Secondary Merkel Cell Carcinoma Manifested in the Parotid
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Case Reports in Dermatological Medicine
Volume 2013, Article ID 960140, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/960140
Case Report
Secondary Merkel Cell Carcinoma Manifested in the Parotid
M. Basati, K. Kassam, and A. Messiha
Northwick Park Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow HA1 3UJ, UK
Correspondence should be addressed to M. Basati;
Received 2 October 2013; Accepted 23 October 2013
Academic Editors: B. Giomi and M. Viglione
Copyright © 2013 M. Basati et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background. Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck is a rare and aggressive malignant tumour. Both the dermatological and
surgical colleagues should be aware of this entity as lesions usually present on sun exposed areas of the skin such as the head and
neck. Main Observation and Treatment. A 69-year-old male originally presented to the maxillofacial surgery department with a
growing lesion on the left eyebrow. Histological analysis confirmed Merkel cell carcinoma and consequently surgical excision was
carried out. A follow-up PET/CT scan 2 years later demonstrated a hotspot in the left parotid gland. Fine needle aspiration and
cytology revealed Merkel cell carcinoma. A subtotal parotidectomy left side with ipsilateral selective neck dissection levels I to III
was carried out. Conclusions. Potential secondary Merkel cell carcinoma in the head and neck region should be taken into account
when planning short- and long-term follow up for previously diagnosed patients. This followup should involve both dermatological
and surgical colleagues.
1. Introduction
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive malignant tumour of neuroendocrine origin, with incidence being
reported as low as 0.44/100 000 cases a year [1]. Clinical diagnosis is difficult due to a nonspecific appearance. Often the
lesion presents as a nonindurated and slightly erythematous
nodule. The most common location of the lesion is on sun
exposed areas of the skin, with UVB radiation posing an
increased risk [2]. Epidemiological studies reveal further risk
in immunocompromised patients and Caucasian patients
older than 50 [3]. Furthermore 48% of lesions are diagnosed
in the head and neck region, with 61% of patients being male
[4]. Heath et al. [3] use a favourable acronym when looking
at typical clinical features at presentation: AEIOU, asymptomatic, enlarging rapidly, immunosuppression, older age,
and UV exposed site.
MCC has a poor 5-year prognosis, with a 75% survival
for local disease and 50% for regional [5]. The prognosis is
even poorer for: (1) male patients, (2) primaries of T2 size and
extension, (3) nodal involvement, (4) and if metastatic disease
is present [4]. The frequency of both local and regional spread
of disease is high, with up to 21% of cases developing distant
metastatic lesions [6]. Common sites of metastasis have been
described as lymph nodes, mediastinum, lung, liver, and
bone [7]. The mortality rate of MCC is twice that of melanoma
[8]. Even with this aggressive nature of the disease and high
risk of mortality, the awareness of MCC is poor amongst
practitioners. The following case report aims to increase
awareness and stimulate debate and education within units.
2. Case Presentation
A 69-year-old male originally presented to the oral and
maxillofacial department in 2010 with a gradually increasing
lump in the left eyebrow region of four weeks duration. A
diagnosis of localised MCC was made following wide local
excision. There was total eradication of residual disease. The
patient was under regular follow-up scans and in 2012 a
PET/CT revealed a 1.3 cm left intraparotid node of uncertain
significance.
Medical history to note was noninsulin dependent diabetes, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. The patient had
good social support, living with wife and extended family.
3. Investigations
The patient underwent an urgent FDGPET and fine needle
aspirate (FNA) ultrasound. The FNA ultrasound together
with cytopathology (positive for CAM5.2 and CK20) was
2
Case Reports in Dermatological Medicine
Figure 1: Ultrasound of parotid/neck region. Within the right
parotid a 15 mm hypoechoic lesion was seen. Initial differentials:
salivary gland tumour and abnormal possibly necrotic intraparotid
node.
suggestive of MCC in the parotid (Figure 1). Immunocytochemistry was performed for confirmation.
The results of the investigations were discussed at both
skin and head and neck multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting with colleagues, and it was decided that the most appropriate management was a subtotal parotidectomy left side
with ipsilateral selective neck dissection levels I to III.
4. Differential Diagnosis
The following is a differential diagnosis for MCC, and the list
is by no means exhaustive [9]:
(i) basal cell carcinoma,
(ii) small cell melanoma,
(iii) lymphoma,
(iv) blue round cell tumours,
(v) metastatic small lung carcinoma.
5. Treatment
An extra oral incision from the left preauricular region to
the left neck was made and raised. Anterior, superior, and
posterior flaps were developed in aid to carry out a selective
neck dissection I–III with identification and preservation of
the following anatomical structures:
Figure 2: Careful dissection revealing the branches of the facial
nerve which were preserved. The facial nerve passes through the
parotid gland after emerging from the stylomastoid foramen. The
arrow points to the point of division into five branches: temporal,
zygomatic, buccal, marginal mandibular, and cervical.
the branches of the facial nerve, in particular the marginal
mandibular branch. The marginal mandibular branch of the
facial nerve provides motor innervations to the muscles of the
lower lip and the chin. Damage to this nerve can leave the
patient with a drooping lip and chin on that side (Figure 2).
The specimen was removed with further deep harvest of
salivary tissue on islands (Figure 3). Drains were placed and
closure was carried out in layers.
6. Outcome and Followup
Histopathology revealed a well-sampled parotid gland with
no metastatic tumour within salivary parenchyma. One
intraparotid lymph node was almost completely replaced by a
poorly differentiated tumour (20 mm in diameter) in keeping
with metastatic MCC. There was no extracapsular spread. A
final diagnosis of metastatic MCC left parotid was made.
The facial nerve was spared and immediately after surgery
the patient had good facial expression and no signs of neurological deficit. At a short-term follow-up appointment the
patient had no shoulder weakness and only slight weakness of
his lower lip. As this weakness was not present immediately
after surgery it is likely this is a temporary paresis due to
post-op oedema. The patient is under regular followup and
at present free of disease.
(i) (...truncated)