Using a technology-based intervention to promote weight loss in sedentary overweight or obese adults: a randomized controlled trial study design
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy
Dovepress
open access to scientific and medical research
M e t h odolo g y
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 54.37.163.172 on 12-Jul-2018
For personal use only.
Open Access Full Text Article
Using a technology-based intervention to promote
weight loss in sedentary overweight or obese
adults: a randomized controlled trial study design
This article was published in the following Dove Press journal:
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy
3 February 2011
Number of times this article has been viewed
Vaughn W Barry 1
Amanda C McClain 1
Sara Shuger 1
Xuemei Sui 1
James W Hardin 2
Gregory A Hand 1
Sara Wilcox 1
Steven N Blair 1,2
Department of Exercise Science;
Department of Epidemiology and
Biostatistics, University of South
Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
1
2
Correspondence: Vaughn W Barry
Department of Exercise Science, Public
Health Research Center, University of
South Carolina, 921 Assembly Street,
Columbia, SC 29063, USA
Tel +1 803 777 7566
Fax +1 803 777 2504
Email
submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S14526
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Purpose: The SenseWear™ Armband is an activity monitor developed to improve lifestyle
self-monitoring. Currently, few studies assess electronic self-monitoring and weight loss with
a lifestyle intervention program. To our knowledge, only one study has used the SenseWear
Armband in combination with a lifestyle intervention to improve weight loss, and no studies
have evaluated whether a self-monitoring intervention based solely on the armband can promote
weight loss. Consequently, the aims of the study were to assess weight loss from electronic
self-monitoring, to compare these values to the lifestyle intervention and standard care groups,
and to compare weight loss with lifestyle intervention with and without the armband.
Patients and methods: We recruited 197 sedentary overweight or obese adults (age,
46.8 ± 10.8 years; BMI, 33.3 ± 5.2 kg/m2) to participate in the 9-month study. Participants were
randomized into one of four weight loss groups: 1) the standard care group received a selfdirected weight loss program, complete with an evidence-based weight loss manual (standard
care, n = 50); 2) a 14-week group-based behavioral weight loss program followed by weekly,
biweekly, and monthly telephone counseling calls (GWL, n = 49); 3) the use of the armband
to help improve lifestyle self-monitoring (SWA alone, n = 49); or (4) the group-based behavioral weight loss program and follow-up telephone counseling calls plus the armband (GWL +
SWA, n = 49). All participants received the evidence-based weight loss manual at baseline. All
measures were performed at baseline and months 4 and 9. The primary outcomes were weight
loss and waist circumference reduction.
Results: This study is a well-designed randomized controlled study powered to detect a 0.5-kg
weight loss and 0.6-cm waist circumference reduction in overweight and obese sedentary
adults.
Conclusion: Innovative technologies are providing lifestyle self-monitoring and weight loss
tools. Utilizing these technologies may be an important step in improving the current obesity
epidemic.
Keywords: lifestyle, energy balance, behavioral education, accelerometer, SenseWear™
Armband
Introduction
Approximately two-thirds of adults in the United States are overweight or obese.1
Excess weight is associated with many health conditions, including hypertension,
dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, osteoarthritis, cardiovascular disease, stroke, and
some cancers.2–4 Furthermore, the medical cost of excess weight for the United States
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy 2011:4 67–77
© 2011 Barry et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article
which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
67
Dovepress
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 54.37.163.172 on 12-Jul-2018
For personal use only.
Barry et al
is estimated to be $147 billion per year.5 Clearly, effective
weight loss solutions are needed to improve the country’s
health profile.
One strategy that has been proven effective for weight
loss, at least in the short term, is group-based lifestyle
intervention weight loss programs (GWL). 6 These programs target key features in weight loss, including healthy
eating, increased physical activity, and behavioral therapy.
Behavioral therapy incorporates behavior change strategies
such as dietary and physical activity self-monitoring, goal
setting, problem solving, and stress management, and many
of these programs are grounded in behavioral science theory,
including Social Cognitive Theory and the Transtheoretical
Model.7 Individuals who effectively incorporate these key
features may reduce their initial body weight by 8%–10%
within 4–6 months of treatment.8 Unfortunately, there are
limitations in using GWLs to reach large segments of the
population efficiently and cost effectively, such as obtaining qualified staff, participant availability, and the need for
smaller group sizes.
The use of physical activity monitoring devices, such as
pedometers and accelerometers, helps individuals increase
their physical activity through self-monitoring, goal setting,
and other behavioral strategies. Although these devices
effectively encourage participants to increase their physical
activity habits,9 they only marginally reduce weight when
used alone.10 Both physical activity and energy intake selfmonitoring are needed for more effective weight loss.11,12 The
SenseWear™ Armband (BodyMedia, Pittsburgh, PA, USA)
is a physical activity monitor that includes software for selfmonitoring of daily energy expenditure and energy intake.
The real-time feedback of these parameters can improve
individual self-monitoring and therefore may improve weight
loss outcomes.
Research has shown that the armband is accurate when
measuring resting energy expenditure13–15 and when measuring energy expenditure in laboratory13,15,16 (ie, treadmill and
cycle ergometry exercise) and free-living conditions.17,18
Therefore, the armband may be an appropriate device in
assessing energy expenditure for weight loss or weight
maintenance purposes. In one recent study, the armband was
used as a real-time self-monitoring device in conjunction
with a GWL. This small study (n = 57) reported improved
weight loss over 3 months when the armband was worn in
conjunction with a GWL, beyond which weight loss was
accomplished with a GWL alone.19 This small study did not
include an armband-alone group and did not utilize a nonGWL control group. The purpose of the Lifestyle Education
68
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
for Activity (...truncated)