Chemical composition of the bark ofPinus sibirica

Chemistry of Natural Compounds, Mar 1994

V. V. Grishko, L. I. Demenkova, V. A. Raldugin

Article PDF cannot be displayed. You can download it here:

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FBF00630021.pdf

Chemical composition of the bark ofPinus sibirica

Chemistry of Natural Compounds, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1994 C H E M I C A L C O M P O S I T I O N O F THE BARK O F Pinus sibirica V. V. Grishko, L. I. Demenkova, and V. A. Raidugin UDC 547.595.9 The Siberian stone pine Pinus sibirica R. Mayr -- an industrially important coniferous species [1] -- has been studied inadequately in the phytochemical respect [2, 3]. Continuing an investigation of its isoprenoids [4], we have made a preliminary analysis of the components of the bark extracted by diethyl ether. Of them, only phenolic acids had been identified previously, by GLC. The extract, obtained with a yield of 5.5% on the air-dry bark (the raw material was collected from trees with a diameter of 50-60 cm), contained 29.4% of neutral compounds, 8.2% of strong acids, and 62.4% of weak acids, which were isolated by the successive treatment of the initial etheral extract with aqueous solution of NaHCO 3 and NaOH. The weak acids consisted of resin acids, fatty acids, and polyfunctional acids (66.9, 1.9, and 31.2%, respectively). The resin acids included lambertianic (42.0%), abietic (33.1%), isopimaric (13.9%), dehydroabietic (6.5%), and neoabietic (3.4%) acids (PMR spectrum, 400 MHz). From the methylated multicomponent polyfunctional acids, by chromatography on SiO 2, we isolated the methyl esters of the known [2] 7-ketodehydroabietic and 15-O-methylisocupressic acids. The strong acids, unlike those of shoots of the Siberian stone pine [4], contained a very small amount of 15-0succinylisocupressic acid (about 6%). After chromatography on SiO 2, from PMR spectra and by TLC comparison with authentic specimens, the known 7a-hydroxydehydroabietic, 13~-hydroxy-7-keto-13,14-dihydroabietic, and 15-hydroxy-7ketodehydroabietic acids were identified in the form of their methyl esters, these in total making up about a third of the weight of all the strong acids. The neutral part of the initial extract consisted of hydrocarbons (5.5%, including 3.6% of diterpenes, 1.7% of sesquiterpenes, and about 0.2% of monoterpenes; determined by GLC) a mixture of esters (21.7%), isocembrol and 4epiisocembrol (16.7%; ratio 5.3:1, PMR) and polar compounds (48.6%). By rechromatography of the latter on SiO 2, its main isoprenoid components were isolated and identified by their PMR spectra: the labdanoids pinusolide and isoagatholal [2], the triterpenoids 21-episerratenediol and its 21-O-methyl ether [5], and mixtures of stigmast-4-en-3-one and campest-4-en-3-one (16:1, GLC) and of ~-sitosterol and campesterol (17:1, GLC). The mixture of esters was hydrolyzed, as described in [6]. By chromatography on SiO 2, the neutral fraction of the product obtained yielded a mixture of native methyl esters of resin acids (composition the same as that of the methylated mixture of free resin acids from the acid part of the initial extract), aliphatic isoprenoid alcohols (including polyprenols and dolichols, identified provisionally from the results of PMR and HPLC), and a mixture of j3-sitosterol and campesterol. The investigation of the components of the extract of the bark of the Siberian stone pine is continuing. REFERENCES . 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. A. S. Isaev, The Pine Forests of Siberia [in Russian], SO "Nauka," Novosibirsk (1985). V. A. Pentegova, Zh. V. Dubovenko, V. A. Raldugin, and t~. N. Shmidt, Terpenoids of Coniferous Plants [in Russian], SO "Nauka," Novosibirsk (1987), p. 97. A. S. Gromova, A. I. Syrchina, and N. A. Tyukavkina, Khim. Prir. Soedin., 824 (1971); N. A. Tyukavkina, A. S. Gromova, V. I. Lutskii, and I. S. Chubarova, Khim. Prir. Soedin., 78 (1974). V. V. Grishko, S. A. Shevtsov, L. I. Demenkova, V. A. Raldugin, and G. V. Lyandres, Sib. Khim. Zh., No. 2, 94 (1991). A. H. Conner, V. A. Nagasampagi, and J. W. Rowe, Phytochemistry, 19, 1121 (1980). I. S. Pavlutskaya and V. I. Roshchin, Khim. Drev., No. 3, 102 (1989). Novosibirsk Institute of Organic Chemistry, Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Translated from Khimiya Prirodnykh Soedinenii, No. 2, pp. 290-291, March-April, 1994. Original article submitted April 12, 1993. 266 0009-3130/94/3002-0266512.50 ©1995 Plenum Publishing Corporation (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FBF00630021.pdf
Article home page: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00630021

V. V. Grishko, L. I. Demenkova, V. A. Raldugin. Chemical composition of the bark ofPinus sibirica, Chemistry of Natural Compounds, 1994, pp. 266-266, Volume 30, Issue 2, DOI: 10.1007/BF00630021