Tradition of Value Education Implementation in Indonesian Primary Schools

Journal of Social Studies Education Research Sosyal Bilgiler Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi 2018:9 (4), 295-318 www.jsser.org Tradition of Value Education Implementation in Indonesian Primary Schools Kama Abdul Hakam1 Abstract Following Indonesia’s 1998 reform, value education in the form of a specific subject is no longer applied. The results of the 2006 national discussion recommended new education programs loaded with values. Therefore, the value education integration in learning activities has been carried out since 2007 and was updated in 2011, 2016, and 2017. The latest update of value education integration year 2017 emphasizes the implementation of Character Education in school activities. The aim of this study is to examine the implementation of value education in Indonesian primary schools from the starting point of the reform until now. This study applied the historical method with a purposive random sampling using all reference primary schools (school models) in each province in Indonesia. The results show that value education in Indonesian primary school activities (intra-curricular, extra-curricular, development of school culture, and collaboration with the community) tend to use value transmission approaches through the methods of training, modeling, conditioning, and habituation, which foster moral behavior in the form of students’ discipline and adherence to rules and norms. Indonesian primary school activities have an insufficient constructionist approach that contributes to the lack of student’s moral consideration. Key words: value education implementation; value transmission; Indonesian primary school Introduction There is a broad agreement that schools must contribute to the formation and development of student values in the form of moral development and student character formation (Nucci, et al, 2014). The role of schools always lies among the controversies between the sociological approach and the psychological approach. The followers of the sociological school are motivated by the view that the present era of social decay is taking place (Bennet & Spalding, 1992; Putnam, 2013) and an ongoing teenage crisis (Bennet, 1992; Himmelfarb, 2001; Wynne 1982) so that traditional moral values are required through a form of character education tradition (Bennett, 1994; Wynne & Ryan, 1993). Educators 1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Social Science Education, Indonesia University of Education, , Indonesia, 295 Journal of Social Studies Education Research 2018: 9 (4), 295-318 of traditional character based on Aristotle’s thought see the importance of the formation of virtues from the beginning and the influence of social groups. For instance, Durkheim (2012) viewed the importance of group and community involvement in shaping the younger generations. This sociological school is influenced by the idea that every individual has the potential to accept social values; and each generation always produces values that are upheld as a result of the agreement of the community groups. The agreed values are feasible and must be passed on to the next young generation (Hakam, 2000). The sociological school, in the form of character education, views the importance of educational activities by seeding and inheriting values. On that basis, the sociological school of value education recognizes the existence of objective values that are accepted by community groups or nations and even the world, both in the form of universal values and absolute values. Thus, the adherents of this sociological school view the importance of value education activities in the following forms: (1) The delivery of value information enables students to understand correctly the rules of value; (2) Modeling is needed to portray values in the form of behavior so that students are able to imitate value activities in their lives; (3) Training is needed to train students to act in accordance with the rules of the values exemplified; (4) Conditioning is required so that students are able to take roles to do the values in real actions; and (5) Habituation is needed so that students continuously carry out the values in-order that such values become accustomed to their lives. Such educational measures like that are expected to build a culture of social values that are upheld through school education. The nature of value education in the sociological school is more appropriately referred to as character education because it is more interested in inherited certain values to students that are subsequently to become their identity. Character education, then, recognizes that the most important value education outcomes are moral behavior or moral conduct (Nucci, et al, 2014). Conversely, followers of the psychological approach are motivated by the idea that individuals are always in the midst of rapid social change due to the inheritance of social injustice such as gender racism and discrimination that are challenged by social movements reflecting moral improvement (Killen, et al, 2002). Individuals are always faced with dilemmatic decision making (Kohlberg, 1976) among existing social values. Therefore, moral maturity is needed behind the choice of values. These rational moral educators are based on the philosophy of Socrates, which emphasizes the role of reason in drawing arguments from rational ethics. Consequently, there is Hakam autonomous truth in moral actions based on the principles of justice and honesty (Rawls, 2001). The focus is on developing moral reasoning derived from Piaget’s work (See Piaget (1962)). Followers of the psychological school hold the view that individuals are not only able to accept the values of society but actually have the potential of unique values; and education is obliged to facilitate the potential of these individual values to develop optimally. It can be concluded that value education is not to increase the treasury of a person (Kohlberg, 1976). However, students are facilitated to use their judgment so that it can increase systematically. Therefore, value education needs to expose individuals to choose values. They are given the opportunity to value their values and are given the opportunity to actualize their choice of values to become theirs (Raths, et al, 1978; Yigit, 2017). Thus, the learning objective of education value is not to pass on social values but to construct and to develop the potential of individual values towards maturity. Kohlberg (1976) called it maturity moral judgment; Raths et al (1978) called it believing in personal value; and Fraenkel (1977) called it having a principle of life. The most appropriate value education term is Moral Education. To measure the success of the values constructed, a number of developmentalist figures set out a range of stages. On the one hand, Kohlberg (1976) divided it into three stages: pre-conventional; conventional; and postconventional, which can be measured by using the Moral Judgment Instrument. On the othe (...truncated)