Time course of the physiological stress response to an acute stressor and its associations with the primacy and recency effect of the serial position curve

PLOS ONE, May 2019

Whether stress affects memory depends on which stress pathway becomes activated and which specific memory system is involved. The activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), leads to a release of catecholamines. The activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, leads to a release of glucocorticoids. In thus study, it was investigated whether SNS and/or HPA axis activation are associated with long-term memory (LTM) and/or working memory (WM) performance in humans. Thirty-three participants underwent the socially evaluated cold-pressor test. Salivary alpha-amylase (sAA) was used as a marker for the activation of the SNS and cortisol as marker for HPA axis activation. Memory was assessed by means of word lists with 15 words each. The primacy effect (i.e., the correctly recalled words from the beginning of the lists) of the serial position curve was considered as indicator for LTM. The recency effect (i.e., the correctly recalled words from the end of the lists) were used as estimator for WM performance. In sAA responders, the recency effect and, therefore, WM performance increased immediately after the stressor. This was not found in sAA non-responders. In cortisol responders, the primacy effect and, thus, LTM performance decreased 20 minutes after the stressor. No change in LTM performance was found in cortisol non-responders. Our study supports the assumptions that 1) SNS activation is associated with WM processes via stimulation of the prefrontal cortex, and 2) HPA axis activation is associated with LTM processes through interactions with the hippocampus.

A PDF file should load here. If you do not see its contents the file may be temporarily unavailable at the journal website or you do not have a PDF plug-in installed and enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, you can download the file locally and open with any standalone PDF reader:

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213883&type=printable

Time course of the physiological stress response to an acute stressor and its associations with the primacy and recency effect of the serial position curve

May Time course of the physiological stress response to an acute stressor and its associations with the primacy and recency effect of the serial position curve Linda BeckerID 0 1 Nicolas RohlederID 0 1 0 Editor: Bruno Bonaz, Grenoble Faculty of Medicine and Hospital , FRANCE 1 Department of Psychology, Chair of Health Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg , Erlangen , Germany Whether stress affects memory depends on which stress pathway becomes activated and which specific memory system is involved. The activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), leads to a release of catecholamines. The activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, leads to a release of glucocorticoids. In thus study, it was investigated whether SNS and/or HPA axis activation are associated with long-term memory (LTM) and/or working memory (WM) performance in humans. Thirty-three participants underwent the socially evaluated cold-pressor test. Salivary alpha-amylase (sAA) was used as a marker for the activation of the SNS and cortisol as marker for HPA axis activation. Memory was assessed by means of word lists with 15 words each. The primacy effect (i.e., the correctly recalled words from the beginning of the lists) of the serial position curve was considered as indicator for LTM. The recency effect (i.e., the correctly recalled words from the end of the lists) were used as estimator for WM performance. In sAA responders, the recency effect and, therefore, WM performance increased immediately after the stressor. This was not found in sAA non-responders. In cortisol responders, the primacy effect and, thus, LTM performance decreased 20 minutes after the stressor. No change in LTM performance was found in cortisol non-responders. Our study supports the assumptions that 1) SNS activation is associated with WM processes via stimulation of the prefrontal cortex, and 2) HPA axis activation is associated with LTM processes through interactions with the hippocampus. - Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. Funding: LB was supported by the Bavarian Equal Opportunities Sponsorship ? Fo?rderung von Frauen in Forschung und Lehre (FFL) ? Promoting Equal Opportunities for Women in Research and Teaching. The authors acknowledge support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and FriedrichAlexander-Universita?t Erlangen-Nu?rnberg (FAU) within the funding programme Open Access Introduction Cognitive functions?especially memory?are not entirely independent of peripheral physiological processes. Some peripherally transmitted molecules (e.g., some hormones) can pass the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and can, therefore, affect neural activity directly. Other substances indeed cannot pass the BBB but can still affect neural activity through indirect feedback loops Publishing.The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. by activating brain networks, which lead to the release of neuro modulators in brain regions involved in cognitive processing (e.g. [ 1?3 ]). One prominent candidate which can trigger such effects is stress. Stress can be defined as ?an actual or anticipated disruption of homeostasis or an anticipated threat to well-being? ([ 4 ], p. 397). The acute stress response is dominated by two pathways (e.g., [ 5,6 ]; Fig 1A). The first, which starts immediately after the onset of the stressor is the activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS). This leads to the release of the catecholamines adrenaline and noradrenaline which both cannot pass the BBB but can affect cognitive processing through indirect pathways [1]. The peripherally transmitted catecholamines can activate the locus coeruleus in the brainstem which stimulates the release of noradrenaline and dopamine in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) via the ventral tegmental area [ 3,7,8 ]. The PFC is involved in a variety of higher order cognitive functions, e.g., in working memory (WM) processes which are mainly controlled by noradrenaline and dopamine [ 9 ]. The second stress response, which peaks with a short delay of a few minutes after the onset of the stressor, is the activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis. This leads to the release of glucocorticoids (i.e., cortisol in humans or corticosterone in rodents) from the adrenal cortex. After threatening socially-evaluative stressors (e.g., the Trier Social Stress Test; [ 10 ]), HPA axis response peaks approximately 20 minutes after the end of the stressor (e.g., [ 11 ]). The stress hormone cortisol can pass the BBB and can, therefore, directly affect neural processing [ 12 ]. Cortisol binds to two different receptors in the brain [ 13,14 ]. The first, the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR, or type 1 receptor) can be found within the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex [15]. The second, the glucocorticoid receptor (GR, or type 2 receptor) is widely distributed in different brain areas. Which cognitive processes (i.e., which memory functions) are affected after cortisol release depends on which receptors and, therefore, in which brain area, cortisol binds to [ 16 ]. Both receptor types have different affinity for cortisol [ 13 ]. The MRs have high affinity and are, therefore, usually occupied at basal cortisol concentrations. The GRs have a lower affinity for cortisol and are, thus, in many cases not occupied unless cortisol levels are increased. The brain structure in which both MRs and GRs are localized is the hippocampus which is also mainly involved in long-term memory (LTM) processes. Therefore, there has been a long research history in the evaluation of the effects of cortisol binding on GRs in the hippocampus and its associations with LTM processes (e.g., [ 17?19 ]). Fig 1. a) Stress pathways that are activated after an acute stress situation, affected brain regions through indirect (dashed arrow) or direct pathways, and b) a simplified memory model. 2 / 15 A classical model which involves both WM and LTM, was proposed by Atkinson and Shiffrin [ 20 ]. According to this model, any new information first enters?after it has passed the socalled sensory register?WM. After this, the information is either forgotten or it is stored in LTM from where it can be retrieved at later time points (Fig 1B). One easy way to assess both WM and LTM within one experiment is to investigate the so-called serial position effects [ 21,22 ]. A typical experimental procedure is to present word lists of approximately 15 words to the participants and to let them recall as many words as they can remember immediately after the last word was presented. The classical observation is that words from the beginning as well as from the end of the word list can be better recalled than words from the middle of the list. The first effect is called the primacy effect (PE) which is associated with LTM processes. The second is called recency effect (RE) and it is associated with WM [ 21 ]. The effects of acute stress on the serial position effects have not been investigated so far. The aims of the present study were to investigate whether SNS activation is associated with WM and whether HPA axis activation is associated with LTM performance in humans after an acute stressor. As measures of the functioning of the memory systems, the PE and the RE of the serial position curve were examined. The hypotheses were that 1) SNS activation would start immediately after the stressor and would be related with the RE and, thus, with WM and 2) that HPA axis activation would peak with a time delay of approximately 20 minutes and would be associated with the PE and, therefore, with LTM performance. It was assumed that these effects will only be found in participants who show indeed a SNS or HPA axis response, respectively (the so-called responders). Furthermore, it was hypothesized that such effects will not be found in the non-responder groups. Materials and methods Participants Thirty-three healthy, German-speaking adults participated (mean age: 24.0 ? 5.7 years; eight male; BMI = 22.2 ? 2.8 kg/m2). None of them reported endocrinological, neurological, or psychological diseases. This was checked during a pre-screening. Persons with a psychiatric diagnosis (currently or in the past) were screened out. All participants gave their written and informed consent. The study was carried out in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) and was approved by the local ethics committee of the Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (protocol # 6_18 B). Experimental procedure The time course of the experiment is shown in Fig 2. The whole session?including instructions?lasted 60 minutes. For memory assessment, participants were presented three word lists with 15 words each with inter-stimulus intervals of one second. The words were simple neutral words with a short pronunciation time (e.g., the German words for ?dog?, ?coffee?, ?bus?, or ?door?). After the presentation of each list, the participants were asked to immediately recall as many words as they had remembered. As measure for LTM performance, the PE was used which was defined as the sum of correctly recalled words from the first three words of the lists. Accordingly, the RE, which was used as a measure for WM performance, was defined as the sum of correctly recalled words from the last three words of the lists. Memory testing was repeated three times throughout the experimental session with three lists each time. The order of the word lists was counterbalanced between the participants and between the memory assessment time points. Stress was induced by means of the socially evaluated cold-pressor test (SECPT, [ 23 ]) in groups of two participants. The participants stood in front of a table on which transparent 3 / 15 Fig 2. Time course of the experimental procedure. Stress was induced by means of the socially evaluated cold-pressor test (SECPT). boxes filled with ice water were placed. Participants were instructed to immerse their hands in the ice water as long as possible for up to three minutes. Mean immersion time was 2:20 ? 1:06 min (min. 0:18, max: 3:00). The hand of each participant was directly opposite of the hand of the other person with the aim to introduce a competitive situation. Remaining time was displayed on a large-display digital clock that was visible for both participants. An auditory countdown announced the last five seconds. Therefore, our protocol slightly differed from that reported by Schwabe and colleagues (2008, [ 23 ]) and by Minkley and colleagues (2014) who introduced the first group version of the SECPT [ 24 ]. One experimenter who wore a medical uniform was present during the SECPT and was instructed to behave distanced and to keep a neutral mimic. Salivary alpha-amylase (sAA) and salivary cortisol were used as measures of SNS and HPA axis activity [ 25?28 ]. Saliva was collected by means of salivettes (Sarstedt, Nu?mbrecht, Germany) at seven time points during the experimental session. The first saliva sample (s0) was collected immediately prior to the presentation of the first word list. The following samples were collected immediately prior (s1) and immediately after (s2) the SECPT. The following four samples were collected five (s3), ten (s4), 20 (s5), and 35 (s6) minutes after the end of the SECPT. The participants were instructed not to eat, drink (except water), smoke, or brush their teeth two hours before the start of the experimental session. Additionally, subjective stress perception was rated on a ten-point Likert-scale with the anchors ?not stressed at all? and ?totally stressed? during saliva collection. Furthermore, some demographic and psychological variables were collected by means of questionnaires during waiting time between the saliva samples (when no memory tests were performed). Demographic variables that were assessed were sex, age, weight, and height. The amount of regular physical activity was measured by means of the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ; [ 29,30 ]). Chronic stress was assessed by means of the screening scale of the Trier Inventory of Chronic Stress (TICS-SSCS; [31]) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS; [ 32 ]). Additionally, burnout and depression were measured by means of the Maslach Burnout Inventory [ 33 ] and the German version of the depression scale from the Center for Epidemiological Studies (CES-D, [ 34,35 ]). 4 / 15 Sample processing Saliva samples were stored at -30?C after collection for later analyses. After the study was completed, samples were sent to Dresden LabService GmbH (Dresden, Germany) where they were analyzed by means of high performance liquid chromatography. Sample analysis For statistical analyses, IBM SPSS Statistics (version 25) was used. For evaluation of the memory test, the number of recalled words for each position (1 to 15) was summed for the three word lists at each the three measurement time points. First, only the memory tests were analyzed to ensure that primacy and recency effects were actually found. Therefore, an analysis of variance for repeated measurement (rmANOVA) with the withinsubject factors ?position? (?1?, . . ., ?15?) and ?time point (?pre SECPT?, ?post SECPT?, and ?SECPT + 20 min.?) was calculated. The number of correctly recalled words was averaged over the percentiles (1st to 3rd, 4th to 6th, . . ., 13th to 15th word position; P1, . . ., P5) to make the following post-hoc analysis easier to interpret. Only the percentiles were used for further statistical analysis. If necessary, sphericity violations (determined by Mauchly?s test of sphericity; [ 36 ]) were corrected by adjusting the degrees of freedom with the procedure by 36. As post-hoc tests, t-tests with adjusted alpha levels according to the Bonferroni correction were calculated. Partial etasquares (?p2) for ANOVAs and Cohen?s d for t-tests are reported for effect sizes. If necessary, Cohen?s d was corrected according to the method that was proposed by Morris (2008; [ 37 ]). For further analysis (after the occurrence of an PE and RE was revealed), P1 was considered as a measure of the primacy effect and, therefore, for long-term memory, and P5 was considered as a measure for the recency effect and, thus, for working memory performance. To test whether the PE and the RE differed between the three time points (?pre SECPT?, ?post SECPT?, and ?SECPT + 20 min.?) and whether they were, therefore, related to the stress induction, a further rmANOVA with the factors ?time point? and ?memory effect? (?PE? and ?RE?) was calculated. Because of positive skewness, cortisol levels were transformed by means of the natural logarithm prior to further statistical analysis. Participants were classified as responders or nonresponders, separately for sAA and cortisol. Participants with an increase of more than 10 percent between s1 and s2 for sAA and between s1 and s5 for cortisol were classified as responders. Further rmANOVAS with the within-subject factors ?memory type? and ?time point? and the between-subject factor ?respondence? were calculated. If necessary, post-hoc rmANOVAS with the factors ?time point? and ?respondence? were calculated, separately for the PE and RE. Results Stress effects on memory A main effect of the factor position (F(6.011, 192.35) = 24.80, p < .001, ?p2 = .44), a main effect of time point (F(2, 64) = 4.08, p = .022, ?p2 = .11), and an interaction position time (F(14.17, 453.42) = 4.83, p < .001, ?p2 = .13) were found (Fig 3A?3C). A further rmANOVA, in which the percentiles P1, P3, and P5 were compared, revealed a significant main effect of the factor time point (F(1.61, 51.76) = 58.0, p < .001, ?p2 = .64), a marginally significant main effect of the factor percentile (F(2, 64) = 2.84, p = .066, ?p2 = .08), and a significant interaction time point percentile (F(4, 128) = 13.19, p < .001, ?p2 = .29). Post-hoc t-tests showed that both the primacy effects (i.e., P1 > P3) and recency effects (i.e., P5 > P3) were found for all three time points (all p < .001) in this sample. For further analysis, the first (P1) and the last (P5) three words were used as measures for the PE and RE. A further rmANOVA revealed main effects of the factors time point (F(2, 64) = 5 / 15 Fig 3. Number of correctly recalled words in dependence of the word position, a) before the SECPT, b) immediately after SECPT, c) 20 minutes after the SECPT, and d) strength of the primacy and recency effect in dependence of the measurement time-point. 5.76, p = .005, ?p2 = .15) and memory effect (F(1, 32) = 17.15, p < .001, ?p2 = .35) and an interaction time point memory effect (F(1.67, 53.4) = 20.76, p < .001, ?p2 = .39, Fig 3D). Post-hoc ttests showed that the strength of the PE and RE was the same before the SECPT and different after the SECPT (i.e., the RE was stronger than the PE; both p < .001). Immediately after SECPT, the PE was the same as before (p = .236). The PE was significantly weaker 20 minutes after the SECPT than immediately after it (t(32) = 3.65, p = .001, d = -0.71). Therefore, LTM performance did not differ immediately after SECPT, but decreased 20 minutes after the stress induction. The RE was significantly stronger immediately after the SECPT than before (prepost: t(32) = -5.43, p < .001, d = 0.86), but did not change further in the following 20 minutes (p = .122). Therefore, WM performance increased immediately after the SECPT, but did not change afterwards. Subjective stress perception Subjective stress perception significantly differed between the seven time points (F(3.68, 117.75) = 13.56, p < .001, ?p2 = .30). Post-hoc t-tests revealed that subjective stress perception was higher 6 / 15 immediately after the SECPT (s2) than before it (s1-s2: t(32) = -2.97, p = .006, d = 0.56) and further declined until 20 minutes after the SECPT (s5, all p < .230, Fig 4A). Salivary alpha-amylase Salivary alpha-amylase concentration significantly differed between the seven time points (F(6, 192) = 2.32, p = .034, ?p2 = .07, Fig 4B). Post-hoc t-tests revealed that sAA concentration increased immediately after the SECPT (s1-s2: t(32) = -2.20, p = .035, d = 0.49) and then decreased until it reached a minimum ten minutes after the SECPT (s3-s4: t(32) = 1.91, p = .033, d = -0.32). Amylase concentration did not change further after s4. Twenty-two participants were classified as sAA-responders with an sAA-increase of more than ten percent between s1 and s2. Eleven participants were classified as sAA non-responders. A further rmANOVA with the within-subject factors memory type and time and the betweensubject factor sAA respondence was calculated. This revealed a main effect of memory type (F(1, 31) = 24.25, p < .001, ?p2 = .44), a main effect of time (F(2, 62) = 4.49, p = .015, ?p2 = .13), a memory type sAA respondence interaction (F(1, 1) = 5.29, p = .028, ?p2 = .15), and a memory type time interaction (F(2, 62) = 15.41, p < .001, ?p2 = .33). Post-hoc analysis for the PE revealed only a main effect of time (F(2, 62) = 7.55, p = .001, ?p2 = .20; Fig 5A). Thus, the PE and, therefore, long-term memory performance was not associated with the sAA response. For the RE, a main effect of time was found (F(2, 62) = 18.24, p < .001, ?p2 = .37) and a main effect of sAA respondence were found (F(1, 31) = 4.77, p = .037, ?p2 = .13; Fig 5B). Only the sAA responders showed a main effect of the factor time effect (F(2, 42) = 23.37, p < .001, ?p2 = .53), but not the sAA non-responders. Therefore, WM performance only increased in sAA responders. However, it should be noted that the sAA-non responders had higher baseline REs than the sAA-responders which might have prevented a further increase (t(31) = -2.28, p = .030, d = -0.84). Cortisol Cortisol concentration also differed significantly between the seven time points (F(2.02, 164.48) = 7.08, p = .001, ?p2 = .20, Fig 4C). Post-hoc t-tests revealed that cortisol concentration did not differ between before and immediately after the SECPT (p = .368). Afterwards cortisol concentration increased until it reached a maximum 20 minutes after the SECPT (s4-s5: t(32) = -3.35, p = .002, d = 0.45). Twenty-three participants were classified as cortisol-responders with a cortisol increase of more than ten percent between s1 and s5. Ten participants were assigned to the cortisol nonresponders group. A further rmANOVA with the within-subject factors memory type and time and the between-subject factor cortisol respondence was calculated. This revealed a main effect of memory type (F(1, 31) = 16.51, p < .001, ?p2 = .35), a main effect of time (F(2, 62) = 7.01, p = .002, ?p2 = .18), a memory type time interaction (F(2, 62) = 13.12, p < .001, ?p2 = .30), and a memory type time cortisol respondence interaction (F(2, 1) = 4.07, p = .022, ?p2 = .12). Post-hoc analysis for the PE revealed a main effect of time (F(2, 62) = 4.92, p = .01, ?p2 = .14) and a time cortisol respondence interaction (F(2, 31) = 11.79, p = .005, ?p2 = .16). Post-hoc analyses showed that, for the PE, a time effect was found only for the cortisol responders (F(2, 44) = 18.28, p < .001, ?p2 = .45), but not for the cortisol non-responders (Fig 5C). Therefore, long-term memory performance only decreased in cortisol responders after the SECPT, but not in cortisol non-responders. For the RE, only a main effect of time (F(2, 62) = 15.44, p < .001, ?p2 = .51), but no interaction time cortisol respondence or a main effect of cortisol respondence were found (Fig 5D). 7 / 15 Fig 4. Time course of subjective stress ratings (a), sAA concentration (b), and cortisol concentration (c) at different time points before and after the SECPT. Discussion In this study, we investigated the time course of the physiological stress response and its associations with WM and LTM performance. The latter were operationalized by means of the PE and the RE of the serial position curve. Our first finding was that WM performance increased immediately after the stressor in participants who showed a sAA response. No changes in WM performance were found in sAA non-responders. This is in line with our hypothesis and with previous findings, in which improvements in WM performance after an acute stressor were found as well [ 38?42 ]. However, other studies also found the opposite, i.e. impaired WM functioning after an acute stressor (e.g., [ 43?47 ]). However, in contrast to our study, in most cases spatial WM and not verbal WM was investigated in these previous studies. One explanation that has been proposed to explain the different findings was that WM improves for simple tasks, but that it is impaired for complex tasks [ 2 ]. This explanation fits well to the results of Fig 5. Primacy and recency effects for sAA (a, b) as well as for cortisol (c, d) responders and non-responders, before, after and 20 minutes after the SECPT. 9 / 15 our study because we used simple word lists with only 15 non-emotional words, and it can be assumed that this was an easy task for our participants. Our second finding was that LTM performance did not change immediately after the stressor, but decreased 25 minutes after its onset in cortisol responders. This was also the time point of the maximal cortisol response. This decrease in LTM performance was not found in cortisol non-responders. Our finding is in line with many previous studies in which a drop in LTM performance and a relation with glucocorticoids was found (e.g., [ 48?52 ]). However, there are also a few studies which cannot support this conclusion [ 53,54 ]. It has been proposed that the timing of the glucocorticoid release (or injection for pharmacological studies), is the critical factor for the diversity of the findings [ 55?57 ]. This could also explain why we did not find an effect on LTM performance immediately after the stressor. Our findings support the view that peripherally transmitted noradrenaline leads via indirect pathways to a release of noradrenaline and dopamine in the PFC (e.g., [ 2 ]). Furthermore, our results are in line with previous findings that have shown that peripherally released cortisol passes the BBB and binds to receptors that are located in the hippocampus (e.g., [ 17?19 ]). However, in the PFC GRs can be found as well [ 15 ] and the hippocampus also receives noradrenaline and dopamine input [ 58,59 ]. However, the association between PFC functioning and peripheral glucocorticoid release can be found for longer time delays only [60]. Furthermore, associations between hippocampal dopamine release and memory have been found for chronic stress and late long-term potentiation only [ 61,62 ]. In our study, we investigated SNS and HPA axis response to an acute stressor. However, there are further peripheral-physiological stress responses which occur with a longer time delay, but which might be related with memory processes as well (e.g., parasympathetic activation and activation of inflammatory processes; e.g., [ 63 ]). This should be investigated in future research (e.g., by means of heart-rate variability analyses and collection of blood samples). It is important to point out that neutral words were used in our study. There is an extensive literature on the effects of (e.g., emotional) arousal or stress on emotional memory (e.g., [ 64,65 ]). It was found that emotional LTM is enhanced?and not impaired as it is for neutral stimuli [66]. For memory formation of emotional stimuli, the amygdala plays a critical role [ 67 ]. Emotional memory is indeed affected by SNS activity [ 68 ]. For example, it has been found that the enhancement in emotional LTM is eliminated through a blockade of betaadrenergic receptors in humans [ 65 ]. Furthermore, it was shown that a noradrenaline injection after learning enhances LTM for emotional stimuli [ 64 ]. In animal studies, it has been found that noradrenaline can have long-term effects on the hippocampus [ 69?72 ]. Besides, glucocorticoids are also involved in LTM enhancement for emotional stimuli. For example, Buchanan and Lovallo [73] found that a cortisol injection during learning enhanced recall one week later. To combine these manifold findings, it has been suggested that both, the glucocorticoid and the noradrenaline pathway, interact in emotional memory formation [ 74,75 ]. Furthermore, it should be noted that, in previous studies, LTM was assessed in a different way than in our study. In most previous paradigms, participants were presented the material on one day and the recall took place on another day. Thus, the elapsed time was much longer than in our study. Our design has the advantage that learning as well as retrieval of the items could both be tested at all three time points within one person. Therefore, our design offers new insights in the effects of acute stress on memory performance. Our study does not allow us to draw conclusions about the reasons for the sAA- or cortisolnon respondence. It has been shown previously that stress responsiveness is associated with childhood traumata and adversity (e.g., [ 76,77 ]). These might be factors underlying the nonresponsiveness in our study as well. Unfortunately, we did not ask our participants for this. But, this should be investigated in future research. 10 / 15 Moreover, our design should be repeated with emotional stimuli in future studies. Furthermore, it should be combined with imaging techniques to get more insight into the underlying neural processes. Besides, our design should be supplemented by the collection of blood samples, because the use of sAA as marker for SNS activity is well-established [ 78,79 ], there are still some valid concerns that need to be taken into account [80]. Furthermore, our design should be supplemented by pharmacological treatments, which block either the MR or the GR, because to understand the underlying mechanisms both receptor types should be taken into account [ 16,81 ]. Conclusions Our study supports the assumption that SNS activation after an acute stressor immediately improves WM function. This is probably related with noradrenergic and dopaminergic activation of the PFC. Furthermore, we showed that HPA axis activity is associated with LTM processes?probably through interactions with the hippocampus. Using the serial position effects to measure both WM and LTM performance within one test seems to be a very good means for further research on the effects of acute stress on memory. Supporting information S1 File. Data file. (CSV) S2 File. Codebook. (XLSX) Acknowledgments Author Contributions Conceptualization: Linda Becker. Formal analysis: Linda Becker. Investigation: Linda Becker. Methodology: Linda Becker. Project administration: Linda Becker. Supervision: Nicolas Rohleder. Visualization: Linda Becker. Writing ? original draft: Linda Becker. Writing ? review & editing: Nicolas Rohleder. We thank Aylin Go?gsen, Kristin von Majewski, and Yvonne Daichendt for data collection. 11 / 15 12 / 15 13 / 15 14 / 15 1. Arnsten AFT . Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function . Nature reviews neuroscience . 2009 ; 10 ( 6 ): 410 . https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2648 PMID: 19455173 2. Lupien SJ , McEwen BS , Gunnar MR , Heim C. Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition . Nature reviews neuroscience . 2009 ; 10 ( 6 ): 434 . https://doi.org/10.1038/ nrn2639 PMID: 19401723 3. Sara SJ . The locus coeruleus and noradrenergic modulation of cognition . Nature reviews neuroscience . 2009 ; 10 ( 3 ): 211 . https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2573 PMID: 19190638 4. Ulrich-Lai YM , Herman JP . Neural regulation of endocrine and autonomic stress responses . Nature reviews neuroscience . 2009 ; 10 ( 6 ): 397 . https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2647 PMID: 19469025 5. Chrousos GP , Gold PW . The concepts of stress and stress system disorders: Overview of physical and behavioral homeostasis . Jama . 1992 ; 267 ( 9 ): 1244 - 52 . PMID: 1538563 6. Stratakis CA , Chrousos GP . Neuroendocrinology and pathophysiology of the stress system . Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences . 1995 ; 771 ( 1 ): 1 - 18 . 7. Foote SL , Morrison JH . Extrathalamic modulation of cortical function . Annual review of neuroscience . 1987 ; 10 ( 1 ): 67 - 95 . 8. Valentino RJ , van Bockstaele E. Convergent regulation of locus coeruleus activity as an adaptive response to stress . European journal of pharmacology . 2008 ; 583 ( 2-3 ): 194 - 203 . https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ejphar. 2007 . 11 .062 PMID: 18255055 9. Briand LA , Gritton H , Howe WM , Young DA , Sarter M. Modulators in concert for cognition: Modulator interactions in the prefrontal cortex . Progress in neurobiology. 2007 ; 83 ( 2 ): 69 - 91 . https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.pneurobio. 2007 . 06 .007 PMID: 17681661 10. Kirschbaum C , Pirke K-M , Hellhammer DH . The 'Trier Social Stress Test' -a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting . Neuropsychobiology . 1993 ; 28 ( 1-2 ): 76 - 81 . https://doi.org/10.1159/000119004 PMID: 8255414 11. Kudielka BM , Schommer NC , Hellhammer DH , Kirschbaum C . Acute HPA axis responses, heart rate, and mood changes to psychosocial stress (TSST) in humans at different times of day . Psychoneuroendocrinology . 2004 ; 29 ( 8 ): 983 - 92 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen. 2003 . 08 .009 PMID: 15219648 12. Lupien SJ , Maheu F , Tu M , Fiocco A , Schramek TE . The effects of stress and stress hormones on human cognition: Implications for the field of brain and cognition . Brain and cognition . 2007 ; 65 ( 3 ): 209 - 37 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc. 2007 . 02 .007 PMID: 17466428 13. de Kloet ER , Reul J , Sutanto W. Corticosteroids and the brain . The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology . 1990 ; 37 ( 3 ): 387 - 94 . PMID: 2257242 14. Reul J , de Kloet E. Two receptor systems for corticosterone in rat brain: Microdistribution and differential occupation . Endocrinology . 1985 ; 117 ( 6 ): 2505 - 11 . https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-117-6-2505 PMID: 2998738 15. Otte C , Wingenfeld K , Kuehl LK , Kaczmarczyk M , Richter S , Quante A , et al. Mineralocorticoid receptor stimulation improves cognitive function and decreases cortisol secretion in depressed patients and healthy individuals . Neuropsychopharmacology . 2015 ; 40 ( 2 ): 386 . https://doi.org/10.1038/npp. 2014 . 181 PMID: 25035081 16. de Kloet ER , Oitzl MS , Joe?ls M. Stress and cognition: Are corticosteroids good or bad guys? Trends in neurosciences . 1999 ; 22 ( 10 ): 422 - 6 . PMID: 10481183 17. Lupien SJ , de Leon M , de Santi S , Convit A , Tarshish C , Nair NPV , et al. Cortisol levels during human aging predict hippocampal atrophy and memory deficits . Nature neuroscience . 1998 ; 1 ( 1 ): 69 - 73 . https://doi.org/10.1038/271 PMID: 10195112 18. McEwen BS . Stress and hippocampal plasticity . Annual review of neuroscience . 1999 ; 22 ( 1 ): 105 - 22 . 19. de Quervain J-F de , Henke K , Aerni A , Treyer V , McGaugh JL , Berthold T , et al. Glucocorticoid-induced impairment of declarative memory retrieval is associated with reduced blood flow in the medial temporal lobe . European Journal of Neuroscience . 2003 ; 17 ( 6 ): 1296 - 302 . PMID: 12670318 20. Atkinson RC , Shiffrin RM . Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes1 . In: Psychology of learning and motivation: Elsevier; 1968 . p. 89 - 195 . 21. Atkinson RC , Shiffrin RM . The control of short-term memory . Scientific American . 1971 ; 225 ( 2 ): 82 - 91 . PMID: 5089457 22. Murdock BB Jr. The serial position effect of free recall . Journal of experimental psychology . 1962 ; 64 ( 5 ): 482 . 23. Schwabe L , Haddad L , Schachinger H. HPA axis activation by a socially evaluated cold-pressor test . Psychoneuroendocrinology . 2008 ; 33 ( 6 ): 890 - 5 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen. 2008 . 03 .001 PMID: 18403130 24. Minkley N , Schro?der TP, Wolf OT , Kirchner WH . The socially evaluated cold-pressor test (SECPT) for groups: Effects of repeated administration of a combined physiological and psychological stressor . Psychoneuroendocrinology . 2014 ; 45 : 119 - 27 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen. 2014 . 03 .022 PMID: 24845183 25. Hellhammer DH , Wu?st S , Kudielka BM . Salivary cortisol as a biomarker in stress research . Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009 ; 34 ( 2 ): 163 - 71 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen. 2008 . 10 .026 PMID: 19095358 26. Kirschbaum C , Hellhammer DH . Salivary cortisol in psychoneuroendocrine research: Recent developments and applications . Psychoneuroendocrinology . 1994 ; 19 ( 4 ): 313 - 33 . PMID: 8047637 27. Nater UM , Rohleder N , Gaab J , Berger S , Jud A , Kirschbaum C , et al. Human salivary alpha-amylase reactivity in a psychosocial stress paradigm . Int J Psychophysiol . 2005 ; 55 ( 3 ): 333 - 42 . https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijpsycho. 2004 . 09 .009 PMID: 15708646 . 28. Rohleder N , Nater UM , Wolf JM , Ehlert U , Kirschbaum C. Psychosocial stress-induced activation of salivary alpha-amylase: An indicator of sympathetic activity? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences . 2004 ; 1032 : 258 - 63 . https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1314.033 PMID: 15677423 . 29. Craig CL , Marshall AL , Sjorstrom M , Bauman AE , Booth ML , Ainsworth BE , et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity . Medicine and science in sports and exercise . 2003 ; 35 ( 8 ): 1381 - 95 . https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS. 0000078924 .61453.FB PMID: 12900694 30. Fogelholm M , Malmberg J , Suni J , Santtila M , Kyro?la?inen H, Ma?ntysaari M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: Validity against fitness . Medicine and science in sports and exercise . 2006 ; 38 ( 4 ): 753 - 60 . https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss. 0000194075 .16960.20 PMID: 16679993 31. Schulz P , Schlotz W. Trierer Inventar zur Erfassung von chronischem Stress (TICS): Skalenkonstruktion und teststatistische U?berpru?fung; 1995 . 32. Cohen S , Kamarck T , Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress . Journal of health and social behavior . 1983 : 385 - 96 . PMID: 6668417 33. Maslach C , Jackson SE . Maslach burnout inventory Consulting Psychologists Press Palo Alto . MaslachMaslach Burnout Inventory: Second Edition1986 . 1986 . 34. Hautzinger M , Bailer M , Hofmeister D , Keller F. ADS: Allgemeine Depressionsskala: Testhandbuch ( 2te Ausgabe): Go? ttingen : Hogrefe; 2012 . 35. Radloff LS . The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population . Applied psychological measurement . 1977 ; 1 ( 3 ): 385 - 401 . 36. Mauchly JW . Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution . The Annals of Mathematical Statistics . 1940 ; 11 ( 2 ): 204 - 9 . 37. Morris SB . Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs . Organizational research methods . 2008 ; 11 ( 2 ): 364 - 86 . 38. Duncko R , Johnson L , Merikangas K , Grillon C . Working memory performance after acute exposure to the cold pressor stress in healthy volunteers . Neurobiology of Learning and Memory . 2009 ; 91 ( 4 ): 377 - 81 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm. 2009 . 01 .006 PMID: 19340949 39. Henckens MJ , Hermans EJ , Pu Z , Joe?ls M, Ferna?ndez G. Stressed memories: How acute stress affects memory formation in humans . Journal of Neuroscience . 2009 ; 29 ( 32 ): 10111 - 9 . https://doi.org/10.1523/ JNEUROSCI.1184- 09 . 2009 PMID: 19675245 40. Weerda R , Muehlhan M , Wolf OT , Thiel CM . Effects of acute psychosocial stress on working memory related brain activity in men . Human brain mapping . 2010 ; 31 ( 9 ): 1418 - 29 . https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm. 20945 PMID: 20127868 41. Yuen EY , Liu W , Karatsoreos IN , Feng J , McEwen BS , Yan Z. Acute stress enhances glutamatergic transmission in prefrontal cortex and facilitates working memory . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 2009 :pnas- 0906791106 . 42. Yuen EY , Liu W , Karatsoreos IN , Ren Y , Feng J , McEwen BS , et al. Mechanisms for acute stressinduced enhancement of glutamatergic transmission and working memory . Molecular psychiatry . 2011 ; 16 ( 2 ): 156 . https://doi.org/10.1038/mp. 2010 .50 PMID: 20458323 43. Diamond DM , Park CR , Heman KL , Rose GM . Exposing rats to a predator impairs spatial working memory in the radial arm water maze . Hippocampus . 1999 ; 9 ( 5 ): 542 - 52 . https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI) 1098 - 1063 ( 1999 ) 9:5<542::AID-HIPO8>3.0 .CO; 2 - N PMID : 10560925 44. Elzinga BM , Roelofs K. Cortisol-induced impairments of working memory require acute sympathetic activation . Behavioral neuroscience . 2005 ; 119 ( 1 ): 98 . https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0735 - 7044 . 119 .1.98 PMID: 15727516 45. Luethi M , Meier B , Sandi C . Stress effects on working memory, explicit memory, and implicit memory for neutral and emotional stimuli in healthy men . Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience . 2009 ; 2:5 . https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.08.005. 2008 PMID: 19169362 46. Mizoguchi K , Yuzurihara M , Ishige A , Sasaki H , Chui D-H , Tabira T. Chronic stress induces impairment of spatial working memory because of prefrontal dopaminergic dysfunction . Journal of Neuroscience . 2000 ; 20 ( 4 ): 1568 - 74 . PMID: 10662846 47. Schoofs D , Preu? D , Wolf OT . Psychosocial stress induces working memory impairments in an n-back paradigm . Psychoneuroendocrinology . 2008 ; 33 ( 5 ): 643 - 53 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen. 2008 . 02 .004 PMID: 18359168 48. Buss C , Wolf OT , Witt J , Hellhammer DH . Autobiographic memory impairment following acute cortisol administration . Psychoneuroendocrinology . 2004 ; 29 ( 8 ): 1093 - 6 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen. 2003 . 09 .006 PMID: 15219661 49. Kirschbaum C , Wolf OT , May M , Wippich W , Hellhammer DH . Stress-and treatment-induced elevations of cortisol levels associated with impaired declarative memory in healthy adults . Life Sci . 1996 ; 58 ( 17 ): 1475 - 83 . PMID: 8622574 50. de Quervain J-F de , Roozendaal B , Nitsch RM , McGaugh JL , Hock C . Acute cortisone administration impairs retrieval of long-term declarative memory in humans . Nature neuroscience . 2000 ; 3 ( 4 ): 313 . https://doi.org/10.1038/73873 PMID: 10725918 51. Quesada AA , Wiemers US , Schoofs D , Wolf OT . Psychosocial stress exposure impairs memory retrieval in children . Psychoneuroendocrinology . 2012 ; 37 ( 1 ): 125 - 36 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j. psyneuen. 2011 . 05 .013 PMID: 21696892 52. Rohleder N , Wolf JM , Kirschbaum C , Wolf OT . Effects of cortisol on emotional but not on neutral memory are correlated with peripheral glucocorticoid sensitivity of inflammatory cytokine production . Int J Psychophysiol . 2009 ; 72 ( 1 ): 74 - 80 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho. 2008 . 03 .010 PMID: 18824040 . 53. Domes G , Heinrichs M , Reichwald U , Hautzinger M . Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis reactivity to psychological stress and memory in middle-aged women: High responders exhibit enhanced declarative memory performance . Psychoneuroendocrinology . 2002 ; 27 ( 7 ): 843 - 53 . PMID: 12183219 54. Nater UM , Moor C , Okere U , Stallkamp R , Martin M , Ehlert U , et al. Performance on a declarative memory task is better in high than low cortisol responders to psychosocial stress . Psychoneuroendocrinology . 2007 ; 32 ( 6 ): 758 - 63 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen. 2007 . 05 .006 PMID: 17606328 55. Het S , Ramlow G , Wolf OT . A meta-analytic review of the effects of acute cortisol administration on human memory . Psychoneuroendocrinology . 2005 ; 30 ( 8 ): 771 - 84 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen. 2005 . 03 .005 PMID: 15919583 56. Scho?nfeld P, Ackermann K , Schwabe L. Remembering under stress: Different roles of autonomic arousal and glucocorticoids in memory retrieval . Psychoneuroendocrinology . 2014 ; 39 : 249 - 56 . https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen. 2013 . 09 .020 PMID: 24139625 57. Schwabe L , Joe?ls M, Roozendaal B , Wolf OT , Oitzl MS . Stress effects on memory: An update and integration . Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews . 2012 ; 36 ( 7 ): 1740 - 9 . 58. Lisman JE , Grace AA . The hippocampal-VTA loop: controlling the entry of information into long-term memory . Neuron . 2005 ; 46 ( 5 ): 703 - 13 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron. 2005 . 05 .002 PMID: 15924857 59. Verhage M , Ghijsen WE , Boomsma F , Lopes da Silva, Fernando H. Endogenous noradrenaline and dopamine in nerve terminals of the hippocampus: Differences in levels and release kinetics . Journal of neurochemistry . 1992 ; 59 ( 3 ): 881 - 7 . PMID: 1494914 60. Henckens MJ , van Wingen GA , Joe?ls M, Ferna?ndez G. Time-dependent corticosteroid modulation of prefrontal working memory processing . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 2011 ; 108 ( 14 ): 5801 - 6 . 61. Lisman J , Grace AA , Duzel E. A neoHebbian framework for episodic memory; role of dopamine-dependent late LTP . Trends in neurosciences. 2011 ; 34 ( 10 ): 536 - 47 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins. 2011 . 07 . 006 PMID: 21851992 62. Nisenbaum LK , Zigmond MJ , Sved AF , Abercrombie ED. Prior exposure to chronic stress results in enhanced synthesis and release of hippocampal norepinephrine in response to a novel stressor . Journal of Neuroscience . 1991 ; 11 ( 5 ): 1478 - 84 . PMID: 1674004 63. Pellissier S , Dantzer C , Mondillon L , Trocme C , Gauchez A-S , Ducros V , et al. Relationship between vagal tone, cortisol, TNF-alpha, epinephrine and negative affects in Crohn's disease and irritable bowel syndrome . PLoS ONE . 2014 ; 9 ( 9 ):e105328. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0105328 PMID: 25207649 64. Cahill L , Alkire MT . Epinephrine enhancement of human memory consolidation: Interaction with arousal at encoding . Neurobiology of Learning and Memory . 2003 ; 79 ( 2 ): 194 - 8 . PMID: 12591227 65. Cahill L , Prins B , Weber M , McGaugh JL . ?-Adrenergic activation and memory for emotional events . Nature . 1994 ; 371 ( 6499 ): 702 . https://doi.org/10.1038/371702a0 PMID: 7935815 66. Payne JD , Jackson ED , Hoscheidt S , Ryan L , Jacobs WJ , Nadel L . Stress administered prior to encoding impairs neutral but enhances emotional long-term episodic memories . Learning & Memory . 2007 ; 14 ( 12 ): 861 - 8 . 67. Lupien SJ , McEwen BS . The acute effects of corticosteroids on cognition: Integration of animal and human model studies . Brain research reviews . 1997 ; 24 ( 1 ): 1 - 27 . PMID: 9233540 68. Murchison CF , Zhang X-Y , Zhang W-P, Ouyang M , Lee A , Thomas SA . A distinct role for norepinephrine in memory retrieval . Cell . 2004 ; 117 ( 1 ): 131 - 43 . PMID: 15066288 69. Madison DV , Nicoll RA . Norepinephrine decreases synaptic inhibition in the rat hippocampus . Brain research . 1988 ; 442 ( 1 ): 131 - 8 . PMID: 2834010 70. Neuman RS , Harley CW . Long-lasting potentiation of the dentate gyrus population spike by norepinephrine . Brain research . 1983 ; 273 ( 1 ): 162 - 5 . PMID: 6311345 71. Stanton PK , Sarvey JM . Depletion of norepinephrine, but not serotonin, reduces long-term potentiation in the dentate gyrus of rat hippocampal slices . Journal of Neuroscience . 1985 ; 5 ( 8 ): 2169 - 76 . PMID: 4040556 72. Stanton PK , Sarvey JM . Norepinephrine regulates long-term potentiation of both the population spike and dendritic EPSP in hippocampal dentate gyrus . Brain research bulletin . 1987 ; 18 ( 1 ): 115 - 9 . PMID: 3030508 73. Buchanan TW , Lovallo WR . Enhanced memory for emotional material following stress-level cortisol treatment in humans . Psychoneuroendocrinology . 2001 ; 26 ( 3 ): 307 - 17 . PMID: 11166493 74. Cahill L , McGaugh JL . Modulation of memory storage. Current opinion in neurobiology . 1996 ; 6 ( 2 ): 237 - 42 . PMID: 8725966 75. Roozendaal B , Okuda S , de Quervain D-F , McGaugh JL . Glucocorticoids interact with emotion-induced noradrenergic activation in influencing different memory functions . Neuroscience . 2006 ; 138 ( 3 ): 901 - 10 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience. 2005 . 07 .049 PMID: 16310958 76. Gillespie CF , Phifer J , Bradley B , Ressler KJ . Risk and resilience: genetic and environmental influences on development of the stress response . Depression and anxiety . 2009 ; 26 ( 11 ): 984 - 92 . https://doi.org/ 10.1002/da.20605 PMID: 19750552 77. Heim C , Nemeroff CB . The role of childhood trauma in the neurobiology of mood and anxiety disorders: preclinical and clinical studies . Biological psychiatry . 2001 ; 49 ( 12 ): 1023 - 39 . PMID: 11430844 78. Nater UM , Rohleder N , Schlotz W , Ehlert U , Kirschbaum C. Determinants of the diurnal course of salivary alpha-amylase . Psychoneuroendocrinology . 2007 ; 32 ( 4 ): 392 - 401 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j. psyneuen. 2007 . 02 .007 PMID: 17418498 79. Rohleder N , Nater UM . Determinants of salivary alpha-amylase in humans and methodological considerations . Psychoneuroendocrinology . 2009 ; 34 ( 4 ): 469 - 85 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen. 2008 . 12 . 004 PMID: 19155141 . 80. Bosch JA , Veerman ECI , Geus EJ de, Proctor GB. ?-Amylase as a reliable and convenient measure of sympathetic activity: Don't start salivating just yet! Psychoneuroendocrinology . 2011 ; 36 ( 4 ): 449 - 53 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen. 2010 . 12 .019 PMID: 21295411 81. Vogel S , Ferna?ndez G , Joe?ls M, Schwabe L. Cognitive adaptation under stress: A case for the mineralocorticoid receptor . Trends in cognitive sciences . 2016 ; 20 ( 3 ): 192 - 203 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics. 2015 . 12 .003 PMID: 26803208


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213883&type=printable

Linda Becker, Nicolas Rohleder. Time course of the physiological stress response to an acute stressor and its associations with the primacy and recency effect of the serial position curve, PLOS ONE, 2019, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213883