Assessment of Performance in Cognitive vs Affective Domain among First Year MBBS Students: A Cross-sectional Study
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/56640.16976
Original Article
Education Section
Assessment of Performance in Cognitive vs
Affective Domain among First Year MBBS
Students: A Cross-sectional Study
Sharmila Aristotle1, Balaji Ramraj2
ABSTRACT
Introduction: National Medical Commission (NMC) has revised
MBBS curriculum and incorporated Competency Based Medical
Curriculum (CBME) which describes various competencies. Most
of the competencies are based on cognitive, psychomotor and
affective domain, which an Indian medical graduate should attain.
Both cognitive and psychomotor domains were taught as a part
of curriculum however, students learned affective domain as a
hidden curriculum only. Now CBME has incorporated affective
domain as a part of MBBS curriculum in the form of Attitudes
Ethics and Communication (AETCOM) module, teaching and
evaluating the affective domain demands attention.
Aim: To evaluate the performance of first year MBBS students in
cognitive domain vs affective domain from their routine curriculum.
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted
in SRM Medical college Hospital and Research Centre,
Chengalpattu, India, from September to October 2019 among
149 1st year MBBS students. Three students were absent on
day of assessment. Hence, 146 students were assessed in
both domains. The performance of both domains (cognitive and
affective) were assessed in the form of Objective Structured
Practical Examination (OSPE). Chi-square was used to compare
the qualitative data and Unpaired t-test was used to compare
the means.
Results: The mean age of the students was 18.66±0.64 years.
About 76 (52.1%) were male and 70 (47.9%) were female
students. Out of total, 22 (15.1%) of students had scored less
than minimum mark for pass in cognitive and 8 (5.5%) of students
had scored less than minimum mark for pass in AETCOM.
Only 2 (1.3%) of students had scored less than minimum mark
for pass in both OSPE examinations. In addition, 49 (33.5%)
students had scored more than average marks in cognitive and
94 (64.4%) students had scored more than average in AETCOM
and 34 (23.2%) of students had scored more than average in
both domains. The difference in the mean score was found to be
statistically significant (p-value <0.0001).
Conclusion: This study concludes that the learners performed
better in affective domain, when compared to cognitive domain.
Keywords: Attitude domain, Competencies, Curriculum, Psychomotor
INTRODUCTION
The MBBS curriculum in India has been reformed after 21 years
and came into implementation from 2019-20 academic session
onwards. The Competency Based Medical Education (CBME)
incorporates many new teaching elements like foundation course,
Attitude, Ethics, and Communication Module (AETCOM), early
clinical exposure, integration and alignment, student doctor method
of clinical training, electives, self-directed learning, critical thinking
and research abilities, psychomotor skill development and simulation
training, emphasis on primary healthcare centers to meet the global
standards [1].
The outcome of CBME is expressed in terms of competencies for
various domains such as cognitive, psychomotor and affective. To
address the affective domain, the curriculum has integrated the
AETCOM module, as a longitudinal program that emphasises the
importance of development of proper attitude and communication
skills to the student’s right from the foundation course itself. Each
module offers suggestions of teaching learning methodology
and assessment type. The first professional year consists of five
AETCOM modules for teaching affective domain and foundations
of communication is one among them, which emphasises formative
assessment [1]. Cognitive domain were taught in the curriculum
in the form of various competences, which includes subjectwise outcomes, so called sub competencies. In subject anatomy
82 total topics were designed by National Medical Commission
(NMC) [1].
Graduate Medical Education Regulation (GMER 2019) has also
proposed assessment in the form of summative and formative
assessments, which covers all the three major domains cognitive,
10
affective and psychomotor domain [1]. Since, importance is given for
all the three domains in the assessment part, the biggest challenge
for CBME is to integrate ‘Knowledge, skill, attitude’ components
and to bring a paradigm shift in teaching learning and assessment
methods [2].
Many assessment methods are available globally which are proved
to be effective in assessing the behavioural practice of trainees in
clinical settings of attitude and professionalism. A 360° feedback
assessment from multiple sources proves to be holistic in evaluating
values and behaviour [3]. However, one of the tools to assess
the AETCOM competencies are Objective Structured Clinical
Examination (OSCE) and Objective Structured Practical Examination
(OSPE) in a summative assessment examination setting [4].
The affective domain is taught in the MBBS curriculum as a
hidden curriculum for years and NMC has revised the CBME
curriculum, which now becomes mandatory for teaching such
skills. Incorporation of this affective domain as a part of curriculum
demands specific attention in the form of evaluating the progress
of the learners. Moreover, there exists a lacuna in comparing the
knowledge component with that of affective domain and integrating
them. Hence, this study was carried out to evaluate the performance
of the first year MBBS graduates in cognitive vs affective domain
by an OSPE and to evaluate the progress of learning in teaching
affective domain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This cross-sectional study was conducted in SRM Medical college
Hospital and Research Centre, Chengalpattu, India, from September
to October 2019 among 149 1st year MBBS students. The study
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2022 Sep, Vol-16(9): JC10-JC13
www.jcdr.net
Sharmila Aristotle and Balaji Ramraj, Learner Performance in Academic Knowledge vs Communication Skills
was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee [Ref no. 847/
IEC/2019].
Inclusion criteria: This study was a part of academic curriculum; all
first year students admitted in the academic year 2019-2020 were
included in the study.
Exclusion criteria: All the students were taught in both the domains
for a period of two months. However, students who were absent on
the assessment day were excluded from the data analysis.
Out of total 149 students, admitted in first year MBBS (2019-2020
batch), three students were absent on day of assessment. Hence,
146 students were assessed in both domains.
Affective Domain
The AETCOM module- Foundations of communication skills were
taught to the students based on Kalamazoo Consensus Statement
for communication skill as per NMC module [5]. The module
was taught to them in the form of role play by faculties of Medical
Education Unit (MEU) of SRM Medical College Hospital and Research
Centre. Kalamazoo module is based on seven essential elements
(...truncated)