Kinetochore microtubule establishment is defective in oocytes from aged mice.
Report
Report
Cell Cycle 13:7, 1171–1179; April 1, 2014; © 2014 Landes Bioscience
Kinetochore microtubule establishment
is defective in oocytes from aged mice
Maria Shomper, Christina Lappa, and Greg FitzHarris*
Cell and Developmental Biology; University College London; London, UK
Keywords: oocyte aging, spindle, chromosome segregation, kinetochore, cohesin, aneuploidy
Errors in chromosome segregation in mammalian oocytes increase in number with advancing maternal age, and are
a major cause of pregnancy loss. Why chromosome segregation errors are more common in oocytes from older females
remains poorly understood. In mitosis, accurate chromosome segregation is enabled by attachment of kinetochores to
microtubules from appropriate spindle poles, and erroneous attachments increase the likelihood of mis-segregation.
Whether attachment errors are responsible for age-related oocyte aneuploidy is unknown. Here we report that oocytes
from naturally aged mice exhibit substantially increased chromosome misalignment, and fewer kinetochore pairs that
make stable end-on attachments to the appropriate spindle poles compared with younger oocytes. The profile of misattachments exhibited is consistent with the types of chromosome segregation error observed in aged oocytes. Loss of
chromosome cohesion, which is a feature of oocytes from older females, causes altered kinetochore geometry in meiosisI. However, this has only a minor impact upon MT attachment, indicating that cohesion loss is not the primary cause
of aneuploidy in meiosis-I. In meiosis-II, on the other hand, age-related cohesion loss plays a direct role in errors, since
prematurely individualized sister chromatids misalign and misattach to spindle MTs. Thus, whereas cohesion loss leading
to precocious sister chromatid separation is a direct cause of errors in meiosis-II, cohesion loss plays a more minor role in
the etiology of aneuploidy in meiosis-I. Our data introduce altered MT-kinetochore interactions as a lesion that explains
aneuploidy in meiosis-I in older females.
Introduction
Ensuring that daughter cells inherit the correct chromosomes
at the time of cell division is essential for maintaining cellular
health. Whereas chromosome mis-segregation is unusual in most
mammalian cell types, errors are relatively common in mammalian oocytes, resulting in aneuploid oocytes that are developmentally compromised. Oocyte aneuploidy is particularly common
in older females and is thus a major cause of age-related infertility in humans.1,2 Why oocytes from older females mis-segregate
chromosomes more frequently than those from younger females
is poorly understood.
Chromosome segregation is executed by the spindle, a
dynamic transient organelle assembled from microtubules
(MTs).3,4 Chromosomes interact with spindle microtubules via
kinetochores, complex proteinaceous structures that assemble
on centromeric DNA.5 In mitosis, accurate chromosome segregation requires that kinetochores of sister chromatids (“sister
kinetochores”) bind to microtubules from opposite poles of the
spindle, such that shortening of kinetochore-bound MTs (kMTs)
in anaphase causes one sister chromatid to be inherited by each
daughter cell.6 Failure to establish kMTs correctly can lead to
chromosome mis-segregation. For example, kinetochore attachment to both spindle poles simultaneously causes chromosomes to
experience pulling forces from both poles in anaphase, resulting
in “lagging” chromosomes that might be mis-segregated.7 This
scenario, termed merotelic attachment, is particularly hazardous,
as it is not detected by the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC)
that surveys and prevents other errors.8-10 Merotelic attachments
are thus considered a key cause of aneuploidy in somatic cells.
Whereas in mitosis sister chromatids are separated, in meiosisI sister chromatids remain attached and co-segregate in order to
separate homologous chromosomes (see Fig. 1A). Essential for
this is that sister chromatid cohesion is maintained during meiosis-I, and sister kinetochores serve together as a single microtubule-binding unit to enable co-segregation.11 Sister cohesion is
subsequently lost at anaphase of meiosis-II, generating a haploid
genome that forms the maternal contribution at fertilization
(Fig. 1A). Chromosome segregation errors increase with maternal age both in meiosis-I and meiosis-II. However, the nature of
the age-related defect remains mysterious.
Laboratory mice aged 1–2 years exhibit increased chromosome mis-segregation and aneuploidy analogous to age-related
oocyte aneuploidy in humans, and are thus an invaluable model
to examine the cause of errors.12 Using this approach, several
groups have found that chromosome cohesion is weakened in
oocytes from older females.13-16 This conclusion is supported by
*Correspondence to Greg FitzHarris; Email:
Submitted: 12/09/2013; Revised: 01/27/2014; Accepted: 01/29/2014; Published Online: 02/11/2014
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.28046
www.landesbioscience.com
Cell Cycle
1171
a reduced abundance of cohesin component proteins on chromosome arms,13,14 a reduced threshold for sister individualization
by separase,17 and an increased distance between sister kinetochores in metaphase-II (Met-II) eggs.13-15 As a result of cohesion
loss, sister pairs can be prematurely individualized in Met-II in
older mice.14 Importantly, similar to mice, chromosome cohesion
is lost with increasing age in human oocytes,18 and it has thus
been widely suggested that cohesion loss might be a fundamental
cause of age-related aneuploidy.
Although the evidence that chromosome cohesion is lost with
advancing age is strong, a critical unanswered question is: why
should cohesion loss cause chromosome mis-segregation (dyad
gain or loss) in meiosis-I? A prevalent hypothesis is that a loosening of sister chromosome cohesion in meiosis-I could change
the size and geometry of the effective microtubule-binding area,
which might, in turn, promote erroneous kinetochore–microtubule interactions, thereby causing mis-segregation.8,17,19-21 In
support of this hypothesis, oocytes from old mothers frequently
exhibit lagging anaphase chromosomes, which in mitosis are
symptomatic of merotelic attachment errors.13,14,22 However,
whether age-related cohesion loss has a direct impact upon chromosome segregation in meiosis-I is yet to be formally examined.
Specifically, whether sister kinetochore geometry is indeed altered
in aged oocytes in meiosis-I, when MT–kinetochore attachments
are being formed, and whether this can affect the fidelity of MT
binding are unknown.
In any cellular setting, the occurrence of aneuploidy must be
explained in terms of the failure of spindle microtubules to accurately dispatch chromosomes to the forming daughter cells. Here
we present a detailed examination of kinetochore–microtubule
interactions and chromosome positioning and report substantial
differences in the profile of MT attachments between oocytes
from young and natur (...truncated)