Role of community health workers in type 2 diabetes mellitus self-management: A scoping review
Role of community health workers in type 2 diabetes mellitus self-management: A scoping review
Bonaventure Amandi Egbujie 0 1
Peter Arthur Delobelle 0 1
Naomi Levitt 0
Thandi Puoane 0 1
David Sanders 0 1
Brian van Wyk 0 1
0 Editor: Oathokwa Nkomazana, University of Botswana Faculty of Medicine , BOTSWANA
1 School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape , Cape Town, South Africa, 2 Chronic Disease Initiative for Africa , Division of Diabetic Medicine and Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town , Cape Town , South Africa
☯ These authors contributed equally to this work.
³ These authors also contributed equally to this work.
Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are
within the paper and its Supporting Information
Funding: This study is part of the SMART2D
project funded by the European Commission's
Horizon2020 Health Coordination Activities (Grant
Agreement No 643692) under call ªHCO-05-2014:
Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases: prevention
and treatment of type 2 diabetesº. The SMART2D
consortium includes the following 6 partner
institutions: Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Institute
The review was guided by a stepwise approach outlined in the framework for scoping
reviews developed by Arksey and O'Malley. Peer reviewed scientific and grey literature was
searched using a string of keywords, selecting English full-text articles published between
2000 and 2015. Articles were selected using inclusion criteria, charted and content
1008 studies were identified of which 54 full text articles were selected. Most (53) of the
selected studies were in HIC and targeted mostly minority populations in low resource
settings. CHWs were mostly deployed to provide education, support, and advocacy. Structured
curriculum based education was the most frequently reported service provided by CHWs to
support T2DM self-management. Support services included informational, emotional,
of Tropical Medicine, Belgium; Collaborative Care
Systems, Finland; Makerere University, School of
Public Health, Uganda; University of Western Cape,
School of Public Health, South Africa; and Uppsala
University, Sweden. The funders played no role in
the preparation of this manuscript. The contents of
this article are solely the responsibility of the
authors and do not reflect the views of the EU.
Competing interests: The authors have declared
that no competing interests exist.
appraisal and instrumental support. Models of CHW care included facility linked nurse-led
CHW coordination, facility-linked CHW led coordination and standalone CHW interventions
without facility interaction.
CHWs play several roles in T2DM self-management, including structured education,
ongoing support and health system advocacy. Preparing and coordinating CHWs for these roles
is crucial and needs further research and strengthening.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has become one of the major causes of burden of disease
globally. An estimated 422 million adults were living with the disease in 2014, compared with
108 million in 1980[
], representing a nearly quadruple increase within a period of thirty-four
years. By 2035 the prevalence of T2DM is expected to increase by about 54% from the 2013
figures to about 592 million adults globally, increasing further to 642 million adults by 2040[
All regions of the world are affected, but low and middle income countries (LMIC), where
over 70% of T2DM cases occur, suffer more. About 12% of all health expenditure globally is
estimated to be spent on T2DM and its associated complications alone with the majority of
countries having to spend between 5±20% of their national health budget on the disease[
Sub-Sahara Africa (SSA) despite having the lowest T2DM prevalence presently is projected
to have the highest rate of increase in T2DM cases of about 109% between 2015 and 2040[
With this epidemiological shift predicted for the region, contextually appropriate but low
resource approaches are needed to manage the disease. Approaches that involve affected
individuals and communities are key, because a large number of the population resides in rural
areas with little access to healthcare facilities. The utilization of CHWs as a community-based
strategy has been useful and effective in providing health promotion and prevention for
patients with chronic diseases[
] Using CHWs to enhance patient and community
management of T2DM is a potentially viable option and is reviewed in the current study. The review
will focus on the roles they (CHW) play, including what they do, how they are prepared to
perform these roles and what they influence (outcomes).
This study was guided by the Arksey and O'Malley framework for conducting scoping reviews
]. We initially defined and subsequently refined the research question based on the
framework's and other recommendations that broad scope research questions should be used to
increase the amount of literature to be reviewed[
We conducted a comprehensive literature search in the peer reviewed journal databases
PubMed, CINAHL, COCHRANE, Scopus, SAGE, as well as grey literature repositories,
Proquest Dissertation and Google scholar. The investigators chose three key constructs: `Type 2
diabetes mellitus,' `community health workers' and `self-management' for the literature search
based on a number of iterative meetings and discussions. The key constructs were searched
using combinations which also included synonyms according to the database being searched
2 / 18
to ensure that articles with related terms were equally identified. For PubMed search, the
constructs were searched as MeSH terms, while for other databases, words such as `self-efficacy'
and `self-care' were included as alternative to self-management, and `promotoras', `promotores
de salud', and `community aides' as alternative to CHWs.
The search was limited to articles published in English between January 2000 and
December 2015 and identified abstracts were imported into Mendeley desktop software for review.
Selecting relevant articles
Once retrieved from the literature search (as `hits'), we selected articles through a two-stage
process. Firstly, all titles and abstracts were screened and eligible articles identified for full text
retrieval. These retrieved full texts articles were subsequently screened for eligibility and
selected according to set inclusion criteria. An article was included if the primary intervention
focused on T2DM self-management or involved the use of CHWs or similar
communitybased non-professional health personnel. Exclusion criteria included literature reviews, peer
rather than CHW interventions, commentaries, editorials, perspective articles or duplicates
from already selected studies. Fig 1 shows the full process of article identification and selection
for this studystudies. Fig 1 shows the full process of article identification and selection for this
Charting selected articles
We charted articles to answer the research questions using a tool designed for that purpose.
Charting was done by the first author with regular iteration among all co-authors, based on a
review of the available information in each article, which was updated as new information
emerged. We utilized both descriptive and narrative data analytical methods to glean
information from articles[
Collating, summarizing, and reporting the results
Combining the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the suggestions by Levac et al[
adapted the framework by breaking it into three stages to ensure that the collated reports
answered a research question and created clear messages for the review. First, we conducted a
descriptive, numerical analysis of the extent and nature of the current literature based on the
search output presented in a narrative format, as charts and in table format. We then
conducted thematic narrative synthesis in line with the research questions and finally discussed
the implications of the first two outputs.
Characteristics of selected articles
Full text of fifty-four (54) articles that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The summary
of included articles can be seen in S1 Appendix. We found a five-fold increase in the number
of relevant articles between the five year period 2011±2015 and the six year period 2000±2005,
as shown in Fig 2.
Randomized controlled trial (RCT) (n = 22), one group pre-test post-test (n = 16), and
quasi-experimental (n = 10) designs were the most frequently reported methods to study
CHW interventions for T2DM. Fig 3 shows the distribution of different study designs. Few
studies used a cross sectional (n = 2) or qualitative (n = 2)_study design [9±13].
Fifty-two (52) articles described studies conducted in High Income Countries (HICs) and
the US in particular (51). None of the studies were conducted in a low income country (LIC).
3 / 18
Fig 1. Diagram showing the flow process for identification and selection of eligible article in the scoping review.
Minorities and disadvantaged groups were the most frequently targeted groups for CHW
assisted T2DM self-management interventions. Hispanics, most of whom were Mexican
Americans, made up more than 50% of this group, with African Americans also frequently
studied. The study conducted in Australia that met our study criteria targeted Aboriginal
people who also comprise a minority and disadvantaged group.
4 / 18
Fig 2. Diagram showing number of articles on CHW led T2DM self-management intervention in each five-year period between 2000 and 2015
among selected studies.
Recruitment and selection
In all studies CHWs were recruited from the community where interventions took place (54
articles). These individuals are often known to be longstanding members of the intervention
communities and being `bilingual' was frequently used as a criteria for recruitment.
Academic qualification requirement for recruitment varied between studies. While high
school diploma was frequently required for selection (16 articles), one article reported that
there was no academic qualification requirement for selection as a CHW. Most studies (34
articles) failed to report the educational qualification of CHWs recruited for their intervention
with 20 articles reporting that CHWs had at least a high school diploma.
Fig 3. Diagram showing study designs commonly used to research CHW's role in self-management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
5 / 18
We found that training duration varied significantly between studies ranging from a few hours
to several months. Six studies (11%) reported that the training offered to CHWs lasted one
week or less, and one article reported that the training duration was limited to four hours. Ten
studies (19%) reported that training lasted more than a week with two reporting five and six
months training durations. Thirteen studies (24%) indicated training duration lasting several
hours (range 20±240 hours) but did not specify how these was spread in days, weeks or months.
Curiously, most of the studies (24 or 44%) did not state training duration even when training
was said to have been provided. No criteria were provided about how the duration of CHW
training was decided upon in most of the articles. In the reported longest training duration
(approximately six months), CHWs underwent training through a local health authority in
order to be certified. From the reviewed studies, only 13 (24%) reported that CHWs were
provided training updates in order to support their initial training. 35 studies (65%) did not state
whether ongoing training was provided while 9 studies (16%) had no update training provided.
CHW trainings were frequently conducted by certified diabetes educators (CDE),
intervention principal investigators (PI) or a research expert. The focus of PI led CHW training was
often related to the study protocol. Few studies reported that CHWs were offered
comprehensive multidisciplinary training by physicians, dieticians and CDE[14±16]. The use of an
apprenticeship model for training, which refers to the coaching of newly recruited CHWs on
the job by older CHWs, was reported in one study. We found limited information on the
theoretical principle underlying CHW training. In one of the studies, adult learning technique was
applied in training CHW.
[16±18]. From the review, training duration seemed to be associated with improved HbA1c
and diabetes knowledge. The longer the training duration, the more likely study is to report
improved HbA1c and diabetes knowledge as the study outcome. The only study that reported
no improvement in diabetes knowledge had CHWs trained for a total duration of less than
Roles played by CHWs
Education. Education was the most frequently reported (n = 44) service provided by CHWs in
T2DM self-management. CHWs are commonly used as lay diabetes educators for T2DM
patients[9,11,15,17,19±59]. The aim of education varied between studies but increasing
patients' knowledge was most frequently reported. CHWs also delivered stress management,
meal preparation and planning, physical activity, problem solving, goal setting, as well as
medication adherence education. None of the selected studies covered all the purposes mentioned
CHWs deliver education to T2DM patients in group, individually or both (9, 14 and 19
articles respectively). While individual education was usually delivered in patient's homes, group
education was delivered at various locations such as health facilities, churches, or other
community settings. Education was often provided using paper tools but occasionally with
Education curriculum. CHWs deliver curriculum based education using manuals adapted
from an existing document or documents developed purposely for the intervention. The
American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines and American National Diabetes Education
Program (NDEP) curriculum were the most frequently reported sources for CHW led
education (n = 16). In other studies where curricula were developed for the study purpose,
intervention designers used community-based participatory research (CBPR) with stakeholders
including CHWs and other care providers.
6 / 18
In addition to their role as diabetes health educators, we found that CHWs were frequently
deployed to provide support to T2DM patients (n = 42). This support was frequently provided
in addition to health education but sometimes it served the sole purpose of their service.
Support as used in this review varied between interventions, but generally belonged to one of the
following four categories: emotional, appraisal, informational and instrumental/tangible
] These forms of support were usually delivered through one-on-one interaction at
patients' homes, follow-up phone conversations or group community settings in places such as
CHWs most frequently provide informational support giving advice and information about
community and other vital resources to patients (n = 30). Informational support refers only to
non-curriculum based information on community resources for T2DM disease management.
Four of these thirty studies reported that informational support was the only support
intervention, while the remaining 26 studies reported that informational support was given in
combination with other forms of support.
Twenty studies reported that appraisal support was given to patients at home in
combination with other forms of support. Appraisal support referred to providing assistance or
feedback to promote the conduct of self-management assessment (knowledge and behavior) by
patients based on previously provided education.
CHWs also provided instrumental support to T2DM patients (n = 16). Instrumental
support mostly involved helping patients to `navigate' the health system and other systems that
support the maintenance of healthy living such as social services[
], referrals and financial
assistance. Other instrumental roles reported in the selected studies included helping with
paperwork for services, accompanying patients, and arranging health services.
CHWs also provide critical emotional support to T2DM patients. Support services were
often provided in combination and frequently tailored to each individual's requirement.
Advocacy is the third commonly reported role played by CHWs for T2DM self-management
(10 articles)[15,22,43,61±67]. This role overlaps somewhat with the `instrumental support'
function as some articles reported referral support and setting up doctor's appointments as
advocacy. However, advocacy in this category refers to the role played by CHWs in helping
participants communicate with their physician and health facility, ensuring that they receive
good clinical services in line with stipulated guidelines. It includes helping patients to access
health resources such as glucose strips, medication, and orthopedic shoes from health facilities,
where accessing such commodities may take a longer period without help.
The selected articles described CHWs roles as described above in different combinations, as
shown in Fig 4. We found that a combination of Education and support activities is the most
frequently reported approach and is more likely to lead to improvement in HbA1c as well as
diabetes knowledge compared to other combinatiosn of roles. This combination is also found
to lead to better outcomes compared to any of the roles alone. When a single role is used, we
found that Education only approach leads to the best outcomes. The review also showed that
education only intervention using CHW is less likely to result in weight or BMI reduction
compared to combination of education and support activities by CHW.
As the selected studies indicate, three broad models of CHW coordination are frequently used
in T2DM self-management interventions. In the first model, CHWs are coordinated by
7 / 18
Fig 4. Venn diagram showing distribution of CHWs role in T2DM in selected articles, n = number of articles.
intervention managers or research investigators, who are usually not employed by the health
facility where the intervention is situated and where coordination is essential for intervention
or research implementation. There is no direct interaction between CHWs and usual patient
care providers in this model (n = 17). In the second model, CHWs are supervised and
coordinated by a nurse or physician in the facility where the patients receive their clinical services
(n = 27). CHWs communicate routinely with these usual care providers. Studies where this
model was used, reported that CHWs were mostly employed by the health facility and fully
integrated and hence coordinated and supervised in the existing health system. Among the
twenty-seven interventions where nurses coordinated CHWs, they had designated T2DM
intervention activities (n = 7) or performed a regular duty in the facility in addition to
facilitating CHW T2DM activities (n = 20). Where a nurse was dedicated solely to T2DM intervention
by coordinating CHWs, such nurse was often referred to as nurse-case manager (NCM).
One study looked at the effectiveness of the different models of coordination mentioned
above and showed that the NCM model of coordination was more effective than interventions
where CHWs were not coordinated by nurses or where nurses alone provided T2DM services
]. In the third model of coordination, a more experienced CHW is used to coordinate other
CHWs. Often designated as the senior CHW, this person communicates with health facilities
to facilitate the work of CHWs.
Blood sugar control and blood lipid levels were the two most frequently measured outcomes in
CHW led T2DM self-management interventions in our review (Fig 5). Thirty-eight (70%) of
the studies reported that glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was the biomarker used to
monitor blood sugar control and measure the success of intervention. One study reported using
random blood sugar to measure blood sugar control among T2DM patients[
]. In studies
that used HbA1c as primary outcome measure, a few reported improvement in values for
patients whose baseline HbA1C were much higher than the normal (closer to 10%), with very
little or no gains for patients whose values were close to the normal range (<7%)[
Fourteen studies (24%) measured the lipid profile of participants as a primary or secondary
outcome. Fifteen articles reported blood pressure checks in addition to blood sugar level as a
measure of effectiveness of intervention, while 16 articles reported that BMI was measured to
monitor CHW effectiveness in T2DM self-management. Other studies reported using physical
activity, medication adherence, number of clinic visits, fruit and/or vegetable intake as the
measure of success.
8 / 18
Fig 5. Diagram showing outcomes frequently targeted and reported in CHW supported self-management of type 2
Diabetes mellitus study.
Apart from the biophysical outcomes mentioned above, seventeen articles (31%) reported
that T2DM knowledge was the key outcome measure. Other studies reported improved
selfmanagement behavior or self-efficacy as outcome measure using standardized tools. The
selfmanagement tools commonly reported in our review included the `Summary of Diabetes
Selfcare Activities' tool[
], the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale[
Lorig Self-efficacy Scale[
]. It is important to mention that although all studies targeted
self-management as an outcome, only seven studies reported the use of standardized scales to
measure self-efficacy or self-management.
We conducted this study to map the available literature and evidence related to CHWs' roles
in T2DM self-management interventions globally.
The roles increasingly played by CHWs in T2DM self-management are most prominent in
HIC, in particular the US. Based on the findings from our review we have categorized these
roles into the triad of education, support and advocacy (ESA). Palmas et al (2015) in a
systematic review of CHW interventions similarly identified education, support and advocacy as the
major roles played by CHWs[
]. In the US, the National Community Health Advisor Study
through a national survey listed seven basic roles for CHWs including cultural mediation,
informal counselling & social support, education, advocacy, ensuring people get services they
need, capacity building and direct service provision[
]. Findley et al (2012) in a New York
State survey among CHWs and employers identified five basic roles played by CHWs
including advocacy, education, community outreach, referral and cultural bridging[
]. Norris et al
(2006) found a great variability in the roles played by CHWs in diabetes care[
As part of the recommendation for the ª1 million CHWs in sub-Saharan Africa by 2015º,
Singh and Sachs (2013) noted that CHWs in the `Millennium Village project' essentially played
three roles viz. education, pre-approved clinical services and referral[
]. Our categorization
of CHW roles represents a functional approach to relaying their use in self-management
interventions and is not different from the classifications described above. Our classification is
however based on CHWs' role in diabetes self-management only, while some of the roles
mentioned in studies above are for several other chronic conditions.
9 / 18
In our review CHWs were most commonly used as diabetes educators for T2DM
intervention. Diabetes education is not always available in every country and even when available,
patients do not always have access and therefore are not reached with this critical component
]. As educators, CHWs are used to bridge this care gap by providing accessible
education to people in their preferred locations, in particular focusing on disadvantaged
In addition to education, CHWs are also used to provide social support which can be
emotional, informational, appraisal and tangible in nature[
]. The definition of this support
varied across studies, although it is commonly recognized as being crucial to successful
selfmanagement. As noted by Davis et al (2007), improvements in diabetic control following
CHW self-management education intervention begins to decline six months after the end of
] and lifetime follow-up and support may be required, especially in
settings where there is a lack of professional health care providers.
CHWs also provide advocacy services to T2DM patients. This is the least reported role
because advocacy had different meanings in different studies. Culica et al (2007) and Ingram
et al (2007) considered activities such as filling papers and referring T2DM patients to clinics
as advocacy, but we have classified the latter as part of instrumental or tangible support.
Advocacy has not been comprehensively explored by diabetes program designers and CHWs have
been reported to be on the periphery of formal health systems[
], without much integration,
which may have hampered their role as advocates.
CHWs often undertake different roles in T2DM self-management, with studies showing
this to be an increasing trend between 2000 and 2015. Education and support alone is not
sufficient to provide self-management capabilities to T2DM patients. Cummings et al (2013) in a
randomized controlled trial of education alone compared with education alongside other roles
for CHWs found and suggested that programs should not only focus on didactic diabetes
education, but should include other support activities that increase coping skills[
Coordination and supervision of CHWs in their roles is crucial for success or failure[
We found different coordination models which either made CHWs outsiders or insiders to
patient routine care. Models that integrate CHW coordination within the health system and
give CHWs access to regular patient care were found to be effective. Lehmann and Sanders
(2007) noted that CHWs often work peripherally and are not directly coordinated by the
health system, which can make it difficult to fully participate in patient management. There is
evidence of improved clinical outcomes for T2DM self-management interventions when a
CHW works with, and is coordinated, by a health facility linked nurse for program delivery
Preparing CHWs to play their role in T2DM self-management is a critical yet often
neglected component of intervention design. Insufficient training undermines successful
implementation of well-intended CHW interventions[
]. Just as CHW training duration and
content are critical, the type and quality of training providers is also critical to successful
knowledge transfer. CDEs were often tasked with training CHWs in the reported studies,
although few reported that CHWs were trained by endocrinologists, CDE, mental health
professionals, and nutritionists in a complete training package. Training in study policies and
procedures, technical skills, and diabetes education alone may not provide CHWs enough
capacity to perform the role of health educators, and more may be required[
involvement of a multidisciplinary team of medical and health promotion professionals in the training
of CHWs may represent the optimal way to ensure quality and consistency. Of equal
significance is the provision of ongoing training to CHWs. Most studies in this review lasted between
6±12 months and did not identify the need for ongoing training. For interventions at
population level that will potentially last several years, ongoing training will however be necessary.
10 / 18
In the reviewed literature, HbA1c was the most frequently used measure of success in
CHW led T2DM self-management interventions. HbA1c is the recommended standard test
for glycemic monitoring in diabetes as it measures average plasma glucose over 2±3 months
] and is thus the appropriate test if glycaemic control is the preferred outcome measure.
This suggests that CHWs are used to target and focus on chronic glycemic control rather than
acute control in T2DM management. It is important to mention that in HIC, HbA1c tests may
be freely available as a routine diabetes investigation, but for many LMIC, routine access to
HbA1c is limited. Thus, in a study setting, using HbA1c as an outcome measure in LMIC is
quite possible, but it would be more difficult in routine care in rural or primary care settings
where cost and access to even point of care HbA1c machines may be limited. Bennet et al
recognized such challenges to the use of Hb1Ac in poorer countries. A good knowledge of the
interaction between hemoglobin levels and HbA1c is also important since different
hemoglobin levels could affect the interpretation of any HbA1c result obtained[
]. Having said
these, it is important to recognize that not all patients will experience huge benefit in terms of
reduction in HbA1c value when supported by CHW no matter the roles or combination of
roles. There is therefore the need for triaging and selection criteria for the clients who will
most likely benefit from CHW support as far as HbA1c reduction is concerned.
T2DM disease knowledge was also a frequently reported primary or secondary outcome in
our review. To improve their self-efficacy, patients will require good knowledge of T2DM
disease as well as other self-management skills, including goal setting and coping skills. The
ultimate goal of T2DM education is to improve self-efficacy in individuals, and as such, any
education falling short of this cannot be said to be adequate. The measures in our review were
mostly related to T2DM knowledge and not inclusive of self-management or self-efficacy.
Non-inclusion of self-efficacy as part of a CHW led diabetes education intervention outcome
could make it difficult to evaluate the actual impact of such intervention or the pathways
through which any noted changes occurred. As observed in our review, increased T2DM
knowledge do not always translate into improved glycemic control[
], which could be
due to the fact that increased knowledge did not result in improved self-management. Studies
have observed that increased knowledge does not necessarily translate into changes in
], and there is a need for further research to answer questions
related to the association or lack of it between improved T2DM knowledge, self-efficacy and
ultimately glycemic control. Outcome measures in diabetes education intervention should
hence not only speak to increased diabetes knowledge but also include self-management and
Patients with poorly controlled blood sugar are more likely to benefit from CHW support
compared to patients with better glycaemic control. This suggests that there could be
usefulness to triaging of patients most at risk for the sake of providing CHW support. Secondly,
CHW training duration may have influence on the quality of support they provide and
ultimately affect the clinical target outcome. Thirdly, Improvement in blood sugar control does
not always align with increased diabetes knowledge or self-management practice among
T2DM patient as shown in our reviewed studies, which suggests existence of other mediators
or pathways through which self-management support leads to improved clinical outcome.
Recommendations for research
Training methodology that most appriopriately capacitates CHW for T2DM self-management
support was not clear from the review. More studies are required to establish how best to train
11 / 18
CHW for their role in T2DM support. This includes who should provide the training and for
how long. More studies will be required to answer question on whether triaging T2DM
patients for CHW support will be beneficial overall or less not. Furthermore research into the
relationship between diabetes self-management support activities (education, support,
advocacy), diabetes knowledge, self- efficacy and improved outcomes will provide more
information on what works and should be pursued further.
Although we made stringent efforts to ensure that all available literature was identified and
included, we recognize that some articles may have been missed. We searched for articles in
three peer reviewed journal databases and an online data source and used two databases to
search for the full text of selected abstracts. It is possible that some articles have been missed,
especially in the grey literature. We are also cautious about interpreting the findings from this
study since most selected studies came from one country, the US. It could however be argued
that the use of CHWs for T2DM self-management is most common in the US and hence most
research publications will be from this country. Further to this, abstract and full text selection
was done by one author rather than by two independent researchers as recommended by
Arksey and O'Malley. This could result in researcher bias in including or excluding articles from
full review. Iteration between all the authors however ensured rigorous article selection and
charting. Despite the above reported limitations, we are confident that the findings from this
study are a true reflection of the roles CHWs play in T2DM self-management intervention.
CHWs play several useful roles in T2DM self-management that includes structured education,
ongoing support and health system advocacy. Most of the available evidence however come
from HICs with very little from LMICs. Preparing and coordinating CHWs for these roles is
essential for success and will need further research and strengthening. Training models that
deliver comprehensive knowledge and enhance CHWs' capacity to deliver T2DM
self-management support is lacking and needs to be developed. Further studies should attempt to explore
the mediating link between self-efficacy and self-management of T2DM when CHWs are used.
S1 Appendix. Summary of the characteristics of selected studies I.
S2 Appendix. Summary of the characteristics of selected studies II.
This study is part of the SMART2D project funded by the European Commission's
Horizon2020 Health Coordination Activities (Grant Agreement No 643692) under call
ªHCO-052014: Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases: prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetesº. The
SMART2D consortium includes the following partner institutions: Karolinska Institutet,
Sweden; Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium; Collaborative Care Systems, Finland; Makerere
University, School of Public Health, Uganda; University of the Western Cape, School of Public
Health, South Africa; and Uppsala University, Sweden. The contents of this article are solely
the responsibility of the authors and do not reflect the views of the EU.
12 / 18
Conceptualization: Bonaventure Amandi Egbujie, Thandi Puoane, David Sanders, Brian van
Data curation: Bonaventure Amandi Egbujie, Peter Arthur Delobelle, Naomi Levitt, Thandi
Formal analysis: Bonaventure Amandi Egbujie.
Funding acquisition: Thandi Puoane, David Sanders.
Investigation: Bonaventure Amandi Egbujie.
Methodology: Bonaventure Amandi Egbujie, Peter Arthur Delobelle, Naomi Levitt, Thandi
Project administration: Bonaventure Amandi Egbujie, Peter Arthur Delobelle, Naomi Levitt,
Software: Bonaventure Amandi Egbujie.
Supervision: Peter Arthur Delobelle, Naomi Levitt, Thandi Puoane, Brian van Wyk.
Validation: Peter Arthur Delobelle.
Visualization: Bonaventure Amandi Egbujie.
Writing ± original draft: Bonaventure Amandi Egbujie, Peter Arthur Delobelle, Naomi
Writing ± review & editing: Bonaventure Amandi Egbujie, Peter Arthur Delobelle, Thandi
Puoane, David Sanders, Brian van Wyk.
13 / 18
14 / 18
15 / 18
among urban Latino populations. Health Promot Pract. 2009; 10:293±302. https://doi.org/10.1177/
1524839907306406 PMID: 18344318
16 / 18
Wagner J, Bermudez-Millan A. Community health workers assisting Latinos manage stress and diabetes
(CALMS-D): rationale, intervention design, implementation, and process outcomes. Transl Behav . . .
[Internet]. [cited 2015 Sep 2]; Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13142-015-0332-1
Walton JW, Snead C a, Collinsworth AW, Schmidt. Reducing diabetes disparities through the
implementation of a community health worker-led diabetes self-management education program. Fam
Community Health [Internet]. 2012; 35(2):161±71. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
22367263 https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0b013e31824651d3 PMID: 22367263
17 / 18
1. World Health Organization. Global Report on Diabetes [Internet] . 2016 . Available from: http://apps.who. int/iris/bitstream/10665/204871/1/9789241565257_eng.pdf
2. International Diabetes Federation . IDF Diabetes Atlas, 6th edn [Internet] . Basel, Switzerland; 2013 . Available from: https://www.idf.org/
3. International Diabetes Federation . IDF Diabetes Atlas, 7th edn [Internet] . Brussels, Belgium; 2015 . Available from: http://www.diabetesatlas.org
4. Esterson YB , Carey M , Piette JD , Thomas N , Hawkins M. A systematic review of innovative diabetes care models in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) . J Health Care Poor Underserved . 2014 Feb; 25 ( 1 ): 72 ± 93 . https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu. 2014 .0037 PMID: 24509014
5. Levitt NS , Puoane T , Denman CA , Abrahams-Gessel S , Surka S , Mendoza C , et al. Referral outcomes of individuals identified at high risk of cardiovascular disease by community health workers in Bangladesh , Guatemala, Mexico, and South Africa. Glob Health Action [Internet] . 2015 Jan [cited 2016 Apr 15 ] ; 8(1):1±7 . Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid= 4390559&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
6. Puoane T , Bradley H , Hughes G . Community intervention for the emerging epidemic of non-communicable diseases . South African J Clin Nutr . 2006 ; 19 : 56 ± 62 .
7. Arksey H , O'Malley L . Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework . 2005 ; 8 ( 1 ): 19 ± 32 . Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
8. Levac D , Colquhoun H , O'Brien KK . Scoping studies: advancing the methodology . Implement Sci . 2010 ; 5 : 69 . https://doi.org/10.1186/ 1748 -5908-5-69 PMID: 20854677
9. DePue JD , Rosen RK , Seiden A , Bereolos N , Chima ML , Goldstein MG , et al. Implementation of a culturally tailored diabetes intervention with community health workers in American Samoa . Diabetes Educ [Internet]. Jan [cited 2015 Dec 4 ]; 39 ( 6 ): 761 ± 71 . Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/ articlerender.fcgi?artid=4062972&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
10. Ndou T , van Zyl G , Hlahane S , Goudge J. A rapid assessment of a community health worker pilot programme to improve the management of hypertension and diabetes in Emfuleni sub-district of Gauteng Province, South Africa . Glob Health Action [Internet] . 2013 Jan [cited 2016 Mar 28 ]; 6 : 19228 . Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3556684&tool= pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v6i0. 19228 PMID: 23364086
11. Schmidt K , Collinsworth A , Barnes S , Brown R . Impact of a Community Health Worker±Led Diabetes Education Program on Hospital and Emergency Department Utilization and Costs . JCOM [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Sep 2 ]; Available from: http://turner-white.com/pdf/jcom_may15_diabetes.pdf
12. Davis KL , O'Toole ML , Brownson CA , Llanos P , Fisher EB . Teaching how, not what: the contributions of community health workers to diabetes self-management . Diabetes Educ [Internet] . 2007 Jun [cited 2016 Mar 12 ]; 33 Suppl 6 ( SUPPL . 6):208S± 215S . Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/ record.url?eid= 2 - s2 . 0 - 34347356646 &partnerID=tZOtx3y1
13. Deitrick LM , Paxton HD , Rivera A , Gertner EJ , Biery N , Letcher AS , et al. Understanding the Role of the Promotora in a Latino Diabetes Education Program . Qual Health Res [Internet] . 2010 ; 20 ( 3 ): 386 ± 99 . Available from: http://qhr.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/1049732309354281 https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1049732309354281 PMID: 20133505
14. Elizabeth A. Prezio a , Dunlei Cheng a, 1 , Bijal A . Balasubramaniana 1, Kerem Shuval a, 1 , Darla E. Kendzor a, 1, Dan Culica b 2. Community Diabetes Education (CoDE) for uninsured Mexican Americans: a randomized controlled trial of a culturally tailored diabetes education and management . Diabetes Res . . . [Internet] . 2013 [cited 2015 Sep 29 ]; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0168822713000284
15. Culica D , Walton JW , Prezio EA . CoDE: Community Diabetes Education for uninsured Mexican Americans . Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) [Internet] . 2007 Apr [cited 2016 Mar 29 ]; 20 ( 2 ): 111 ± 7 . Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1849870&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype= abstract
16. Walton JW , Snead CA , Collinsworth AW , Schmidt KL . Reducing diabetes disparities through the implementation of a community health worker-led diabetes self-management education program . Fam Community Health [Internet] . 2012 Jan [cited 2016 Mar 12 ]; 35 ( 2 ): 161 ± 71 . Available from: http://www. scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid= 2 - s2 . 0 - 84858189881 &partnerID=tZOtx3y1 https://doi.org/10.1097/ FCH.0b013e31824651d3 PMID: 22367263
17. Heisler M , Choi H , Palmisano G , Mase R , Richardson C , Fagerlin A , et al. Comparison of Community Health Worker±Led Diabetes Medication Decision-Making Support for Low-Income Latino and African American Adults With Diabetes Using E-Health Tools Versus Print Materials . Ann Intern Med [Internet]. 2014 Nov 18 [cited 2015 Oct 2 ]; 161 ( 10 _Supplement): S13 . Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral. nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4391371&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
18. McEwen MM , Pasvogel A , Gallegos G , Barrera L . Type 2 diabetes self-management social support intervention at the U.S.-Mexico border . Public Health Nurs [Internet]. Jan [cited 2016 Jan 4 ]; 27 ( 4 ): 310 ± 9 . Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2917267&tool= pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
19. Babamoto KS , Sey KA , Camilleri AJ , Karlan VJ , Catalasan J , Morisky DE . Improving Diabetes Care and Health Measures Among Hispanics Using Community Health Workers: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial . Heal Educ Behav [Internet] . 2009 ; 36 ( 1 ): 113 ± 26 . Available from: http://heb. sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/36/1/113%5Cnhttp://heb.sagepub.com.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/ cgi/content/abstract/36/1/113%5Cnhttp://heb.sagepub.com.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/cgi/reprint/36/ 1/113.pdf
20. Beckham S , Bradley S , Washburn A , Taumua T. Diabetes management: utilizing community health workers in a Hawaiian/Samoan population . J Health Care Poor Underserved [Internet] . 2008 ; 19 ( 2 ): 416 ± 27 . Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18469413 https://doi.org/10.1353/ hpu.0.0012 PMID: 18469413
21. Brown SA , Garcia AA , Kouzekanani K , Hanis CL . Culturally Competent Diabetes Self-Management Education for Mexican Americans . Diabetes Care [Internet] . 2002 ; 25 ( 2 ): 259 ± 68 . Available from: http:// care.diabetesjournals.org/content/25/2/259.full. pdf PMID: 11815493
22. Brown HS , Wilson KJ , PagaÂn JA , Arcari CM , Martinez M , Smith K , et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a community health worker intervention for low-income Hispanic adults with diabetes . Prev Chronic Dis [Internet] . 2012 Jan [cited 2015 Nov 18 ]; 9: E140 . Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/ articlerender.fcgi?artid=3475531&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd9. 120074 PMID: 22916995
23. Cadzow RB , Vest BM , Craig M , Rowe JS , Kahn LS . ªLiving well with diabetesº: evaluation of a pilot program to promote diabetes prevention and self-management in a medically underserved community . Diabetes Spectr [Internet] . 2014 Nov [cited 2016 Mar 29 ]; 27 ( 4 ): 246 ± 55 . Available from: http://www. pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4231932&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract https://doi.org/10.2337/diaspect.27.4.246 PMID: 25647046
24. Carrasquillo O , Patberg E , Alonzo Y , Li H , Kenya S . Rationale and design of the Miami Healthy Heart Initiative: a randomized controlled study of a community health worker intervention among Latino patients with poorly controlled diabetes . Int J Gen Med [Internet] . 2014 Jan [cited 2015 Dec 22 ]; 7 : 115 ± 26 . Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3942117&tool= pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S56250 PMID: 24600243
25. Castillo A , Giachello A , Bates R , Concha J , Ramirez V , Sanchez C , et al. Community-based Diabetes Education for Latinos: The Diabetes Empowerment Education Program . Diabetes Educ [Internet] . 2010 Jan [cited 2016 Mar 12 ]; 36 ( 4 ): 586 ± 94 . Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid= 2 - s2 . 0 - 78149391629 &partnerID=tZOtx3y1 https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721710371524 PMID: 20538970
26. CeneÂ CW , Haymore LB , Ellis D , Whitaker S , Henderson S , Lin F-C , et al. Implementation of the power to prevent diabetes prevention educational curriculum into rural African American communities: a feasibility study . Diabetes Educ [Internet]. Jan [cited 2015 Dec 18 ]; 39 ( 6 ): 776 ± 85 . Available from: http:// www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4429528&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
27. Collinsworth AW , Vulimiri M , Schmidt KL , Snead C a. Effectiveness of a community health worker-led diabetes self-management education program and implications for CHW involvement in care coordination strategies . [Internet] . Vol. 39 , The Diabetes educator. 2013 . p. 792 ± 9 . Available from: http://www. scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid= 2 - s2 . 0 - 84887489576 &partnerID=tZOtx3y1 https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0145721713504470 PMID: 24052203
28. Cruz Y , Hernandez-Lane M. The effectiveness of a community health program in improving diabetes knowledge in the Hispanic population: Salud y Bienestar (Health and Wellness) . J community . . . [Internet] . 2013 [cited 2015 Sep 2 ]; Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10900-013- 9722-9
29. Cummings DM , Lutes LD , Littlewood K , DiNatale E , Hambidge B , Schulman K. EMPOWER: a randomized trial using community health workers to deliver a lifestyle intervention program in African American women with Type 2 diabetes: design, rationale, and baseline characteristics . Contemp Clin Trials [Internet] . 2013 Sep [cited 2015 Dec 4 ]; 36 ( 1 ): 147 ± 53 . Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S1551714413000980 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct. 2013 . 06 .006 PMID: 23792133
30. Davis KL , O'Toole ML , Brownson C a , Llanos P , Fisher EB . Teaching how, not what: the contributions of community health workers to diabetes self-management . Diabetes Educ . 2007 ; 33 Suppl 6 ( June 2007 ):208S± 215S .
31. De Pue JD , Dunsiger S , Seiden AD , Blume P , Rosen RK , Goldstein MG , et al. Nurse±Community HealthWorker Team Improves Diabetes Care in American Samoa . Diabetes Care . 2013 ; 36 ( 16 ): 1947 ± 53 .
32. Deitrick LM , Paxton HD , Rivera A , Gertner EJ , Biery N , Letcher AS , et al. Understanding the role of the promotora in a Latino diabetes education program . Qual Health Res [Internet] . 2010 Mar [cited 2016 Mar 12 ]; 20 ( 3 ): 386 ± 99 . Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid= 2 - s2 . 0 - 76649102067 &partnerID=tZOtx3y1 https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309354281 PMID: 20133505
33. Henderson VA , Barr KL , An LC , Guajardo C , Newhouse W , Mase R , et al. Community-based participatory research and user-centered design in a diabetes medication information and decision tool . Prog Community Health Partnersh [Internet]. 2013 Jan [cited 2016 Mar 28 ]; 7 ( 2 ): 171 ± 84 . Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4117400&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype= abstract https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr. 2013 .0024 PMID: 23793248
34. Ingram M , Torres E , Redondo F , Bradford G , Wang C , O'Toole ML. The impact of promotoras on social support and glycemic control among members of a farmworker community on the US-Mexico border . Diabetes Educ [Internet] . 2007 ; 33 Suppl 6 (June):172S± 178S . Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/17620398
35. Islam NS , Wyatt LC , Patel SD , Shapiro E , Tandon SD , Mukherji BR , et al. Evaluation of a community health worker pilot intervention to improve diabetes management in Bangladeshi immigrants with type 2 diabetes in New York City . Diabetes Educ [Internet]. Jan [cited 2015 Oct 25 ]; 39 ( 4 ): 478 ± 93 . Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3912744&tool= pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
36. Liebman J , Heffernan D , Sarvela P . Establishing diabetes self-management in a community health center serving low-income Latinos . Diabetes Educ [Internet] . 2007 Jun [cited 2016 Mar 12 ]; 33 Suppl 6 ( SUPPL . 6):132S± 138S . Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid= 2 - s2 . 0 - 34347341834 &partnerID=tZOtx3y1
37. Lujan J , Ostwald SK , Ortiz M. Promotora diabetes intervention for Mexican Americans . Diabetes Educ [Internet] . 2007 ; 33 ( 4 ): 660 ± 70 . Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17684167 https:// doi.org/10.1177/0145721707304080 PMID: 17684167
38. McElmurry BJ , McCreary LL , Park CG , Ramos L , Martinez E , Parikh R , et al. Implementation, outcomes, and lessons learned from a collaborative primary health care program to improve diabetes care
39. McEwen MM , Pasvogel A , Gallegos G , Barrera L . Type 2 diabetes self-management social support intervention at the U.S.-Mexico border . Public Health Nurs [Internet] . 2010 ; 27 ( 4 ): 310 ± 9 . Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2917267&tool= pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525- 1446 . 2010 . 00860 . x PMID : 20626831
40. Otero-Sabogal R , Arretz D , Siebold S , Hallen E , Lee R , Ketchel A , et al. Physician-community health worker partnering to support diabetes selfmanagement in primary care . Qual Prim Care [Internet] . 2010 ; 18 ( 6 ): 363 ± 72 . Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid= 2 - s2 . 0 - 79952167899 &partnerID=tZOtx3y1 PMID: 21294977
41. Palmas W , Findley S , Mejia M. Results of the northern Manhattan diabetes community outreach project: a randomized trial studying a community health worker intervention to improve diabetes care . Diabetes . . . [Internet] . 2014 [cited 2015 Sep 2 ]; Available from: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/37/4/963.short
42. PeÂrez-Escamilla R , Damio G , Chhabra J , Fernandez ML , Segura-PeÂrez S , Vega-LoÂpez S , et al. Impact of a community health workers-led structured program on blood glucose control among Latinos with type 2 diabetes: The DIALBEST Trial . Diabetes Care . 2015 ; 38 ( 2 ): 197 ± 205 . https://doi.org/10.2337/ dc14-0327 PMID: 25125508
43. Prezio EA , Cheng D , Balasubramanian BA , Shuval K , Kendzor DE , Culica D. Community Diabetes Education (CoDE) for uninsured Mexican Americans: A randomized controlled trial of a culturally tailored diabetes education and management program led by a community health worker . Diabetes Res Clin Pract . 2013 ; 100 ( 1 ): 19 ± 28 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres. 2013 . 01 .027 PMID: 23453178
44. Rothschild SK , Martin MA , Swider SM , TumialaÂn Lynas CM , Janssen I , Avery EF , et al. Mexican American trial of community health workers: a randomized controlled trial of a community health worker intervention for Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes mellitus . Am J Public Health [Internet] . 2014 Aug [cited 2016 Mar 12 ]; 104 ( 8 ): 1540 ± 8 . Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid= 2 - s2 . 0 - 84904291499 &partnerID=tZOtx3y1 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH. 2013 .301439 PMID: 23947316
45. Ryabov I. The impact of community health workers on behavioral outcomes and glycemic control of diabetes patients on the U.S.-Mexico border [Internet] . Int Q Community Health Educ. 2011 [cited 2016 Jan 3 ]. Available from: http://qch.sagepub.com/content/31/4/387.full.pdf
46. Sarah Hamid1 , Shira Dunsiger2 , Andrew D Seiden3 , Ofeira Nu'usolia4, John Tuitele4 J, D DePue2 and STM . Impact of a Diabetes Control and Management Intervention on Healthcare Utilization in American Samoa . 2013 ; 18 ( 9 ): 1199 ± 216 .
47. Saxe-Custack A , Weatherspoon L . A Patient-Centered Approach Using Community- Based Paraprofessionals to Improve Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes . Am J Heal Educ [Internet] . 2013 ; 44 ( 4 ): 213 ± 20 . Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx ?direct=true&AuthType=ip,url,uid, shib&db=rzh&AN=2012211370&site=ehost-live
48. Sixta CS , Ostwald S. Texas-Mexico Border Intervention by Promotores for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes . Diabetes Educ [Internet] . 2008 ; 34 ( 2 ): 299 ± 309 . Available from: http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10. 1177/0145721708314490 https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721708314490 PMID: 18375779
49. Sosa E. Lessons learned from training of promotores de salud for obesity and diabetes prevention . J Heal . . . [Internet] . 2013 [cited 2015 Sep 2 ]; Available from: http://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/jhdrp/vol6/ iss1/1/
50. Spencer MS , Rosland A -M, Kieffer EC , Sinco BR , Valerio M , Palmisano G , et al. Effectiveness of a community health worker intervention among African American and Latino adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial . Am J Public Health [Internet] . 2011 Dec [cited 2016 Feb 26 ]; 101 ( 12 ): 2253 ± 60 . Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid= 2 - s2 . 0 - 81555226643 &partnerID=tZOtx3y1 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH. 2010 .300106 PMID: 21680932
51. Sul S , Nurhayati I , Zawiyah Y. The Involvement of Lay Educators in the Diabetic Control of Type 2 Diabetic Patients . researchgate.net [Internet]. [cited 2015 Sep 2 ]; Available from: http://www.researchgate. net/profile/Sondi_Sararaks2/publication/264825860_The_Involvement_of_Lay_Educators_in_the_ Diabetic_Control_of_Type_2_Diabetic_Patients/links/53f2ce8a0cf2bc0c40ecb6d2.pdf
52. Tang TS , Funnell M , Sinco B , Piatt G , Palmisano G , Spencer MS , et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Peer Leaders and Community Health Workers in Diabetes Self-management Support: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial . 2015 ; 1 ± 10 .
53. Thompson JR , Horton C , Flores C. Advancing diabetes self-management in the Mexican American populationÐA community health worker model in a primary care setting . Diabetes Educ . 2007 ; 33 :159S± 165S . https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721707304077 PMID: 17620396
54. Treadwell H , Holden K , Hubbard R , Harper F , Wright F , Ferrer M , et al. Addressing obesity and diabetes among African American men: examination of a community-based model of prevention . J Natl Med Assoc . 2010 ; 102 ( 9 ): 794 ± 802 . PMID: 20922923
55. Two Feathers J , Kieffer EC , Palmisano G , Anderson M , Sinco B , Janz N , et al. Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH) Detroit partnership: improving diabetes-related outcomes among African American and Latino adults . Am J Public Health [Internet] . 2005 Sep [cited 2016 Apr 8 ]; 95 ( 9 ): 1552 ± 60 . Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid= 1449397&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH. 2005 .066134 PMID: 16051927
56. Valen M , Narayan S , Weldeking L . An innovative approach to diabetes education for a hispanic population utilizing community health workers . J Cult Divers . 2012 ; 19 ( 1 ): 10 ± 7 . PMID: 22611837
57. Vincent D , Pasvogel A , Barrera L . A feasibility study of a culturally tailored diabetes intervention for Mexican Americans . Biol Res Nurs [Internet] . 2007 Oct [cited 2016 Mar 12 ]; 9 ( 2 ): 130 ± 41 . Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid= 2 - s2 . 0 - 34548795878 &partnerID=tZOtx3y1 https://doi. org/10.1177/1099800407304980 PMID: 17909165
60. House JS . Work stress and social support [Internet] . Addison-Wesley Longman , Incorporated; 1981 . (Addison-Wesley Series in Health Education) . Available from: https://books.google.co.za/books?id= qO2RAAAAIAAJ
61. Gary TLT , Batts-Turner M , Bone LRL , Yeh HC , Wang NY , Hill-Briggs F , et al. A randomized controlled trial of the effects of nurse case manager and community health worker team interventions in urban African-Americans with type 2 diabetes . Control Clin Trials [Internet] . 2004 [cited 2016 Mar 9 ]; 25 ( 1 ): 53 ± 66 . Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197245603001739 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cct. 2003 . 10 .010 PMID: 14980748
62. Ingram M , Torres E , Redondo F , Bradford G , Wang C , O'Toole ML. The impact of promotoras on social support and glycemic control among members of a farmworker community on the US-Mexico border . Diabetes Educ [Internet] . 2007 Jun [cited 2016 Mar 12 ]; 33 Suppl 6 ( SUPPL . 6):172S± 178S . Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid= 2 - s2 . 0 - 34347351401 &partnerID=tZOtx3y1
63. Thompson JR , Horton C , Flores C. Advancing diabetes self-management in the Mexican American population: a community health worker model in a primary care setting . Diabetes Educ [Internet] . 2007 Jun [cited 2016 Mar 12 ]; 33 Suppl 6 ( SUPPL . 6):159S± 165S . Available from: http://www.scopus.com/ inward/record.url?eid= 2 - s2 . 0 - 34347324176 &partnerID=tZOtx3y1
64. McEwen MM , Pasvogel A , Gallegos G , Barrera L . Type 2 diabetes self-management social support intervention at the U.S.-Mexico border . Public Health Nurs [Internet] . 2010 Jan [cited 2016 Mar 12 ]; 27 ( 4 ): 310 ± 9 . Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid= 2 - s2 . 0 - 77955081863 &partnerID= tZOtx3y1 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525- 1446 . 2010 . 00860 . x PMID : 20626831
65. Allen JK , Himmelfarb CRD , Szanton SL , Bone L , Hill MN , Levine DM . COACH trial: a randomized controlled trial of nurse practitioner/community health worker cardiovascular disease risk reduction in urban community health centers: rationale and design . Contemp Clin Trials [Internet] . 2011 May [cited 2015 Sep 29 ]; 32 ( 3 ): 403 ± 11 . Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid= 3070050&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct. 2011 . 01 .001 PMID: 21241828
66. Walton JW , Snead CA , Collinsworth AW , Schmidt KL . Reducing Diabetes Disparities Through the Implementation of a Community Health Worker±Led Diabetes Self-Management Education Program . Fam Community Health [Internet] . 2012 ; 35 ( 2 ): 161 ± 71 . Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/ linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an= 00003727 - 201204000 -00010 https://doi.org/10. 1097/FCH.0b013e31824651d3 PMID: 22367263
67. Saxe-Custack A , Weatherspoon L . A Patient-Centered Approach Using Community- Based Paraprofessionals to Improve Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes . Am J Heal Educ [Internet] . 2013 ; 44 ( 4 ): 213 ± 20 . Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx ?direct=true&AuthType=ip,url,uid, shib&db=rzh&AN=2012211370&site=ehost-live
68. Gary TL , Bone LR , Hill MN , Levine DM , McGuire M , Saudek C , et al. Randomized controlled trial of the effects of nurse case manager and community health worker interventions on risk factors for diabetesrelated complications in urban African Americans . Prev Med (Baltim) [Internet]. 2003 ; 37 ( 1 ): 23 ± 32 . Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743503000409
69. Thompson JR , Horton C , Flores C. Advancing diabetes self-management in the Mexican American population: a community health worker model in a primary care setting . Diabetes Educ . 2007 ; 33 Suppl 6 :159S± 165S .
70. Castillo A , Giachello A , Bates R . Community-based Diabetes Education for Latinos The Diabetes Empowerment Education Program . Diabetes . . . [Internet] . 2010 [cited 2015 Oct 10 ]; Available from: http://tde.sagepub.com/content/36/4/586.short
71. Rothschild SK , Martin MA , Swider SM , TumialaÂn Lynas CM , Janssen I , Avery EF , et al. Mexican American trial of community health workers: a randomized controlled trial of a community health worker intervention for Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes mellitus . Am J Public Health [Internet] . 2014 Aug [cited 2015 Nov 28 ]; 104 ( 8 ): 1540 ± 8 . Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender. fcgi?artid=4103223&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH. 2013 .301439 PMID: 23947316
72. Ryabov I. The impact of community health workers on behavioral outcomes and glycemic control of diabetes patients on the U.S.-Mexico border . Int Q Community Health Educ [Internet] . 2010 Jan [cited 2016 Mar 12 ]; 31 ( 4 ): 387 ± 99 . Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid= 2 - s2 . 0 - 84855496269 &partnerID=tZOtx3y1 https://doi.org/10.2190/IQ.31.4. f PMID : 22192944
73. Palmas W , March D , Darakjy S , Findley SE , Teresi J , Carrasquillo O , et al. Community Health Worker Interventions to Improve Glycemic Control in People with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis . J Gen Intern Med . 2015 ; 1004 ± 12 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015 -3247-0 PMID: 25735938
74. Rosenthal E , Wiggins N , Brownstein J , R R , Johnson S , Koch E . The final report of the National Community Health Advisor Study . 1998 ;
75. Findley SE , Matos S , Hicks AL , Campbell A , Moore A , Diaz D. Building a consensus on community health workers' scope of practice: lessons from New York . Am J Public Health [Internet] . 2012 Oct [cited 2016 May 21 ]; 102 ( 10 ): 1981 ± 7 . Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi? artid=3490670&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH. 2011 .300566 PMID: 22897548
76. Norris SL , Chowdhury FM , Van Le K , Horsley T , Brownstein JN , Zhang X , et al. Effectiveness of community health workers in the care of persons with diabetes . Diabet Med [Internet]. 2006 May [cited 2016 Mar 12 ]; 23 ( 5 ): 544 ± 56 . Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid= 2 - s2 . 0 - 33646006732 &partnerID=tZOtx3y1 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464- 5491 . 2006 . 01845 .x PMID: 16681564
77. Singh P , Sachs J . 1 million community health workers in sub-Saharan Africa by 2015 . Lancet [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2015 Sep 2 ]; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0140673612620029/pdf?md5=439f58ab1a79c47d39c7e303e3408f9a&pid= 1 - s2 . 0 - S0140673612620029 -main. pdf&_valck=1
78. Davis KL , O'Toole ML , Brownson CA , Llanos P , Fisher EB . Teaching How, Not What: The Contributions of Community Health Workers to Diabetes Self-Management . Diabetes Educ [Internet] . 2007 ; 33 ( Supplement 6 ):208S± 215S . Available from: http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0145721707304133 https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721707304133 PMID: 17620403
79. Lehmann U , Sanders D . Community health workers: what do we know about them. state Evid Program Act costs impact Heal outcomes using community Heal Work Geneva World Heal Organ . 2007 ; 1 ± 42 .
80. Hill-Briggs F , Batts-Turner M , Gary TL , Brancati FL , Hill M , Levine DM , et al. Training community health workers as diabetes educators for urban African Americans: value added using participatory methods . Prog Community Health Partnersh [Internet] . 2007 ; 1 ( 2 ): 185 ± 94 . Available from: http://www.scopus. com/inward/record.url?eid= 2 - s2 . 0 - 70350468084 &partnerID=tZOtx3y1 https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr. 2007 .0008 PMID: 20208238
81. Kim KS , Kim SK , Lee YK , Park SW , Cho YW . Diagnostic value of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) for the early detection of diabetes in high-risk subjects . Diabet Med . 2008 ; 25 ( 8 ): 997 ± 1000 . https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1464- 5491 . 2008 . 02489 . x PMID : 18959616
82. Bennett CM , Guo M , Dharmage SC . HbA1c as a screening tool for detection of Type 2 diabetes: A systematic review . Diabet Med . 2007 ; 24 ( 4 ): 333 ± 43 . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464- 5491 . 2007 . 02106 . x PMID : 17367307
83. Sinha N , Mishra TK , Singh T , Gupta N. Effect of iron deficiency anemia on hemoglobin A1c levels . Ann Lab Med . 2012 ; 32 ( 1 ): 17 ± 22 . https://doi.org/10.3343/alm. 2012 . 32 .1.17 PMID: 22259774
84. Ford ES , Cowie CC , Li C , Handelsman Y , Bloomgarden ZT . Iron-deficiency anemia, non-iron-deficiency anemia and HbA1c among adults in the US . J Diabetes . 2011 ; 3 ( 1 ): 67 ± 73 . https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1753- 0407 . 2010 . 00100 . x PMID : 20942846