Parallax distortion by the weak microlensing effect
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 323, 952±964 (2001)
Parallax distortion by the weak microlensing effect
M. V. Sazhin,w V. E. Zharov and T. A. Kalinina
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow 119899, Russia
Accepted 2000 December 11. Received 2000 November 9; in original form 2000 June 1
A B S T R AC T
Key words: gravitational lensing ± reference systems ± stars: distances ± galaxies: active ±
quasars: general.
1
INTRODUCTION
Very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) has achieved a precision
level of position measurements of tens of microarcseconds (Ma
et al. 1998; Gontier et al. 1999). VLBI may soon achieve an
accuracy of several microarcseconds, or the fundamental limit of
accuracy of the position measurements being determined by the
non-stationary curvature of space-time in our Galaxy (Sazhin
1996; Sazhin et al. 1998).
Besides, the creation of space interferometers much exceeding
the Earth's diameter is in sight (Andreyanov & Kardashev 1981;
Andreyanov et al. 1986; Kardashev 1986) A 10±100 times
increase in the interferometer baseline is likely to allow a
precision of position measurements of the order of one microarcsecond (,1 mas), or even a hundred nanoseconds of arc
(,100 nas) to be achieved.
In optical ground-based astronomy, until the last decade, the
positional accuracy amounted to ,0.1 arcsec, which was far worse
than in radioastronomy. The great success of the space project
Hipparcos lies in the achievement of a precision of ,1 milliarcsecond (mas) in optical astronomy for measuring stellar
coordinates and parallaxes. Astronomers hope to develop this
success in the space experiments being planned (Projects GAIA,
SIM, DARWIN, FAME and DIVA). A precision of , 1±10 mas is
planned. High-precision positional measurements would allow the
stellar distance scale to be increased from 1 kpc to several tens or
hundreds of kpc.
The inclusion of general relativistic effects has become a
necessary part of the observation reduction procedure when the
accuracy of observations is close to the value of ,1 mas. The
reduction procedure involves gravitational effects induced by
the Sun and planets of the Solar system (IERS 1996). These
w
E-mail:
bodies induce a non-stationary curvature of space-time in the
Solar system, making a ray from a celestial source move along a
curved trajectory. The positions, velocities and masses of the Sun
and planets are known with a high degree of accuracy, which
permits a precise estimate of the gravitational effects in positional
measurements.
As the accuracy increases, the astronomers will undoubtedly
encounter new phenomena. One of them, the non-stationarity of
space-time, is due to the motion of visible stars and invisible
bodies in our Galaxy. A list of phenomena which will be important
in microarcsecond and submicroarcsecond astrometry is discussed
by Kopeikin & Gwinn (2000).
The non-stationary curvature induced by the Sun and planets is
a deterministic process. The non-stationary curvature created by
moving stars in our Galaxy is a stochastic process, since the
distances to most (in particular, invisible) stars as well as their
masses are unknown. Thus it is impossible to reduce the
observations with the same degree of definiteness as in the
Solar system. For the observer a distant source will execute a
stochastic motion under the action of this process around an
average position which is the true position of the source in the sky.
The value of this oscillation is of the order of 1 mas, and the
characteristic time of motion is in the range from tens to hundreds
of years.
Since the reduction procedure becomes impossible, a value of
,1 mas has been called the fundamental limit of positional
measurement accuracy, and the effect itself called the weak
microlensing effect.
In previous papers the weak microlensing effect has been
discussed for a single observer. However, very important
astronomical information is given by observations made simultaneously by two observers from different points of space, or one
observer at different moments of time. Such observations allow
the parallax of a celestial source to be measured and the distance
q 2001 RAS
Parallax measurements allow distances to celestial objects to be determined. Together with
measurements of their position on the celestial sphere, they give a full three-dimensional
picture of the location of the objects relative to the observer. The distortion of the parallax
value of a distant source affected by weak microlensing is considered. This means that the
weak microlensing leads to distortion of the distance scale. The gravitational deflection
causes a retrograde apparent motion of the image, which is revealed as a negative parallax. It
is shown that the distortions may significantly change the parallax values when they amount
to several microseconds of arc. In particular, at this level many measured values of
parallaxes should be negative.
Parallax distortion by weak microlensing
q 2001 RAS, MNRAS 323, 952±964
the parallax value, a `jump' of the image may occur from one side
of the lens to the other. This effect will result in a considerable
distortion of the source position and parallax.
Of course, the weak microlensing effect observed from the
barycentre of the Solar system is not added to the source parallax
motion. An attempt to reduce the position of the source, observed
from the Earth, to the barycentre following the standard equations
will lead to a mistake, since in this case the parallactic
displacement value itself will depend on the microlensing effect.
In the problem related to the distortion of measured parallaxes
there naturally appear some quantities having different orders of
magnitude. We shall consider that the unit vectors indicating the
direction to the light source are the leading term of zeroth order,
and the quantities containing the parallax of the source as a factor
are of first order. We shall also regard the proper shift of the light
source or lens over the time of observation as first-order terms.
These values are products of the proper motion of the object. We
shall consider the angular distance between the lens and the light
source to be a small parameter as well.
Besides these small parameters, one more small parameter
arises in the problem which is not related to the geometry of the
problem under consideration, but is related to general relativistic
effects. This is the squared ratio of two values. The first is the
angular size of the Einstein cone, and the second value is the
angular distance between the source and lens.
As is seen from the foregoing, the small parameters take
different values. Thus, for example, the lens parallax may be
10 mas, whereas the parallax of an extragalactic source may be
10 nas, which 106 times less. Nevertheless, the terms containing
the lens parallax squared are less than the terms proportional to the
first power of the source parallax. Hence in the equations we shall
retain linear terms with respect to small paramete (...truncated)