Gene mutations in cardiac arrhythmias: a review of recent evidence in ion channelopathies
The Application of Clinical Genetics
Dovepress
open access to scientific and medical research
R e v iew
The Application of Clinical Genetics downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 5.135.254.153 on 12-Jul-2018
For personal use only.
Open Access Full Text Article
Gene mutations in cardiac arrhythmias: a review
of recent evidence in ion channelopathies
This article was published in the following Dove Press journal:
The Application of Clinical Genetics
17 January 2013
Number of times this article has been viewed
Pi-Yin Hsiao 1
Hui-Chun Tien 2
Chu-Pin Lo 2
Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang 3
Yi-Hsin Wang 2
Ruey J Sung 4
Institute of Life Sciences, National
Central University, Taoyuan,
Taiwan; 2Department of Financial
and Computational Mathematics,
Providence University, Taichung,
Taiwan; 3Cardiovascular Center
and Department of Cardiology,
National Taiwan University, Taipei,
Taiwan; 4Division of Cardiovascular
Medicine, Stanford University School
of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
1
Abstract: Over the past 15 years, molecular genetic studies have linked gene mutations to many
inherited arrhythmogenic disorders, in particular, “ion channelopathies”, in which mutations
in genes encode functional units of ion channels and/or their transporter-associated proteins
in patients without primary cardiac structural abnormalities. These disorders are exemplified
by congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS), short QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome (BrS) and
catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT). Functional and pathophysiological studies have led to better understanding of the clinical spectrum, ion channel structures
and cellular electrophysiology involving dynamics of intracellular calcium cycling in many
subtypes of these disorders and more importantly, development of potentially more effective
pharmacological agents and even curative gene therapy. In this review, we have summarized
(1) the significance of unveiling mutations in genes encoding transporter-associated proteins
as the cause of congenital LQTS, (2) the technique of catheter ablation applied at the right
ventricular outflow tract may be curative for severely symptomatic BrS, (3) mutations with
channel function modulated by protein Kinase A-dependent phosphorylation can be the culprit of
CPVT mimicry in Andersen-Tawil syndrome (LQT7), (4) ablation of the ion channel anchoring
protein may prevent arrhythmogenesis in Timothy syndrome (LQT8), (5) altered intracellular
Ca2+ cycling can be the basis of effective targeted pharmacotherapy in CPVT, and (6) the
technology of induced pluripotent stem cells is a promising diagnostic and research tool as it
has become a new paradigm for pathophysiological study of patient- and disease-specific cells
aimed at screening new drugs and eventual clinical application of gene therapy. Lastly, we have
discussed (7) genotype-phenotype correlation in relation to risk stratification of patients with
congenital LQTS in clinical practice.
Keywords: Brugada syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, induced
pluripotent stem cells, long QT syndrome, short QT syndrome.
Introduction
Correspondence: Ruey Jen Sung
100 Rowan Tree Lane, Hillsborough,
CA 94305, USA
Tel +1 650 685 1865
Fax +1 650 685 1865
Email
submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S29676
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Applying the technology of DNA sequencing,1 Curran et al2 and Wang et al3,4 noted
that mutations in the KCNQ1, KCNH2, and SCN5A genes, encoding the α-subunit
of ion channels that conduct potassium delayed-rectifier currents (IKs and IKr) and the
sodium current (INa), respectively, could be responsible for three subtypes (LQT13) of congenital long-QT syndrome (LQTS). These seminal works have inspired
many investigators and prompted extensive basic research, leading to subsequent
identification of various gene mutations causing cardiac arrhythmias referred to as
“inherited arrhythmogenic disorders” (Table 1). These arrhythmogenic disorders with
mutations in genes encoding developmental components of cardiac structures produce
diseases associated with a structurally abnormal heart, exemplified by hypertrophic
The Application of Clinical Genetics 2013:6 1–13
© 2013 Hsiao et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article
which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
1
Dovepress
Hsiao et al
The Application of Clinical Genetics downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 5.135.254.153 on 12-Jul-2018
For personal use only.
Table 1 Inherited arrhythmogenic disorders
Mutations in genes encoding developmental components
of the heart
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM)
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C)
Dilated cardiomyopathy (DC)
Mutations in genes encoding functional units of ion channels
and/or transporter-associated proteins (“ion channelopathies”)
Congenital long-QT syndrome (LQTS)
Brugada syndrome (BrS)
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT)
Short-QT syndrome (SQTS)
cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia
(cardiomyopathy), and dilated cardiomyopathy, whereas those
with mutations in genes encoding functional units of ion
channels and/or their transporter-associated proteins produce
diseases associated with a structurally normal heart, such as
congenital LQTS, short-QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome
(BrS), and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular
tachycardia (CPVT), known as “ion channelopathies”
(Tables 2–5). All these arrhythmogenic disorders are usually
genetically heterogeneous, and their clinical courses are
underscored by variable clinical expressivity ranging from
being asymptomatic to episodic syncope, abortive cardiac
arrest, and sudden cardiac death (SCD).
To confirm that a specific gene mutation is linked to
cardiac arrhythmias, functional studies to illustrate consequences of the mutation are required. These functional studies usually use heterologous expression systems, primarily
Xenopus oocytes, human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells, and
Chinese hamster ovary cells.5 Electrophysiological effects
of the mutant ion channel are then compared to those of the
wild-type counterpart. However, in order to include important constituents of the macromolecular complex of an ion
channel in the complex living environment so as to reproduce
the exact molecular and electrophysiological phenotype, it
is often necessary to generate a transgenic mouse model
carrying the specific gene mutation.6
Through collaborative endeavors between clinical and
basic science researchers over the past 15 years, we now
have better understanding of the clinical spectrum, molecular
genetics, ion-channel structures, and cellular electrophysiology
relating to these inherited arrhythmogenic disorders. Taking ion
channelopathies as an example, the discovery of genetic defects
involving the L-type Ca2+ channel (Cav1.2), (...truncated)