redox chemistry of molybdenum in natural waters and its involvement in biological evolution. Front. Microbiol. 3, 1–7 (2012). CASPubMedArticleGoogle Scholar59. Sanchez-Baracaldo, P., Ridgwell, A. & Raven, J. A. A Neoproterozoic transition in the marine nitrogen cycle. Curr. Biol. 24, 652–657 (2014). CASPubMedArticleGoogle Scholar60. Wang, D., Aller, R. C. & Sañudo-Wilhelmy, S. A. A new method for the quantification of different redox-species of molybdenum (V and VI) in seawater. Mar. Chem. 113, 250–256 (2009). CASArticleGoogle Scholar61. Glass, J. B., Axler, R. P., Chandra, S. & Goldman, C. R. Molybdenum limitation of microbial nitrogen assimilation in aquatic ecosystems and pure cultures. Front. Microbiol. 13, (2012). Google Scholar62. Pisarevsky, S. A., Elming, S. A., Pesonen, L. J. & Li, Z. X. Mesoproterozoic paleogeography: Supercontinent and beyond. Precamb. Res. 244, 207–225 (2014). CASArticleGoogle Scholar63. Kah, L. C., Lyons, T. W. & Chesley, J. T. Geochemistry of a 1.2 Ga carbonate-evaporite succession, northern Baffin and Bylot Islands: implications for Mesoproterozoic marine evolution. Precamb. Res. 111, 203–234 (2001). CASArticleGoogle Scholar64. Dupont, C. L., Butcher, A., Valas, R. E., Bourne, P. E. & Caetano-Anollés, G. History of biological metal utilization inferred through phylogenomic analysis of protein structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10567–10572 (2010). PubMedArticleGoogle Scholar65. Schwarz, G., Mendel, R. R. & Ribbe, M. W. Molybdenum cofactors, enzymes and pathways. Nature 460, 839–847 (2009). CASPubMedArticleGoogle Scholar66. Zhang, Y. & Gladyshev, V. N. General trends in trace element utilization revealed by comparative genomic analyses of Co, Cu, Mo, Ni, and Se. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 3393–3405 (2010). CASPubMedArticleGoogle Scholar Download references Acknowledgements We thank C. Taylor and A. Sandison for skilled technical support. Author information Author notesSamuel Spinks Present address: CSIRO Mineral Resources Flagship, Australian Resources Research Centre, Perth, Western Australia 6151, Australia. AffiliationsSchool of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UKJohn Parnell, Samuel Spinks, Steven Andrews, Wanethon Thayalan & Stephen Bowden AuthorsSearch for John Parnell in:Nature Research journals • PubMed • Google ScholarSearch for Samuel Spinks in:Nature Research journals • PubMed • Google ScholarSearch for Steven Andrews in:Nature Research journals • PubMed • Google ScholarSearch for Wanethon Thayalan in:Nature Research journals • PubMed • Google ScholarSearch for Stephen Bowden in:Nature Research journals • PubMed • Google Scholar Contributions J.P. conceived the project and prepared the manuscript. J.P., S.A., S.S. and S.B. undertook the sampling. S.A., S.S. and W.T. performed the measurements and analysed the data. All the authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. Competing interests The authors declare no competing financial interests. Corresponding author Correspondence to John Parnell. Supplementary information PDF files1.Supplementary Information Supplementary Figures 1-5, Supplementary Tables 1-3 and Supplementary References Rights and permissions To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink. About this article Publication history Received 28 June 2014 Accepted 20 March 2015 Published 19 May 2015 DOI https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7996

This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms7996.pdf

John Parnell, Samuel Spinks, Steven Andrews, Wanethon Thayalan, Stephen Bowden. High Molybdenum availability for evolution in a Mesoproterozoic lacustrine environment, Nature Communications, 2015, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7996