CARBOHYDRATE-DEFICIENT TRANSFERRIN: MARKER OF ACTUAL ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION OR CHRONIC ALCOHOL MISUSE?
Alcohol & Alcoholism Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 646-650. 1998
CARBOHYDRATE-DEFICIENT TRANSFERRIN: MARKER OF ACTUAL
ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION OR CHRONIC ALCOHOL MISUSE?
IDUN-MERETE MIKKELSEN*, ROLF-DIETER KANITZ1, ODD NILSSEN 2 and
NILS-ERIK HUSEBY
Institute of Medical Biology, University of Troms0, N-9037 Troms0. Norway, 'Kliniken des Kreises Pinneberg.
Kreiskrankenhaus Elmshorn, Germany and institute of Community Medicine, University of Troms0, N-9037 Troms0, Norway
Abstract — Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) is a useful indicator of excessive alcohol
consumption with higher sensitivity and specificity than other markers that are used. In the present study,
CDT was analysed in 161 patients hospitalized in a surgical ward to evaluate whether history of drinking
and chronic alcohol misuse are important determinants of CDT elevations. Fifty-one of the patients were
diagnosed as alcohol-dependent and they all reported a long history of alcohol abuse Several of these, as
well as many of the non-dependent patients, reported a high, recent alcohol consumption (>60 g/day for
the previous 2 weeks). CDT performed better in detecting patients with alcohol dependency than in
detecting patients with high alcohol consumption irrespective of dependency, showing higher sensitivity
(47 vs 37%), likelihood ratio (4.7 vs 3.4), and a statistically significant difference in the receiveroperating characteristic curve areas (P = 0.04 in a two-tailed comparison test). In two subgroups, one
with alcohol-dependent and one with non-dependent patients, consuming similar amounts of alcohol
(range: 60—170 g/day), the sensitivity of CDT was 52 and 5%, respectively. We conclude that CDT is a
better marker for patients with chronic alcohol misuse than as a marker for high actual alcohol
consumption alone.
INTRODUCTION
Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) is an
'abnormal' transferrin frequently used as a marker
of excessive and chronic alcohol consumption.
Stibler (1991), when introducing the test, suggested that serum CDT levels will increase after
excessive drinking (more than 50-80 g per day)
for a period of 2-3 weeks. However, frequency
and intensity of alcohol consumption have also
been suggested to influence CDT (Allen et al.,
1994), and it is also known that the clinical utility
of the CDT measurements is altered according to
the population examined. Thus, the sensitivity of
CDT in detecting alcohol abuse is lower among
patients in general clinical settings than among
patients admitted to detoxification treatments
(Allen et al., 1994). Low sensitivities have been
reported in general population studies (Nilssen et
al., 1992; Gronbaek et al., 1995). In young,
healthy subjects drinking voluntarily for a short
time excessive amounts of alcohol, no or low-
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
frequent increases in CDT were found (Salmela et
al., 1994; Lesch et al, 1996). However, CDT is
frequently and rapidly elevated in chronic alcoholics relapsing after a period of not drinking
(Schmidt et al., 1997), indicating that alcoholdependent subjects might be especially susceptible
to effects from re-exposure to ethanol resulting in
elevated CDT (Borg et al., 1994; Rosman et al.,
1995).
Lesch et al. (1996) stated that CDT is a marker
for chronic alcohol abuse with high sensitivity and
specificity among alcohol-dependent subjects.
They also reported that there was no correlation
between blood-alcohol concentration and elevations of CDT. Niemela et al. (1995) described
higher CDT levels in early phases of alcoholic
liver diseases and Yamauchi et al. (1993)
concluded that CDT is a useful marker of noncirrhotic alcoholic liver diseases. These studies
suggest that other features beyond alcohol consumption alone, such as long-term alcohol abuse
and chronicity of the alcohol problem have effects
on CDT levels, as recently reported by Saini et al.
(1997).
In two previous reports, we have evaluated CDT
646
© 1998 Medical Council on Alcoholism
(Received 5 March 1998; in revised form 24 April 1998; accepted 1 June 1998)
CDT AS A MARKER FOR ALCOHOL INTAKE OR CHRONIC MISUSE?
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients
The patients were hospitalized in a surgical
department at the University Hospital of Liibeck
and have been described in detail in our previous
studies (Huseby et al., \991a,b). In the present
study, we excluded those patients who had not
reported (or did not want to report) their recent
alcohol consumption (meaning daily consumption
over the previous 2 weeks), and those patients
from whose serum samples we now lacked
sufficient amounts for renewed %CDT analysis.
The patients consisted of 161 otherwise unselected subjects admitted to an acute surgical ward.
Among these, 51 were diagnosed as alcoholdependent according to SCAN interviews (WHO,
1992a) (section 11: Abuse) complying with both
ICD-10 (WHO 19926) and DSM-III-R (American
Psychiatric Association, 1987) criteria. The
remaining 110 patients did not meet these criteria
and were classified as non-dependent. The patients
were also interviewed at admittance about their
alcohol consumption for the previous 2 weeks
(DOSE: mean consumed g of pure alcohol/day).
The alcohol-dependent patients had > 10-year
history of drinking and had had at least one
detoxification treatment period. All non-dependent patients, including the high consumers, had
< 10-year history of drinking and had not been
subject to detoxification. The alcohol consumption
for the whole patient group ranged between
0-800 g/day, median value: 36 g/day. The alcohol
consumption for the alcohol-dependent patients
ranged between 0-800 g/day with a median DOSE
value of 63 g/day. Among the non-dependent
patients, the alcohol consumption ranged between
0-162 g/day, median DOSE was 26 g/day. Most
patients in this group (91 of the 110) consumed
quantities of ethanol of < 60 g/day. The remaining
19 non-dependent patients reported a higher consumption (60-162 g alcohol/day), with mean and
median values of 92 and 78 g/day, respectively. A
comparable group (n = 21) was selected from
among the alcohol-dependent patients (consuming
>60 g/day but less than 170 g/day); their alcohol
intake mean and median values were 92 and 84
g/day, respectively. The alcohol-dependent
patients from the surgical ward had a median
age of 45.0 years, and the non-dependent patients
had a median age of 43.5 years. All patients
voluntarily joined the programme, which complied with the Helsinki declaration of 1975.
Blood sampling and analysis
A venous blood sample was drawn from the
patients at inclusion and serum was kept frozen at
—70°C until analysed. CDT measurement was
performed by the AXIS %CDT Turbidimetric
Immunoassay (TIA) kit from AXIS Biochemicals
ASA (Oslo, Norway). This kit separates the transferrin isoforms by micro columns and quantifies
CDT by turbidimetry. The analytical procedure
was performed as described by the manufacturer.
The cut-off value was selected as 6% according to
the manufacturer's ins (...truncated)