A 4-Point Block Method for Solving Higher Order Ordinary Differential Equations Directly

Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences Volume 2016, Article ID 9823147, 8 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9823147 Research Article A 4-Point Block Method for Solving Higher Order Ordinary Differential Equations Directly Nazreen Waeleh1 and Zanariah Abdul Majid2,3 1 Faculty of Electronic & Computer Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), 76100 Melaka, Malaysia Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia 3 Institute for Mathematical Research, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia 2 Correspondence should be addressed to Nazreen Waeleh; Received 18 April 2016; Revised 23 June 2016; Accepted 30 June 2016 Academic Editor: Harvinder S. Sidhu Copyright © 2016 N. Waeleh and Z. Abdul Majid. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. An alternative block method for solving fifth-order initial value problems (IVPs) is proposed with an adaptive strategy of implementing variable step size. The derived method is designed to compute four solutions simultaneously without reducing the problem to a system of first-order IVPs. To validate the proposed method, the consistency and zero stability are also discussed. The improved performance of the developed method is demonstrated by comparing it with the existing methods and the results showed that the 4-point block method is suitable for solving fifth-order IVPs. 1. Introduction Many natural processes or real-world problems can be translated into the language of mathematics [1–4]. The mathematical formulation of physical phenomena in science and engineering often leads to a differential equation, which can be categorized as an ordinary differential equation (ODE) and a partial differential equation (PDE). This formulation will explain the behavior of the phenomenon in detail. The search for solutions of real-world problems requires solving ODEs and thus has been an important aspect of mathematical study. For many interesting applications, an exact solution may be unattainable, or it may not give the answer in a convenient form. The reliability of numerical approximation techniques in solving such problems has been proven by many researchers as the role of numerical methods in engineering problems solving has increased dramatically in recent years. Thus a numerical approach has been chosen as an alternative tool for approximating the solutions consistent with the advancement in technology. 𝑦v = 𝑓 (𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑦󸀠 , 𝑦󸀠󸀠 , 𝑦󸀠󸀠󸀠 , 𝑦iv ) , Commonly, the formulation of real-world problems will take the form of a higher order differential equation associated with its initial or boundary conditions [4]. In the literature, a mathematical model in the form of a fifth-order differential equation, known as Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation, has been used to describe several wave phenomena depending on the values of its parameters [2, 3, 5, 6]. The KdV equation is a PDE and researchers have tackled the problem analytically and numerically. It is also noted that in certain cases by using different approaches the KdV might be transformed into a higher order ODE [7]. To date, there are a number of studies that have proposed solving fifth-order ODE directly [8, 9]. Hence, the purpose of the present paper is to solve directly the fifth-order IVPs with the implementation of a variable step size strategy. The fifth-order IVP with its initial conditions is defined as 𝑦 (𝑎) = 𝑦0 , 𝑦󸀠 (𝑎) = 𝑦1 , 𝑦󸀠󸀠 (𝑎) = 𝑦2 , 𝑦󸀠󸀠󸀠 (𝑎) = 𝑦3 , 𝑦iv (𝑎) = 𝑦4 , 𝑥 ∈ [𝑎, 𝑏] . (1) 2 Conventionally, (1) will be converted to a system of firstorder ODEs by a simple change of variables. However, it will increase the computational cost in terms of function evaluation and thus will affect the computational time. This drawback is obviously seen when dealing with a higher order problem. Furthermore, [10] also has remarked that the block method is far more cost-effective when it is implemented in direct integration. Hence, several researchers [11–16] have shown an interest in the development of direct integration methods. A direct integration method of variable order and step size for solving systems of nonstiff higher order ODEs has been discussed in [11] whereby [12] has proposed an algorithm based on collocation of the differential system at selected grid points for direct solution of general secondorder ODEs. In addition, [13] has used the Gaussian method in order to solve fourth-order differential equations directly. However, it requires a tedious computation as well, since it consists of higher order partial derivatives of Taylor series algorithm which supplies the starting values. Jator and Li [15] have proposed the linear multistep method (LMM) for solving general second-order IVPs directly. The method is self-starting, so it involves less computational time by avoiding incorporating subroutines to supply the starting values. Thus far, a number of researchers have concerned themselves with developing a numerical method based on block features, and the characteristic feature of the block method is that in each application it generates a set of solutions concurrently [10]. Rosser [10] also has remarked that the implementation of block method in numerical computation will reduce the computational cost by reducing the number of function evaluations. Shampine and Watts [17] have constructed an 𝐴-stable implicit one-step block method and Cash [18] has studied block methods based upon the Runge-Kutta method for the numerical solution of nonstiff IVPs. Furthermore [19] has used the self-starting LMM to solve second-order ODEs in a block-by-block fashion and recently [20] has constructed a predictor-corrector scheme 3-point block method with the implementation of variable step size. This research is an extension of the work in [20] in which the solution is computed at three points concurrently and it shows the satisfactory numerical results obtained when solving general higher order ODEs. An increasing amount of literature is devoted to variable step size implementations of numerical methods [11, 21, 22]. The practicality of varying the step size for block method has been justified by [10]. This strategy is an attempt to reduce the computational cost as well as maintaining the accuracy. The Falkner method with variable step size implementation for the numerical solution of second-order IVPs has been employed in [21]. Although the implementation of the method involves varying the step size and solving directly, the computation is still tedious since the coefficients of the formulae must be calculated every time the step size is changed. On the contrary, the present work will store all the integration coefficients in the code in order to avoid the tedious calculatio (...truncated)